FLUX.2 [max] Black Forest Labs vs Wan 2.5 (Preview) Alibaba

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent adherence to lighting instructions with realistic soft window light and shadows.
• + Highly realistic textures on the book cover and wood grain.
• + Clean, modern aesthetic with perfect geometric cube construction.

• − The plant is more behind the scene than specifically behind the cube to be seen through the glass clearly.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Successfully placed the plant directly behind the cube so it is visible through the glass.
• + Good tactile quality on the aged red book cover.
• + Dynamic lighting with visible dust motes in the air.

• − The cube is not a perfect cube; the bottom glass panel extends beyond the side walls.
• − The blue sphere has a slightly matte, less realistic interaction with the glass floor compared to Model A.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent preservation of the car's model and specific details from the source image
• + Accurately places the man from the second source image into the driver's seat including his distinct hairstyle and clothing
• + Realistic lighting and shadow integration for the outdoor setting

• − The scale of the man relative to the car seems slightly too large

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Successfully captures a dynamic sense of motion with blurred wheels and background
• + Features iconic California elements like palm trees and coastal cliffs

• − Very poor preservation of the man's identity; the face and details are mostly lost
• − The car, though similar, has distorted proportions and is a left-hand drive version which places the driver on the wrong side for a standard PCH shot

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent depiction of motion blur from passing cars as requested.
• + Realistic skin textures and weather effects with rain droplets visible on clothing and bike.
• + Strong adherence to the 'imperfect framing' cue, giving a candid street photography feel.

• − The bike basket has some structural inconsistencies where the metal wires meet.
• − The man's kneeling posture on the wet ground feels slightly unnatural for a quick repair.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Beautiful, clear reflections on the wet pavement.
• + High level of detail in the bicycle components and repair tools scattered on the ground.
• + Great shallow depth of field and bokeh execution.

• − Failed to include the requested motion blur from passing cars.
• − The scene feels a bit too staged and clean for a 'candid' street photo.
• − The lighting on the man's hair appears slightly artificial compared to the environment.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Exquisite engraving details on the plate armor
• + Highly realistic skin texture including pores and fine scars
• + Subtle and sophisticated warm lighting integration

• − The braids are less distinct and partially obscured
• − The character looks slightly more like a general fantasy warrior than specifically a paladin

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Excellent depiction of the braided hair and beads
• + Very clear and detailed texture on the leather straps and frayed cloth
• + Includes an actual torch in the background to justify the lighting

• − The engraving on the armor is a bit flat and less ornate than Model A
• − The face has a slightly smoother, more 'CG' look compared to the high-realism of the other image

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent typography with clean, legible sans-serif fonts
• + Professional grid layout that logically separates text and images
• + Includes realistic price points and social media icons for a complete design feel

• − Internal logic errors where pizza images are listed under the Appetizers header
• − Text descriptions contain many gibberish characters

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Strict adherence to the 3-section layout requested (Appetizers, Pizza, Mains)
• + High-quality, vibrant food photography with consistent styling
• + Good use of color-coded horizontal rules to separate sections

• − Text rendering is significantly worse with warped characters and illegible descriptions
• − Top header text is redundant and poorly integrated into the design

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent text legibility and clean graphic design.
• + High-resolution texture on the burger bun and patty.
• + Effective use of the 'starburst' element for pricing as requested.

• − The 'exploded' effect is less dynamic, with many components still appearing stacked.
• − The bottom bun looks slightly flat and detached compared to the overall lighting.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Superb dynamic composition with a true 'exploded' feel and motion.
• + Creative typography with a melting/fiery effect that blends with the theme.
• + Vibrant lighting and more energetic background with glowing embers and smoke.

• − The pricing text is slightly less polished in its rendering.
• − The lettuce in the upper right appears a bit disconnected from the main burger assembly.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Exceptional chalk texture with realistic dusty smudges and varying opacity
• + Flawless text rendering including longer, complex words
• + Superior composition with realistic lighting from an overhead lamp

• − The handwriting style is slightly more uniform than a natural human slant might be

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Good handwritten flow with natural slants and variations in letter size
• + Includes realistic chalk dust piles on the frame and board

• − Failed to include 'Herbs' in the second menu item
• − Repeated the price '$9' on two separate lines for the cookies
• − The letter 's' in 'Specials' has a slight digital font artifact look compared to the rougher chalk in Model A

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent high-detail rendering of the spacesuit and horse texture.
• + Strong composition with the asteroid providing a logical grounding for the surreal scene.
• + Good use of cinematic lighting and atmospheric depth in the background.

• − The horse's legs appear somewhat thin and elongated compared to the body.
• − Failed the specific spatial instruction; the astronaut is on top of the horse.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Dynamic sense of movement with the galloping pose and debris trails.
• + Vibrant color palette and clear background elements like the planet and galaxy.
• + Clean anatomical rendering of the horse's head.

• − Failed the specific spatial instruction; the astronaut is riding the horse instead of the reverse.
• − Minor artifacts in the rendering of the horse's rear hooves against the foreground blur.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Successfully preserved the exact facial features and skin condition (vitiligo) of the person in Image 1.
• + Accurately reproduced the outfit details, including the specific tartan pattern, coat texture, and jewelry.
• + Maintained the background and lighting of the source image while naturally integrating the clothing.

• − The person's hands are slightly distorted and don't match the original skin tone perfectly.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Captured the clothing and accessories (sunglasses) from Image 2 well.

• − Failed the primary instruction to keep the person from Image 1, replacing him with the person from Image 2.
• − Altered the face, hair, and skin characteristics entirely, ignoring the source preservation requirement.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent photographic lighting and skin textures
• + High level of interior detail such as the radio and seat textures

• − The driver has human hands coming out of the sleeves instead of capybara paws
• − The capybara's head is not naturally joined to the human-like body

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Correctly depicts capybara paws on the steering wheel
• + Very cinematic composition with a clear view of both subjects and the Times Square-style background
• + Accurately captures the 'bored' expression of the passenger

• − The capybara's face is a bit flatly lit compared to the background
• − Slightly less realistic interior textures compared to the other model

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent atmospheric lighting with a cinematic feel
• + Perfect text legibility and alignment
• + Superior border integration that feels cohesive with the gothic theme

• − The jack-o-lantern face is a bit standard compared to the more creative flame effect in the other image

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Intricate flame details inside the jack-o-lantern eyes and mouth
• + Vibrant colors that pop against the parchment background
• + Good interpretation of the 'twisted trees' and gothic architecture elements

• − The central illustration being a circle within a square feels less like a poster and more like a sticker
• − The thorn border looks a bit repetitive and digitally pasted on
• − The text alignment is slightly cramped at the bottom

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent preservation of original identity and facial features
• + Hair texture looks wind-swept and natural for the setting
• + Perfect lighting integration with the existing scene

• − One small stray hair cluster at the very top looks slightly detached

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Successfully added thick hair with good volume
• + Consistent lighting on the hair

• − Significantly altered the facial structure, making the subject look like a different person
• − The hair style is a bit too manicured/styled for the rugged desert context

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Perfect adherence to the 45° top-down isometric perspective.
• + Accurately represents a miniature 3D cartoon scene with a raised diorama base.
• + Excellent text rendering and layout balance.

• − The color of the text is slightly muted compared to the prompt's 'bold' request, though it is still very clear.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + High-quality PBR materials with attractive reflections on the salmon.
• + Clear, bold text rendering with a well-placed flag icon.
• + Gentle, appealing lighting.

• − Completely failed the '45° top-down isometric' perspective request, opting for a low-angle eye-level shot instead.
• − The base is a simple cylinder rather than the requested 'diorama base'.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent integration of all three themes (hockey, news anchor, dogs) within a cohesive scene.
• + Character design strongly resembles the original subject, especially the hair and smile.
• + High visual quality with detailed background elements like the scoreboard and studio lighting.

• − Text on the news desk and scoreboard is slightly distorted/garbled.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Features a fun detail with a dog wearing a hockey jersey.
• + Clear, clean vector-style caricature aesthetic.
• + Successfully captures the core elements of the prompt including the microphone and hockey stick.

• − The facial likeness is significantly weaker than the other model, losing the original subject's features.
• − The composition feels a bit more disjointed with floating elements against a simple background.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent balance of lighting with realistic god rays and soft morning mist.
• + Superior anatomical silhouettes and naturalistic fur textures for all animals.
• + Better sense of scale and depth within a cohesive environment.

• − The animals' eyes are slightly less 'big and expressive' than requested compared to Model B.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Strong adherence to the 'big expressive eyes' and 'joyful' descriptors.
• + Very vibrant colors that emphasize a whimsical, storybook atmosphere.
• + Captures the dew sparkles well with floating droplets.

• − The fox's eyes appear unnaturally glowing and slightly distorted.
• − Anatomical issues in the front paws and limbs of the kitten and puppy.
• − The butterfly on the left has anatomical inconsistencies and looks pasted on.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Matches the 'hand-painted textures' and 'soft pastel' prompt perfectly with a watercolor paper aesthetic.
• + Captures the warm, nostalgic Ghibli mood through textured overlays and glowing lighting.
• + Preserves the specific color palette of the original clothing very well.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Very clean line art and character design that feels like modern digital anime.
• + Creative addition of falling leaves adds a whimsical, Ghibli-esque environmental detail.
• + Maintains clear distinction between the characters and the background.

• − Lacks the requested 'hand-painted texture', looking more like standard digital cel-shading.
• − The colors are a bit too vibrant and high-contrast compared to the requested 'soft pastels'.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Successfully added highly detailed leaves with realistic shading and depth.
• + Created a strong sense of motion in the hair that looks natural and dynamic.
• + Preserved the subject's face and the dog's appearance with high fidelity.

• − The leash has a slight continuity break where it meets the hand/collar compared to the source.
• − Some leaves in the foreground are slightly blurry, though this adds to the depth of field.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Nicely rendered hair movement that feels light and airy.
• + Preserved the overall composition and lighting of the source image well.

• − The flying leaves look like flat, bright green illustrations rather than realistic foliage.
• − The dog's tail has a motion blur artifact that looks slightly smudged rather than energetic.
• − The edit to the leaves feels low-effort compared to the rest of the scene.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent typography including the grave accent in 'Caffè'
• + Clean vector emblem style with balanced proportions
• + Subtle and professional paper texture background

• − The steam lines are very thin and lack the weight of the rest of the illustration

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Stronger visual contrast with bold brown tones
• + Accurate typography and branding placement
• + Dynamic steam illustration that matches the logo weight

• − Background texture is a bit heavy-handed with the artificial paper creases
• − Composition feels slightly more generic than the circular emblem

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Includes all 6 steps required in the prompt.
• + Follows the muted NASA-inspired color palette accurately.
• + Text rendering for the steps and astronaut names is highly legible.

• − Repeats the label 'Earth Orbit' three times incorrectly.
• − The rocket design is more generic and less resembling a Saturn V.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + More accurate Saturn V rocket vector illustration.
• + Stronger 'modern vector' aesthetic with a more professional infographic layout.
• + Excellent use of the navy, white, and red color scheme.

• − Fails to include all 6 steps, missing visual representations for Descent and Landing specifically.
• − One of the astronaut icons appears to be wearing a helmet that resembles a soldier rather than an astronaut.