Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra Black Forest Labs Qwen Image Alibaba

Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

19.0 arena score

#46 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Qwen Image

21.4 arena score

#34 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

Qwen Image

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 13

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Qwen Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • + Excellent refraction and transparency effects through the glass cube.
  • + High-resolution texture on the book cover and realistic lighting.
  • + Accurate placement of the sphere floating inside the volume.
  • The sphere appears to be floating mid-air inside the cube, which might be a slightly surreal interpretation of 'inside'.
  • The plant's positioning feels a bit crowded against the glass.

Qwen Image

  • + Natural composition with a clear view of the plant behind the cube.
  • + Relatively realistic light scattering and reflection on the glass surfaces.
  • + The sphere rests on the bottom surface, which feels grounded.
  • The glass cube has internal vertical seams that look like support struts rather than a single glass volume.
  • The red book appears significantly smaller than the cube, whereas a typical book would likely cover more area.
  • Lower overall sharpness and detail compared to the other image.

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra produces a much higher quality image with realistic textures and superior glass refraction. While Qwen Image follows the spatial prompts correctly, its rendering of the glass cube lacks the clarity and physical accuracy seen in FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra, which feels like a professional photograph.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Qwen Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • + Excellent execution of long-exposure motion blur on passing traffic.
  • + High-fidelity textures on the man's clothing and the wet pavement.
  • + Accurate reflections and realistic lighting interaction with the red bike.
  • The man's hands are not clearly engaged in 'repairing' the bike, more just holding it.
  • The bicycle's mechanical structure is slightly simplified/broken near the pedals.

Qwen Image

  • + Stronger 'candid' feel with more natural, expressive posture for the elderly man.
  • + The man is clearly interacting with the seat/bike for a repair task.
  • + Good atmospheric rain effect.
  • Failed to generate the requested motion blur from passing cars (cars are static/slow).
  • The bicycle's front fork and wheel alignment are physically impossible/detached.
  • Lower image resolution and overall clarity compared to the competitor.

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra followed the technical requirements of the prompt much better, specifically capturing the motion blur and 50mm lens look with high clarity. Qwen Image captured a more emotive and accurate 'repairing' pose, but failed on the motion blur requirement and suffered from significant anatomical errors in the bicycle's construction.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Qwen Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • + Exquisite texture on the skin and facial hair
  • + Perfect adherence to 'faint scars and dirt' for a grounded look
  • + Consistent and realistic engravings on various types of plate armor
  • Composition is a bit tighter than the requested close portrait, feels like a crop
  • Bokeh sparks are very subtle and almost meld into the darkness

Qwen Image

  • + Dynamic lighting with a visible light source
  • + Clear inclusion of all requested elements including beads and sparks
  • + Strong contrast and vibrant colors
  • Scars look like heavy face paint or stage makeup rather than skin tissue
  • The sparks look like artificial vector star-shapes rather than photographic bokeh
  • Metal textures are slightly smoothed over compared to the other model

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra wins by a significant margin due to its superior realism; the skin texture, faint scarring, and the way light interacts with the metal feels authentic. Qwen Image, while following the prompt well, suffers from artificial-looking scars and overly digitized spark effects that detract from the 'lifelike' requirement.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Qwen Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • + Excellent professional mock-up presentation with realistic paper fold effects.
  • + Clean typography that follows the requested section headers closely.
  • + Coherent and appetizing food photography that integrates well with the white space.
  • Includes some gibberish text in the descriptions and pricing.
  • The grid layout for the photos is a bit irregular compared to a standard grid.

Qwen Image

  • + Perfectly aligned grid system with vibrant color-blocked backgrounds.
  • + Large, bold sans-serif font that matches the modern minimalist aesthetic perfectly.
  • + Clearly defined sections for Appetizers and Pizza/mains as requested.
  • Significant text artifacts and illegible characters in the menu items.
  • The 'Pizzaurant' heading is a bit cheesy compared to the minimalist request.
  • Food images are slightly repetitive (many similar salads).

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra produces a more professional and realistic menu mock-up with sophisticated layout and spacing, though it struggles with some text legibility. Qwen Image follows the 'grid' instruction more literally with a very bold and colorful modern look, but the text rendering is significantly less polished. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra is preferred for its superior visual balance and overall professional quality.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Qwen Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • + Exceptional photorealistic textures on the patties and buns
  • + Perfectly centered and clean typography
  • + High-quality rendering of fire and glowing embers at the base
  • Failed to include the starburst element for the price
  • Included some unintelligible watermark-like text at the bottom

Qwen Image

  • + Fully adhered to the layout request including the starburst
  • + Stronger sense of motion with flying ingredients like tomatoes and sauce
  • + Vibrant and punchy color palette
  • Image quality is slightly more 'plastic' or illustrative than photorealistic
  • Composition feels a bit more cluttered compared to the clean layout of the rival

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra produces a much more professional and high-fidelity image with realistic textures that look like high-end commercial photography, though it missed the starburst requirement. Qwen Image followed every part of the prompt including the specific price starburst, but its visual quality is lower and has a more 'artificial' AI look. FLUX1.1 is the winner for its superior realism and aesthetic appeal despite the minor prompt omission.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Qwen Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • + The chalk texture looks highly realistic with authentic smudging on the board edges.
  • + The handwriting has natural variations in line weight and character height.
  • The text is highly garbled with many spelling errors and repetitions like 'mushroommm' and 'chocolate & Brown Chocolate'.
  • Failed to use cursive for the title as requested.

Qwen Image

  • + The text is much more legible and follows the requested menu items accurately.
  • + The title font has the requested cursive elements, even if not fully linked.
  • + Composition is centered and balanced within a cozy café environment.
  • Failed the date prompt, writing '20026' instead of '2026'.
  • The chalk texture is very clean and uniform, bordering on looking like a digital font rather than natural chalk.

Verdict: While FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra excels at the authentic appearance of chalk and realistic smudging, the actual content of the text is a repetitive mess with significant spelling errors. Qwen Image provides a much more usable image with readable, accurately spelled menu items, despite the error in the year and a slightly 'too-perfect' chalk style. Qwen Image is the winner for successfully rendering the complex list of items requested.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Qwen Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'cinematic' and 'highly detailed' descriptors
  • + Superior background depth with satellites and a distant curving planet
  • + Beautifully rendered textures on the horse's mane and the space suit
  • The orange object on the astronaut's backpack is a slightly strange artifact
  • The bridle physics look a bit loose

Qwen Image

  • + Natural, clean lighting on the subjects
  • + Good anatomical proportions for both the horse and the astronaut
  • The background is less detailed and lacks the 'cinematic' scale of the competitor
  • The horse's back right leg has a strange white marking that looks like a detached sock/hoof
  • Lower overall resolution and sharpness compared to the other image

Verdict: Both models successfully interpreted the prompt, but FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra created a much more ambitious and visually stunning scene with intricate background details and superior texturing. Qwen Image produced a solid but more basic composition with some minor anatomical oddities on the horse's leg.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Qwen Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • + Excellent fur texture on the capybara.
  • + High image resolution and clarity.
  • The woman is placed in the passenger seat instead of the back seat.
  • The woman is holding the steering wheel despite the capybara being in the driver's seat.
  • The capybara's head to body ratio is anatomically confusing in this perspective.

Qwen Image

  • + Correctly places the businesswoman in the back seat as requested.
  • + The capybara is correctly positioned with its paws on the steering wheel.
  • + The lighting and composition accurately reflect a taxi interior at night.
  • The hands of the capybara look more like primate hands than rodent paws.
  • Text on the car roof sign is nonsensical.

Verdict: Qwen Image followed the spatial instructions of the prompt much more accurately, placing the passenger in the back seat while the capybara drives. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra failed the primary composition requirement by placing the woman in the front seat and having her hands on the steering wheel, which contradicted the requested scene logic.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Qwen Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • + Excellent typography rendering for the primary details
  • + Superior composition with a parchment scroll effect
  • + Highly detailed thorns and dark, atmospheric lighting
  • Included a redundant line of text with a typo ('noickt')
  • Missed the word 'Party' in the main title
  • Jack-o-lantern is placed behind the text rather than centrally as the focal point

Qwen Image

  • + Atmospheric cinematic lighting with a foggy background
  • + Includes all core visual elements like webs, thorns, and twisted trees
  • + Focal point is well-centered and balanced
  • Major typos in the main title ('Halle Party Invitation')
  • Gothic font is slightly cluttered and harder to read
  • The 'parchment' effect is limited to a small outer border rather than the main poster area

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra produces a much cleaner and more professional-looking invitation with better font legibility, despite a minor logic error in repeating a sentence with a typo. Qwen Image captures the 'cinematic' and 'moody' atmosphere better but fails significantly on text accuracy and the parchment texture requested.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Qwen Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • + Excellent typography with a creative arched 'JAPAN' text.
  • + Higher resolution details on the sushi rice and salmon texture.
  • + Polished, professional 3D render feel with soft global illumination.
  • Includes some confusing elements like a steaming dish and a ladybug-like artifact.
  • Diorama base is less distinct from the scene floor.

Qwen Image

  • + Stronger adherence to the 'miniature diorama' concept with a clear layered base.
  • + Bold, high-contrast text that is very easy to read.
  • + Cleaner and simpler composition that matches the 'cartoon' instruction well.
  • Texture on the salmon looks slightly unnatural or stiff.
  • The flag icon next to the text is slightly distorted.

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra produces a more visually sophisticated and detailed render with elegant typography, though it includes a few illogical elements like steam and insects. Qwen Image follows the 'miniature' and 'diorama' prompt cues more literally with a well-defined platform, but the overall asset quality is slightly lower than its competitor. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra is the winner due to its superior lighting and texture work.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Qwen Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • + Excellent soft lighting and atmosphere
  • + Cute, stylized character designs that fit a wholesome vibe
  • + High-quality fur texture and butterfly rendering
  • Anatomical fusion: the kitten and fox look very similar in style
  • Does not look hyper-photorealistic as requested, appearing more like a digital painting
  • The pets are mostly stationary rather than 'tumbling together'

Qwen Image

  • + Better adherence to 'hyper-photorealistic' with distinct animal features
  • + Captures the 'tumbling' and 'chasing' action much better than Model A
  • + Clear distinction between the tabby kitten and the red fox kit
  • Individual animals are at different scales that look physically impossible together
  • The puppy's face looks slightly flat compared to the lighting on the other animals
  • The kitten's front paw has some anatomical artifacts

Verdict: While FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra creates a beautiful, dream-like illustration, Qwen Image better adheres to the 'hyper-photorealistic' part of the prompt and successfully captures the dynamic action requested. Qwen Image provides a more literal interpretation of four distinct species playing together, whereas FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra relies on a very similar aesthetic for all four animals.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Qwen Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • + Excellent professional vector emblem execution
  • + Accurate date and business type rendering
  • + Strong adherence to color palette and texture prompts
  • Spelling error in the main brand name ('Framlian' instead of 'Florian')

Qwen Image

  • + Simpler minimalist interpretation of the cloche
  • + Correct date rendering on the banner
  • Severe typography issues with overlapping and jumbled letters
  • Less polished 'vector emblem' feel compared to the competitor

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra produces a far superior visual product with excellent composition and professional-grade detailing, though it failed to correctly spell 'Florian'. Qwen Image correctly identified the cloche and banner but struggled significantly with the typography, resulting in an unreadable brand name.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Qwen Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • + Excellent professional vector aesthetic with a sophisticated layout.
  • + Strong adherence to the requested NASA-inspired color palette.
  • + High-quality graphic design elements like the lunar surface and stars.
  • Text consists of heavy gibberish and 'lorem ipsum' style content.
  • Logically confusing layout that doesn't follow a clear 1-6 chronological sequence.

Qwen Image

  • + Directly follows the 6-step chronological sequence requested.
  • + Legible English text for major headings and name labels.
  • + Accurate representation of the requested icons like the Lunar Module.
  • Composition feels cluttered and less like a professional 'poster'.
  • The inclusion of the prompt instruction 'Stop at landing' as a header is a common AI error.
  • The Saturn V illustration is generic and less detailed compared to other elements.

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra produces a much more visually stunning and professional-looking infographic that looks like a real poster, though its text is mostly nonsensical. Qwen Image follows the logical instructions of the prompt much better, providing the 6 specific steps in order with readable labels, but it lacks the design polish and artistic cohesion of the former. Qwen Image is preferred for functional accuracy, while FLUX1.1 is preferred for pure visual quality.

Next steps

Explore each model