Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [pro] Black Forest Labs Wan 2.7 Pro Alibaba

Settled by community votes across 19 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [pro]

26.3 arena score

#8 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Wan 2.7 Pro

21.0 arena score

#37 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [pro]

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

Wan 2.7 Pro

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 19

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent photographic quality and realistic depth of field.
  • + Accurate glass refraction and reflections on the sphere and table.
  • + The lighting looks natural and adheres perfectly to the 'from the left' instruction.
  • The glass cube looks more like a display stand with thin edges rather than solid glass.
  • The plant in the background is quite blurry, making the 'visible through glass' effect less distinct.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Strong adherence to all spatial instructions, especially the plant visible through the glass.
  • + Texture of the wooden table and the red book cover is highly detailed.
  • + The sphere has a nice marbled texture that makes it more visually interesting.
  • The glass box has some perspective issues on the right edge.
  • The lighting is a bit flat compared to the more cinematic Model A.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt instructions perfectly, including the specific spatial relationships between all objects. FLUX.2 [pro] is more aesthetically pleasing with superior lighting and soft focus, while Wan 2.7 Pro offers more texture and better visibility of the plant through the glass. FLUX.2 [pro] is the likely winner due to its overall higher realism and better execution of light and shadow.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
FLUX.2 [pro]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Successfully preserved the specific person's identity and hairstyle from the source image.
  • + Maintained high fidelity to the original car model and its color.
  • + Created a realistic sense of motion with blurred wheels and road textures.
  • The person is sitting on the right side (passenger side in US) while actually driving the vehicle.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Captured a very scenic and atmospheric California coastline aesthetic.
  • + Excellent lighting and shadow integration on the car and landscape.
  • Completely failed to use the person from the source image, replacing him with a generic figure.
  • The person is positioned incorrectly, appearing to be sitting in the back or very far back in the seat.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] is the clear winner as it successfully integrated the specific person and car from the source images into the new environment. While the steering wheel placement is slightly illogical for a US coastline drive, Wan 2.7 Pro failed the primary task of person preservation by replacing the subject with a completely different individual.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent adherence to shallow depth of field and motion blur prompts.
  • + Very realistic skin and clothing texture.
  • + Atmospheric lighting with convincing rain effects and reflections.
  • Physical interaction with the bike is slightly awkward with a floating hand/finger.
  • A bit more stylized than the 'no stylization' prompt requested.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Features a very realistic, mundane Japanese street setting.
  • + Strong 'candid' feel with high levels of detail on the bicycle.
  • + Good reflection quality on the wet pavement.
  • Fails to include the requested motion blur for passing cars.
  • Depth of field is much deeper than the requested 50mm/shallow look.
  • The rain effect is very sparse and barely visible.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] followed the technical camera instructions much more effectively, accurately depicting the shallow depth of field and motion blur requested in the prompt. While Wan 2.7 Pro captures a more grounded, literal Japanese street scene, it ignored several key stylistic requirements, making FLUX.2 [pro] the superior cinematic choice.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'close portrait' instruction, creating a more intimate and intense feel.
  • + Superior lighting effects with high-contrast warm glow and realistic bokeh sparks.
  • + Texture on the leather straps and metallic engravings is exceptionally detailed and sharp.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + More sophisticated braiding pattern with beads integrated into the crown of the hair.
  • + Good balance of battle-worn elements like grime and subtle scarring.
  • + Clean, professional composition with clear background separation.
  • Texture on the leather straps is slightly blurry compared to the armor.
  • The lighting feels a bit more flat and less dramatic than requested.
  • A bit further away from the subject than a 'close portrait' typically implies.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] captures the 'close portrait' aspect better, resulting in a more intense and detailed image that feels tangible through its high-contrast lighting and sharp textures. Wan 2.7 Pro offers a very clean aesthetic and a great interpretation of the braided hair, but it lacks the visceral detail and dramatic torchlight reflections present in the FLUX output.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent structure following the requested grid of food photos.
  • + Strong use of bold sans-serif fonts and vibrant color coding for sections.
  • + Clean layout that closely resembles a professional printed menu.
  • Contains significant typos and repetitions like 'MINS' instead of 'MAINS'.
  • Logic errors in prices including commas and nonsensical dollar amounts.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Superior text rendering with legible descriptions and fewer spelling errors.
  • + Beautiful food photography and a high-quality lifestyle presentation including props.
  • + Sophisticated minimalist design with functional elements like a QR code and social media icons.
  • The food variety is a bit random compared to the specific categories requested.
  • Small typos still exist in item names like 'Calariri' and 'Bissue'.

Verdict: Wan 2.7 Pro is the clear winner for its professional aesthetics, superior legibility, and realistic graphic design elements like the QR code and social footers. While FLUX.2 [pro] followed the grid layout request well, it suffered from disruptive spelling errors and illogical content repetition that made the design feel less usable.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent typography integration with high-quality fiery effects on the text.
  • + Photorealistic texture on the meat patties and melted cheese.
  • + Great sense of motion with the swirling sauce and flying crumbs.
  • The 'exploded' effect is a bit vertical and compressed compared to the more dynamic spread of the other image.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Very dynamic composition with ingredients flying out in all directions.
  • + Includes extra details like cucumbers and onions not explicitly mentioned but adding to the 'exploded' look.
  • + Strong adherence to the starburst and specific text requirements.
  • The lighting on the meat and cheese looks slightly more artificial or 'plastic' compared to the photorealism of Model A.
  • Individual flame icons on the text look a bit like clip-art compared to the integrated glow in Model A.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, including all text elements and the specific starburst. FLUX.2 [pro] is preferred for its superior photorealism and sophisticated typography effects, whereas Wan 2.7 Pro offers a more energetic composition but with slightly less realistic lighting.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent chalk texture with realistic grit and smudge effects on the slate board.
  • + Highly realistic cursive handwriting that feels authentic to a human hand.
  • + Perfectly captures the 'cozy café' atmosphere with warm lighting and a natural slate texture.
  • The alignment is a bit more chaotic, making it slightly harder to read at a glance.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Perfect text rendering of the entire prompt, including the completion of the truncated item.
  • + Very clean layout with clear spacing and consistent letter sizing.
  • + The background elements like the lighting and shelves enhance the cafe theme.
  • The handwriting feels slightly too uniform and digital, bordering on a 'chalk' font rather than natural handwriting.
  • The chalk texture is much smoother and lacks the realistic dustiness seen in the other model.

Verdict: Both models followed the complex text instructions perfectly, which is an impressive feat. FLUX.2 [pro] is the winner for visual realism, as its text has the tactile, imperfect quality of real chalk on stone, whereas Wan 2.7 Pro feels slightly more like a digital graphic overlay despite its perfect legibility.

Pose & Character Mashup

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”

Source
FLUX.2 [pro]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent character preservation of the person from Image 2, including clothing and accessories
  • + Successfully integrated the lighting and yellow background from Image 1
  • + Good anatomical rendering of the hands and feet
  • Failed to match the 'exact pose' from Image 1, choosing a crouching pose instead of the specific tilted balance
  • Loss of the specific dynamic lean and arm angles from the reference

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Perfectly preserves Image 1
  • Failed the core editing task by not changing the character at all
  • Completely ignored Image 2 and the character reference instruction

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] followed the character and environment instructions very well, successfully placing the man from Image 2 into the setting of Image 1, though it slightly modified the pose into a crouch. Wan 2.7 Pro failed the task entirely by simply returning the original Image 1 without any edits. FLUX.2 [pro] is the clear winner for actually performing the requested image synthesis.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'horse on top' spatial instruction
  • + Cinematic lighting and high detail in the space background
  • + Creative interpretation that feels genuinely surreal
  • Anatomical glitch where the horse appears to have a secondary body or merging torso below it
  • Positioning of the horse's legs is physically awkward even for a surreal image

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + High visual clarity and clean rendering
  • + Good anatomical proportions for the subjects
  • Failed the core prompt instruction of 'horse on top, not vice versa'
  • Less 'surreal' and more of a standard literal interpretation
  • Floating planets look somewhat pasted on and lack environmental integration

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] followed the specific spatial constraint of placing the horse on top of the astronaut, which is a difficult prompt to get right, resulting in a more surreal and creative image. Wan 2.7 Pro completely ignored the 'not vice versa' instruction and created a standard astronaut riding a horse. Despite some anatomical merging artifacts in Model A, it is the much better response to the specific prompt.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent photorealistic lighting and depth within the cabin
  • + High quality texture detail on the capybara's fur and the jacket
  • + Perfect adherence to the 'bored expression' of the passenger in the background
  • The capybara's hands look more like gloved human hands than paws

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Natural composition showing both the driver and the passenger clearly
  • + Good depiction of the Manhattan street environment through the windows
  • + The capybara's expression is very calm and professional
  • The passenger is sitting in the front passenger seat instead of the back seat
  • The capybara's hands have unsettling, long primate-like fingers
  • Lighting is a bit flat compared to the other model

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] followed the spatial instructions much better by placing the passenger in the back seat and achieved a higher level of photorealism through superior lighting. Wan 2.7 Pro failed on the back seat requirement and produced anatomical errors with the capybara's hands.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent cinematic lighting with a moody, atmospheric night sky
  • + Photorealistic rendering of the jack-o-lantern and fog
  • + Clean and readable parchment texture with burnt edges
  • The thorn border is a bit thin and less ornate than requested
  • Composition is a bit bottom-heavy with large empty space around the text

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Intricate border design featuring webs, thorns, and decorative illustration
  • + Superior framing with the twisted trees and lanterns creating depth
  • + Very polished, professional graphic design layout
  • The lighting is more illustrative and less 'moody' or cinematic than the prompt asked for
  • Includes additional non-requested elements like 'Est. 1847' and a tombstone

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] excels at creating a moody, atmospheric, and realistic 'cinematic' scene with perfectly executed text and lighting. However, Wan 2.7 Pro provides a much more complete and professional invitation layout with a highly detailed gothic border and better use of the square canvas, despite its more cartoony/illustrative style.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [pro]
Before After
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Successfully added a large volume of hair with natural texture.
  • + Excellent preservation of the jacket, background, and lighting.
  • + The hair color perfectly matches the existing beard.
  • The forehead height/hairline feels slightly unnatural and high.
  • Changed the shape of the right side of the face/cheek area slightly.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Extremely realistic and believable hairline placement.
  • + Perfectly preserves the original facial features and bone structure.
  • + The hair style feels more cohesive with the person's age and character.
  • Small stray hairs at the very top look slightly digital upon close inspection.

Verdict: Both models performed exceptionally well, but Wan 2.7 Pro is the clear winner for its superior anatomical accuracy. While FLUX.2 [pro] added a thick head of hair, it slightly altered the facial structure and created a less convincing hairline compared to Wan 2.7 Pro, which looks like a genuine, unedited photograph.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent adherence to the isometric perspective on a raised diorama base
  • + Clean and bold text rendering that perfectly matches the placement request
  • + Consistent, high-quality 3D clay-like textures for the sushi components
  • The nigiri rice texture looks slightly like bubble wrap rather than individual grains

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Superior PBR material rendering with realistic subsurface scattering on the fish
  • + Highly detailed modeling of rice grains and ikura pearls
  • + Very pleasing soft lighting and color palette
  • Included extra floating elements and text not requested in the prompt
  • The flag icon is placed to the side of the text rather than below it
  • Missed the specific 'raised diorama base' instruction, opting for just a plate

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] followed the structural instructions much better, delivering a true isometric scene on a raised diorama base with the exact text layout requested. While Wan 2.7 Pro produced more visually impressive material textures and lighting, its failure to include the diorama base and the inclusion of unnecessary peripheral elements makes it less accurate to the prompt.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.2 [pro]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent integration of all elements into a cohesive scene.
  • + Clean and polished cartoon caricature style with high resolution.
  • + Preserves the subject's likeliness well through hair and eye color.
  • The hockey sticks in the back are slightly warped.
  • The desk's inner screen perspective is a bit flat.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Successfully captures a more 'manic' and exaggerated caricature expression.
  • + Cleverly merges the microphone and hockey stick into one object.
  • + Includes text elements that directly reference the prompt.
  • The facial features look less like the original subject than Model A.
  • Some anatomical issues with the hands, including a detached-looking finger on the stick.

Verdict: Both models followed the instructions well, but FLUX.2 [pro] produced a much more visually appealing and professional caricature. FLUX.2 [pro] managed to preserve the subject's identity better while creating a dense environment filled with relevant details like dogs in jerseys and a custom anchor desk, whereas Wan 2.7 Pro felt slightly more generic and had minor anatomical flaws in the hands.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent soft fur textures and fine detail on the animals
  • + Atmospheric lighting with subtle dew-like sparkles
  • + Clean and cute composition that feels professional
  • The animals are very static and sitting rather than 'playfully chasing' or 'tumbling'
  • The butterflies are landing on the animals rather than being chased

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Successfully captures the movement and action of 'playfully chasing'
  • + Perfect execution of 'god rays' as requested in the prompt
  • + More diverse and vibrant wildflower meadow
  • Anatomical issues with the kitten's legs and the dog's back legs
  • The fur texture feels slightly more artificial and sharpened compared to Model A

Verdict: FLUX.1 [pro] excels in pure image quality and realistic textures, but it creates a static portrait rather than the active scene requested. Wan 2.1 Pro much better represents the energy of 'chasing and tumbling' with impressive lighting effects, though it suffers from some anatomical clipping and less realistic fur rendering.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.2 [pro]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Perfectly captures the Studio Ghibli art style with clean line work and character design.
  • + Strong source preservation of the meme's composition and character poses.
  • + Excellent background detail that feels thematic and hand-painted.
  • The color palette is a bit washed out compared to vibrant Ghibli films.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Beautiful watercolor textures and hand-painted aesthetic.
  • + Preserves the original facial likenesses of the people in the meme more accurately.
  • + Soft, warm lighting that matches the 'nostalgic' prompt instruction.
  • The art style is more generic watercolor than specific Ghibli anime style.
  • The woman in the foreground has slight anatomical blurring in the face.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] effectively transforms the image into a authentic-looking anime still by completely redesigning the characters' features in the Studio Ghibli house style while maintaining the iconic composition of the original meme. Wan 2.7 Pro produces a lovely watercolor illustration that keeps the actors' faces more recognizable, but it misses the specific 'Ghibli' animation look requested in the prompt. FLUX.2 [pro] is the winner for better stylistic adherence to the specific 'Ghibli' instruction.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [pro]
Before After
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent preservation of the source subject and background details.
  • + Hair movement is realistic and captures the look of a strong breeze.
  • + The leaves are high resolution and integrate well into the foreground depth.
  • Some leaves are slightly too oversized, and the quantity can feel a bit cluttered.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Natural composition of flying leaves that feels more organic and less overwhelming.
  • + Hair wind effect is very plausible and energetic.
  • + Added motion blur to some leaves enhances the sense of dynamic action.
  • The color of the leaves shifted towards orange/brown, subtly changing the seasonal feel of the scene.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] and Wan 2.7 Pro both performed excellently in this edit, perfectly preserving the woman, dog, and background while adding the requested motion. FLUX.2 [pro] opted for larger, greener leaves that dominate the frame, while Wan 2.7 Pro provided a more subtle, realistic scattering of autumn-colored leaves with a slight motion blur that better conveys the 'energetic and lively' feel requested.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent typography with perfect spelling of 'Caffè Florian'.
  • + Minimalist vector style that closely follows the restraint requested in the prompt.
  • + Clean layout with subtle texture that enhances the vintage aesthetic without clutter.
  • The cloche icon is somewhat generic and simple compared to the elaborate text.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Beautifully detailed engraving style on the cloche and laurels.
  • + Rich use of warm brown tones and elegant banners.
  • + Creative addition of relevant context like 'Venezia Italia' which fits the real-world brand.
  • Misspelled the primary name as 'Florion' instead of 'Florian'.
  • Composition is cluttered with floating corner elements like coffee beans and cups that distract from the main logo.
  • The steam lines are somewhat messy and poorly integrated.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] is the clear winner because it followed all text requirements perfectly and adhered to the 'minimalist' instruction. While Wan 2.7 Pro produced a very attractive vintage illustration, the misspelling of 'Florian' and the inclusion of unnecessary peripheral objects made it less successful as a professional logo design.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent large-scale vector aesthetic with crisp lines
  • + Creative use of illustrations to show the progression of the journey
  • + Highly legible title fonts
  • Missed the final 'Landing' step, combining it with Descent
  • Text body content is mostly gibberish

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Matches the requested NASA color palette perfectly
  • + Follows all six specific steps requested in the prompt including Landing
  • + Impressive text rendering with factual data about the mission
  • Icons are much smaller and harder to see compared to Model A
  • Composition is a bit cramped in the vertical center
  • The word 'Descent' is misspelled as 'DESCRIPT'

Verdict: Wan 2.7 Pro is the slightly better choice for an infographic because it successfully included all six requested steps and contains factual mission data that makes sense, whereas FLUX.2 [pro] used placeholder text and omitted the final landing step. However, FLUX.2 [pro] has a superior visual design for a poster with its larger, more detailed vector icons and balanced layout.

Next steps

Explore each model