Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [max] Black Forest Labs Imagen 4.0 Generate 001 Google

Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [max]

25.8 arena score

#10 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

17.0 arena score

#55 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [max]

100.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

0.0%

win rate

100.0% 0.0% ties 0.0%
Shared challenges 13

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Excellent optical realism with accurate glass refractions and reflections
  • + High-quality textures on the book cover and wooden table
  • + Perfect adherence to spatial requirements with the plant clearly visible through the glass
  • The 'cube' is rendered more like a glass box or display case with thin walls rather than a solid glass cube

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Produces a solid glass cube with realistic internal reflections of the blue sphere
  • + Strong lighting and clean composition
  • + The book texture and color are very natural
  • The blue sphere is levitating mid-air inside the cube without physical support
  • The plant is less visible through the glass compared to Model A, appearing more as a background element than an object viewed through the medium

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt instructions perfectly, with all requested elements present. FLUX.2 [max] is preferred for its superior optical physics, correctly showing the plant refracted through the glass and placing the sphere on the bottom surface of the cube, whereas Imagen 4.0 rendered a floating sphere and more opaque glass sides.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Excellent adherence to the motion blur request with a realistically blurry passing car
  • + Authentic 50mm lens look with natural background compression and bokeh
  • + Hands and the mechanical interaction with the bicycle wheel are very realistic
  • The cropping at the top of the frame feels slightly unintentional rather than a stylistic choice

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Beautiful skin texture and facial expression
  • + Stronger emphasis on wet pavement reflections with vibrant colors
  • + Good atmospheric rain effect on the man's jacket
  • Fails to include motion blur on the passing car, which appears static
  • The bicycle mechanics are slightly nonsensical where the tool meets the gears

Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] followed the prompt more comprehensively, successfully incorporating the requested motion blur of passing cars which added to the 'candid' feel. While Imagen 4.0 produced a very high-quality portrait with excellent lighting, it failed to render the specific kinetic energy requested and the bicycle details were less coherent.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Excellent skin texture with realistic dirt and perspiration
  • + Highly convincing metal engraving and realistic weathering on the armor
  • + Natural-looking hair braiding and bead integration
  • The bokeh sparks in the background are a bit sparse compared to the prompt's potential

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Strong prompt adherence regarding the beads in the hair
  • + Good lighting contrast from the visible torch
  • + Clear, intricate engraving patterns on the pauldrons
  • Skin texture appears slightly smooth and plastic-like compared to Model A
  • The scars look like surface drawings rather than integrated tissue
  • Lighting on the face is a bit flat despite the proximity of the torch

Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] provides a significantly more realistic and cinematic interpretation of the prompt, with superior skin texture, weathered armor, and convincing battle-worn details. While Imagen 4.0 captures the specific bead and torch elements well, its overall rendering has a more CGI-like quality that lacks the depth and lifelike eyes found in the FLUX image.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Features a highly professional and organized document layout true to real-world menu design.
  • + Includes a wide variety of food images that are well-integrated into the structure.
  • + Successfully follows the section requirements for Appetizers, Pizza, and Mains with clear headers.
  • The grid of photos is slightly repetitive with many similar looking pizzas and sandwiches.
  • Some text alignment in the pizza section is a bit cramped.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Excellent minimalist aesthetic with creative geometric accents.
  • + High-quality, vibrant food photography that feels elevated and modern.
  • + True grid-based composition that creates a balanced visual weight across the page.
  • The section headers are somewhat scattered and less intuitive for a functional menu.
  • Misalignment between headers and photos (e.g., pizza header is under a salad photo).

Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] produces a more realistic and usable menu layout that clearly separates the requested sections, though the design is a bit traditional. Imagen 4.0 Generate 001 offers a more modern and visually striking minimalist design with superior food photography, but fails on the logical grouping of headers and their corresponding items. FLUX.2 [max] is the winner for its superior professional utility and accurate sectioning.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Excellent text integration with a strong fiery glow effect on the main title.
  • + Clean and professional starburst design that stands out well.
  • + Highly photorealistic textures on the burger bun and patty.
  • The 'exploded' effect is less pronounced, with several layers still appearing stuck together.
  • The background lighting is a bit flat compared to the dynamic nature of the prompt.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Superb 'exploded' composition with clear separation of every ingredient.
  • + The price starburst perfectly follows the 'fiery, glowing effect' requested in the prompt.
  • + Dynamic sense of motion with embers and floating toppings like onions and pickles.
  • The main text is placed over the burger, obscuring the product details.
  • The cheese texture looks slightly plastic or CG compared to the realism of the buns.

Verdict: Imagen 4.0 Generate 001 captures the 'exploded' and 'dynamic' aspects of the prompt much more effectively than FLUX.2 [max], despite the questionable text placement. FLUX.2 [max] produces a very clean advertisement layout, but the burger lacks the suspended, mid-air energy requested in the prompt.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Excellent chalk texture with natural-looking smudges and varying stroke opacity
  • + Perfect text accuracy and spelling for all menu items
  • + Highly realistic cinematic lighting and atmospheric cafe setting
  • The 'Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies' item is slightly cut off at the end

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Natural wood grain on the frame is well-rendered
  • + Followed the request for simple chalk-like lettering
  • Includes instructional meta-talk from the prompt like 'Tittle', 'Menu', and 'Footer' text
  • Significant number of spelling errors and gibberish sentences appearing throughout the board
  • Text looks like a digital overlay rather than authentic chalk on a board

Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] produced a stunningly realistic image with perfect spelling and authentic chalk textures that capture the requested 'cozy café' atmosphere. In contrast, Imagen 4.0 Generate 001 failed significantly by including the structure labels from the prompt into the final image and generating nonsensical text and spelling errors.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Excellent character-to-environment grounding with the horse standing on a physical asteroid.
  • + High level of realistic detail on the spacesuit and horse anatomy.
  • + Strong cinematic composition with the galaxy swirl framing the subjects.
  • Missed the specific 'horse on top' negation instruction, delivering a standard astronaut on a horse.
  • The lighting on the horse's legs feels slightly detached from the cosmic environment.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Beautiful surrealist elements like the nebulae patterns inside the horse's fur.
  • + Dynamic pose with a sense of motion across the atmosphere.
  • + Vibrant color palette with rainbow light trails adding to the surreal theme.
  • Completely failed the semantic challenge to put the horse on top of the astronaut.
  • Minor anatomical awkwardness where the astronaut's leg meets the saddle.

Verdict: Both models failed the specific prompt instruction to place the horse on top of the astronaut, instead providing the conventional 'astronaut riding a horse' image. FLUX.2 [max] produced a more grounded, cinematic image with better textures, while Imagen 4.0 offered a more creative, colorful interpretation of the surrealist requirement.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Excellent photographic lighting and depth of field
  • + Includes realistic taxi dashboard details and meter
  • + Capybara fur texture is highly realistic
  • Generated human hands on the capybara's body instead of paws
  • Businesswoman in background is slightly blurry and less detailed

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Correctly interpreted 'paws on the steering wheel' without blending human anatomy
  • + Strong character expressions for both the capybara and the passenger
  • + Clear and balanced composition showing both subjects prominently
  • The 'TAXI' sign is placed on the inside/ceiling of the car unnaturally
  • Capybara claws look somewhat bird-like or exaggerated
  • Image has a slightly more 'digital' or CGI feel compared to Model A

Verdict: Model B (Imagen 4.0) followed the anatomy instructions much better by providing the capybara with paws rather than the jarring human hands seen in Model A (FLUX.2). While Model A has superior photorealistic lighting and textures, the anatomical error on the main subject makes Model B the preferred choice for this surreal prompt.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Excellent photographic realism and cinematic lighting
  • + Perfectly executed gothic text and scroll formatting
  • + Highly atmospheric background with foggy depth
  • The parchment effect is limited to the edges rather than the whole layout

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Strong composition with a clear 'poster' aesthetic
  • + Good adherence to the 'twisted trees' and 'thorns' prompt elements
  • + Distinct parchment scroll graphic on the side
  • Illustration style feels slightly more cartoonish than 'cinematic'
  • Text rendering on the date/location is a bit cramped compared to the top title

Verdict: Both models followed the complex text instructions perfectly. FLUX.2 [max] is the winner because it achieves a much higher level of visual polish and realism, creating a truly cinematic and spooky atmosphere as requested, whereas Imagen 4.0 has a flatter, more 2D illustrative quality.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Perfectly adheres to the request for layout, isometric angle, and diorama style.
  • + Flawless text rendering for 'JAPAN' and 'SUSHI' with the requested flag icon.
  • + Excellent interpretation of the 3D cartoon style with clean, soft textures.
  • The sushi models are quite simplified compared to the realistic PBR request.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Very high detail on the sushi textures, specifically the roe and fish grain.
  • + Effective lighting and shadows on the plate and base.
  • Completely failed to include the requested text and flag icon.
  • Ignored the '3D cartoon' and 'isometric' style, opting for a photographic macro look.
  • The background is not the requested solid light blue.

Verdict: FLUX.2 followed every instruction in the prompt, including the specific text arrangement, the isometric diorama perspective, and the artistic cartoon style. Imagen 4.0 provided a realistic photograph of sushi which, while high quality in texture, failed to incorporate the text, the specific background color, or the requested stylized isometric composition. FLUX.2 is the clear winner for its superior prompt adherence.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'hyper-photorealistic' instruction with natural textures and lighting.
  • + Correctly features all four animals with distinct, realistic anatomy.
  • + Masterful use of 'god rays' and morning dew sparkles that feel integrated into the 3D space.
  • The kitten's pose is a bit stiff compared to the others.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Captures the 'tumbling together' aspect well with the playful interaction between the dog and cat.
  • + Vibrant, colorful flowers add to the joyful vibe.
  • Fails the 'hyper-photorealistic' requirement, leaning heavily into a digital illustration or greeting card style.
  • The fox's anatomy is slightly awkward, and the lighting feels flatly applied rather than volumetric.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] followed the prompt's request for hyper-photorealism perfectly, creating a scene that looks like high-end wildlife photography with believable lighting and fur textures. Imagen 4.0 Generate 001 produced a charming illustration, but it failed the core stylistic requirement of being photorealistic, looking more like a 2D digital painting. FLUX.2 [max] is the winner for its superior technical execution and closer adherence to the requested aesthetic.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Excellent typography with a classic feel and correct accent mark
  • + Sophisticated emblem composition with a well-rendered banner
  • + Authentic subtle parchment-like texture on the background
  • The steam lines are slightly thin and faint compared to the rest of the logo

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Clean, minimalist vector aesthetic with bold lines
  • + Perfectly legible text including the establishment year
  • + Good use of the cloche dome as the central focal point
  • Misses the 'vintage' and 'subtle texture' requirements, appearing more like a modern flat icon
  • Does not use a 'banner' for the establishment date, opting for a simple ribbon shape

Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] captures the vintage aesthetic perfectly, using classic typography, an elegant emblem layout, and a textured background that gives it a historical feel. Imagen 4.0 Generate 001 is clean and professional but feels too modern and 'flat', failing to incorporate the subtle textures and traditional emblem styling requested.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Excellent typography rendering with almost perfect spelling and legibility.
  • + Includes additional thematic elements like the crew silhouettes and names.
  • + Consistent 'steps' layout that follows the requested logical progression.
  • The Saturn V icon looks more like a generic modern shuttle or rocket.
  • Incorrectly labels the first panel as 'Earth Orbit' instead of just 'Launch'.
  • The logical flow of the icons is slightly cramped across the panels.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Features a highly accurate and recognizable Saturn V rocket icon.
  • + Follows the NASA-inspired color palette perfectly with bright reds and deep navies.
  • + Clean, professional composition that feels like a modern educational poster.
  • The trajectory icons are logically confusing, showing 'Launch' occurring in Earth orbit.
  • Leaves out the final 'Descent' and 'Landing' steps requested in the prompt.
  • The 'Translunar' icon shows a satellite orbiting a tiny moon rather than a trajectory arc.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] followed the complex step-by-step instructions much better, including panels for descent and landing which are missing in the other model. While Imagen 4.0 Generate 001 had a much better Saturn V illustration and cleaner overall aesthetic, its failure to include all 6 requested steps and its confusing logical flow make it less successful as an infographic.

Next steps

Explore each model