FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra Black Forest Labs vs GPT Image 1 Mini OpenAI

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent photorealistic textures on the book cover and wooden table.
• + Highly accurate glass refractions showing the plant behind the cube.
• + Crisp lighting that clearly originates from the left as requested.

• − The sphere is floating in the center rather than resting on the bottom, which may feel slightly unnatural.

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Natural grounding of the blue sphere on the bottom of the cube.
• + Simple and clean composition that follows all prompt instructions.

• − The plant is completely blurred out and doesn't appear 'through' the glass as clearly as the prompt implies.
• − Lower overall texture detail compared to its competitor.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent execution of long-exposure motion blur on passing cars
• + High clarity and realistic lighting on wet pavement
• + Good full-body composition including reflections

• − The man appears to be posing with or moving the bike rather than 'repairing' it
• − Skin texture looks slightly smoothed compared to the 'natural texture' request

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Outstanding natural skin texture and facial detail
• + Captures the 'repairing' action more accurately with a crouched pose
• + Authentic shallow depth of field and color grading for a 50mm lens feel

• − Missed the 'motion blur from passing cars' instruction as the background cars are static
• − Less emphasis on the wet pavement reflections compared to Image A

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• − The image failed to render, resulting in a solid black frame.
• − Total failure to adhere to the prompt.

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Excellent adherence to all prompt elements including braided hair, scars, and ornate armor.
• + Impressive textural detail on the engraved plate and leather straps.
• + Masterful use of lighting and bokeh to create a cinematic atmosphere.

• − The beads in the hair are subtly integrated and could be more prominent.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent professional flyer layout with realistic perspective.
• + Includes complex details such as price points, item descriptions, and branding icons.
• + Sophisticated typography variation that feels like a real restaurant menu.

• − Text contains frequent misspellings like 'Pizzzans' and 'Appet Love'.
• − Layout is slightly cluttered compared to a strict minimalist aesthetic.

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Very clean and organized 3x2 grid that perfectly matches the prompt.
• + Perfectly legible and bold sans-serif header text.
• + Superior minimalist composition that functions effectively as a simple template.

• − Empty space for the menu items looks like an unfinished template.
• − Less 'professional' in terms of real-world menu depth compared to Model A.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Extremely high photorealistic detail on food textures
• + Crisp, modern commercial-grade lighting and resolution
• + Accurate text rendering for all requested strings

• − Missed the starburst element for the price
• − Includes hallucinated watermark-like text at the bottom

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Perfect adherence to all layout instructions including the starburst
• + Superior fiery, glowing effect on all text elements
• + Captures a distinct 'magical' atmosphere consistent with the prompt

• − Visual resolution and food texture are significantly lower than the competitor
• − Composition feels slightly more static than the prompt's 'dynamic' request

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Features a more authentic café-style background with depth.
• + Captures the specific imperfections and 'natural variation' requested in the prompt.

• − Significant spelling errors and word repetitions (e.g., 'mushroomm', 'fresh fresh', 'riistratnisnios').
• − Failed to render the title in the requested 'elegant cursive' style.
• − Text is messy and lacks proper spacing for a menu.

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Excellent text spelling and layout, accurately following all menu items and prices.
• + Superior chalk texture that looks realistically grainy and feathered.
• + Good composition with a clear, readable hierarchy.

• − The font is a bit too uniform, lacking some of the requested 'handwritten' slant and variation.
• − Failed to use 'elegant cursive' for the title as specifically requested.
• − The board feels slightly flatter and less integrated into a 3D environment.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + High resolution and bright, cinematic lighting against the Earth.
• + Clean and polished textures on the spacesuit and horse's fur.
• + Dynamic composition with a sense of movement.

• − Completely failed the negative constraint/spatial instruction of placing the horse on top of the astronaut.
• − Included strange artifacts like the orange object on top of the astronaut's backpack.

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Good atmospheric depth and starry background texture.
• + The horse's anatomy is reasonably well-rendered for a surreal concept.

• − Failed the specific prompt instruction to have the horse on top of the astronaut.
• − The image is somewhat dark and lacks the requested high-detail cinematic sharpness seen in the competitor.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + High resolution with vibrant colors and sharp details
• + Excellent rendering of capybara fur and whiskers

• − Failed the spatial logical request, placing the passenger in the front seat holding a steering wheel
• − Incorrectly depicts the businesswoman as a second driver or passenger with a wheel

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Correctly follows the spatial layout, placing the passenger in the back and the capybara in the driver's seat
• + Accurately captures the 'bored' expression of the businesswoman
• + Maintains a moody, cinematic lighting that fits the nighttime city theme

• − Image is slightly grainier/noisier compared to Model A
• − The capybara's paw on the wheel looks slightly human-like in structure

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent adherence to the 'parchment scroll' and 'thorns' aesthetic
• + Very crisp typography with high legibility
• + Clean composition with distinct background and foreground elements

• − Includes hallucinatory/repetitive text below the scroll
• − The title text misses the word 'Party' as requested in the prompt

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Perfect text accuracy including the presence of the word 'Party'
• + Superior artistic mood with a gritty, vintage texture
• + Centered composition feels more cohesive and cinematic

• − The border of webs and thorns is very subtle and hard to see
• − Smaller text on the banner and location details is slightly less legible than it could be

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent 3D rendering with sophisticated lighting and PBR material effects.
• + Beautifully detailed diorama with a comprehensive miniature scene.
• + Correct text placement and inclusion of all requested elements.

• − Includes a strange, non-requested ladybug-style artifact on the base.
• − The 'JAPAN' text is slightly warped along a curve rather than being strictly flat/bold.

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Highly accurate adherence to the 'minimal' part of the prompt.
• + Perfectly clean and bold typography that matches the request exactly.
• + Consistent matte 'cartoon' texture across the entire model.

• − Simple composition lacks the visual interest of a 'miniature 3D scene'.
• − The diorama base is very basic compared to the requested 'miniature 3D scene' descriptor.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent soft lighting and atmospheric god rays
• + Cohesive artistic style across all four animals
• + Highly detailed fur texture and expressive eyes

• − Static composition that lacks the 'chasing and tumbling' movement requested
• − The kitten looks more like a stylized plush toy than a real tabby

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Perfectly captures the 'chasing and tumbling' action in the prompt
• + More realistic animal anatomy and fur patterns
• + Accurate depiction of a tabby kitten as requested

• − The fox's front right leg has anatomical issues/blending with the body
• − Background bokeh is slightly less creamy than Image A

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent vector emblem style with professional line work
• + Beautiful color palette of warm browns and creams on a light background
• + Sophisticated vintage typography and composition

• − Failed to spell the primary brand name correctly, rendering it as 'Framilian' instead of 'Florian'

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Perfect text accuracy for 'Caffè Florian' and 'Est. 1720'
• + Clean, minimalist interpretation of the cloche and steam
• + Good use of texture for a vintage effect

• − Ignored the request for a 'light background', opting for solid black
• − Misses the 'banner' requirement for the 'Est. 1720' text, using a flat graphic instead

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent visual depth and complex vector artistic style.
• + Captures the specified color palette perfectly.
• + Includes a large amount of supporting graphical elements that look professional.

• − The numerical sequence of the steps is illogical and confusing.
• − Text is largely gibberish beyond the main headers.
• − The layout is cluttered and difficult to read as a functional infographic.

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Perfect adherence to the 6 requested steps in the correct order.
• + Clean, legible text for all major headers.
• + Strictly follows the 'crisp lines' and 'flat-vector' style requested in the prompt.

• − The composition is a bit basic and lacks the 'poster' feel of the other model.
• − Iconography for 'Translunar' is a bit abstract compared to others.