Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B Black Forest Labs Nano Banana Pro Google

Settled by community votes across 20 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

20.6 arena score

#13 of 32 in Image Editing

Skill signature · Image Editing

Nano Banana Pro

28.2 arena score

#2 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Best Image Editing right now Top 2 in Text-to-Image
Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

0.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Nano Banana Pro

100.0%

win rate

0.0% 0.0% ties 100.0%
Shared challenges 20

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent photographic quality with realistic depth of field.
  • + Accurately represents the soft window light coming from the left.
  • + The blue sphere appears realistically inside the glass volume.
  • The glass object is more of a hollow vase than a crisp geometric cube.
  • The perspective of the cube's base is slightly warped.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Accurately depicts a sharp, geometric glass cube.
  • + Great detail on the red vintage book and the potted fern.
  • + Highly realistic textures on the wooden table and shadows.
  • The blue sphere looks more like it is sitting on top of the bottom glass pane rather than centered inside.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt instructions perfectly, including the placement of all objects and the specific lighting direction. Nano Banana Pro is the winner as it provided a more defined 'cube' shape and felt like a more cohesive, high-detail photograph, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 9B produced a glass object that felt slightly more like a thick-walled candle holder.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent preservation of the car's original angle and design.
  • + High visual quality with realistic motion blur on the wheels and road.
  • The man is barely visible, with only his hair identifiable from behind the seat.
  • The composition is less engaging and fails to highlight the specific person from the source image.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Excellent subject preservation, accurately featuring the man's face, hair, and outfit.
  • + Dynamic, cinematic composition that clearly shows both the driver and the California coastline.
  • + Natural lighting and realistic integration of the person into the car interior.
  • The perspective of the car is altered compared to the source image.
  • Minor artifacts in the steering wheel area near the hands.

Verdict: Nano Banana Pro is the clear winner for successfully merging both source subjects into a single scene. While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B preserved the car's perspective better, it almost entirely obscured the person. Nano Banana Pro accurately captured the man's likeness and clothing while placing him in a beautifully rendered coastal environment.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent shallow depth of field and bokeh realism.
  • + Superior skin texture and fine detail rendering on the face and hands.
  • + Strong adherence to the 'candid' and 'imperfect framing' prompt elements.
  • The motion blur of the passing cars is subtle compared to Model B.
  • The bicycle anatomy near the pedals and chain is slightly confusing.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Provides a more atmospheric street scene with neon reflections.
  • + Better captures the 'motion blur' aspect of passing vehicles.
  • + Accurate representation of a Japanese street with signs and taxis.
  • The man's hands have significant anatomical errors (blended fingers).
  • Lower resolution/clarity in the face compared to Model A.
  • The bike's kickstand and wheel alignment look structurally impossible.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is the superior image because it achieves high photographic realism and natural skin textures that perfectly match the '50mm' and 'no stylization' requirements. While Nano Banana Pro captures a more vibrant street atmosphere with better motion blur, it suffers from severe anatomical distortions in the subject's hands and logical errors in the bicycle's construction.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Highly detailed engraving on the plate armor with excellent symmetry.
  • + Sharp, clear facial details and lifelike texture in the eyes.
  • + Effective use of warm torchlight and bokeh sparks across the background.
  • The character appears slightly too clean for a 'battle-worn' description despite the scars.
  • The leather straps look somewhat flat compared to the metalwork.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Superb interpretation of 'battle-worn' with grit, dirt, and realistic facial texture.
  • + Very detailed hair braiding with distinct beads as requested.
  • + Excellent lighting on the armor, showing more realistic wear and tear.
  • The engraving on the armor is slightly less intricate than in the other image.
  • The depth of field is a bit noisier in some areas of the background.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B produced a very clean and symmetrical image with stunning armor engravings, while Nano Banana Pro excelled at the 'battle-worn' and gritty aesthetic, providing superior skin texture and realistic dirt application. Nano Banana Pro is preferred for its more atmospheric and authentic interpretation of the character's condition.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Strong bold font choices
  • + Crisp high-resolution food images
  • + Modern color gradient accents
  • Nonsensical header text with character overlapping
  • Poor logical structure with duplicate section headers (Appetizers twice, Mains twice)
  • Images are repetitive, showing four pizzas for different categories

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Excellent logical layout with clear sections for Appetizers, Pizza, and Mains
  • + Greater variety in food photography matching the labels
  • + Clean and legible text layout that follows design conventions
  • Slightly lower fidelity in text rendering compared to the bold headers of the other model
  • Minor artifacting in the 'Chicken Pizza' photo which looks like pasta

Verdict: Nano Banana Pro is the clear winner as it provides a functional and logical menu layout that follows all prompt instructions, including distinct sections for different food types. While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B has high visual sharpness, it fails the basic task of menu design by repeating the same food image (pizza) for all categories and having unreadable, overlapping header text.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana Pro
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent typography with a glowing fire texture on the main title.
  • + High-impact starburst for the price with a clean font.
  • + Dynamic composition with embers that feel integrated into the physics of the explosion.
  • The 'exploded' effect is less pronounced, looking more like two halves of a burger than individual components.
  • The secondary text 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' lacks the requested fiery/glowing effect.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Superior deconstructed layout showing separation between pickles, onions, tomatoes, and patty.
  • + Highly realistic textures on the vegetables and dripping sauce.
  • + Consistent glowing fiery effect applied across all text elements including the price and secondary message.
  • The '€6.99' text is slightly cramped inside its starburst.
  • The starburst element is smaller and has less visual weight than in the competing image.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt well, but Nano Banana Pro is the winner because it successfully applied the 'fiery, glowing effect' to all text elements as requested, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 9B left the secondary text plain white. Additionally, Nano Banana Pro provided a more detailed 'exploded' burger with clearly separated ingredients like onions and pickles, enhancing the dynamic feel.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Natural chalk smudge and texture effects on the board.
  • + Excellent rendering of cursive handwriting styles.
  • + High resolution and clarity on the board details.
  • Spelling error in 'Mushrropom'.
  • The wooden frame composition is a bit flat and tight on the edges.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Perfect spelling for all requested menu items.
  • + Superior composition showing the 'cozy café' environment with depth.
  • + Text is highly legible while maintaining the requested handwriting style.
  • The date '2026' is slightly less clean than the other text.
  • The chalk texture on the letters is slightly more uniform than Image A.

Verdict: Nano Banana Pro is the winner because it successfully followed all text instructions with perfect spelling, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 9B included a jarring typo in 'Mushroom'. Additionally, Nano Banana Pro provided a much better composition that captured the requested 'cozy café' atmosphere.

Pose & Character Mashup

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent adherence to the complex leg-crossing pose from Image 1.
  • + Accurately replicates the character's facial features and sunglasses from Image 2.
  • + Maintains the lighting and vibrant yellow background of the source environment impeccably.
  • The character's right hand (bottom left) is rendered as a clenched fist rather than the splayed hand in Image 1.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Successfully combines the character's clothing and appearance from Image 2 with the environment of Image 1.
  • + Good rendering of the face and accessories.
  • Fails significantly on the lower body pose, with the character standing normally rather than the dynamic cross-legged balance of Image 1.
  • The interaction between the character and the red stool is less convincing than Model A.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is the clear winner as it successfully replicated the difficult dynamic pose from Image 1, including the specific cross-legged positioning on the stool. Nano Banana Pro failed to capture the core of the pose instruction, rendering the character in a much simpler standing position that does not match the reference.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + High visual quality and resolution of the astronaut and background elements.
  • + Cinematic lighting and composition with detailed galaxies and planets.
  • Failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is riding the horse instead of the horse being on top.
  • Includes garbled, AI-generated text at the bottom.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Followed the difficult logical prompt instruction by placing the horse on top of the astronaut.
  • + Creative interpretation with the addition of a celestial cape for the horse.
  • + Clean image without any hallucinated text Overlay.
  • The horse's legs are anatomically awkward where they meet the astronaut's hands.
  • Slightly less 'cinematic' lighting compared to the opponent.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B produced a high-quality image but completely ignored the core spatial instruction to put the horse on top, whereas Nano Banana Pro followed the complex prompt perfectly. Nano Banana Pro is preferred for its superior adherence to the surreal requirements of the text, despite having slightly less refined textures.

Outfit Transfer Challenge

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana Pro
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent preservation of the subject's face, hair, and vitiligo patterns
  • + High level of detail in accessories including the watch and several added jewelry items
  • Halos and artifacts around the hair-to-outfit transition area
  • Added several necklaces that were not present in Source Image 2

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Perfectly maintains the background and the original person's facial features
  • + More accurate replication of the specific outfit components from Source Image 2
  • Loss of some fine details in the scarf's texture compared to the source
  • Placement of the watch is slightly awkward against the cuff

Verdict: Both models did an exceptional job preserving the subject's identity and skin patterns while blending the new outfit. Nano Banana Pro is the winner because it more accurately reflected the outfit from Source Image 2, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 9B added several pieces of jewelry not found in the original request.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent photorealistic texture on the capybara's fur.
  • + Consistent lighting between the phone screen and the passenger's face.
  • + Clear depiction of the 'taxi driver cap' as requested.
  • The passenger is sitting in the front passenger seat, failing the 'back seat' instruction.
  • The steering wheel is positioned strangely high, obscuring the capybara's body.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Correctly placed the human businesswoman in the back seat as per the prompt.
  • + Included realistic taxi details like the fare meter and dashboard documents.
  • + High level of background detail showing a convincing Manhattan street.
  • The capybara's expression is slightly more glazed/taxidermy-like compared to Model A.
  • Minor blurring artifacts on the human passenger's hands.

Verdict: Nano Banana Pro is the clear winner because it correctly followed the spatial instruction to place the passenger in the back seat, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 9B placed her in the front. Nano Banana Pro also added extra touches of realism like the taxi meter while maintaining the humorous contrast requested in the prompt.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent typography with clean, legible serif fonts.
  • + Perfect adherence to all requested text and event details.
  • + Balanced composition with high-quality cinematic lighting around the jack-o-lantern.
  • The 'webs and thorns' border is a bit repetitive and symmetrical.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Atmospheric vintage parchment texture is very convincing.
  • + Artistic 'gnarly' tree framing adds to the gothic aesthetic.
  • + Creative inclusion of spiders within the border webs.
  • Text rendering is slightly inconsistent with some minor bleeding in the font details.
  • The scroll banner placement feels a bit crowded right under the main title.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, but FLUX.2 [klein] 9B wins due to its superior text clarity and professional layout. While Nano Banana Pro captures the 'vintage' parchment feel slightly better, FLUX.2 [klein] 9B produces a more polished final product that looks like a real invitation.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Before After
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent texture and volume that matches the beard style.
  • + Perfectly preserves the facial features and the glasses frame position.
  • + The lighting on the hair matches the desert environment perfectly.
  • The hairline on the side of the head is a bit high and abrupt.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + The hairline is blended very naturally with the forehead.
  • + Maintains the source image's facial features and background composition accurately.
  • The hair texture is slightly thinner and less defined compared to Model A.
  • Some stray hairs on the top right lack the high-fidelity realism of the main mass.

Verdict: Both models performed excellent edits, making the hair look integrated rather than like a wig. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is the winner due to the superior volume and realistic curly texture of the hair which matches the rugged aesthetic better, whereas Nano Banana Pro produced a slightly thinner, more wispy appearance. Both models succeeded in preserving the original facial features and environment perfectly.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent typography with clean, bold execution.
  • + Perfect isometric 45-degree angle that feels very balanced.
  • + Soft, stylized 3D textures that match the cartoon aesthetic well.
  • The flag icon is incorrect, resembling the Yemen flag instead of Japan.
  • The sushi design is a bit unusual, particularly the piece with both salmon topping and a seaweed wrap.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Highly accurate flag icon for Japan.
  • + Beautiful diorama base with cherry blossom and moss details for added creative flair.
  • + High variety of realistic sushi models including nigiri, maki, and gunkan.
  • The 'JAPAN' text is slightly off-center to the left.
  • The lighting is a bit flat compared to the soft shadows in the other model.

Verdict: Nano Banana Pro is the winner because it correctly identifies the Japanese flag and provides a much more detailed and recognizable variety of sushi. While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B has superior typography and a cleaner layout, its failure to generate the correct national flag for a country-specific prompt is a significant inaccuracy.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent caricature style with exaggerated features that still resemble the subject
  • + Cleverly integrates hockey by placing the anchor desk inside a hockey arena with a crowd
  • + Includes a large variety of dogs as part of the audience and setting
  • The 'humorous' elements are a bit subtle compared to the other model
  • The text on the screens and banners is unintelligible gibberish

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Stronger adherence to 'humor' with dogs wearing jerseys and holding hockey pucks
  • + Preserves the subject's clothing style (denim shirt) from the source image
  • + Clearer text and iconography related to the tv anchor profession
  • The facial features are less 'caricaturized' and more like a standard cartoon portrait
  • The hockey stick is positioned awkwardly in the hand

Verdict: Both models followed the instructions well, but Nano Banana Pro is the winner because it successfully integrated all three themes—hockey, dogs, and news anchor—into a single, cohesive, and humorous scene. While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B did a better job with the physical caricature of the face, Nano Banana Pro's inclusion of jersey-wearing dogs and sports memorabilia felt more aligned with the 'exaggerated and humorous' request.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent handling of golden sunrise lighting and god rays
  • + Vibrant and dense wildflower composition
  • + High level of detail in the fur textures
  • Failed to include the baby bunny requested in the prompt
  • The kitten's anatomy and pose appear slightly awkward and floaty

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Included all four requested animals: puppy, kitten, bunny, and fox
  • + Better captures the sense of movement and 'playfully chasing' mentioned in the prompt
  • + Clean anatomy and expressive faces across all subjects
  • Image has a slightly more saturated, 'AI-illustrated' look rather than hyper-photorealistic
  • The background trees are a bit generic and less detailed

Verdict: Nano Banana Pro is the winner for successfully including all four animals (missing only the bunny in FLUX.2), and for better depicting the 'playful chasing' action described. While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B has slightly superior lighting and texture detail, its failure to adhere to the core subject list makes it less successful for this specific prompt.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent soft watercolor texture that matches the Ghibli aesthetic perfectly.
  • + Captures the dreamy, pastoral background requested in the prompt.
  • + Maintains the core compositional elements while flawlessly transitioning to an illustration style.
  • Loses the original 'distracted' and 'angry' facial expressions, giving everyone a generic pleasant look.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Successfully preserves the original facial expressions and emotional context of the source image.
  • + Good use of hand-painted line art and soft shading.
  • + Better preservation of the specific clothing details, like the pattern on the man's shirt.
  • The textures are slightly more digital and less like a 'hand-painted' Ghibli background compared to Model A.
  • The background architecture is a bit clunky in its perspective.

Verdict: While both models successfully converted the photo into a beautiful illustration, FLUX.2 [klein] 9B (Model A) captured the requested Studio Ghibli 'vibe' and watercolor texture much better. However, Nano Banana Pro (Model B) is arguably the better edit because it preserved the specific character emotions and narrative of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme, whereas Model A made everyone look happy and content, losing the irony of the original photo.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Before After
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent preservation of the subject's face and original features.
  • + Realistic and symmetrical 'blowing' effect on the hair.
  • + Consistent distribution of falling leaves across the frame.
  • The hair movement looks a bit too stiff and perfectly fanned out.
  • The leaves are all autumn-colored, which contrasts slightly with the very green trees in the background.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + The hair motion appears more organic and windswept, specifically following a clear direction.
  • + Effectively added motion to the dog's tail as well, increasing the 'energetic' feel requested.
  • Distorts the woman's face significantly, specifically her right eye and nose area.
  • Contains some messy artifacts/specks in the air above the woman's head.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is the winner because it successfully adds the requested motion and elements while keeping the subject's face perfectly intact and recognizable from the source image. Although Nano Banana Pro has a more natural hair flow and includes the dog in the animation, it fails as an edit by introducing significant facial distortion and messy artifacts.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent typography and spelling including correct accents
  • + Clean vector style with bold lines
  • + Strong circular framing element and balanced composition
  • The steam element is a bit thick and looks slightly cartoonish

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Beautiful etching-style shading on the cloche and banner
  • + Elegant curly steam design
  • + Sophisticated vintage aesthetic with fine details
  • The letter 'C' in 'Caffè' is slightly disconnected
  • Some minor linework inconsistencies on the left side of the banner

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, producing high-quality logos with perfect spelling. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B leans towards a modern, bold vector approach with great balance, while Nano Banana Pro captures a more authentic hand-drawn vintage feel with its cross-hatching and elegant steam. Nano Banana Pro is slightly preferred for its more artistic interpretation of the 'vintage' and 'cloche' requirements.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Features a bold, stylized flat-vector aesthetic.
  • + Good adherence to the requested color palette.
  • Numerous spelling errors including 'AOILLO', 'EARDHT', and 'LANDINING'.
  • The flow of the infographic is confusing and non-linear.
  • Icons are repeated or mismatched to the steps.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Excellent adherence to all six requested steps with a clear, logical flow.
  • + Near-perfect text rendering and typography.
  • + Professional composition that looks like a real infographic.
  • + Accurate iconography for the Saturn V, Earth, Moon, and Lunar Module.
  • The 'Descent' step features red thrust lines that are slightly more aggressive than a strictly 'flat-vector' style, though it still fits the theme.

Verdict: Nano Banana Pro significantly outperforms FLUX.2 [klein] by following the requested six-step sequence with high accuracy and professional-grade typography. While FLUX.2 struggled with basic spelling and a chaotic layout, Nano Banana Pro delivered a cohesive, educational-style poster that perfectly matched the NASA-inspired theme.

Next steps

Explore each model