Black Forest Labs' flagship image generation model delivering state-of-the-art quality with exceptional realism, precision, and consistency for both text-to-image and advanced image editing
Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.
FLUX.2 [max]
#10 of 62 in Text-to-Image
Recraft V4.1
#53 of 62 in Text-to-Image
Where the votes landed
FLUX.2 [max]
0%
win rate
Ties
0%
Recraft V4.1
0%
win rate
Challenge by challenge
The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.
Geometric Composition
Text-to-Image“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [max]
- + Excellent photorealistic texture on the book cover and table.
- + Accurate adherence to light direction from the left with realistic shadows.
- + Sophisticated rendering of glass thickness and internal reflections.
- − The glass cube has a mirrored base which wasn't explicitly requested.
- − The sphere is resting on the bottom rather than appearing suspended, which might be less 'magical' but is more physically grounded.
Recraft V4.1
- + Strong composition with the blue sphere floating centrally.
- + Clear visibility of the plant through the glass as requested.
- + Good material contrast between the matte book and polished wood.
- − Lighting is somewhat flat and doesn't strongly convey 'window light from the left'.
- − The glass cube physics are slightly inconsistent at the bottom edge.
Verdict: Both models followed the prompt instructions perfectly. FLUX.2 [max] is the winner due to its superior lighting quality and realistic textures, particularly the grain on the table and the leather-like texture of the red book. Recraft V4.1 produced a more whimsical image with a floating sphere, but the overall render quality felt slightly more computer-generated compared to the high-end photorealism of FLUX.2 [max].
Candid Street Photography
Text-to-Image“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [max]
- + Excellent anatomical accuracy in the man's hands and face
- + Superior mechanical detail of the bicycle's components
- + Strong photographic realism with natural skin texture and wet surfaces
- − The motion blur in the background car is slightly more static than 'candid' motion blur
- − Composition is a bit more staged than 'imperfect framing'
Recraft V4.1
- + Captures the 'imperfect framing' and 'candid' feel very effectively
- + Atmospheric rainy effects and reflections are highly evocative
- + Better sense of cinematic mood and background motion
- − The man's hand and face anatomy is slightly distorted upon closer inspection
- − Bicycle geometry is inconsistent where it meets the man's hands
- − The man's posture and the bicycle frame lack the realism found in Model A
Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] provides a much higher level of technical and anatomical quality, looking like a professional 50mm photograph with realistic textures and coherent mechanical details. Recraft V4.1 captures the 'candid street photo' mood and motion blur more artistically but suffers from significant distortions in the subject's anatomy and the bicycle's structure.
Fantasy Warrior
Text-to-Image“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [max]
- + Superior engraving detail on the plate armor which shows distinct patterns and depth.
- + Excellent representation of the 'battle-worn' theme with realistic facial scars and dirt smudges.
- + Very high-quality texture on the leather straps and frayed cloth underlayer.
- − The braided hair with beads is present but slightly less prominent in the hairstyle choice.
- − The lighting feels a bit more like studio lighting rather than a single atmospheric torchlight.
Recraft V4.1
- + Perfect adherence to the 'hair braided with small beads' prompt with several visible braids.
- + Captures the warm torchlight ambiance and atmospheric bokeh sparks very effectively.
- + The facial expression and eyes feel deeply lifelike and emotive.
- − The armor engraving is slightly softer and less intricate than the competition.
- − Texture on the leather straps is less distinct compared to the other image.
Verdict: Both models performed exceptionally well, but FLUX.2 [max] takes the lead due to its incredible technical detail in the armor engravings and the realistic textures of the straps and cloth. While Recraft V4.1 better represented the specific hairstyle and lighting atmosphere requested, FLUX.2 [max] produced a sharper, more professional-looking image that feels more grounded.
Modern Clean Menu
Text-to-Image“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [max]
- + Excellent grid layout for images
- + Vibrant colors and professional graphic design accents
- + Strong use of bold sans-serif headers
- − Text consists of gibberish/placeholder language
- − The food images are repetitive and don't always match the section titles
- − Pricing is unrealistically low
Recraft V4.1
- + Perfectly legible and accurate English text
- + Images accurately correspond to the menu item descriptions
- + Clean, minimalist aesthetic with functional whitespace
- − The grid of images is slightly unaligned and lacks consistent sizing
- − A bit basic in terms of graphic design compared to Model A
Verdict: Recraft V4.1 is the clear winner for a functional design because it provides perfectly legible, contextually accurate text that matches the food photos. While FLUX.2 has a more sophisticated graphic design and a better image grid layout, the text is nonsensical, making it less useful for a real-world application.
Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge
Text-to-Image“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [max]
- + Excellent food photography styling with realistic textures on the meat and bun.
- + Superior integration of all prompt elements, including the sauce swirl and embers.
- + Very clean and professional text rendering for all titles and the price.
- − The burger components are a bit densely packed, slightly reducing the 'exploded' feel.
- − The starburst sticker looks a bit like a flat graphic compared to the 3D burger.
Recraft V4.1
- + Excellent sense of motion and 'exploded' physics with widely separated components.
- + Highly creative and impactful fiery typography that matches the theme perfectly.
- + Dynamic lighting and smoke effects create a dramatic atmosphere.
- − The patty and lettuce have a slightly more processed or artificial look compared to Model A.
- − The bottom bun is missing entirely, which contradicts the 'all components' requirement.
Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] produces a more appetizing and commercially viable advertisement with superior photorealistic textures and complete assembly of the burger. While Recraft V4.1 captures a better sense of motion and has more impressive thematic typography, it fails to include the bottom bun and the food quality looks less realistic.
Chalkboard Menu
Text-to-Image“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [max]
- + Excellent chalk texture with realistic smudges and dust on the board surface.
- + Very high professional composition and warm café lighting.
- + Flawless spelling of all menu items including the cut-off prompt item.
- − The handwriting style looks a bit too consistent, bordering on a digital 'chalk' font rather than raw human writing.
Recraft V4.1
- + Perfectly captures the 'natural variations' of human handwriting with irregular letter sizes and slants.
- + Highly realistic chalk grain and pressure variations in the strokes.
- + Correctly interpreted and completed the partial 'Brown But...' prompt.
- − Composition is a tight crop, lacking the atmospheric surroundings of the café.
- − A minor spelling error in 'Truffle' (rendered with an extra 'f').
Verdict: Both models followed the complex prompt very well, but Recraft V4.1 captured the authentic, imperfect look of human chalk handwriting much more convincingly than FLUX.2 [max]. While FLUX.2 [max] produced a more beautiful overall photograph with better atmospheric lighting, Recraft V4.1's text looked truly hand-drawn rather than like a digital font overlay.
The Reversed Rodeo
Text-to-Image“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [max]
- + Excellent lighting and cinematic composition using a spiral galaxy background
- + Very clean, high-resolution textures on the spacesuit and horse
- + Creative interpretation by placing the subjects on a floating asteroid
- − Failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is riding the horse, not the horse on top of the astronaut
Recraft V4.1
- + Dynamic action pose with the horse galloping through space
- + Rich color palette and good use of depth with orbiting debris
- + High level of detail in the horse's mane and the asteroid belt
- − Failed the negative constraint; the horse is being ridden by the astronaut, which is the standard interpretation
- − Some anatomical awkwardness in the horse's rear legs
Verdict: Both models completely ignored the specific spatial constraint 'horse on top, not vice versa,' instead opting for the common 'astronaut riding a horse' trope. FLUX.2 [max] is the superior image due to its cleaner rendering, better lighting, and more cohesive composition, whereas Recraft V4.1 has slight anatomical issues with the horse.
The Capybara Taxi Driver
Text-to-Image“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [max]
- + Excellent photorealistic lighting and skin textures on the passenger.
- + The taxi meter and interior details are very authentic.
- + High resolution with cinematic bokeh effect.
- − The capybara has human hands, which is disturbing and violates the prompt's likely intent for paws.
- − The proportions of the capybara head on a human body look like a costume rather than an animal.
Recraft V4.1
- + Accurately depicts capybara paws on the steering wheel.
- + The capybara's body and fur look natural and realistic rather than a person in a suit.
- + Better adherence to the 'bored expression' for the businesswoman.
- − The capybara is not wearing the requested 'dark jacket'.
- − Overall image quality is slightly softer/grainier than Model A.
Verdict: While FLUX.2 [max] has superior lighting and technical rendering, it failed significantly by giving the capybara human hands and a human body. Recraft V4.1 followed the anatomy requirements much more successfully, showing a realistic capybara with paws, which makes the surreal scene much more convincing and humorous despite the missing jacket.
The Halloween Invitation
Text-to-Image“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [max]
- + Excellent legibility and text alignment.
- + Clean and polished graphic design layout.
- + Perfect adherence to all prompt details including the specific banner text.
- − The parchment texture feels slightly less vintage compared to Model B.
- − The lighting on the pumpkin is a bit flat compared to the surrounding environment.
Recraft V4.1
- + Stronger vintage aesthetic with richer textures and more intricate borders.
- + Highly creative and stylistic gothic typography.
- + Dynamic lighting with clouds and moon adding to the cinematic atmosphere.
- − The event details at the bottom are poorly aligned and feel like an afterthought.
- − The banner text is significantly smaller and harder to read.
- − Minor layout issues with the main title overlaps.
Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] produced a superior invitation in terms of functional design, offering perfect text clarity and a balanced layout that is ready for use. While Recraft V4.1 captured a much more atmospheric and artistic 'vintage gothic' feel with impressive textures, its failure to properly align and scale the event information makes it less effective as a functional invitation.
Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes
Text-to-Image“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [max]
- + Excellent typography style and placement.
- + Authentic isometric 3D perspective.
- + Clean, minimalist 3D cartoon aesthetic.
- − The sushi elements look a bit more like plastic toys than food.
Recraft V4.1
- + High-quality realistic PBR textures on the fish.
- + Beautiful soft lighting and shadows.
- + Good font rendering and inclusion of all elements.
- − The perspective is more of a standard 3/4 view than the requested 45° isometric.
- − The background contains a slight gradient rather than a solid light blue.
Verdict: Both models adhered very well to the prompt, including all text and icon requirements. FLUX.2 [max] captured the 'isometric' and '3D cartoon' style more accurately with its geometric diorama base, while Recraft V4.1 excelled in the 'realistic PBR materials' aspect with much more detailed food textures. FLUX.2 [max] is the winner for better literal adherence to the specific camera angle and diorama structure requested.
Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow
Text-to-Image“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [max]
- + Excellent adherence to the 'standing/tumbling' movement request
- + Accurate depiction of all four animals side-by-side
- + Beautiful dewy sparkle effects on the grass
- − The fox kit has slightly unnatural front paw anatomy
- − The butterflies appear somewhat flatly layered over the scene
Recraft V4.1
- + Superior 'god ray' lighting and atmospheric glow
- + More expressive facial interactions between the animals
- + High-quality fur texture and backlighting
- − The kitten has an oddly elongated torso/neck
- − The bunny is significantly smaller and partially cut off by the frame
Verdict: Both models followed the complex prompt well, but FLUX.2 [max] produced a more balanced composition featuring all four animals clearly in mid-action. Recraft V4.1 had more dramatic lighting and emotional expression, but suffered from some anatomical warping on the kitten and weaker animal scaling.
Vintage Cafe Logo
Text-to-Image“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [max]
- + Excellent emblem composition with central hierarchy.
- + Perfect rendering of specified 'Est. 1720' banner and typography.
- + Beautiful subtle paper texture and warm color palette.
- − The accent mark over the 'E' in 'Caffè' is slightly stylized as a grave accent instead of the more traditional Italian grave, but still accurate.
Recraft V4.1
- + High contrast vector style with clean lines.
- + Accurate text rendering for both the name and the date banner.
- + Good use of negative space for the steam effect.
- − Missing the requested 'subtle texture' on the background.
- − Composition feels a bit bottom-heavy with overly large text compared to the icon.
- − Lacks the 'vintage' feel requested, looking more like a modern corporate logo.
Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] followed the prompt much more successfully by creating a cohesive vintage emblem with the requested paper textures and warm tones. Recraft V4.1 produced a very clean vector, but it failed to include the background texture and lacks the balanced composition that defines a classic logo emblem.
Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility
Text-to-Image“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [max]
- + Excellent iconography with detailed, recognizable lunar modules and planetary bodies.
- + Creative inclusion of crew member silhouettes with correct names.
- + Effective use of the requested color palette across all elements.
- − Confusing layout with redundant and overlapping labels (e.g., 'Earth Orbit' appears multiple times).
- − Fails to follow the linear 6-step progression clearly, merging steps into four panels.
Recraft V4.1
- + Perfectly follows the 6-step request with a clean, grid-based infographic layout.
- + Strict adherence to the 'flat-vector' style with crisp lines and consistent iconography.
- + Highly legible text and accurate representation of the NASA-inspired color scheme.
- − Repeat numbering error (showing two '04' steps and skipping '05').
- − The Saturn V icon is a bit simplified compared to the partner model.
Verdict: Recraft V4.1 is the clear winner for its superior layout and adherence to the 'infographic' request, providing a clean 6-step flow that is easy to read. While FLUX.2 [max] has more detailed individual illustrations, its composition is cluttered and repeats labels incorrectly throughout the graphic.
Explore each model
Recraft's V4.1 standard tier text-to-image model — refines V4's photorealism with more natural lighting, softer gradients, and sharper illustration styles for everyday creative work