FLUX.2 [pro] Black Forest Labs vs FLUX1.1 [pro] Black Forest Labs

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Excellent photographic realism and depth of field
• + Accurate representation of a red hardcover book with spine details
• + Natural lighting and shadows on the wooden table surface

• − The glass cube has an open side rather than being a solid enclosure

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Strong colors and clear visibility of the plant through the glass
• + Perfect sphere geometry with realistic window reflections
• + The sphere appears centered within the volume of the cube

• − The glass cube is rectangular/tall rather than a standard cube shape
• − The red book appears more like a thin fabric-covered slab without traditional book proportions

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Excellent depiction of a bicycle repair task with logical interaction
• + Highly realistic skin texture and fabric detail
• + Beautifully rendered reflections and water ripples that enhance the mood

• − The motion blur of the car is subtle compared to the sharp background buildings

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Strong bokeh effect in the background lights creates a cinematic feel
• + Effective wet pavement texture and reflections

• − Physical incoherence as the bicycle is missing its rear half
• − The man is simply holding the handlebars rather than repairing it
• − Anatomical issues with the man's hands merging into the bike

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Excellent adherence to the 'beads in hair' prompt element.
• + Clear and intricate floral engravings on the armor plate.
• + Warm, atmospheric lighting that clearly originates from the visible torch.

• − The scars look a bit like surface-level scratches rather than deep battle wounds.
• − Leather strap texture is slightly softer compared to the armor.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Extremely lifelike eyes with impressive iris detail.
• + Superior skin texture showing pores, sweat, and grit.
• + Striking use of shallow depth of field and bokeh sparks.

• − Failed to include the small beads in the braided hair as requested.
• − The armor engravings are less distinct and partially obscured.
• − Warm torchlight is less evident, with a cooler overall color temperature.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Very clean and professional grid layout with high-quality headers
• + Excellent font choice that aligns perfectly with the 'bold sans-serif' and 'modern' prompt
• + Good color coordination with vibrant category-specific accents

• − Text duplication issues where 'Garlic Bread' and 'Margherita Pizza' are repeated under every section
• − One photo of steak is mislabeled as 'MageFiza Pizza'

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Stylishly presented as a physical mockup with realistic depth/shadows
• + Successfully incorporates 'Appetizers', 'Pizza', and 'Mains' (misspelled as Man & Dreafry)

• − Text legibility is poor with significantly garbled characters
• − Food images are clustered at the bottom rather than integrated into a cohesive grid for the whole menu
• − Layout feels a bit cluttered compared to the minimalist request

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Excellent adherence to the 'exploded burger' request with clear separation of ingredients.
• + Perfect text rendering for all three requested elements with the specified fiery glow.
• + High-quality photorealistic textures on the lettuce, meat, and melting cheese.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Dynamic sense of depth with particles flying toward the camera.
• + Bright, high-contrast lighting on the burger bun and embers.

• − Failed the 'exploded burger' requirement; the burger is mostly assembled rather than suspended in mid-air.
• − Repeated the 'MAGIC BURGER' text twice and missed the starburst requirement.
• − Included illegible hallucinated text at the bottom of the image.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Excellent chalk texture with realistic smudging and dusting on the slate surface.
• + High text accuracy that perfectly follows the prompt's content and style requirements.
• + Natural letter variations and alignment that truly mimic human handwriting.

• − The slate board texture makes the edges look a bit more like stone than a standard café chalkboard.
• − The '2026' is slightly less cursive than the main title line.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Clean, readable layout with attractive decorative dividers.
• + Good atmospheric lighting in the background café setting.

• − Significant text errors including 'Herbss', 'Chipkies', 'giluten', and price inaccuracies like '$228'.
• − The text looks more like a digital font overlay rather than organic chalk handwriting on a board.
• − Repeated lines for the octopus dish which was not requested.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Successfully followed the difficult logic of 'horse on top' of the astronaut.
• + High cinematic quality with beautiful lighting on the Earth and galaxies.
• + Clean, sharp details on the spacesuit and horse's mane.

• − The transition area where the horse is 'riding' the astronaut is a bit physically confusing/cluttered.
• − Includes a second partial horse body merged with the astronaut.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Dramatic, painterly aesthetic with vibrant color contrast.
• + Excellent anatomical rendering of the horse and lighting on the helmet.

• − Failed the primary logic constraint of 'horse on top, not vice versa'.
• − Atmosphere looks more like a cloudy sky on Earth than actual deep space.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Excellent photorealism with detailed textures on the capybara fur and jacket.
• + Highly accurate composition showing the driver and passenger in their correct respective seat positions.
• + Highly realistic dashboard and interior lighting that matches a New York taxi.

• − The anthropomorphic hands on the steering wheel are slightly uncanny compared to natural capybara paws.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Atmospheric bokeh lighting in the background creates a nice city-at-night feel.
• + Good character design for the capybara and the passenger.

• − The composition is incorrect, placing the driver and passenger side-by-side in the front seat.
• − The capybara is not holding the steering wheel as requested; only one arm is visible and gestured toward the passenger.
• − The perspective makes the car interior feel cramped and less like a standard taxi.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Excellent typography with perfect spelling and high legibility.
• + Sophisticated parchment border with integrated webs and thorns.
• + Polished cinematic lighting and atmospheric composition.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Atmospheric twisted trees and moon placement.
• + Vibrant color palette with glowing Jack-o-lantern.

• − Significant text errors including redundant 'Party Party' and spelling mistakes like 'inivited'.
• − Repeated event information at the bottom of the poster.
• − Failed to provide a square format as requested, providing a vertical flyer instead.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Excellent typography rendering with the requested hierarchy and a small flag icon.
• + Strong adherence to the 'diorama base' and '45° isometric' camera angle instructions.
• + Clean, high-quality shading that mimics 3D PBR materials well.

• − The sushi rice texture is a bit large-grained, appearing more like individual beads than realistic rice.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Beautiful soft lighting and color palette that feels very 'miniature cartoon'.
• + High variety in the sushi types which makes for a more interesting scene.
• + Text is perfectly centered and legible.

• − Missed the request for a flag icon.
• − The 'SUSHI' text is very small compared to the large bold request.
• − Includes extra elements like tomatoes and unknown jars that weren't requested.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Successfully includes all four requested animals (dog, cat, rabbit, fox).
• + Excellent fur texture and realistic environmental lighting.
• + Sophisticated composition with interaction between all subjects.

• − The fox's front leg anatomy looks slightly elongated/flattened.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Beautiful backlighting and bokeh effect.
• + Captured the 'puppy dog eyes' expression very effectively.
• + Lively and colorful palette.

• − Failed to include all requested animals, missing the red fox kit completely.
• − Anatomy of the kitten's paws is strange and merged.
• − The butterflies appear as glowing yellow shapes rather than realistic insects.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Perfect text rendering for both the brand name and the 'Est. 1720' banner
• + Clean vector emblem style that adheres strictly to the minimalist prompt
• + Accurate representation of a cloche dome with stylized steam

• − The circle frame is slightly interrupted by the text, though this is a common design choice

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Elegant vintage aesthetic with detailed woodcut-style shading
• + Good preservation of the warm brown and cream color scheme
• + High artistic quality for a logo concept

• − Major spelling errors, rendering 'Fratilian' instead of 'Florian'
• − The design is quite ornate and busy, clashing with the 'minimalist' requirement in the prompt
• − The 'Est. 1720' is just text and not on a banner as requested

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Excellent typography and readability for main headings.
• + Clean, professional flat-vector aesthetic that matches the 'modern infographic' request.
• + Logical vertical flow that follows the requested mission steps sequentially.

• − The rocket used is a generic space shuttle style rather than the requested Saturn V.
• − Body text under headings is illegible gibberish.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Strong heading text with 'APOLLO 11'.
• + Creative use of a central moon graphic as the focal point.
• + Good adherence to the requested color palette.

• − Confusing layout with non-sequential numbering (1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 4).
• − Iconography is somewhat messy and inconsistent compared to Model A.
• − Fails to clearly represent the specific mission steps requested in a coherent way.