Black Forest Labs' ultra-high resolution image generation model, an enhanced version of FLUX1.1 [pro] optimized for premium quality output
Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
#49 of 62 in Text-to-Image
Recraft V4.1
#53 of 62 in Text-to-Image
Where the votes landed
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
100.0%
win rate
Ties
0.0%
Recraft V4.1
0.0%
win rate
Challenge by challenge
The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.
Geometric Composition
Text-to-Image“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
- + Excellent photorealistic texture on the book and glass edges
- + Accurate depiction of the plant seen through the glass surfaces
- + Very clean, high-resolution rendering with realistic lighting reflections
- − The sphere appears to be floating mid-air inside the cube without physical support
Recraft V4.1
- + Great composition and depth of field
- + Strong lighting and shadow work on the wooden table surface
- + Accurately places all requested elements in the scene
- − The plant is barely visible through the cube, mostly appearing behind it
- − The sphere also appears to be floating magically rather than resting
Verdict: Both models followed the prompt instructions perfectly, including the specific spatial relationships. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra produced a more realistic and detailed image, particularly in the rendering of the book's gold-leaf spine and the refractive properties of the glass, making it the more visually impressive result.
Candid Street Photography
Text-to-Image“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
- + Excellent execution of long-exposure motion blur on passing cars.
- + High clarity and realistic textures on the man's clothing and the bicycle.
- + Strong adherence to the 'reflections on wet pavement' and 'red bicycle' prompts.
- − The man appears more like he is walking his bike rather than actively repairing it.
- − The image feels a bit too 'clean' and lacks the 'imperfect framing' requested.
Recraft V4.1
- + Perfectly captures the 'candid' and 'imperfect framing' feel with a tight, gritty crop.
- + The pose clearly depicts the man actively repairing the bicycle.
- + Excellent atmospheric quality with visible rain droplets and authentic skin texture.
- − Lacks the 'motion blur from passing cars' as requested; the background cars are static.
- − The bicycle's geometry becomes a bit messy near the chain guard and rear wheel.
Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra excels at the technical photographic prompts, particularly the motion blur and lighting, but feels slightly generic. Recraft V4.1 better captures the emotional intent and the 'candid' nature of the scene, providing a more convincing 'repair' interaction and realistic skin textures, despite missing the motion blur requirement. Recraft V4.1 is preferred for its superior storytelling and mood which aligns better with the 'no stylization' request.
Fantasy Warrior
Text-to-Image“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
- + Excellent adherence to the 'battle-worn' descriptor with realistic skin textures and grime.
- + Masterful lighting with distinct warm torchlight highlights and cool shadows.
- + Superior fine detail in the intricate armor engravings and the texture of the leather strap.
- − The beads in the hair are present but less distinct than in the competing image.
Recraft V4.1
- + Strong composition with a dynamic, intense facial expression.
- + Clearly visible beads in the braided hair as requested in the prompt.
- + Good use of bokeh sparks and shallow depth of field for atmospheric effect.
- − The 'scars' look somewhat like superficial lines rather than integrated skin trauma.
- − The metal texture looks slightly more digital/smooth compared to the grit found in the first image.
Verdict: Both models performed exceptionally well, but FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra wins due to its superior rendering of textures, particularly the skin grit and the tactile nature of the engraved plate armor. While Recraft V4.1 provided a more intense expression and clearer hair beads, FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra created a more cinematic and physically believable image with better lighting complexity.
Modern Clean Menu
Text-to-Image“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
- + Dynamic and aesthetically pleasing food photography
- + High-quality mock-up presentation with realistic shadows and perspective
- − Nonsensical placeholder text with many spelling errors like 'Pizzzans' and 'Appet Love'
- − Cluttered layout that makes the menu hard to read as a functional document
Recraft V4.1
- + Excellent typography with clean, legible, and correctly spelled text
- + Clear organization with logical grid alignment for both text and images
- + Strict adherence to the requested sections (Appetizers, Pizza, Mains)
- − Visual style is slightly flat and looks like a basic digital template rather than a premium design
- − The food images are smaller and less integrated into the overall flow
Verdict: Recraft V4.1 is the superior choice for a design task as it produces perfectly legible, correctly spelled text and a functional layout that follows all prompt instructions. While FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra has more vibrant photography and a professional mock-up feel, its text is nonsensical and the layout is too chaotic for a real menu.
Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge
Text-to-Image“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
- + Excellent integrated lighting that reflects the fire onto the burger surfaces.
- + Higher density of details with embers and crumbs adding to the sense of motion.
- + Very clean and professional text rendering for 'MAGIC BURGER'.
- − Failed to include the requested starburst for the price tag.
- − The burger isn't truly 'exploded' into individual components, appearing more like a tall, deconstructed stack.
- − The background fires look a bit static and illustrative rather than realistic.
Recraft V4.1
- + Perfectly followed the 'exploded' instruction, separating each ingredient clearly in mid-air.
- + Stronger adherence to specific prompt elements like the price starburst and the fiery text effect.
- + Dynamic composition with sauce splashes and sparks that suggest actual movement.
- − The burger patty texture looks a bit flat and less appetizing compared to the other model.
- − The bottom bun is missing completely, leaving the deconstruction feeling incomplete.
- − The lighting on the ingredients is somewhat washed out and doesn't fully match the fiery environment.
Verdict: Recraft V4.1 followed the specific architectural instructions of the prompt much better, correctly including the 'exploded' burger layout and the starburst for the price. However, FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra produced a significantly more polished and appetizing visual with superior lighting and texture, even though it failed the starburst requirement. Recraft V4.1 is the winner for overall prompt adherence and layout, despite slightly lower food realism.
Chalkboard Menu
Text-to-Image“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
- + Excellent chalk-like texture on the board surface
- + Accurate rendering of the requested date and wood frame
- − Significant spelling and repetition errors in the text
- − Handwriting style varies inconsistently and becomes messy
- − Text rendering is blurred and hallucinates extra lines
Recraft V4.1
- + Perfect text accuracy for all menu items
- + Highly realistic chalk texture on the lettering with natural variations
- + Consistent and legible handwriting style throughout
- − Missing the 'elegant cursive' style for the title as requested
- − Composition is a bit tightly cropped at the top
Verdict: Recraft V4.1 is the clear winner as it typesets the menu items with 100% accuracy and maintains a very convincing chalk-on-blackboard aesthetic. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra suffered from significant text hallucinations, repeating words like 'Brown' and 'Cookies' and failing to correctly spell 'Mushroom' or 'Risotto'.
The Reversed Rodeo
Text-to-Image“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
- + Excellent high-resolution detail on the astronaut's suit and the horse's anatomy.
- + Strong cinematic composition with a clear sense of scale against the Earth.
- − Completely failed the negative constraint to have the horse on top of the astronaut.
Recraft V4.1
- + Atmospheric lighting and nebula effects create a surreal outer-space feel.
- + Dynamic action pose for the horse relative to the asteroid field.
- − Completely failed the specific prompt instruction to place the horse on top of the astronaut.
- − Minor artifact where the astronaut's leg merges strangely with the horse's back.
Verdict: Both FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra and Recraft V4.1 failed the core challenge of the prompt, which was to subvert the expectation of a rider by placing the horse on top of the astronaut. Between the two standard interpretations, FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra is the better image due to its superior clarity, anatomical correctness of the horse, and realistic textures on the space suit.
The Capybara Taxi Driver
Text-to-Image“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
- + High resolution and crisp visual quality.
- + Excellent texture on the capybara's fur and the jacket.
- − Failed the spatial layout by placing the passenger in the front seat holding a steering wheel.
- − The capybara is positioned in the driver's side but is not actually touching the steering wheel.
Recraft V4.1
- + Perfect adherence to the prompt's layout with the passenger correctly in the back seat.
- + Accurately depicts the capybara with paws on the steering wheel.
- + Captures the bored, normal expression of the businesswoman very well.
- − Slightly lower resolution and grainier texture compared to the other model.
- − The capybara is not wearing the requested jacket.
Verdict: While FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra has superior image clarity and textures, it completely failed the composition by placing the human passenger in the front seat with a second steering wheel. Recraft V4.1 followed the instructions much better, correctly placing the human in the back seat and the capybara in the driver's seat, creating a far more coherent scene despite missing the jacket detail.
The Halloween Invitation
Text-to-Image“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
- + Excellent typography legibility and layout
- + Detailed foliage and scrollwork
- + Higher resolution and cleaner graphic elements
- − Missed the word 'Party' in the main title
- − Includes a repetitive and misspelled line of text ('noickt') below the banner
Recraft V4.1
- + Stronger atmospheric and cinematic lighting
- + Accurate fulfillment of the full 'Halloween Party Invitation' title text
- + Superior aesthetic for a 'vintage gothic' mood
- − The event details at the bottom are slightly small and less balanced
- − The scroll banner is very tiny compared to the other elements
Verdict: Recraft V4.1 delivers a more cohesive and atmospheric 'vintage gothic' look with cinematic lighting that perfectly matches the requested mood, despite the small banner. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra has better technical layout and legibility, but it contains a significant spelling error ('noickt') and missed part of the main title. Recraft V4.1 is the winner for its superior artistic interpretation and accurate title text.
Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes
Text-to-Image“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
- + Excellent typography integrated into the design
- + Adheres well to the 'miniature 3D cartoon' aesthetic with soft textures
- + High detail count including steam and garnish
- − Includes some odd artifacts like a small red bug on the diorama
- − The layout is a bit cluttered compared to the 'minimal' request
Recraft V4.1
- + Perfect adherence to the 'minimal' and 'isometric' requirements
- + Very clean layout with a clearly defined diorama base
- + Text and flag icon are crisp and modern
- − The textures for the fish look a bit flat compared to the PBR request
- − Slightly less 'cartoonish' than requested, leaning more toward realistic 3D render
Verdict: Both models followed the prompt well, but they interpret the 'cartoon' and 'diorama' aspects differently. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra created a more charming, detailed scene with beautiful soft lighting, while Recraft V4.1 provided a much cleaner, more professional graphic design layout that better respected the 'minimal' keyword. FLUX1.1 is slightly better for the artistic request, but Recraft V4.1 is better for a commercial or user-interface look.
Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow
Text-to-Image“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
- + Excellent adherence to the 'fluffy' and 'expressive eyes' aspect of the prompt
- + Clean, artistic composition with a coherent color palette
- + Very high quality rendering of fur texture and lighting
- − Stylistically leans more towards 'digitally rendered' or 'AI-stylized' than hyper-photorealistic
- − Characters look very similar in facial structure, appearing almost like toys
Recraft V4.1
- + Stronger adherence to 'hyper-photorealistic' with realistic animal proportions and textures
- + Better action matching for 'playfully chasing' and 'tumbling together'
- + Visible dew sparkles and more distinct god rays as requested
- − Internal consistency error with the kitten's paw/leg merging into the dog's chest
- − The dog's size is somewhat large compared to the other 'baby' animals
Verdict: While FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra produces a beautiful, clean image with a very high aesthetic appeal, it feels more like a 3D animation than a photograph. Recraft V4.1 captures the requested photorealism and dynamic action much better, despite a few minor anatomical merging issues between the kitten and the dog.
Vintage Cafe Logo
Text-to-Image“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
- + Excellent emblem composition with a cohesive badge design.
- + Strong vintage aesthetic with subtle background texture.
- + High-quality vector illustration style with professional shading on the cloche.
- − Spelling error in the main brand name, rendering it as 'Caffè Framilian'.
- − The design is quite busy for a 'minimalist' request.
Recraft V4.1
- + Perfect text rendering with correct spelling and accent mark.
- + Follows the 'minimalist' keyword much better than the competitor.
- + Clean vector lines suitable for a modern-vintage logo.
- − The steam lines are very thin and look slightly generic compared to the font weight.
- − The background is very flat with no visible 'subtle texture' as requested.
Verdict: Both models captured the vintage aesthetic and color palette well. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra produced a more visually impressive and detailed emblem but failed on the primary task of spelling the brand name correctly. Recraft V4.1 followed the typography instructions perfectly and adhered more closely to the 'minimalist' requirement, making it the more usable logo.
Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility
Text-to-Image“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
- + Features a more dynamic and creative layout including a lunar surface base.
- + Includes more detailed, though mostly gibberish, text blocks that mimic a real poster.
- − Step logic is completely incoherent with duplicate 'Landing' steps and nonsensical sequencing.
- − Text rendering is poor with significantly higher amounts of 'AI gibberish' throughout the graphic.
- − Iconography is inconsistent and does not follow the requested steps.
Recraft V4.1
- + Perfectly adheres to the requested 6-step sequence and specific icon descriptions.
- + Excellent text legibility and clean, professional vector iconography.
- + Strictly follows the requested NASA-inspired color palette and flat-vector style.
- − Very simple grid composition lacks the artistic flair of an 'infographic poster'.
- − Error in numbering with the 'Descent' step labeled as 04 instead of 05.
Verdict: Recraft V4.1 is the clear winner as it accurately followed the instructions for specific steps and iconography while maintaining excellent legibility and a clean vector aesthetic. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra created a visually busy and attractive layout, but the content failed to follow the logical sequence of the prompt and was filled with unreadable text.
Explore each model
Recraft's V4.1 standard tier text-to-image model — refines V4's photorealism with more natural lighting, softer gradients, and sharper illustration styles for everyday creative work