FLUX.2 [max] Black Forest Labs vs GPT Image 1.5 OpenAI

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent cinematic lighting with realistic bokeh and shadows.
• + Very high texture detail, particularly on the table grain and the leather-like book cover.
• + Correct interpretation of the 'partially visible through glass' plant element.

• − The glass cube lacks a physical top panel, making the book appear to float slightly or rest only on the edges.
• − The plant in the background is significantly blurred compared to the main subject.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Very clean and solid construction of the glass cube with clear edges and a visible top surface.
• + Strong adherence to all prompt elements including the lighting direction and object placement.
• + Realistic reflections on the blue sphere and the bottom of the cube.

• − The wood grain on the table is somewhat generic compared to Model A.
• − The plant lacks the depth and soft focus that would make the composition feel more professional.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent preservation of the car's model and specific design details.
• + Accurately places the man inside the car while maintaining his scarf and dreadlocks.
• + High-quality environment and lighting integration.

• − The man's expression is quite stern compared to the original smile.
• − The scaling of the man seems slightly small relative to the car's interior.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Captures the man's facial expression and smile more accurately than Model A.
• + Great dynamic composition showing the perspective of driving along the coast.

• − Significant loss of car identity, changing the grill and front details of the Rolls Royce.
• − Inaccurate hand placement/anatomy on the steering wheel.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent adherence to the motion blur request for passing cars.
• + Highly realistic skin textures and fine details on the hands.
• + Accurately captures the 'imperfect framing' of a candid street photo.

• − The brake cables on the bicycle are a bit messy and structurally illogical.
• − The background cars have slightly surreal lighting/ghosting.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Stronger atmospheric rain effects with visible droplets on the clothing and hat.
• + Great attention to the reflections on the wet pavement.
• + Composition feels very grounded and lifelike.

• − Missed the specific request for motion blur on the passing cars; the background car is static.
• − Minor anatomical confusion where the hands meet the bicycle chain area.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent depiction of ornate engraving on the plate armor.
• + Superior skin texture featuring realistic scars and dirt.
• + Clean, professional lighting with a clear shallow depth of field.

• − The beads in the hair are a bit small and less distinct than in Model B.
• − The expression is a bit static compared to the intensity of the scene.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Very lifelike and expressive eyes that draw the viewer in.
• + Fantastic lighting with vibrant warm highlights and bokeh sparks.
• + Strong adherence to the 'braided hair with small beads' part of the prompt.

• − The armor textures are slightly noisy and less defined than in Model A.
• − Over-saturation of skin tones makes the face look a bit orange in some areas.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Strictly followed the request for a grid of food photos.
• + Excellent use of vibrant secondary colors (yellow, red, green) for section headers.
• + Clean, professional aesthetic that feels like a real modern layout.

• − The text is largely gibberish/placeholder text.
• − Some image artifacts present, like a floating hand in the slider photo.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Perfect English text and logical menu pricing.
• + Clear association between menu categories and the corresponding food photos.
• + High visual quality of the food photography.

• − The food photos are in stacked blocks rather than a true grid layout as requested.
• − Design feels a bit more generic compared to the bold styling of the other model.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent photorealistic texture on the bun and patty
• + Clean and readable text integration
• + Clearer exploded view showing the separation of all components

• − The '€6.99' starburst looks like a flat graphic compared to the photorealistic burger
• − The lighting on the bottom bun feels slightly disconnected from the fiery background

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent adherence to the 'fiery, glowing effect' for all text elements
• + Dynamic composition with embers that feel more integrated into the scene
• + Stronger overall atmosphere and color harmony

• − The burger ingredients are less distinctly 'exploded' and look somewhat cluttered
• − Slightly more artificial 'AI' look to the food textures compared to Model A

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Displays a high-quality chalk texture with realistic smudges on the board.
• + Correctly renders all prompt text including the extended list of items.
• + Features a clean, centered composition with warm overhead lighting.

• − Handwriting appears slightly too uniform, resembling a digital chalk font.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Successfully captures a more organic, handwritten feel with variable letterforms.
• + Accurately renders all requested text including pricing and the footer note.
• + Chalkboard smearing and texture look highly authentic.

• − The layout is somewhat less balanced with a tighter crop at the top.
• − Cursive elements in the title are less elegant compared to the other model.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent character face and accessory recreation from Image 2.
• + Matches the atmospheric lighting and warm tones perfectly.

• − Fails significantly on the leg pose, resulting in a squat rather than the crossed leg position.
• − The right hand has severe anatomical issues (claw-like fingers).

GPT Image 1.5

• + Follows the exact leg-crossing pose from Image 1 much more accurately.
• + High fidelity in preserving the scarf, sunglasses, and facial hair of the character.
• + Better hand anatomy compared to the other model.

• − The head angle is slightly less dynamic/tilted than requested in the reference pose.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent cinematic lighting and composition.
• + Clean, high-resolution rendering with a surreal floating asteroid base.
• + Distinct separation between foreground and the background galaxy.

• − Failed the specific reversal instruction; the astronaut is riding the horse.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Dynamic sense of motion and detailed lunar environment.
• + Highly detailed space suit and horse tack textures.

• − Failed the specific reversal instruction; the astronaut is riding the horse.
• − The scale of planets in the background feels cluttered and inconsistent.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Successfully replicates the exact outfit from Image 2 including the watch and rings.
• + Preserves the face and unique vitiligo patterns with high accuracy.
• + Matches the warm lighting and color temperature of the original scene.

• − The scarf pattern is slightly simplified compared to the source.
• − Minor change to the intensity of the sand on the cheek.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Good replication of the scarf's fraying and layering.
• + Accurately places the gold watch from the source image.

• − Fails the primary instruction by cropping out the face entirely.
• − The jeans color is significantly darker than the source outfit.
• − Lost the ring detail from the source's left hand.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Exceptional photographic realism in lighting and textures
• + Highly detailed taxi interior including the dashboard, ignition, and seats
• + Realistic depiction of the passenger's face and phone

• − The capybara appears to have human hands in gloves rather than paws on the wheel
• − The capybara's anatomy is slightly distorted to fit a human seat and posture

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent adherence to the 'front paws' requirement showing actual capybara anatomy
• + The taxi driver cap is more iconic and professional as requested
• + Great centered composition that highlights both the driver and passenger

• − Lower overall image resolution and clarity compared to Model A
• − The capybara's eyes look slightly artificial

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Crystal clear text rendering for all details including the small banner.
• + Clean, modern gothic layout with sharp borders.

• − The parchment effect feels like a digital overlay rather than an integrated texture.
• − The lighting on the pumpkin is a bit flat compared to the background.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent 'vintage' aesthetic with a cohesive dark parchment texture throughout.
• + Dynamic, atmospheric lighting with a glowing moon and graveyard silhouette.
• + Creative scroll banner and decorative flourishes that match the gothic theme.

• − Slightly less crisp text on the 'Location' line compared to Model A.
• − The thorn border is a bit repetitive in its pattern.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent preservation of the original image's lighting, background, and clothing.
• + The hair texture is high-resolution and matches the existing beard well.
• + Maintains the exact facial geometry and expression of the source image.

• − The hair volume is arguably a bit exaggerated at the top, looking slightly like a wig.
• − The hair encroaches a bit too much on the ear/glasses contact point.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Natural, realistic hair density and curl pattern that fits the character's aesthetic.
• + Very clean integration of the hairline with the forehead.
• + Almost perfect preservation of pixels outside the hair area.

• − Slightly altered the shape of the glasses frames.
• − Subtle changes to the nose and eye area making the person look like a slightly younger version of themselves.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent adherence to the 'cartoon' and 'soft textures' stylistic requirements.
• + Clean and professional typography layout with correct flag placement.
• + Minimalist approach matches the 'minimal garnish' instruction perfectly.

• − The diorama base is a bit plain compared to the '3D miniature' potential.

GPT Image 1.5

• + High-quality PBR materials with realistic reflections on the glass and ceramics.
• + Rich, detailed textures on the wood and sushi rice.
• + Good centered composition with a clear isometric perspective.

• − Fails the 'mild garnish' requirement by adding many extra assets like a teapot, soy sauce bottle, and cups.
• − Stylistically leans more towards realism than the requested 'cartoon' scene.
• − The text 'SUSHI' is relatively small compared to 'JAPAN'.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Successfully incorporates all elements: TV anchor desk, dogs, and hockey background.
• + The character maintains a distinct resemblance to the person in the source image in a cartoon style.
• + Clean vector-style illustration with high clarity.

• − The 'caricature' style is more of a generic avatar/clipart style rather than an exaggerated caricature.
• − The dogs are repetitive in design.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent caricature style with exaggerated features that still strongly resemble the source subject.
• + Highly creative integration of the dog wearing a hockey helmet and the 'Breaking News' ticker.
• + Rich, vibrant colors and dynamic composition that feels energetic and humorous.

• − Minor text rendering issues on the microphone and ticker, though largely legible.
• − The transition between the desk and the character's body is slightly cluttered.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent composition with a sense of movement as the animals run through the field.
• + Very high level of realism in the fur texture and the dew drops on the grass.
• + Correct anatomical rendering of all four requested animals with distinct features.

• − The lighting is a bit hazy, which slightly reduces the 'pop' of the subjects.
• − The butterflies look a bit static compared to the dynamic movement of the animals.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Vibrant, warm lighting with very strong god rays and 'glittery' dew effects.
• + Captures the 'tumbling' and 'joyful' vibe perfectly with expressive facial expressions.
• + Extremely cute and stylized to emphasize the 'big expressive eyes' requested.

• − The puppy's left paw has five toes with prominent black pads that look slightly unnatural.
• − The animals are crowded together in a way that feels a bit less realistic than the spacing in Model A.
• − The fox's anatomy is slightly more generic/dog-like than the fox in Model A.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Perfectly preserves the composition and poses of the original meme.
• + Art style is very close to authentic hand-drawn anime with subtle paper textures.
• + Maintains specific clothing details like the plaid pattern on the shirt accurately.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent soft, dreamy lighting and pastel color palette.
• + Achieves a high level of aesthetic 'magic' associated with Ghibli backgrounds.
• + Captures the emotional expressions of the characters very well in an illustrative style.

• − The man's hand is oddly merged with his side/hip.
• − The girl in the red dress has much longer, more voluminous hair than the source image.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Successfully added hair blowing in the wind while maintaining hair texture consistency.
• + Added floating leaves that appear somewhat natural to the scene.
• + Preserved the identity of the woman and the dog almost perfectly.

• − The 'flying' leaves are static and lack motion blur, feeling more like they are pasted on top.
• − A weird artifact appears on the woman's left hand where her fingers now look distorted.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent addition of dynamic motion through motion-blurred leaves.
• + The hair blowing looks very natural and follows a logical wind direction.
• + The overall lighting and environment feel more 'energetic' as requested.

• − Slightly altered the woman's facial features compared to the source.
• − Several leaves overlap the dog and the woman's clothes in a way that looks like a digital overlay.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Perfect text rendering for both name and date
• + Accurately follows the light background requirement with subtle texture
• + Excellent vector emblem composition that feels authentic for a vintage logo

• − The steam lines are a bit thin and could be more prominent

GPT Image 1.5

• + Strong artistic texture on the cloche dome
• + Dynamic typography style

• − Failed the light background prompt, using a pitch-black background instead
• − Rendering of the text 'FLORIAN' has minor inconsistencies in letter weight
• − The vector look is slightly more illustrative than a professional logo emblem

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent typography with correct spellings for all names and labels.
• + Well-organized grid layout following the requested sequential steps.
• + Very clean flat-vector style with consistent iconography.

• − The sequence is slightly out of order, placing Lunar Orbit before Translunar.
• − Included yellow in the palette which wasn't specifically requested but fits the lunar module theme.
• − The 'Tranquiity' label has a minor typo.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Strong NASA-inspired color palette usage and dramatic vector styling.
• + Correct chronological ordering of all mission steps.
• + High-quality illustrations of the Saturn V and Lunar Module.

• − The image is cropped at the top, cutting off the title.
• − The 'Translunar' step features a rocket rather than a trajectory arc icon as requested.
• − The 'Earth Orbit' step shows the Earth from the same perspective as the launch step, feeling redundant.