Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B Black Forest Labs Nano Banana 2 Google

Settled by community votes across 20 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

20.6 arena score

#13 of 32 in Image Editing

Skill signature · Image Editing

Nano Banana 2

28.4 arena score

#1 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Best Text-to-Image right now Top 2 in Image Editing
Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

0.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Nano Banana 2

100.0%

win rate

0.0% 0.0% ties 100.0%
Shared challenges 20

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent photorealistic lighting and caustics on the wooden table
  • + Accurate glass refraction of the plant behind the cube
  • + The sphere appears naturally integrated into the base of the glass
  • The glass object is a thick-walled vase rather than a sharp geometric 'cube'
  • The blue sphere is very small compared to the scale of the cube

Nano Banana 2

  • + Perfect geometric cube shape with thin glass walls
  • + Excellent text rendering on the book spine providing additional character
  • + High level of detail in the plant leaves and background environment
  • The reflection of the sphere on the bottom of the cube doesn't quite match its position
  • Slightly less realistic shadow interaction between the book and the cube

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 followed the prompt more literally by generating a perfect geometric cube and including sharp details like the text on the book. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B produced a more artistically pleasing and photorealistic image with superior lighting and refraction, though it interpreted the cube as more of a heavy glass vessel.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent preservation of the car's lighting and appearance from the source image.
  • + Captures the motion blur of the road effectively.
  • The driver is barely visible and obscured by the seat/window frame.
  • The composition is a bit flat compared to the other model.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Successfully places the man from the second source image in the driver's seat with recognizable features/clothing.
  • + Dynamic composition with a winding coastline that adds depth.
  • + High level of detail in the landscape and environment.
  • The driver is sitting unusually high and slightly out of scale with the car's interior.
  • Minor artifacts in the background traffic.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner as it successfully integrated the man from the second source image into the car, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 9B depicts a driver that is almost entirely obscured. Nano Banana 2 also created a much more visually interesting and iconic California coastline backdrop.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent depiction of rainy textures on the pavement and clothing.
  • + Very realistic skin textures and age details on the man's hands and face.
  • + High quality light rendering from the car headlights.
  • Functional logic of the bicycle components is slightly messy around the handlebars.
  • The car in the background lacks the requested motion blur.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Stronger adherence to the 'imperfect framing' and 'candid street' aesthetic with a wider angle.
  • + Captures the neon-lit Japanese street atmosphere perfectly with readable kanji and katakana.
  • + Includes subtle motion blur on the passing vehicle as requested.
  • The man's grip on the wrench and the chain is physically nonsensical and distorted.
  • Skin textures are smoother and less 'natural' than Model A.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B produces a much higher fidelity portrait with superior skin textures and convincing rain effects, though it feels slightly more posed. Nano Banana 2 better captures the specific environmental requests like motion blur and 'imperfect' street framing, but fails significantly on anatomical and mechanical details where the man interacts with the bike. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is the preferred choice for its photographic realism and coherent subject matter.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent detail on the engraved floral patterns of the plate armor.
  • + Superior lighting consistency with warm torchlight glints on the metal rims.
  • + High-quality skin texture with realistic pores and convincing scar tissue.
  • The hair braids and beads felt slightly more simplistic and uniform than requested.
  • The background fire is a bit distracting and lacks realistic integration with the atmospheric smoke.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Stronger adherence to the 'battle-worn' descriptor with heavier dirt and grime on the face.
  • + Beautifully detailed hair braids with intricate metal beads/rings.
  • + Great inclusion of secondary details like the chain, pendant, and runic engravings.
  • The hand holding the sword is anatomically distorted with messy finger merging.
  • The scale of the armor feels slightly bulky or mismatched for the figure's frame.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt well, but FLUX.2 [klein] 9B produced a much cleaner and more professional image with superior skin textures and lighting. Nano Banana 2 captured the 'battle-worn' aesthetic more aggressively, but it suffered from a significant anatomical failure regarding the hand and sword, making FLUX.2 the more reliable output.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + High resolution food photography
  • + Clean minimalist aesthetic
  • + Bold header design
  • Poor typography with significant spelling errors
  • Illogical layout with redundant 'Appetizers' headers and pizza listed under 'Appetizers'
  • Incoherent pricing symbols like $G and $0

Nano Banana 2

  • + Excellent layout with clear sections for Appetizers, Pizza, and Mains
  • + Highly legible and mostly accurate text rendering
  • + Great use of vibrant accents and color-coordinated labels
  • Minor spelling errors in small body text
  • A few artifacts in the food labels at the very bottom

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner as it produces a functional and professional menu design with readable text and a logical layout that matches the prompt perfectly. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B struggles with basic text coherence and logical grouping, placing pizza images under appetizer headers and using nonsensical letter-based pricing.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana 2
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent text legibility and clean rendering
  • + Vibrant, high-impact starburst for the price
  • + Clean, photorealistic food textures
  • The burger is only partially exploded, with many layers still touching
  • The secondary text lacks the requested fiery/glowing effect

Nano Banana 2

  • + Perfect adherence to the 'exploded' request with clear separation of every layer
  • + Captures the fiery, glowing effect on all text elements more effectively
  • + Includes extra details like splashes of sauce and grilled onions
  • The '6' in the price tag is slightly malformed
  • Small artifacts or speckles on the buns compared to Model A

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 followed the prompt's layout and style instructions more closely, specifically by fully exploding the burger components and applying the fiery glow to all requested text. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B produced a cleaner image with better text rendering, but it failed to fully separate the burger layers as requested.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana 2
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent chalk texture and smudging effects on the background board.
  • + Captures a very authentic 'hand-drawn' feel with the thickness of the chalk strokes.
  • + Successfully included all requested text and prices.
  • Contains several significant spelling errors including 'Riott', 'Risoto', 'Octoopus', and 'fress'.
  • Text layout is a bit cluttered with a repetitive price tag on the second item.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Perfect spelling on all menu items and dates.
  • + Better overall composition with a clear view of the café environment and an easel.
  • + The handwriting style is more elegant and consistent with the 'cursive' instruction for the title.
  • The chalk texture is slightly cleaner, looking almost more digital than Image A.
  • There is some minor ghosting/haloing around the text strokes.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner as it provides perfect spelling and high-quality handwriting that follows all instructions. While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B has a very realistic chalk texture, it fails significantly on prompt adherence due to numerous typos and messy text layout.

Pose & Character Mashup

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana 2
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent adherence to the exact tilt and dynamic orientation of the head and body from Image 1.
  • + High character consistency, including the specific scarf pattern and aviator sunglasses.
  • + Accurately recreates the complex leg positioning on the ottoman.
  • The right hand (clenched in a fist) does not match the open-hand gesture of the pose reference.
  • Minor artifacting on the lower leg/ankle area.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Natural skin tones and high-quality rendering of the face and hair.
  • + Good recreation of the scarf and clothing style from Image 2.
  • + Accurate lighting and environment match.
  • Fails to follow the dynamic pose; the character's head and torso are upright rather than tilted horizontally as in Image 1.
  • Anatomy of the feet and legs is slightly awkward and lacks the specific cross-legged balance of the reference.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is the clear winner as it successfully captured the 'exact dynamic pose' requested, specifically the horizontal tilt of the head and the specific center of gravity from Image 1. Nano Banana 2 failed to replicate the tilt of the body, essentially placing the character in a standing position rather than the requested action pose.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + High resolution and cinematic lighting
  • + Excellent anatomical detail on the horse
  • + Balanced composition with varied celestial bodies
  • Failed the spatial orientation prompt; the astronaut is on top
  • Generated nonsensical text at the bottom of the frame

Nano Banana 2

  • + Successfully followed the difficult spatial instruction with the horse on top
  • + Strong surreal atmosphere with iridescent coloring on the horse
  • + Creative use of an upside-down perspective to represent space
  • Lower overall technical fidelity compared to the competitor
  • Noticeable anatomical artifacts near the horse's neck and various harness straps

Verdict: While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B produces a much higher quality image with superior details and lighting, it completely failed the specific prompt instruction to place the horse on top of the astronaut. Nano Banana 2 adhered to the complex spatial requirement and captured the surreal theme more effectively, even though its technical execution was rougher. Nano Banana 2 is the winner for its superior prompt adherence to specific, non-standard layout instructions.

Outfit Transfer Challenge

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent preservation of the subject's face and unique vitiligo patterns
  • + Accurate translation of the plaid scarf pattern and coat texture
  • + Maintains the background detail and beach environment perfectly
  • Adds excessive gold jewelry (necklaces) that were not present in Image 2
  • The subject's head is slightly smaller and angled differently compared to Source 1

Nano Banana 2

  • + Includes the sunglasses and ring from Image 2 which are missing in Model A
  • + Perfectly captures the jacket color and scarf drape
  • + Successfully maps the subject's skin condition onto the visible hands
  • Slightly alters the facial structure and forehead vitiligo pattern compared to Source 1
  • The sunglasses have a minor rendering artifact on the right temple

Verdict: Both models do an impressive job of merging the two images. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is better at preserving the exact identity and facial details of the original subject, though it hallucinates extra jewelry not found in the source. Nano Banana 2 follows the outfit instructions more accurately by including the accessories like the sunglasses and ring, making it the more faithful edit for the specific wardrobe request.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent photorealism in the capybara's fur and clothing textures.
  • + Perfect capture of the 'bored' expression on the businesswoman's face.
  • Failed the spatial requirement by placing the woman in the front passenger seat instead of the back seat.
  • The perspective feels slightly cramped with the capybara's head appearing disproportionately large.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Strictly followed the spatial prompt with the woman in the back seat.
  • + Added incredible detail with the taxi meter, hack license featuring the capybara, and realistic NYC signage.
  • + Composition creates a more cinematic and logical 'taxi interior' feel.
  • The capybara's hat is black rather than the requested yellow.
  • The woman's hand holding the phone has slight anatomical blurring.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner because it correctly placed the passenger in the back seat and included high-quality contextual details like the taxi meter and a humorous 'hack license'. While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B has slightly higher textures on the capybara, it fundamentally failed the composition requirement by putting the passenger in the front seat.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent typography with a clean, legible gothic font
  • + Perfect adherence to all specific text details and formatting
  • + Strong cinematic lighting effect on the jack-o-lantern and trees
  • The parchment texture is a bit flat compared to the other model

Nano Banana 2

  • + Rich, illustrative art style with extra gothic details like skulls and arches
  • + Complex, ornate border design that feels very 'vintage'
  • + Beautiful decorative flourishes around the text
  • The smaller banner text is slightly distorted and harder to read
  • The overall composition feels a bit more cluttered

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B followed the text instructions more precisely, producing perfectly legible and accurately placed text for all fields. Nano Banana 2 provided a more detailed and artistic illustration with extra gothic elements like gravestones and skulls, but the smaller banner text was less clear. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is the winner for its superior balance of technical text rendering and atmospheric composition.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Before After
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent addition of thick, curly hair that significantly changes the subject's appearance as requested.
  • + Matches the salt-and-pepper aesthetic of the existing beard.
  • + Maintains the background and clothing perfectly.
  • The hair integration near the ear and temple is slightly messy, creating some overlapping artifacts with the glasses frame.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Natural and realistic hair texture and density.
  • + Very clean integration with the existing facial features and glasses.
  • + Perfectly preserves the source image's lighting and background.
  • The hair volume is relatively conservative despite the request for a 'full, thick head of hair'.

Verdict: Both models performed excellently, perfectly preserving the original subject's facial features, clothing, and background. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B provided a more transformative 'full and thick' head of curly hair, while Nano Banana 2 opted for a more subtle and cleaner integration of straight hair. Nano Banana 2 is the slight winner for technical execution as it avoided the minor clipping artifacts seen near the glasses in the other model's output.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent 3D miniature 'cartoon' aesthetic with soft textures
  • + Perfectly followed the 45-degree isometric perspective and diorama base request
  • + Very clean and minimal composition
  • The flag icon is incorrect, appearing more like Yemen than Japan
  • The salmon nigiri is oddly placed on top of a maki roll

Nano Banana 2

  • + Includes a correct Japanese flag icon
  • + Higher detail in the food rendering with more variety of sushi
  • + Text is well-integrated and professionally styled
  • Failed to provide a minimal scene, including complex garnish, moss, and many extra elements
  • The perspective is more of a standard 3/4 view than a true isometric top-down view
  • Does not follow the '3D cartoon' aesthetic as closely as Model A

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B followed the stylistic and compositional instructions much better, delivering the specific isometric 3D cartoon look requested, despite a flag error. Nano Banana 2 produced a high-quality food illustration but ignored the 'minimal' and 'isometric' constraints in favor of a busy, photorealistic scene.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Successfully captures a true caricature style with an exaggerated large head.
  • + Includes a complex scene with an arena audience and multiple dogs in the crowd.
  • + Accurately represents the 'TV anchor' role with a news desk and broadcast equipment.
  • The facial likeness to the source image is somewhat generic.
  • The text on the screens and desk is largely illegible gibberish.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Excellent facial likeness preservation despite the caricature exaggeration.
  • + Highly creative integration of all elements, including thematic puns like 'W-K9 News'.
  • + Superior text rendering with clear, humorous headlines.
  • The hand holding the hockey stick has a slightly awkward grip and extra-long finger.
  • The 'Live' sign in the corner has minor artifacts in the lettering.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner as it perfectly integrates all elements of the prompt (hockey, dogs, and TV anchor) in a cohesive and humorous way. While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B creates a generic caricature, Nano Banana 2 maintains a strong facial likeness to the source person and uses clever text, like the 'W-K9' logo, to tie the theme together.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Atmospheric golden hour lighting with clear god rays.
  • + Vibrant and colorful wildflower field.
  • + Sharp focus on the animal faces and eyes.
  • Missing the baby bunny requested in the prompt.
  • The kitten's pose and hands/paws are slightly distorted and awkward.
  • Animals feel a bit static/posed rather than 'tumbling'.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Includes all four requested animals (dog, cat, bunny, fox).
  • + Excellent sense of motion and 'tumbling' interaction.
  • + Strong adherence to the 'hyper-photorealistic' part of the prompt with realistic fur textures.
  • The fox's front right leg has anatomical issues/blending with the environment.
  • The background trees are a bit more blurred compared to the foreground detail level.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner because it successfully included all four specifically requested animals, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 9B completely omitted the baby bunny. Additionally, Nano Banana 2 captured the 'playfully chasing' and 'tumbling' action much more dynamically, while Image A felt like a static studio portrait in a meadow.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent Ghibli-inspired watercolor texture and soft pastel palette.
  • + Correctly translates the composition into an aesthetic dreamy background.
  • Drastically changes the facial expressions, losing the 'shocked' and 'pouty' look of the original characters.
  • Changes the background setting from an urban street to a rural landscape.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Perfectly preserves the specific facial expressions and character emotions from the original meme.
  • + Maintains the urban city street setting while applying the requested Ghibli style.
  • + Preserves the foreground blur effect more accurately than the competitor.
  • The color palette is a bit more saturated than the requested 'soft pastels'.

Verdict: While both models do an excellent job of applying the Studio Ghibli art style, Nano Banana 2 is the superior edit because it preserves the essential character expressions that define the 'distracted boyfriend' meme. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B makes the characters look happy and calm, which undermines the source material's context, whereas Nano Banana 2 keeps the boyfriend's shock and the girlfriend's indignation intact within the new artistic style.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Before After
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent preservation of the subject's face and original features.
  • + Highly symmetrical and aesthetic wind effect in the hair.
  • + Adds a large volume of falling leaves that match the environment's color palette.
  • The hair motion looks a bit stiff and unnaturally posed.
  • Some leaves appear to be floating in front of the subject in an unconvincing way.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Natural and dynamic direction of wind that affects both hair and the dog's tail.
  • + Expressive change to the facial expression (laughing) enhances the energetic feel.
  • + More realistic interaction between the leaves/debris and the wind direction.
  • The subject's facial features were significantly altered compared to the source image.
  • Loss of some original identity in the subject's face.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 captures the requested 'energetic and lively feel' more effectively by modifying the subject's expression and adding motion to the dog's tail as well as the hair. However, FLUX.2 [klein] 9B does a much better job of preserving the source image's identity while adding the requested elements, even if the result feels slightly more static.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Perfect text rendering for both the main name and the date banner
  • + Clean, minimalist vector aesthetic that aligns with modern branding
  • + Excellent use of the requested warm brown and cream color palette
  • The steam element looks slightly cartoonish and detached from the cloche lid
  • Layout is a bit top-heavy with the large text at the bottom

Nano Banana 2

  • + Sophisticated vintage engraving style with refined linework
  • + Elegant circular composition and banner integration
  • + Accurate representation of the 'Est. 1720' banner and cloche steam
  • The text 'Caffè Florian' is slightly crooked and uses inconsistent spacing
  • Slightly less 'minimalist' than requested, favoring a more decorative look

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B delivers a cleaner, more readable logo with perfect typography, making it more practical for a real-world brand identity. Nano Banana 2 has superior artistic texture and a more authentic vintage feel, but is let down by slightly uneven lettering in the curved title.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Features a bold, stylistic layout with integrated space background
  • + Captures the NASA-inspired color palette well
  • Poor text rendering with numerous spelling errors like 'AOILLO', 'EARDHT', and 'LANDINING'
  • Logic of the infographic flow is confusing and non-linear

Nano Banana 2

  • + Excellent typography with perfect spelling for all requested steps
  • + Strict adherence to the 'flat-vector' and 'crisp lines' style with consistent iconography
  • + Logical, easy-to-read layout that follows the mission sequence
  • The 'Descent' icon is slightly small and lacks a dedicated background circle unlike the top row
  • Includes a fourth silhouette in the crew section which is historically inaccurate for Apollo 11

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner as it perfectly follows the stylistic instructions for a flat-vector infographic and renders all text correctly. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B fails significantly on text legibility and the logical flow of the information, whereas Nano Banana 2 provides a clean, professional design suitable for the prompt.

Next steps

Explore each model