FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra Black Forest Labs vs Recraft V4 Pro Recraft AI

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent realism in the texture of the red book cover and wood table.
• + Correctly places the green plant behind the cube as requested.
• + Realistic refraction and dust details on the glass surfaces.

• − The blue sphere appears to be levitating inside the cube rather than resting on the bottom.
• − The book is slightly too large for the cube, hanging over the edges significantly.

Recraft V4 Pro

• + The sphere is seated realistically on the bottom of the cube.
• + Includes a clear window in the background to justify the lighting prompt.

• − The plant is mostly to the side rather than behind the cube, failing the 'visible through the glass' instruction.
• − The rendering of the glass cube's edges is inconsistent and looks a bit muddled.
• − The blue sphere is quite large, ignoring the 'small' descriptor.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent execution of long-exposure motion blur on passing vehicles.
• + Vibrant and accurate color rendition of the red bicycle.
• + High level of detail in the pavement reflections and wet textures.

• − The lighting on the man feels slightly studio-lit compared to the background.
• − The man's pose looks more like he is holding a bike than actively repairing it.

Recraft V4 Pro

• + Captures a much more authentic 'candid' and 'imperfect' photograph feel.
• + Excellent skin texture and realistic, weathered clothing.
• + The composition and perspective feel more cinematic and grounded.

• − Failed to include the requested motion blur for passing cars.
• − The bicycle's structure feels slightly warped or simplified in the front.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• − The image failed to render or is a completely black canvas.

Recraft V4 Pro

• + Excellent adherence to the complex braid and bead requirements.
• + Intricate engraving details on the plate armor with realistic lighting reflections.
• + Captures the 'battle-worn' aesthetic perfectly with dirt and skin texture.

• − The composition is a medium shot rather than a 'close portrait' as requested.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent sense of layout with a 3D mockup presentation
• + Vibrant colors and high-quality food photography
• + Good use of white space and modern graphic elements

• − Several spelling errors like 'Pizzzans' and gibberish body text
• − The grid layout feels a bit cluttered and chaotic

Recraft V4 Pro

• + Perfectly legible and accurate text rendering
• + Clean, logical grid layout that follows the prompt exactly
• + Appropriate use of sans-serif fonts and subheadings

• − The composition is a flat digital file rather than a realistic mockup
• − Visual style is slightly more basic/functional than artistic

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent food photography style with rich colors and textures
• + Highly professional typography with a beautiful glowing neon effect
• + Dramatic lighting and composition with the ground-up fiery embers

• − Failed to include the price in a starburst shape as requested
• − Rendered multiple patties which wasn't specifically requested, making it look a bit cluttered

Recraft V4 Pro

• + Perfect adherence to the starburst container for the pricing text
• + Superior 'exploded' effect with clear separation between all individual ingredients
• + Excellent font integration with fire textures inside the letters

• − The bottom bun is cut off at the edge of the frame
• − The overall lighting on the burger is slightly flatter compared to the background

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent realistic chalk texture and smudge effects
• + Authentic handwritten aesthetic with natural variations in letter size

• − Significant spelling errors and repetitive gibberish text in the menu items
• − Failed to use 'elegant cursive' for the title as requested

Recraft V4 Pro

• + Perfect text rendering with 100% accuracy in spelling and punctuation
• + Clean and balanced composition within the café environment
• + Follows the list of items exactly as prompted

• − Text looks like a digital markers/font rather than chalk handwriting
• − Missing the requested 'elegant cursive' title style

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent clarity and visual resolution.
• + Dynamic composition with a cinematic scale of Earth in the background.
• + Followed the general theme and captured a 'surreal' floating quality.

• − Failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is on top of the horse instead of vice versa.
• − The horse's harness and the astronaut's hands have minor clipping/detailing issues.

Recraft V4 Pro

• + Strong atmospheric lighting and textural detail in the ice/rocks.
• + Highly cinematic 'moon surface' aesthetic.
• + Good anatomical consistency for the horse.

• − Failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is on top of the horse instead of vice versa.
• − The composition feels a bit flatter compared to the depth of the other image.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent fur texture and lighting on the capybara.
• + Sharp focus and high resolution.
• + Beautiful bokeh on the background city lights.

• − Failed the prompt by putting the human passenger in the front seat holding a second steering wheel.
• − The capybara's anatomy and size relative to the car are inconsistent.
• − The interior layout is nonsensical.

Recraft V4 Pro

• + Perfectly adhered to the spatial prompt by putting the woman in the back seat.
• + Captured the rain effect on the window for added realism and atmosphere.
• + Accurate car interior with the capybara's paws correctly positioned on the wheel.

• − The passenger's face is slightly less detailed than the driver's.
• − Slightly more noise in the image compared to the competitor.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent gothic parchment aesthetic with detailed thorn and web borders
• + High-quality gothic font choice for the main heading
• + Coherent color palette that feels like a physical vintage poster

• − Includes redundant and misspelled text under the banner
• − Missed a word in the main title heading
• − The jack-o-lantern is relatively small compared to the text

Recraft V4 Pro

• + Perfect text accuracy for all requested fields
• + Dramatic cinematic lighting with the moon and lightning
• + Clearer inclusion of specific elements like the full moon and webs

• − Lacks the 'dark parchment' texture requested in the prompt
• − The banner is very small and lacks a vintage hand-drawn feel
• − The layout feels a bit disjointed between the top graphic and bottom text block

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent typography integrated into the scene's aesthetic.
• + Beautiful soft lighting and refined 3D cartoon textures.
• + High-quality composition with a clean, professional diorama feel.

• − Includes some unnecessary items like the plant and small insect.
• − Typography is slightly curved/stylized rather than just large bold text.

Recraft V4 Pro

• + Strict adherence to the requested text layout and flag placement.
• + Good 45° isometric perspective.
• + Realistic textures on the salmon and roe.

• − The diorama base is made of coarse salt or rice, which looks messy compared to the requested clean base.
• − Overall visual style is a bit sterile and less 'miniature 3D cartoon' than Model A.
• − Shadows are a bit harsh for a 'gentle lighting' request.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent dreamlike lighting with soft bokeh and god rays
• + Cohesive aesthetic with consistent big, expressive eyes
• + Vibrant colors and high visual appeal

• − Stylistically leans toward 3D digital illustration rather than photorealism
• − Animals feel static rather than 'tumbling' or 'chasing'

Recraft V4 Pro

• + Stronger adherence to 'hyper-photorealistic' request with realistic textures
• + Dynamic posing captures the scene of animals 'tumbling together'
• + Accurately rendered dew drops on the flowers and fur

• − The fox kit has a slightly distorted front leg/anatomy
• − Composition is a bit cluttered compared to the clean layout of the first image

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Beautiful artistic composition with a creative moon-horizon layout.
• + Excellent use of a NASA-inspired color palette and lighting.
• + Clean, professional vector aesthetic in the illustrations.

• − Nonsensical text and gibberish labels throughout the infographic.
• − Confusing organizational flow with steps scattered and mislabeled.
• − Included a second, very strange rocket design that doesn't fit the mission.

Recraft V4 Pro

• + Exceptional text legibility and accuracy for all mission steps.
• + Strict adherence to the 6-step logical flow requested in the prompt.
• + Perfectly executed flat-vector style with consistent iconography.

• − Layout is a bit safe and functional rather than visually dynamic.
• − Small red dust clouds at the bottom are slightly abstract for a technical infographic.