FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra Black Forest Labs vs Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium Stability AI

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent photorealism with realistic glass refraction and texture.
• + Perfect adherence to the lighting and placement instructions.
• + High-resolution details, including legible text on the book spine.

• − The sphere appears to be floating without a physical support, though this may be an intentional 'artistic' interpretation of being 'inside'.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Successfully includes all requested elements in the correct configuration.
• + Captures the soft window light effectively.

• − The glass cube is poorly constructed with messy edges and inconsistent perspective.
• − Lower overall image quality with significant blurring and lack of fine detail.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent execution of motion blur from passing cars as requested.
• + Very high visual clarity and realistic skin and fabric textures.
• + Accurate bicycle anatomy and realistic rain reflections on the ground.

• − The framing is very clean and centered, lacking the 'imperfect framing' requested.
• − The lighting feels a bit too balanced, bordering on a professional studio look rather than a raw candid street photo.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Strong adherence to the 'candid' and 'imperfect framing' prompt with a more naturalistic, raw street photography feel.
• + Effective use of shallow depth of field and a more convincing '50mm lens' aesthetic.
• + The rainfall is more clearly visible in the air compared to the other model.

• − Completely failed to include the motion blur from passing cars requested in the prompt.
• − The man's hands and face have significantly lower detail and some anatomical distortion.
• − The bicycle structure is slightly warped, particularly the handlebars and basket.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent adherence to the 'battle-worn' descriptor with visible sweat, grime, and authentic scarring.
• + Masterful lighting with realistic warm torchlight reflections on the metal and skin.
• + Superior rendering of the braided hair and individual beads as requested.

• − The depth of field is slightly shallower than requested, blurring some armor details.
• − The sparks in the background are somewhat muted compared to the prompt's focus on bokeh.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Good interpretation of ornate engraving on the pauldrons and chestplate.
• + Effective use of bokeh sparks in the background to create atmosphere.
• + Solid facial symmetry and intense expression that fits a paladin character.

• − Failed to include the beads in the hair braids as specified in the prompt.
• − Skin texture looks a bit blotchy and digital compared to the realistic grime of Model A.
• − The lighting on the face feels a bit flat and less like a physical torch source.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent typography with clean, bolde sans-serif fonts
• + Realistic food photography that looks appetizing and professional
• + Modern, three-dimensional mockup presentation

• − Nonsensical text placeholders like 'Pizzzans' and 'Appet Love'
• − The food grid is slightly disorganized with overlapping elements

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Perfectly balanced grid layout following the prompt's structural request
• + Clearly defined sections for different food categories
• + Consistent flat-lay orientation for the food photography

• − Significant text artifacts and illegible font jaggedness
• − Poor resolution on the font rendering compared to the sharp layout
• − The fonts used are more decorative/rough than the 'bold sans-serif' requested

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent typography with a glowing fiery effect and perfect spelling.
• + Highly detailed 'exploded' view that clearly separates components as requested.
• + Clean, professional composition suitable for a high-end advertisement.

• − The burger is scaled very tall, looking like multiple burgers stacked rather than one disassembled one.
• − The price is not inside a starburst as specified.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Successfully included the starburst element for the price.
• + Dynamic flame background provides good contrast and warmth.

• − Failed the 'exploded' instruction; the burger is mostly assembled and floating rather than disassembled.
• − The text 'MAGIC BURGER' lacks the requested fiery, glowing effect and is too small.
• − Visible artifacts in the starburst and slightly muddy lighting on the burger patty.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent chalk-like texture and authentic handwriting style.
• + High level of readability for the main header and several menu items.
• + Realistic ambient lighting and chalkboard wooden frame.

• − Contains several repetition errors and gibberish lines in the mid-section.
• − Text alignment is somewhat messy and lacks the 'elegant cursive' requested for the title.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Includes decorative chalk flourishes and varied sizes.
• + Better captures the 'elegant' aspect of the prompt's request for the title.

• − Extreme spelling errors and nonsensical words throughout the board.
• − Layout is cluttered and the text rendering is inconsistent.
• − Fails on the specific date and price details.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent cinematic lighting and high-resolution textures.
• + Dynamic composition with a sense of motion in the horse's mane and tail.
• + Highly detailed background featuring a curved Earth and celestial bodies.

• − Failed the specific spatial instruction; the astronaut is riding the horse.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Clean, clear subjects with good contrast against the starfield.
• + Good anatomical representation of the astronaut's suit.

• − Failed the specific spatial instruction; the astronaut is riding the horse.
• − The horse's legs show anatomical artifacts and appear stiff.
• − The composition is less cinematic and looks flatter than the alternative.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent photographic lighting and textures on both the animal and human.
• + Successful inclusion of specific details like the yellow taxi cap and dark jacket.
• + Strong bokeh effect of Manhattan streets in the background.

• − The capybara is in the passenger seat and the woman is in the driver's seat, failing the core layout requirement.
• − The capybara's paws are not on the steering wheel.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Correctly places the capybara in the driver's seat and the woman in the back seat.
• + Follows the instruction to have both paws on the steering wheel.
• + Captures the professional expression and clothing requested.

• − The woman is not looking at a phone as requested.
• − The human face in the background is slightly distorted/blurry compared to the foreground.
• − The overall image clarity is lower than the competitor.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent typography with nearly perfect spelling and formatting
• + Sophisticated composition with a central glowing jack-o-lantern and thorn border
• + High visual clarity and professional cinematic lighting

• − Includes a redundant, misspelled line of text below the banner
• − Omitted the word 'Party' from the main title

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Successfully included multiple jack-o-lanterns and prominent webs
• + Colors are vibrant and evoke a classic Halloween aesthetic

• − Significant spelling errors and gibberish text throughout
• − Layout is cluttered and lacks the 'polished' feel requested
• − Garbled dates and locations (e.g., 'The Aches' instead of 'The Arches')

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent adherence to the isometric miniature diorama style.
• + High-quality 3D render look with clean textures and lighting.
• + Accurate text placement and includes requested flag icon.

• − Added an unnecessary tiny insect-like detail on the wooden board.
• − Salmon texture looks slightly too plastic compared to 'realistic PBR'.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Bold, clean typography for the word 'SUSHI'.
• + Realistic textures on the nori and roe.

• − Failed to create an isometric miniature diorama base.
• − Missing the flag icon and the word 'JAPAN' is less prominent than requested.
• − Typography has a slight artifact/overlap on the 'S' and 'i'.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent adherence to the prompt by including all four specified animals.
• + Superior fur texture and soft lighting that matches the requested aesthetic.
• + Better composition with a clear focus on the animals interacting with butterflies.

• − The animals look a bit more like stuffed toys than 'hyper-photorealistic' real animals.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Natural and vibrant color palette with high contrast.
• + Good interpretation of the golden sunrise light.

• − Failed to include the baby bunny, only showing three animals.
• − The kitten has unusual, rabbit-like ears, creating anatomical confusion.
• − The fur textures look slightly over-sharpened and digital.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent vector emblem style with clean lines and balanced composition.
• + Correctly followed the color palette and texture requirements.
• + Professional typography and layout that feels like a real logo.

• − Misspelled 'Florian' as 'Framlian'.
• − The steam effect is a bit singular and basic.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Successfully captured the vintage hand-drawn illustration style.
• + Correctly spelled 'Caffe' and got closer to the main name 'Florrian'.
• + Included a more elaborate banner and supporting coffee cup element.

• − Misspelled 'Florian' as 'Florrian' and '1720' as '170'.
• − The cloche dome shape is distorted and looks more like a round sack.
• − The banner at the bottom contains gibberish text.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent vector aesthetic with clean, professional icons.
• + Adheres to the NASA color palette perfectly.
• + Includes all requested steps in a logical flow from top to bottom.

• − Text contains a significant amount of gibberish despite clear headers.
• − The numbering and labeling logic becomes confusing halfway through the graphic.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Follows the NASA color scheme well.
• + Good use of space with a circular trajectory motif.

• − Icons do not match the specific prompts (e.g., Saturn V icon is missing).
• − Image quality is lower with blurry text and messy line work.
• − The steps are out of order and don't match the historical mission progression requested.