Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B Black Forest Labs Seedream 5.0 Lite ByteDance

Settled by community votes across 20 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

20.6 arena score

#13 of 32 in Image Editing

Skill signature · Image Editing

Seedream 5.0 Lite

23.7 arena score

#22 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

50.0%

win rate

Ties

25.0%

Seedream 5.0 Lite

25.0%

win rate

50.0% 25.0% ties 25.0%
Shared challenges 20

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + High level of photographic realism with excellent texture on the wooden table and glass reflections.
  • + Very accurate spatial reasoning with the blue sphere appearing centered and the plant visibly distorted through the glass depth.
  • + Beautiful lighting and shadow work that matches the requested soft window light source.
  • The glass object is more of a thick-walled vase or container than a strict geometric cube.
  • The blue sphere appears to be floating unnaturally rather than resting on the bottom surface.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Perfectly captures the geometric shape of a hollow cube with thin glass walls.
  • + The red book is more logically sized and placed relative to the cube's top surface.
  • + Correctly interprets the blue sphere resting on the bottom of the cube.
  • The image has a slightly softer, more CGI-like appearance compared to the realism of Image A.
  • The lighting is a bit flat, and the plant behind the glass shows very little optical refraction/distortion.

Verdict: Both models successfully followed all prompt instructions including object placement and color. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is the winner due to its superior photographic quality and impressive handling of complex glass reflections, whereas Seedream 5.0 Lite, while geometrically accurate, looks slightly less realistic.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent preservation of the car's lighting and motion blur
  • + Highly realistic integration of the background scenery
  • The man is barely visible and his face is not rendered
  • The person is positioned in the passenger seat instead of the driver seat

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Successfully places the man in the driver's seat
  • + Good preservation of the man's identity, including his unique hair and clothing
  • + Accurate fulfillment of all prompt instructions
  • Slightly less realistic blending between the car and the road surface
  • Harsh lighting on the man compared to the softer scene

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite is the clear winner as it successfully combined the two source images, placing the specific man from the second image into the driver's seat of the car. While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B created a more photorealistic background, it failed the core instruction by placing an undefined figure in the passenger seat.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent skin texture and realistic age details on the subject.
  • + Highly detailed rendering of the wet pavement and light rain effects.
  • + Complex, believable background with appropriate urban elements.
  • Lacks the 'motion blur from passing cars' requested in the prompt as the cars appear static.
  • The bicycle structure has some inconsistencies where the frame meets the handlebars.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Successfully incorporated motion blur on the passing car in the background.
  • + Good use of shallow depth of field for a cinematic feel.
  • + Effective depiction of water ripples and rain on the jacket.
  • The skin texture appears slightly smoothed and less 'natural' than Model A.
  • Structural issues with the bicycle, specifically the rear derailleur and chain alignment.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B provides a more convincing and detailed subject with superior skin and clothing textures, though it failed to include the requested motion blur. Seedream 5.0 Lite adhered better to the motion blur requirement but suffered from more noticeable anatomical and mechanical distortions in the hands and bicycle parts. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is the winner due to its significantly higher overall realism and visual quality.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Incredible texture detail on the skin, leather, and fabric underlayer.
  • + Excellent adherence to the 'ornate engraved plate armor' requirement with complex patterns.
  • + Very realistic lighting and bokeh effect that naturally integrates with the character.
  • The facial scars look a bit like fresh surface cuts rather than healed 'battle-worn' scars.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Good use of orange highlights from the torchlight on the armor surfaces.
  • + Accurately captures the braided hair with beads as requested.
  • Skin texture is a bit smooth and lacks the 'faint scars and dirt' detail requested in the prompt.
  • The engraving on the armor is less intricate and detailed compared to the other model.
  • The eyes look slightly artificial or less 'lifelike' than Model A.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is the superior image due to its exceptional attention to texture; the leather straps and chainmail/cloth underlayers are highly tactile and detailed. While Seedream 5.0 Lite captures the requested elements, it has a softer, more digital look that lacks the grit and photorealism of the FLUX output.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Clean grid alignment for photos
  • + Professional layout and spacing
  • + Accurate use of bold sans-serif header
  • Text consists of gibberish characters
  • Redundant headers (Appetizers appearing twice)
  • All food photos are variations of pizza regardless of the section header

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Highly legible English text and descriptions
  • + Food photos accurately match their category labels
  • + Excellent layout with clear price and description hierarchy
  • Single minor typo in 'FAII TAS'
  • Design feels slightly more like a flyer than a modern restaurant menu

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite is the clear winner as it produces legible, meaningful text and ensures the food photos correspond to the section headers (Appetizers, Pizza, Mains). While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B has a nice minimalist layout, it fails by filling every photo slot with pizza and generating unreadable placeholder text.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Seedream 5.0 Lite
50% wins 50% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent typography with a realistic fiery texture and 3D effect.
  • + Highly appetizing and photorealistic rendering of burger ingredients.
  • + Dynamic sense of motion with embers and sauce splatters that feel integrated.
  • The 'exploded' effect is less literal; the burger still feels largely stacked rather than individual components floating freely.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Successfully captures the 'exploded' view with clear separation between every layer of the burger.
  • + Clean, neon-style glowing text that is legible and fits the prompt's fiery theme.
  • + Good use of vertical space in the composition.
  • The textures look slightly more digital and less photorealistic than Image A.
  • The starburst for the price is a simple outline and lacks the punchy, commercial polish of its competitor.

Verdict: While Seedream 5.0 Lite followed the 'exploded' instruction more literally by separating each ingredient clearly, FLUX.2 [klein] 9B produced a much more professional and appetizing advertisement. FLUX.2's superior text rendering, realistic food textures, and better-integrated fiery effects make it the more effective image for a brand ad.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Seedream 5.0 Lite
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent typography with perfect spelling in the main menu items.
  • + Realistic chalk texture including believable smudges and dust on the board.
  • + Beautiful cursive handwriting that matches the requested style.
  • One minor spelling error in the footer text ('fress' instead of 'fresh').

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Natural variation in handwriting styles across the board.
  • + Good chalk-on-green-slate aesthetic.
  • Multiple spelling errors in the menu items ('Heriss', 'Beliter', 'frese', 'optoons').
  • The handwriting is less 'elegant cursive' for the title than requested.
  • A bit of a perspective warp on the board edges.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is the clear winner due to its superior text rendering and adherence to the prompt's stylistic requirements. While Seedream 5.0 Lite produces a believable café atmosphere, it suffers from several spelling errors and fails to deliver the requested elegant cursive for the header.

Pose & Character Mashup

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Seedream 5.0 Lite
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent adherence to the complex dynamic pose from Image 1.
  • + High character consistency, successfully translating the face, hair, and clothing of the man in Image 2.
  • + Superior rendering of the hands and overall anatomy in this difficult position.
  • One lens of the sunglasses is missing or blended poorly into the face.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Successfully replicates the environment, background, and lighting of the first source image.
  • + Includes specific clothing details like the scarf and black sweatshirt.
  • Anatomy is severely broken, specifically where the legs connect to the torso.
  • The pose is less accurate to the reference, particularly the angle of the head and the extension of the bottom arm.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is the clear winner as it successfully replicates a very difficult physical pose with believable anatomy, whereas Seedream 5.0 Lite produces a logically impossible body structure. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B also maintains better character consistency, making the man from Image 2 look natural in the new environment.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent world-building with multiple detailed planets and galaxies in the background
  • + High level of anatomical detail on the horse and space suit
  • + Cinematic lighting that integrates the rider and the environment well
  • Failed the negative constraint: showed an astronaut riding a horse instead of a 'horse on top'
  • Includes distracting gibberish text at the bottom of the image

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Vibrant, cosmic color palette that emphasizes the 'space' theme
  • + Consistent rendering of the horse's mane and tail in a zero-gravity style
  • + Clean composition without watermark-like text
  • Failed the negative constraint: showed an astronaut riding a horse instead of a 'horse on top'
  • The astronaut's interaction with the reins is less natural than in Model A

Verdict: Both models failed the logical challenge presented in the prompt ('horse on top, not vice versa'), instead providing the standard Interpretation of an astronaut riding a horse. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B provides a more complex and detailed background with a more cinematic feel, though it is marred by hallucinated text; Seedream 5.0 Lite offers a cleaner image with more saturated colors.

Outfit Transfer Challenge

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent preservation of the subject's original facial features and expression.
  • + Successfully identifies and replicates the detailed pattern of the scarf and the structure of the pea coat.
  • + Great integration of the hand in the pocket, matching the pose and background.
  • Introduces heavy gold bead necklaces that were not present in either source image.
  • Fails to include the sunglasses from the reference outfit.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Successfully includes the sunglasses and gold watch/ring accessories from Image 2.
  • + High fidelity to the texture and pattern of the coat and scarf.
  • + Maintains the subject's skin details and the sandy texture on the face.
  • Significantly alters the subject's face shape and features, making him look like a different person.
  • The sunglasses are poorly integrated, appearing to float on the face or clipping into the nose bridge.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B followed the instruction to keep the person's face completely unchanged much better than Seedream 5.0 Lite, which drastically changed the subject's facial appearance. Although Seedream 5.0 Lite captured more accessories like the sunglasses, FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is the superior edit because it preserved the identity of the base person while convincingly applying the complex clothing layers.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent photorealism in the capybara's fur and the taxi interior
  • + Strong lighting from the phone screen illuminating the passenger
  • + Accurately places the passenger in the back seat as requested
  • The passenger appears to be in the front passenger seat rather than the back seat due to the low camera angle
  • Minor text gibberish on the taxi cap

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Correctly positions the passenger clearly in the back seat behind the driver
  • + Dynamic composition with a great view of the Manhattan street lights
  • + Good adherence to the 'both front paws on the steering wheel' instruction
  • The scale of the capybara's head is slightly disproportionate to the car space
  • Camera angle feels slightly warped near the top of the frame

Verdict: Both models followed the complex prompt with high fidelity, but Seedream 5.0 Lite provided a better spatial arrangement by clearly placing the passenger in the backseat as requested. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B had superior lighting and texture detail, but the passenger's proximity to the dashboard makes her appear to be in the front passenger seat. Seedream 5.0 Lite is the winner for its better composition and adherence to the spatial requirements of the prompt.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent typography with clean, consistent gothic font rendering
  • + Cohesive composition where the background and text elements are well-integrated
  • + Superior cinematic lighting and atmospheric depth in the background illustration
  • The parchment texture is less pronounced than requested, feeling more like a digital painting

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Great 'vintage parchment' texture that gives it a more tactile look
  • + Accurate inclusion of all requested elements including thorns and webs in the border
  • + Text is legible and correctly spelled
  • The composition feels disjointed, with the central image appearing like a sticker on a background
  • The main title text is cramped and suffers from some inconsistent letter heights

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B produces a much more polished and professional-looking invitation with superior lighting and a cohesive layout. Seedream 5.0 Lite captures the 'parchment' texture more effectively, but the overall design feels less integrated and the typography is less refined than its competitor.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Before After
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent texture and density of the hair.
  • + Near-perfect preservation of the background and clothing.
  • + The curly style matches the man's beard texture well.
  • The glasses frames are slightly warped near the temples of the new hair.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Natural hairline and style integration.
  • + Successfully preserved facial features and background.
  • Noticeable blurring at the top edge of the hair against the sky.
  • The hair texture is slightly less detailed compared to its counterpart.

Verdict: Both models handled the edit well, effectively adding hair while keeping the subject's identity and environment intact. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is the winner due to the superior realism in hair texture and volume, whereas Seedream 5.0 Lite has visible soft-focus artifacts around the crown of the head.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent typography style and placement
  • + Realistic wooden texture on the diorama base
  • + High-quality soft lighting and shadows
  • The flag icon is incorrect (appears like the flag of Yemen)
  • The sushi design is slightly messy, with salmon atop a maki roll

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Accurate Japanese flag icon
  • + Diverse range of sushi types on the plate
  • + Perfectly centered and balanced composition
  • The typography has slight kerning issues and rounded edges compared to the 'bold' request
  • The white base blends slightly too much with the white plate

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite followed the specific details of the prompt better, particularly by providing the correct Japanese flag. While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B had superior texture work on the wooden base and very clean text, the incorrect flag and odd sushi assembly make Seedream 5.0 Lite the more successful interpretation.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent caricature style with highly exaggerated proportions.
  • + Successfully incorporates a stadium background with numerous dogs in the crowd.
  • + Captures the user's likeness well while translating it into a comic style.
  • The 'hockey' element is very subtle (just sticks in the background) compared to the 'anchor' and 'dog' themes.
  • Minor artifacts in the hand holding the pen.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Includes all specific elements: hockey stick, pup, and news desk.
  • + Maintains the outfit from the source image (denim jacket).
  • + Clear, legible text on the desk plaque.
  • Style is more of a generic cartoon/avatar than an exaggerated caricature.
  • The proportions are too safe, failing the 'exaggerated and humorous' part of the prompt.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B followed the creative brief for an 'exaggerated caricature' much better than Seedream 5.0 Lite, creating a vibrant, funny scene that feels like a professional caricature. While Seedream 5.0 Lite literalized all aspects of the prompt more clearly (adding a hockey stick directly), it felt more like a flat clip-art illustration than a humorous caricature.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent fur textures and fine detail on the fox and puppy.
  • + Beautiful lighting with well-integrated god rays and dew effects.
  • + High-quality rendering of the meadow and flowers.
  • Completely missed the 'baby bunny' requirement from the prompt.
  • The kitten's facial structure and paw placement are slightly unnatural.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Successfully included all four requested animals: puppy, kitten, bunny, and fox.
  • + Captured the 'tumbling together' vibe perfectly with playful poses.
  • + Strong adherence to the requested 'wholesome' and 'expressive eyes' aesthetics.
  • Slightly more 'digital art' feel compared to the requested 'hyper-photorealistic' style.
  • The sun and light rays appear a bit flat and less realistic than in the other image.

Verdict: While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B provides a more photorealistic texture and superior lighting, it failed to include the baby bunny specified in the prompt. Seedream 5.0 Lite followed the prompt instructions much more accurately, including all characters and capturing the playful action of tumbling, making it the more successful interpretation despite a slightly more stylized look.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent execution of soft pastel colors and hand-painted watercolor textures.
  • + Successfully recreated the original character poses within an iconic Ghibli-esque landscape.
  • + High level of artistic cohesion and nostalgic mood.
  • Changed the urban background to a rural one, losing the specific context of the original meme.
  • The man's expression is too pleasant, losing the 'distracted' look from the source image.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Perfectly preserves the layout and background of the original source image.
  • + Captures the original facial expressions (the man's gaze and the woman's jealousy) with Ghibli-style character designs.
  • + Strong adherence to the 'cel-shaded' look of classic anime films.
  • Less emphasis on 'hand-painted textures' compared to Model A.
  • The transition between the sharp characters and the blurred photographic-style background feels slightly disconnected.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B creates a beautiful watercolor-style illustration that feels like Ghibli concept art, but it significantly alters the setting and character dynamics. Seedream 5.0 Lite is the more successful edit, as it perfectly maintains the iconic 'distracted boyfriend' meme composition and specific character expressions while transforming the style into clean Ghibli-inspired animation.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Before After
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent addition of autumnal leaves that match the colors of the scene
  • + Hair motion looks very natural and dynamic
  • + Almost perfect preservation of the original woman's face and dog's features

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Successful addition of wind-blown hair
  • + Good preservation of the original image layout
  • The green leaves look like stickers and do not integrate well with the lighting
  • The hair edit has some slight artifacts where the strands meet the background
  • Fewer flying elements makes it feel less 'energetic' than Image A

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B followed the prompt more effectively by adding a high volume of flying leaves that feel integrated into the 3D space of the photo. While both models handled the hair motion well, Seedream 5.0 Lite added leaves that look flat and out of place color-wise, whereas FLUX.2 used autumnal tones that complemented the golden lighting of the source.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent typography with correct accent marks
  • + Sophisticated vector emblem style
  • + Well-integrated composition with the cloche and banner
  • The steam trail is a bit thick, looking more like a hair lock than vapor

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Successfully includes all requested elements
  • + Simple and clean minimalist aesthetic
  • + Good color palette adherence
  • The accent on 'CAFFÊ' is incorrect (circumflex instead of grave)
  • Layout feels a bit disconnected with elements floating separately
  • The banner ribbon is broken/clashing with the circular background element

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is the clear winner as it produces a professional, cohesive logo with perfect typography and a unified vector design. Seedream 5.0 Lite makes a significant spelling error with the accent mark on 'Caffè' and has a poorly executed ribbon banner that overlaps awkwardly with the background.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Strong composition that feels like a cohesive poster.
  • + Creative use of silhouettes and backgrounds to tie elements together.
  • + Adheres well to the requested flat-vector art style and color palette.
  • Numerous spelling errors in text labels such as 'AOILLO', 'EARDHT', and 'LANDINING'.
  • Logically confusing layout that doesn't follow a clear 1-6 numerical sequence.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Excellent typography with nearly perfect spelling of labels and crew names.
  • + Clear, logical grid layout that strictly follows the 6-step progression requested.
  • + Clean iconography that matches the flat-vector style requirements perfectly.
  • Translunar icon is a bit overly simplistic compared to the other graphics.
  • The background is quite sparse, lacking the 'poster' feel of a unified design.

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite is the clear winner as it successfully followed the numbered step-by-step instructions and rendered almost all text accurately, including specific crew names. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B followed the stylistic cues well but failed significantly on legibility and logical flow, resulting in several misspelled words and a confusing diagram.

Next steps

Explore each model