FLUX.2 [max] Black Forest Labs vs Wan 2.7 Alibaba

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent photorealistic texture on the red book cover.
• + Accurately represents soft lighting and subtle reflections.
• + Clean, modern aesthetic with sharp glass edges.

• − The glass cube has a mirrored base which wasn't explicitly requested and slightly complicates the visual.
• − The plants in the background are very blurry, losing some 'partial visibility through the glass' detail.

Wan 2.7

• + Stronger adherence to the prompt regarding the plant being visible through the glass.
• + The wooden table has realistic distressed texture and grain.
• + Excellent composition that feels like a natural interior photograph.

• − The blue sphere has a slightly rough, non-spherical texture up close.
• − Minor glass refraction artifacts where the cube edges meet the plant.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent preservation of the man's facial features, hair, and clothing.
• + The car's details and reflections are maintained with high fidelity.
• + Highly realistic integration of the subjects into the new environment.

• − The position of the steering wheel and driver's seat is on the wrong side for a standard car in the US (California).

Wan 2.7

• + Dynamic composition with a sense of motion on the road.
• + Captures the 'California coastline' aesthetic well.

• − Completely fails to preserve the identity of the man from the source image, replacing him with a distorted figure.
• − The car's interior details become messy and incoherent around the driver area.
• − Heavy distortion and artifacts on the driver's face.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent adherence to technical prompts like motion blur and shallow depth of field.
• + Highly realistic skin textures and wet surfaces.
• + Superior composition that feels more cinematic and professional.

• − The 'imperfect framing' prompt is less apparent as the composition feels very deliberate.

Wan 2.7

• + Successfully captures the 'imperfect framing' and 'candid' feel requested.
• + Good reflection quality on the wet pavement.
• + Natural positioning of the subject within a street scene.

• − Fails to incorporate the 'motion blur' requested for passing cars.
• − Lower detail in skin texture and clothing compared to the competitor.
• − The bicycle handles appear slightly distorted and physically illogical.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Sublime leather and cloth texture detailing.
• + Excellent representation of ornate engravings on the plate mail.
• + Very realistic skin texture with dirt and scars that look embedded rather than painted on.

• − The beads are small and somewhat generic compared to the detailed braids in Model B.
• − The lighting transition on the cheek is slightly harsh.

Wan 2.7

• + Superb adherence to the braided hair with beads requirement.
• + Strong atmospheric lighting from the torch in the background.
• + Good use of depth of field with the background wall and sparks.

• − The metal armor texture looks slightly more like plastic/CG in certain highlights.
• − The scars look like simple surface lines rather than deep battle-worn wounds.
• − The engraving on the armor is less intricate than Model A.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent typography rendering with almost perfect spelling in larger headers.
• + Strong contrast with bold, vibrant color accents for different sections.
• + Clean, professional layout that strictly follows the modern minimalist aesthetic.

• − Internal food labels and descriptions contains some gibberish text.
• − The food photos in the grid are repetitive (many similar pizzas).

Wan 2.7

• + Highly organized and appealing 3x4 grid for food photography.
• + Includes realistic supplemental elements like a QR code and social media icons.
• + Greater variety in food photos including pasta, soup, and desserts.

• − The overall image is framed as a mock-up (with a pen and bowl) rather than just the direct digital file requested.
• − Small descriptive text is largely illegible 'lorem ipsum' style scribbles.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent photorealistic texture on the bun and patty
• + Clean and readable text integration
• + Sophisticated use of lighting and depth of field

• − The 'exploded' view is a bit literal and vertically stacked rather than dynamic
• − The fiery background is somewhat blurry and less vibrant

Wan 2.7

• + Highly dynamic and energetic composition with floating ingredients
• + Creative fiery typography for the main title
• + Includes all requested ingredients plus extra details like pickles and flying seeds

• − The patty looks slightly more graphic/illustrated compared to the bun
• − The starburst for the price is a bit cluttered with the surrounding fire graphics

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent chalk texture with realistic dust and smudges.
• + Text is perfectly rendered with hand-drawn variations.
• + Warm, atmospheric lighting matches the 'cozy café' prompt.

• − The 'Brown Butter' item is slightly cut off at the bottom of its line, though the text is still legible.

Wan 2.7

• + Clean, highly legible text rendering.
• + Good composition with decorative chalk lines.
• + Accurately included the full prompt text for the bottom item.

• − The text looks like a digital font overlay rather than real chalk on a board.
• − Strong drop shadows behind the letters break the realism of handwritten chalk.
• − The lighting on the board is inconsistent with the light sources in the background.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Successfully integrated character features from Image 2 including sunglasses, scarf, and facial hair.
• + Maintained the high-contrast yellow lighting and red stool from Image 1.
• + Accurately replicated the difficult leaning pose and arm positions.

• − The feet on the stool look distorted and lack realistic anatomical detail.
• − The tilt of the head is slightly less extreme than the original pose in Image 1.

Wan 2.7

• + Perfectly preserved the background and stool from Image 1.

• − Completely failed the character transfer, retaining the woman from Image 1 instead of the man from Image 2.
• − Failed to include any and all clothing details from Image 2 such as the black sweatshirt, scarf, and sunglasses.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent cinematic lighting and atmosphere
• + Creative inclusion of the asteroid as a grounded platform
• + Higher level of fine detail in the space suit and horse's coat

• − The horse's front legs look slightly unnatural in their stance on the uneven surface

Wan 2.7

• + Copes well with the 'floating' aspect of the prompt
• + Clean character and animal silhouettes
• + Accurate depiction of the astronaut's face within the visor

• − Failed the specific instruction 'horse on top' (showing a human on a horse instead of the inverse)
• − Composition feels a bit flatter and less 'surreal' than requested
• − Generic space background with many repetitive planetoids

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent adherence to the clothing in Image 2, including the specific plaid scarf and navy pea coat.
• + Perfect preservation of the person's facial features and distinctive vitiligo patterns.
• + Very high image quality and realistic lighting integration.

• − The pose is slightly altered from a lean to a more upright stance.
• − The background is cropped differently compared to the original source.

Wan 2.7

• + Successfully maintains the full body pose and lean of Image 1.
• + Resizes the entire image to include the requested shoes and floor.

• − Failed to use the correct outfit from Image 2, generating a generic black and gold coat instead.
• − Significant distortion of the person's hands and face, losing the original likeness.
• − The clothing looks flat and doesn't match the beach lighting as well.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent photorealistic lighting and depth of field
• + Natural integration of the capybara's head onto the human-like body
• + Accurate depiction of a modern car interior with realistic dashboard lighting

• − The capybara is wearing gloves, obscuring the requested 'paws on the steering wheel' detail

Wan 2.7

• + High adherence to the 'front paws' requirement
• + Capybara's expression is very calm and fits the prompt well
• + Clear inclusion of both primary subjects with good focus

• − The capybara's fur texture appears slightly plastic or synthetic compared to Model A
• − Perspective issues where the steering wheel appears disconnected from the dashboard

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent cinematic lighting and atmosphere.
• + High-fidelity textures on the pumpkin and parchment.
• + Clean, professional layout that feels like a modern movie poster.

• − The parchment texture is only visible on the outer edges.
• − The layout is a bit simple compared to the 'vintage' request.

Wan 2.7

• + Excellent 'vintage' aesthetic with an ornate, detailed border.
• + Includes many extra thematic elements like ravens, skulls, and a cauldron.
• + Perfectly captures the scroll banner and parchment style.

• − Illustration style is more 'book-like' than 'cinematic'.
• − Image has a slightly cluttered feel compared to the sleekness of Model A.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent adherence to the 'thick head of hair' request with high volume.
• + Perfectly preserves all background elements and foreground clothing.
• + Highly realistic texture that blends well with the existing beard.

• − The forehead area looks slightly smoothed or altered compared to the original skin texture.

Wan 2.7

• + Natural, believable hair growth pattern and styling.
• + Very effective preservation of the original facial features and lighting.
• + Integration with the ears and glasses is handled cleanly.

• − Slightly less volume than Model A, though still fits the prompt.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent adherence to the 'small raised diorama base' prompt with a multi-tiered platform.
• + Very clean and bold text rendering with a well-integrated flag icon.
• + Achieves a perfect matte cartoon 3D aesthetic with soft lighting.

• − The sushi models are slightly more simplified compared to the texture detail in Model B.
• − Chopsticks are floating or placed awkwardly on the tray without a rest.

Wan 2.7

• + Features more detailed PBR material textures, especially on the fish and rice grains.
• + Includes more variety in the sushi types and garnishes like soy sauce.
• + Clean and stylish typography with a nice stroke effect.

• − The diorama base is very simple and flat compared to the tiered request.
• − The chopsticks are slightly warped/bent and lack the 'ultra-clean' precision of the rest of the image.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent scene composition combining a news desk with a hockey rink
• + High-quality vector art style with clear, expressive characters
• + Clear visual representation of all three prompt elements: TV anchor, dogs, and hockey

• − The caricature's facial likeness to the source image is slightly generic
• − Text on the scoreboards and desk is garbled

Wan 2.7

• + Stronger preservation of the source subject's facial features in caricature form
• + Maintains the 'selfie' pose of the original image
• + Humorous additions like the dog in a hockey helmet

• − The TV anchor aspect is less obvious, looking more like a standard living room
• − Visual quality is a bit cluttered with chaotic speech bubbles
• − The tiny hockey rink model feels a bit detached from the scene

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent adherence to the 'tumbling/chasing' movement specified in the prompt.
• + Perfect rendering of four distinct animals with correct anatomy and expressive eyes.
• + Subtle and realistic integration of god rays and morning dew sparkles.

• − The fox kit has a slightly generic facial structure compared to a real fox.
• − Butterflies are a bit small and faint compared to the rest of the composition.

Wan 2.7

• + Highly detailed fur and crisp rendering of the flowers in the foreground.
• + Strong, dramatic god rays that create a vibrant morning atmosphere.
• + Beautifully detailed butterflies with distinct patterns.

• − The kitten has an anatomical error with a small extra limb or paw visible near its chest.
• − The animals feel more like they are standing in a row rather than 'tumbling together'.
• − The bunny's face looks slightly repetitive or static.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent adherence to the Studio Ghibli art style with characteristic facial features.
• + Strong use of soft, warm, pastel colors as requested.
• + The texture and lighting create a nostalgic, hand-painted feel.

• − The facial expressions are slightly softened, losing a bit of the intense 'distracted' and 'outraged' emotions of the original meme.

Wan 2.7

• + Successfully preserves the specific facial expressions and likenesses of the people in the original meme.
• + Clear watercolor-inspired texture that feels hand-painted.

• − The style leans more toward a realistic watercolor sketch than the specific Studio Ghibli anime aesthetic.
• − The lighting is flat compared to the dreamy atmosphere requested.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent depiction of hair blowing in the wind with significant movement.
• + High preservation of the woman's facial features and the dog's appearance.
• + Leaves look crisp and integrated into the scene naturally.

• − The leash handle has been slightly altered/extended compared to the source.

Wan 2.7

• + Successfully adds both flying leaves and wind-blown hair.
• + Maintains the overall composition and colors of the original scene well.

• − The hair effect is more horizontal and looks slightly less natural than Model A.
• − Some leaves appear as brown blurs or artifacts (e.g., the one near her right hand).
• − The dog's face is slightly softened/changed compared to the source.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Perfectly adheres to the requested name spelling 'Caffè Florian'
• + Strong minimalist vector aesthetic that perfectly matches the requested theme
• + Excellent integration of the 'Est. 1720' banner within the circular emblem

• − Steam lines are a bit thin and could be more pronounced
• − Subtle texture on the background is very faint

Wan 2.7

• + Nice use of secondary design elements like the stars and wheat to create a vintage feel
• + Good use of contrast between the brown and cream tones

• − Misspelled the primary brand name as 'Florion' instead of 'Florian'
• − The design is quite busy, leaning away from the requested 'minimalist' style
• − The cloche looks slightly more like a glass dome than a traditional metal cloche

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent vector art style with clean, modern illustrations and consistent iconography.
• + Legible, well-rendered text for most labels and crew names.
• + Creative inclusion of the crew silhouettes with matching uniforms.

• − Repeats labels like 'Earth Orbit' across different panels incorrectly.
• − The Saturn V rocket illustration looks more like a shuttle or stylized rocket than the actual Apollo hardware.
• − Confuses the sequence of events within the panels.

Wan 2.7

• + Follows the logical flow of the requested steps much more accurately.
• + Excellent adherence to the NASA-inspired color palette and typographic style.
• + Includes impressive detail like specific times, altitudes, and mission dates.

• − Contains several spelling errors like 'Descript', 'Deccent', and 'Tranquiliry'.
• − The icons are smaller and slightly less polished than the other model's vector work.
• − The text at the very bottom is slightly distorted and contains 'Aaroenutics'.