Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B Black Forest Labs Wan 2.6 Alibaba

Settled by community votes across 19 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

22.3 arena score

#32 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Wan 2.6

23.3 arena score

#27 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Top 2 in Image-to-Video
Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

Wan 2.6

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 19

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent cube geometry with clean edges
  • + Realistic texture on the book cover
  • + Clear adherence to the 'soft window light' instruction
  • The 'cube' is missing a top face, appearing more like a five-sided box
  • Reflection of the sphere on the bottom of the glass is slightly misaligned

Wan 2.6

  • + Beautiful natural lighting and shadows on the table
  • + Includes a realistic potted plant rather than just loose leaves
  • + The sphere appears more 'glassy' and translucent
  • The 'cube' has significant perspective errors with the vertical internal edges
  • The book has a worn, slightly tattered edge that might be undesirable for a clean prompt
  • Structural distortion where the book sits on the glass

Verdict: Both models followed the spatial instructions perfectly. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B produced a cleaner, more geometrically accurate glass enclosure, while Wan 2.6 excelled at atmospheric lighting and realistic textures on the table and plant. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B is the likely winner for its superior structural coherence of the main glass object.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent preservation of the specific car model from the source image.
  • + Accurately replicates the man's facial features and distinctive hairstyle.
  • + Effective motion blur on the wheels and road adds a sense of speed.
  • The scale of the man inside the car feels slightly off, making him look a bit small.
  • The lighting on the man's face doesn't perfectly match the bright coastal sun.

Wan 2.6

  • + Incredible composition and background scenery that perfectly matches the 'California coastline' request.
  • + Superior integration of the subject into the vehicle with realistic lighting and posture.
  • + Excellent preservation of the man's clothing, including the plaid coat and scarf.
  • The car's details are slightly altered compared to the source, particularly the hood ornament and side paneling.
  • The man's facial features are slightly softened compared to the source image.

Verdict: Both models handled this complex multi-source edit very well. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B followed the car's technical details more closely, but Wan 2.6 created a much more convincing and visually stunning composition. Wan 2.6 is the winner for its superior blending of the subject into the environment and better captures the lifestyle aesthetic of the prompt.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Natural and realistic color grading
  • + Authentic urban background with realistic cars
  • + Good representation of light rain and ground reflections
  • Anatomical errors where the man's seat and legs merge with the bike frame
  • The man is standing/leaning awkwardly rather than repairing
  • The bike chain and gear assembly are nonsensical

Wan 2.6

  • + Excellent depiction of skin texture and raindrop details
  • + More plausible interaction with the bicycle in a repairing motion
  • + Stronger cinematic lighting and depth of field
  • The raindrops on the jacket appear a bit like glass beads rather than absorbed moisture
  • Slightly more stylized and less 'candid' than requested
  • Bicycle geometry has some minor inconsistencies near the pedals

Verdict: Wan 2.6 is the preferred model as it provides much higher detail in the subject's face and hands, and correctly interprets the 'repairing' action. While FLUX.2 [klein] 4B handles the background environment well, it suffers from significant anatomical merging issues where the man's body blends into the bicycle frame.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Symmetrical and clear engraving on the armor
  • + Accurate depiction of braided hair with subtle beads
  • + Good lighting consistency on the facial features
  • Armor looks a bit flat and like a costume rather than heavy plate
  • The 'battle-worn' effect is very minimal with just a few clean cuts

Wan 2.6

  • + Excellent texture on the leather straps and frayed cloth underlayer
  • + Realistic 'battle-worn' aesthetic with convincing dirt and grime
  • + Superior use of torchlight reflection on the metal and eyes
  • Perspective of the braid interacting with the shoulder armor is slightly messy
  • Extreme dirt on the face might obscure some skin texture details

Verdict: Wan 2.6 captures the 'battle-worn' and 'highly detailed texture' aspects of the prompt significantly better than FLUX.2 [klein] 4B, which feels more like a clean studio portrait. Wan 2.6 provides a much richer atmospheric experience with authentic weathering on both the paladin and his gear.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Features a high variety of high-quality, professional food photography.
  • + The typography is clean and modern, following the bold sans-serif requirement.
  • + The layout intelligently separates elements with a sophisticated, magazine-style grid.
  • The text content is mostly gibberish even for larger headings.
  • The section headers are repetitive and and non-sensical (e.g., 'MDAINS' and 'MDANS').

Wan 2.6

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'vibrant accents' and 'colorful food' prompt instructions.
  • + Highly legible headings like 'APPETIZERS', 'PIZZA', and 'MAINS'.
  • + Logical price formatting and menu structure that looks like a real-world document.
  • The food photos are repetitive, showing mostly pizzas across multiple sections.
  • The section headers and imagery are slightly mismatched (pizza shown under Appetizers).

Verdict: Wan 2.6 is the clear winner as it produced a much more functional and legible menu layout with accurate section headers ('Appetizers', 'Pizza', 'Mains') and clean pricing. While FLUX.2 [klein] 4B has arguably more diverse food photography, its text is nonsensical and the layout feels more like a portfolio page than a menu.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent photographic quality and lighting on the burger.
  • + Clean and professional starburst design.
  • + High-quality rendering of secondary text.
  • The main title text is severely misspelled and garbled.
  • The burger is not 'exploded' as requested, but mostly assembled.

Wan 2.6

  • + Perfect adherence to the 'exploded' and 'suspended' burger concept.
  • + Correct spelling for the main 'MAGIC BURGER' title with an amazing fiery effect.
  • + Excellent atmospheric background with smoke and fire.
  • Individual ingredients display minor AI artifacts upon close inspection.
  • The 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' text is slightly less polished than Model A.

Verdict: Wan 2.6 is the clear winner as it successfully followed the complex request for an 'exploded' burger and correctly spelled the brand name, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 4B provided a static, non-exploded burger and failed completely on the primary title text. Wan 2.6 also better captured the 'fiery' aesthetic requested in the prompt.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent realistic chalk texture with smudges
  • + Uniform handwriting style
  • Numerous spelling errors including 'Truffel', 'Musheram', and 'Ootrpous'
  • Text layout is a bit scattered and lacks the requested 'elegant cursive' for the title

Wan 2.6

  • + Perfect spelling on nearly every word, including complex items
  • + More cinematic and cozy café atmosphere with better composition
  • + Beautifully executed chalk texture with varying thickness and realistic dust
  • The date line is slightly less refined than the main menu items
  • Title is bold and decorative but not strictly 'elegant cursive'

Verdict: Wan 2.6 is the clear winner as it followed the menu text prompt accurately with perfect spelling for difficult words like 'Octopus' and 'Risotto', whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 4B failed significantly on spelling. Wan 2.6 also captures a much better aesthetic for a cozy cafe with more realistic lighting and chalkboard dust details.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent anatomical clarity of the horse and rider
  • + High-resolution textures on the spacesuit and horse fur
  • + Vast and cinematic composition with realistic planetary curvature.
  • Followed the common trope instead of the specific instruction to have the horse on top of the astronaut
  • The lighting on the horse is a bit flat compared to the background.

Wan 2.6

  • + Beautifully vibrant, surreal color palette with purple and blue nebulas
  • + Dynamic action pose with energetic lighting and 'space dust' effects
  • + Highly detailed reflections and lens flare.
  • Failed the negative constraint/spatial instruction to have the horse on top
  • The horse's mane and tail anatomy becomes a bit chaotic with the light effects.

Verdict: Both models failed the specific logic test in the prompt ('horse on top, not vice versa'), which was a trick designed to see if they could invert the standard image. However, Wan 2.6 is the superior artistic work, offering much better lighting, more imaginative colors, and a more cinematic feel than FLUX.2 [klein] 4B.

Outfit Transfer Challenge

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent preservation of the subject's face, hair, and sand textures from Image 1.
  • + Accurately recreates the specific plaid pattern, coat buttons, and accessories (jewelry, belt) from Image 2.
  • + Maintains the background of Image 1 with high fidelity.
  • The coat is colored black instead of the dark navy blue seen in Image 2.

Wan 2.6

  • + Correctly captures the navy blue color of the pea coat.
  • + Includes the sunglasses from Image 2 which Model A omitted.
  • Significantly alters the background on the far left and the beach shoreline.
  • Loss of fine details in the face and hair compared to the original image.
  • The scarf pattern and coat texture are oversimplified.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 4B is the clear winner for its superior ability to preserve the identity and environmental details of the source image while accurately mapping the complex outfit. While Wan 2.6 captures the blue color of the coat more accurately, it fails to maintain the high resolution and background consistency of the original scene.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent photorealistic texture on the capybara's fur and the passenger's face.
  • + Accurate interior perspective that places the viewer inside the vehicle.
  • + High-quality rendering of the capybara's paws on the steering wheel.
  • The passenger appears to be in the front seat or a very small cabin rather than clearly in the 'back seat'.
  • The vehicle interior looks somewhat generic and small for a New York taxi.

Wan 2.6

  • + Captures the rainy Manhattan atmosphere with vibrant, blurred neon lights through the glass.
  • + Clearly depicts the passenger in the rear of the cabin which fits the taxi narrative better.
  • + Adds creative details like the 'TAXI' sign visible through the roof glass.
  • The passenger's hand holding the phone has anatomical issues (merged fingers).
  • The exterior perspective through the windshield makes the car feel strangely transparent or open.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt well, but FLUX.2 [klein] 4B is the winner due to its superior photorealistic skin and fur textures and lack of anatomical errors. While Wan 2.6 captures the 'night in Manhattan' aesthetic more vividly, it suffers from significant artifacts in the passenger's hands and a confusing spatial composition.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Atmospheric cinematic lighting on the pumpkin
  • + High level of detail in the thorny border and cobwebs
  • + Symmetrical and balanced composition
  • Significant spelling errors throughout all text elements
  • Missing the 'Time' detail in the bottom section

Wan 2.6

  • + Excellent text accuracy with no spelling errors
  • + Beautiful gold-textured gothic font
  • + Rich vintage parchment texture and intricate border web work
  • The 'You are invited' banner is slightly warped
  • Lighting on the tree trunks is less realistic compared to the pumpkin glow

Verdict: While FLUX.2 [klein] 4B provides a moody and professionally balanced image, it fails significantly on text rendering, producing gibberish for the main title and errors in the date. Wan 2.6 follows the prompt perfectly, delivering accurate text, all required event details, and a high-quality vintage aesthetic, making it the clear winner for an invitation design.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Before After
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent texture and realistic hair strands
  • + Perfectly preserves facial features and the original background
  • + The hair integrates naturally with the existing beard and sideburns
  • The hairline on the forehead is slightly less dense than requested

Wan 2.6

  • + Provides a very 'full and thick' head of hair as requested
  • + Maintains original lighting and composition
  • Slightly alters the eyebrows and nose bridge during the edit
  • The hair texture looks a bit too smooth and painterly compared to the grainy photographic style of the source image

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 4B is the winner because it identifies and preserves the original person's facial geometry perfectly while adding extremely realistic, messy hair that matches the gritty texture of the source photo. Wan 2.6 provides a thicker head of hair, but it subtly changes the shape of the face and introduces a smoother, more synthetic texture that doesn't blend as well with the background grain.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent high-clarity textures on the fish and plate
  • + Clean, minimalist composition
  • + Accurate 45-degree isometric angle
  • Text is missing the 'I' in 'SUSHI'
  • The flag icon is incorrect, resembling the flag of Latvia instead of Japan
  • Failed to include the requested diorama base

Wan 2.6

  • + Perfect text rendering for both 'JAPAN' and 'SUSHI'
  • + Includes a correct Japanese flag icon
  • + Accurately follows the 'diorama base' and 'isometric miniature' instruction
  • The 'JAPAN' text is slightly off-center
  • Slightly less 'refined' texture compared to the photorealism of the first model

Verdict: Wan 2.6 is the clear winner as it followed all prompt instructions, including the specific text, the correct flag, and the 3D diorama base. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B produced a high-quality render but failed basic text spelling and used the wrong country's flag.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Strong facial resemblance to the source subject in caricature form
  • + Includes professional desk setting and multiple dogs
  • + Humorous exaggerated facial expression
  • Completely fails to include the hockey element
  • The background characters 'melt' into the furniture/screens

Wan 2.6

  • + Successfully incorporates all requested elements: TV anchor job, dogs, and hockey
  • + Clear, clean artistic style with high visual appeal
  • + The hockey stick and pug in a jersey are great creative touches
  • Facial resemblance to the source image is weaker than Model A
  • Hand holding the hockey stick has anatomical issues with finger placement

Verdict: Wan 2.6 is the clear winner as it is the only model that followed the entire prompt, including the specific request for hockey themes. While FLUX.2 [klein] 4B captured the person's likeness slightly better in a caricature style, it completely ignored the hockey instruction.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent lighting with very defined god rays and backlighting on fur.
  • + High clarity and sharp focus across all subjects.
  • + Clean, vibrant colors in the wildflowers.
  • Missed the rabbit completely, substituting a second kitten instead.
  • The fur texture looks slightly more digital/artificial than Model B.
  • Low-quality rendering of floating dust particles/bokeh.

Wan 2.6

  • + Successfully included all four requested animals: puppy, kitten, fox, and bunny.
  • + Very realistic fur textures and more 'photoreal' animal proportions.
  • + Beautiful incorporation of dew sparkles and atmospheric mist.
  • The fox exhibits anatomical issues with its paws/legs.
  • Slightly less clarity in the background compared to Model A.
  • One of the butterflies has a duplicated wing structure.

Verdict: While FLUX.2 [klein] 4B produced a cleaner and more traditionally 'beautiful' image with superior lighting, it failed the prompt by omitting the rabbit. Wan 2.6 adhered to the prompt perfectly by including all four animals and achieved a more convincing photorealistic texture, despite some minor anatomical issues with the fox kit.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'soft pastel colors' and 'dreamy' lighting requested.
  • + Captures the Ghibli-inspired watercolor texture perfectly in the backgrounds.
  • + Reshapes the environment into a more whimsical, anime-style garden city.
  • Changes the facial expression of the partner on the right from angry to content/smiling, losing the original context.

Wan 2.6

  • + Better preservation of the original image's narratives, specifically the 'distracted' look and the partner's angry expression.
  • + Higher contrast and more vibrant colors while still maintaining an illustrative feel.
  • + Successfully applies hand-painted watercolor textures.
  • The white speckle/bokeh effect is a bit heavy-handed and looks like digital noise in some areas.
  • The background is less 'dreamy' and more similar to the original street photo than Model A.

Verdict: Both models do an excellent job of stylizing the famous 'distracted boyfriend' meme into an illustration. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B leans more into the dreamy Ghibli aesthetic with its soft lighting and background changes, but it fails to preserve the key angry expression of the girlfriend. Wan 2.6 is the superior edit because it maintains the core emotional narrative of the source image while perfectly executing the requested watercolor art style.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Before After
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Successfully added a large volume of scattered leaves
  • + Hair motion looks natural and wind-blown
  • + Maintains almost perfect consistency with the original subject's facial features
  • The brown, dried leaves contrast slightly with the lush green background trees

Wan 2.6

  • + Added motion to hair effectively
  • + Leaves match the green color palette of the background foliage
  • + Preserves the original image elements very well
  • Very few leaves added, making the motion feel less 'dynamic' and 'energetic' than requested
  • Some leaves appear as simple green blobs without texture

Verdict: Both models followed the hair motion instructions well, but FLUX.2 [klein] 4B interpreted the 'dynamic and energetic' prompt much more effectively by adding a significant amount of flying leaves. Wan 2.6 was more subtle, but FLUX.2 [klein] 4B created a more transformative and lively result while still maintaining high fidelity to the original person and dog.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Clean vector-style execution with high resolution
  • + Faithful adherence to the color palette and texture requirements
  • Nonsensical spelling of the primary brand name (FLAXTION)
  • Repetitive and redundant text elements in the composition

Wan 2.6

  • + Perfect text rendering for both the brand name and established date
  • + Elegant steam illustration and balanced logo composition
  • + Good use of subtle paper texture and vintage distressing
  • Smallest text on the banner is slightly warped
  • The banner placement is asymmetrical compared to the central axis

Verdict: Wan 2.6 is the clear winner because it correctly rendered the requested text 'Caffè Florian', whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 4B hallucinated a different name entirely. Both models followed the stylistic cues well, but Wan 2.6's composition feels more like a professional logo, while FLUX.2 includes redundant labels and spelling errors.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Successfully includes multiple specific stages requested in the prompt
  • + Accurately follows the NASA color palette
  • + Includes recognizable vector icons for the Saturn V and Lunar Module
  • Text rendering is mostly gibberish or heavily misspelled
  • The layout is somewhat cluttered and disorganized

Wan 2.6

  • + Excellent text legibility and spelling for the title and names
  • + Clean, minimalist aesthetic that fits the modern poster request
  • Fails to include any of the requested 6 stages of the mission
  • Lacks the specific iconography and instructional infographics requested
  • Composition is largely empty space with very little information

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 4B is much more successful at following the complex instructional prompt, providing several of the requested steps and icons, even though the text rendering is poor. Wan 2.6 produced a clean graphic with perfect text, but completely ignored the core requirement of the prompt to illustrate the six specific steps of the mission. FLUX is preferred as it actually attempts to create the requested infographic content.

Next steps

Explore each model