Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B Black Forest Labs FLUX.2 [pro] Black Forest Labs

Settled by community votes across 19 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

20.6 arena score

#13 of 32 in Image Editing

Skill signature · Image Editing

FLUX.2 [pro]

26.3 arena score

#8 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

FLUX.2 [pro]

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 19

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
FLUX.2 [pro]

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent depiction of thick glass with realistic optical distortions
  • + Highly detailed wooden table texture with natural lighting effects
  • + Vibrant and interesting texture within the blue sphere
  • The glass object is more of a rounded vessel than a sharp 'cube' as requested
  • The sphere appears to be floating rather than resting on the bottom surface

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Perfect adherence to the 'cube' geometry with clean, sharp edges
  • + Realistic positioning of objects with the sphere resting on the base
  • + Highly accurate lighting from the left following the prompt
  • The plant in the background is quite blurry, reducing its visibility through the glass
  • The blue sphere has a slightly dull, matte texture compared to the other glass elements

Verdict: While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B produces a more artistically textured image with beautiful thick glass refractions, it fails to deliver a true 'cube' shape. FLUX.2 [pro] followed the spatial and geometric instructions perfectly, creating a clear square cube with all elements positioned exactly as described.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
FLUX.2 [pro]

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent preservation of the original car's structure and details.
  • + High-quality motion blur on the road and wheels.
  • + Beautifully rendered coastal background with palm trees.
  • The man is mostly obscured/turned away, making it hard to identify him.
  • The hair texture is somewhat simplified compared to the source.

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Successfully shows the man's face and original plaid coat for clear subject preservation.
  • + Accurately represents the man's pose and smile from the source image.
  • + Preserves the specific model of the Rolls Royce accurately.
  • The perspective of the man's body in the car's interior is slightly awkward.
  • Some edge artifacts around the car's hood where it meets the road.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] is the winner because it successfully integrates both source images, showing the man's face and his specific plaid coat, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 9B obscures the subject's face entirely. FLUX.2 [pro] delivers a much more recognizable and satisfying edit that adheres to the spirit of combining the two provided images.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
FLUX.2 [pro]

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent skin texture and hyper-realistic facial details
  • + Accurate depiction of rain streaks in the foreground
  • + Complex, cluttered background that adds to the urban Japanese aesthetic
  • The white cars in the background lack the requested motion blur
  • The bike geometry is slightly illogical where the fork meets the frame

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Successfully captures the motion blur of the passing car as requested
  • + Composition feels more 'candid' with better use of negative space
  • + Realistic water ripple effects in the puddles
  • The man's face and hands are slightly soft and lack fine texture
  • The bicycle's rear wheel and chain assembly are physically incoherent

Verdict: Both models captured the cinematic atmosphere well, but FLUX.2 [pro] followed the lighting and technical prompt instructions (specifically motion blur) more accurately. However, FLUX.2 [klein] 9B provided significantly better skin and clothing textures, making it feel more like a high-resolution 50mm photograph despite the lack of motion blur.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
FLUX.2 [pro]

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent composition with a strong, symmetrical focus on the character.
  • + Very high level of detail on the metal engravings and layered chainmail.
  • + Superior lighting and skin texture, showing fine pores and realistic 'faint' scars as requested.
  • The torch in the background looks slightly artificial with a very clean, vertical flame.
  • The beads in the hair are less prominent than in the second model.

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Strong adherence to the 'beads' prompt with colorful, varied beads visible.
  • + Dynamic and moody lighting that emphasizes the battle-worn nature of the character.
  • + Excellent texture on the worn leather and fabric hood.
  • The focal point is slightly soft compared to the first model, reducing the impact of the 'lifelike eyes'.
  • Spark effects look a bit like streaks rather than bokeh particles.
  • The large scar on the forehead looks slightly less integrated into the skin than those in Model A.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B provides a more clinically perfect and sharp portrait with incredible detail in the armor engravings and skin realistic textures. FLUX.2 [pro] captures the atmosphere and specific stylistic prompts like the colorful beads and dirt better, but lacks the extreme sharpness and clarity found in the first image. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is the winner due to its superior anatomical rendering and the high-fidelity detail on the plate armor.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
FLUX.2 [pro]

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent high-resolution food photography that looks appetizing and professional.
  • + Layout feels very dynamic with the large hero heading and vibrant gradient accent.
  • + Adheres to the specifically requested grid structure for food photos.
  • The text is largely nonsensical 'lorem ipsum' style with significant spelling errors in headings.
  • Labels above the grid are repetitive and do not match the content specifically (e.g., showing pizza under 'Appetizers').

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Text is much more legible and structured into clear logical columns.
  • + Includes prices and item descriptions which makes it look more like a functional menu.
  • + Uses color-coded sections to differentiate the menu categories well.
  • Repeated images and text entries (e.g., Garlic Bread appearing in three different sections).
  • Minor spelling errors in headers like 'MINS' instead of 'MAINS'.
  • Composition feels a bit more cramped compared to the airy minimalist feel of the other image.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B produces a more visually striking and professional layout with superior food photography, while FLUX.2 [pro] is more successful at creating a functional menu structure with readable text and logical columns. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is the preferred choice for a design mockup where visual appeal is a priority, whereas FLUX.2 [pro] is better if text legibility is the primary concern, despite some repetitive content.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
FLUX.2 [pro]

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent typography with a glowing lava/fire effect inside the letters.
  • + Highly dynamic composition with explosive sparks and motion-blurred sauce droplets.
  • + Professional lighting and color saturation that creates a high-impact advertising look.
  • The burger is not truly 'exploded' as much as it is 'stacked' with large gaps, missing the full deconstructed feel of the prompt.

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Better 'exploded' view with clear separation between all layers including the bottom bun.
  • + The 'MAGIC BURGER' text uses a very effective literal fire/flame outline.
  • + Stronger sense of suspension and zero-gravity depth.
  • The starburst for the price is a bit flatter and less integrated into the lighting compared to Model A.
  • The 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' text is slightly thinner and less impactful.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, producing high-quality advertising graphics. FLUX.2 [pro] is the winner because it better interpreted the 'exploded' instruction by deconstructing every layer (including the bottom bun), whereas FLUX.2 [klein] kept the burger mostly assembled, but FLUX.2 [klein] had slightly superior integration of the price starburst.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
FLUX.2 [pro]

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent text rendering with no spelling errors.
  • + Very realistic chalk smudges and texture on the board surface.
  • + Successfully captured the 'handwritten cursive' requirement for the title.
  • The 'fresh' in the footer is misspelled as 'fress'.
  • The composition is a tight crop of only the board, losing some of the 'cozy café' atmosphere.

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Beautiful depth of field and environmental storytelling to establish the 'cozy café' setting.
  • + Accurate text rendering and completion of the truncated prompt 'Brown But...'.
  • + High degree of realism in the slate chalkboard texture.
  • The cursive in the title is less 'elegant' compared to model A.
  • The bottom text at the very end is slightly cramped.

Verdict: Both models performed exceptionally well on complex text rendering and chalk aesthetics. FLUX.2 [pro] is the winner because it successfully captured the requested 'cozy café' environment rather than just the board, and provided a more natural layout for the listed items. While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B had slightly better calligraphy in the title, it included a typo in the bottom text.

Pose & Character Mashup

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
FLUX.2 [pro]

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent adherence to the complex leg-crossing pose from Image 1.
  • + Accurately recreates the character's facial features and scarf details.
  • + Maintains the head tilt and arm angles of the source pose.
  • The left arm ends in a clenched fist rather than the open hand gesture.
  • There is a slight anatomical blur where the back leg meets the torso.

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + High visual quality with realistic skin textures and lighting.
  • + Correctly identifies clothing elements like the scarf and sunglasses.
  • Fails significantly on the pose, depicting a crouching/squatting position instead of the specific leg-cross.
  • The character is looking forward rather than maintaining the head tilt from the pose reference.
  • Incorrect arm positioning compared to Image 1.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B followed the pose instructions much more accurately, successfully replicating the difficult crossed-leg balance and head tilt from Image 1. FLUX.2 [pro] produced a higher-fidelity image of the character but failed to capture the specific body position requested, reverting to a generic crouch.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
FLUX.2 [pro]

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + High visual clarity and cinematic lighting
  • + Excellent anatomical detail on the horse and spacesuit
  • Failed to follow the specific spatial instruction (horse on top of astronaut)
  • Includes distracting gibberish text at the bottom of the image

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Followed the specific 'horse on top' spatial reasoning instruction
  • + Captures a more surreal atmosphere as requested
  • + Clean composition without watermarks or text
  • Anatomical glitch where the top horse's leg merges into the lower horse's back
  • Less facial detail visible through the visor compared to Image A

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] is the clear winner because it correctly interpreted the challenging spatial instruction to put the horse on top of the astronaut, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 9B defaulted to a standard 'astronaut riding a horse' concept. While FLUX.2 [pro] has some minor anatomical merging issues, it is far more creative and responsive to the prompt's unique requirements.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
FLUX.2 [pro]

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Successfully places the passenger sitting next to the capybara, creating a clear and humorous juxtaposition.
  • + Excellent lighting on the woman's face from the smartphone screen.
  • + Very sharp focus and textures on the capybara's fur and the taxi driver cap.
  • The passenger is sitting in the front passenger seat rather than the requested back seat.
  • The text on the cap is garbled ('NEW TALA').

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Correctly places the businesswoman in the back seat as requested in the prompt.
  • + The side-profile composition is more cinematic and shows a more detailed taxi dashboard.
  • + Highly realistic lighting and atmospheric rain effects on the window.
  • The capybara's paws look more like human-gloved hands than natural paws.
  • The human passenger is slightly out of focus and less prominent in the composition.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] followed the spatial instructions more accurately by placing the passenger in the back seat, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 9B placed her in the front. However, FLUX.2 [klein] 9B produced a more striking and humorous image with better light interaction on the subjects. FLUX.2 [pro] is the overall winner for technical prompt adherence regarding composition.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
FLUX.2 [pro]

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent typography rendering with perfect spelling and alignment
  • + Beautifully detailed thorn and web border framing the entire composition
  • + Coherent atmospheric lighting between the jack-o-lantern and the environment
  • The parchment texture is a bit flat compared to the requested vintage poster style

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Atmospheric use of ground fog and darker color palette adds to the spooky theme
  • + Stronger parchment texture with torn edge effects matches the vintage request well
  • + Accurate text rendering for all requested details
  • The scrolls and title text look slightly less integrated into the illustration's style than in the other model
  • The glowing jack-o-lantern illumination on the ground is a bit abrupt

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, producing high-quality invitations with perfect text. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is the winner due to its superior composition and more cohesive border design, whereas FLUX.2 [pro] feels slightly more like layered elements rather than a unified poster.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Before After
FLUX.2 [pro]

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent preservation of the subject's face, eyes, and skin texture.
  • + The hair texture is highly detailed and matches the salt-and-pepper tones of the beard.
  • + Seamless integration of the new hair with the existing sideburns and background.
  • None notable.

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Successfully adds a full head of hair that fits the prompt.
  • Noticeably alters the subject's facial structure, especially around the eyes and nose.
  • The hair texture appears slightly more painterly/blurry compared to the original image sharpness.
  • The forehead area looks smoothed out, losing original skin details.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is the clear winner as it successfully added a realistic, thick head of hair while perfectly preserving the identity and facial features of the man in the source image. In contrast, FLUX.2 [pro] changed the subject's face significantly, making him look like a different person.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
FLUX.2 [pro]

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent wood grain texture on the diorama base.
  • + Clear and legible black typography.
  • + Accurate sushi roll construction and realistic salmon texture.
  • The flag icon is incorrect, appearing similar to the flag of Yemen or the German Empire rather than Japan.
  • The sushi placement on the plate is slightly unbalanced.

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Correctly identifies and renders the flag of Japan.
  • + Delightful stylized miniature details including a ginger rose and wasabi dab.
  • + Superior 3D 'cartoon' aesthetic with tactile, beaded rice textures.
  • The white text on a light blue background has lower contrast than Model A.
  • The diorama base is a simple grey block compared to the more detailed wood in Model A.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] is the winner because it accurately followed the instruction for a Japanese flag icon, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 9B generated an unrelated flag. FLUX.2 [pro] also better captured the 'miniature 3D cartoon' style through its charming interpretations of ginger and rice textures.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
FLUX.2 [pro]

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent capture of the subject's facial features in a caricature style.
  • + High level of detail in the background including a crowd and multiple news monitors.
  • + Effectively combines all three themes: TV anchor, dogs, and hockey stadium atmosphere.
  • The hand holding the microphone/pen object is anatomically confusing.
  • The 'hockey' element is more subtle, relegated to the background crowd and stadium setting.

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Features very clear and direct hockey iconography like sticks and a rink desk.
  • + Clean, modern vector-style illustration.
  • + Maintains a friendly, exaggerated aesthetic consistent with the brief.
  • The facial likeness is more generic and less recognizable as the woman in the source image.
  • The hands are quite small and lack the correct proportions even for a caricature.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is the winner because it successfully preserves the facial likeness of the woman from the source image within a caricature style, whereas FLUX.2 [pro] produces a more generic face. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B also creates a much richer scene with a full stadium crowd of humans and dogs, while FLUX.2 [pro] relies on more basic iconography.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
FLUX.2 [pro]

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Strong presence of 'god rays' and dynamic sunrise lighting
  • + Vibrant colors that emphasize the joyful vibe
  • + High clarity on the textures of the flowers and butterflies
  • Missed one of the four requested animals (no bunny)
  • Anatomy issues with the puppy's front leg and the kitten's paws
  • The butterflies appear somewhat artificial or clip-art like

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Included all four requested animals: puppy, kitten, bunny, and fox
  • + More realistic interactions between the animals and the butterflies
  • + Exceptional fur texture and softer, more photorealistic lighting
  • The 'god rays' are much more subtle than requested
  • The kitten's tail is slightly merged with the grass and background

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] is the clear winner as it successfully rendered all four specific animals requested in the prompt, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 9B omitted the bunny. FLUX.2 [pro] also achieved a more believable 'hyper-photorealistic' look with superior anatomical accuracy and natural animal expressions.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
FLUX.2 [pro]

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellently captures the watercolor, pastel vibe of Studio Ghibli backgrounds.
  • + Successfully translates the 'distracted boyfriend' meme into a hand-painted anime style.
  • + The lighting is soft and dreamy as requested.
  • Changed the background from an urban street to a rural landscape, failing to preserve the source setting.
  • The girl on the right is smiling, which loses the 'jealous/indignant' expression essential to the original meme.

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Perfectly preserves the source image's urban composition, including the bus and street layout.
  • + Successfully retains the emotional context of the scene, especially the indignant expression of the girl on the right.
  • + High-quality linework and texture that feels like a frame from a film.
  • The color palette is a bit muted and sepia-toned rather than the requested 'soft pastels'.
  • Some minor artifacting on the edges of the image.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] is the winner because it successfully transforms the image into the requested style while preserving the composition and narrative intent of the source meme. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B produces a beautiful Ghibli-style illustration but changes the setting to a rural field and loses the key 'jealous' facial expression, making it a less accurate edit.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Before After
FLUX.2 [pro]

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'leaves flying' instruction with realistic fall foliage.
  • + Strong source preservation for the main subject and background.
  • + Dynamic hair movement that looks natural for the pose.
  • The leaf rendering is a bit uniform in terms of sharpness across different depths.

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Successfully adds motion to both the hair and the clothing (denim jacket) for a more immersive feel.
  • + Excellent use of depth of field with the flying leaves to create a sense of foreground and background.
  • Some leaves in the extreme foreground are overly blurry and distracting.
  • Slight alteration to the lighting/color saturation compared to the source.

Verdict: Both models performed exceptionally well on this edit. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is perhaps more faithful to the original image's lighting and composition, while FLUX.2 [pro] captures a more 'lively' feel by adding motion to the subject's jacket as well as her hair, and using depth-of-field effects on the leaves to create a 3D sense of motion.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
FLUX.2 [pro]

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Strong, clear typography with correct accents
  • + Bold vector-style shading on the cloche
  • + Perfect brand name and date accuracy
  • The circular border is broken by the text in a slightly awkward way
  • The steam graphic is a bit simplistic compared to the rest of the logo

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Elegant, thin-line vector illustrations
  • + Sophisticated cross-hatch shading on the cloche
  • + Better overall balance and more refined 'vintage' aesthetic
  • The typography is a bit spaced out and less impactful than Model A
  • The accent on 'CAFFÈ' is slightly detached and stylized

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, producing high-quality vector-style logos with correct text. FLUX.2 [pro] is the winner because its illustration style feels more professional and nuanced, particularly in the shading of the cloche and the composition of the circular borders, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is slightly bolder but more generic.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
FLUX.2 [pro]

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Features a bold NASA-inspired color palette.
  • + Good use of flat-vector silhouettes for the crew.
  • Numerous spelling errors in text labels (e.g., 'AOILLO', 'EARDHT', 'LANDINING').
  • The flow of the infographic is confusing and non-linear.
  • The rocket design is generic and does not look like a Saturn V.

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent layout with a clear, logical vertical flow for the steps.
  • + Text rendering is significantly cleaner and more accurate for headings.
  • + Icons much more closely follow the prompt (Earth with orbit ring, trajectory arcs, lunar module).
  • The placeholder descriptive text under headings is gibberish.
  • The astronaut names at the top are slightly misaligned with the silhouettes.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] followed the prompt's structural and iconographic requirements much more effectively, producing a professional vertical infographic that clearly displays the requested steps. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B suffered from severe spelling errors and a disjointed layout that made the information difficult to follow.

Next steps

Explore each model