Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B Black Forest Labs Nano Banana Pro Google

Settled by community votes across 20 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

22.3 arena score

#32 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Nano Banana Pro

28.1 arena score

#2 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Best Image Editing right now Top 2 in Text-to-Image
Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

0.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Nano Banana Pro

100.0%

win rate

0.0% 0.0% ties 100.0%
Shared challenges 20

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent adherence to lighting instructions with a soft, diffused glow.
  • + The glass transparency and internal reflections are physically plausible.
  • + Clean, modern composition with a shallow depth of field.
  • The cube appears to be open or missing a top panel under the book.
  • The scale of the spheres and book relative to the cube is a bit tight.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Highly realistic textures on the vintage book and wooden table.
  • + Perfectly captures the 'blue sphere' instruction with a glass-like marble texture.
  • + Excellent glass refraction showing the plant through the cube.
  • The plant is more 'next to' the cube than 'behind' it as requested.
  • The lighting is quite harsh/direct rather than the requested 'soft window light'.

Verdict: Both models followed the complex spatial instructions accurately. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B better captured the requested soft lighting and clean aesthetic, whereas Nano Banana Pro excelled in textural realism and the specific appearance of the blue sphere. Nano Banana Pro is the winner for its superior detail in the book and table textures, though FLUX.2 had better lighting atmosphere.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent preservation of the original car's structure and details.
  • + Accurately transplants the man's face and distinctive hairstyle into the scene.
  • + Effective use of motion blur on the wheels to suggest driving.
  • The man appears slightly washed out and less integrated with the lighting of the car.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Perfectly captures the subject's clothing, scarf, and hairstyle from the source image.
  • + Superior lighting and composition that creates a more cinematic feel.
  • + Excellent facial likeness and expression preservation.
  • The car's perspective and model details are slightly altered compared to the source image.

Verdict: Both models succeeded at combining the subjects. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B followed the car's original design and angle more closely, but Nano Banana Pro produced a significantly more high-quality, harmonious image. Nano Banana Pro excelled at preserving the man's specific outfit and lighting, making for a much more believable final composite.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent shallow depth of field and bokeh effect
  • + High photographic resolution and clarity
  • + Beautiful reflections on the wet asphalt
  • Anatomy and physics issues with the bike pedals and man's leg placement
  • Failed to capture the requested motion blur from passing cars

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Successfully captured motion blur on the passing vehicle
  • + Very convincing natural skin texture and facial features
  • + Excellent adherence to the 'imperfect framing' and 'no stylization' requirements
  • Some minor artifacts with the bicycle kickstand and spokes
  • Less pronounced rain effect compared to the first image

Verdict: Nano Banana Pro captures the prompt's requested 'no stylization' and 'motion blur' much more effectively, resulting in a photo that looks like a genuine film scan from a street photographer. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B produces a visually beautiful image with high detail, but the bicycle's geometry is nonsensical and it missed the motion blur and candid aesthetic in favor of a clean portrait.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent clarity on the skin texture and scars
  • + Highly symmetrical and clean armor engravings
  • + Accurate depiction of hair beads as requested
  • The lighting feels a bit flat and artificial across the face
  • Lacks the 'battle-worn' intensity of the second image

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Superb cinematic lighting with realistic warm torchlight reflections
  • + Exceptional depiction of dirt and grit, conveying a true battle-worn feel
  • + Detailed texture on leather straps and clothing underlayer
  • The braids are a bit busy compared to the first model
  • Slightly less clarity in the background elements

Verdict: Nano Banana Pro captures the cinematic atmosphere and 'battle-worn' aesthetic much more effectively, using lighting and texture to create a gritty, believable scene. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B produces a very clean and detailed image, but it feels more like a staged cosplay photo than a character in a battle-hardened environment.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent high-end food photography with great color and lighting
  • + Dynamic and modern grid layout
  • Text is largely illegible gibberish
  • The section headers are inconsistent or misspelled (e.g., MDAINS, MDANS)

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Perfect adherence to section requirements (Appetizers, Pizza, Mains)
  • + Clear, legible text and standard menu pricing format
  • + Balanced use of vibrant color accents
  • Slightly more generic 'stock photo' aesthetic
  • Small spelling errors in dish descriptions like 'vith' or 'triingables'

Verdict: Nano Banana Pro is the winner as it perfectly follows all formatting instructions, including specific section headers and a cohesive grid design that remains functional as a menu. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B produces more artistic food photography but fails significantly on text legibility and basic spelling of the requested categories.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent photorealistic texture on the burger bun and meat.
  • + High-quality starburst element for the price tag.
  • + Vibrant glowing embers in the background.
  • The primary text 'MAAC AGIR BUIRCGER' is severely misspelled and garbled.
  • Failed the 'exploded' instruction; the burger is fully assembled rather than suspended in components.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Perfectly depicts the 'exploded' view with all components suspended in mid-air.
  • + All requested text is rendered accurately with no spelling errors.
  • + Consistent glowing neon/fiery effect across all text and the starburst.
  • The burger ingredients look slightly more illustrative compared to the high realism of Model A.

Verdict: Nano Banana Pro is the clear winner as it adhered to every complex prompt instruction, including the 'exploded' burger layout and accurate text rendering. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B failed to separate the burger components and produced nonsensical, garbled text for the main title.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent chalk texture and smudging realistic of a real chalkboard.
  • + Strong central composition focusing on the texture of the board.
  • Numerous spelling errors including 'Truffle', 'Mushroom', 'Grilled', and 'Octopus'.
  • Handwriting style is inconsistent with several different slants and letter weights.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Perfect spelling on all requested menu items and dates.
  • + Includes a realistic cafe background which adds context to the 'cozy café' prompt.
  • + Clean, legible handwriting that maintains a consistent style throughout.
  • The handwriting looks slightly too uniform, almost like a digital chalk font rather than manual writing.
  • The chalkboard easel is slightly cut off at the bottom.

Verdict: Nano Banana Pro is the clear winner as it successfully rendered all text with perfect spelling and followed the context of the 'cozy café' setting. While FLUX.2 [klein] 4B had a more authentic chalk texture on the board, its inability to spell words correctly like 'Truffel' and 'Ootrpous' makes it less useful.

Pose & Character Mashup

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Nano Banana Pro
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Successfully merges the character's sunglasses and scarf into the new pose.
  • + Strong adherence to the lighting and yellow background of the source image.
  • Gave the male character long, flowing hair from the woman in Image 1, failing the 'character reference' task.
  • The face and expression do not closely resemble the man from Image 2.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Excellent character preservation, maintaining the short hair, facial features, and expression from Image 2.
  • + Accurately replicates the complex leg-crossing pose while integrating the character's specific clothing.
  • + Perfectly captures the sunglasses and scarf details from the character reference.
  • Minor anatomical distortion in the way the right forearm connects to the wrist.
  • Slightly less dynamic tilt in the torso compared to the original pose reference.

Verdict: Nano Banana Pro is the clear winner as it successfully transferred the specific character (including hair and facial features) from Image 2 into the pose of Image 1. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B failed to maintain the character reference's identity, erroneously keeping the long hair from the woman in the pose reference instead of using the man's features.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + High resolution and cinematic lighting.
  • + Excellent textures on the spacesuit and horse's coat.
  • Completely failed the negative constraint regarding orientation.
  • The composition is a standard trope and lacks creativity.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Successfully followed the difficult spatial instruction of having the horse on top.
  • + Creates a whimsical and surreal atmosphere that matches the prompt.
  • + Good use of background elements like the cape and galaxies.
  • The transition between the astronaut's hands and the horse's hooves is visually awkward.
  • Lower overall realism in the textures compared to the other model.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 4B followed the standard 'astronaut riding a horse' trope, ignoring the specific instruction for the horse to be on top. Nano Banana Pro successfully interpreted the challenging spatial prompt, resulting in a much more creative and accurate representation of the user's intent, despite slightly lower technical fidelity.

Outfit Transfer Challenge

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent preservation of the subject's face, hair, and vitiligo patterns
  • + High level of detail in accessories including the gold necklace and bracelets
  • + Accurately replicates the scarf pattern and coat style
  • The lighting on the subject's torso is slightly mismatched with the ambient light
  • Minor warping on the hand inside the pocket

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Perfectly preserves the background and the wooden structure
  • + Clean integration of the coat and scarf onto the subject's frame
  • + Accurate accessory placement such as the gold watch
  • The vitiligo pattern on the face is slightly altered compared to Image 1
  • The lighting on the coat feels a bit flat compared to the source

Verdict: Both models did an excellent job of transposing the clothing from Image 2 onto the subject in Image 1. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B followed the instruction more precisely by adding all details including the gold chains and keeping the vitiligo pattern completely unchanged, whereas Nano Banana Pro slightly simplified the jewelry and softened the facial skin patterns. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B is the winner for its superior attention to the specific skin details and complex layering requested.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent character framing with both subjects clearly visible
  • + High-quality textures on the capybara's fur and the woman's clothing
  • + Both front paws are clearly placed on the steering wheel as requested
  • The camera angle feels like it is inside the dashboard or engine block
  • The proportions of the car's interior feel slightly cramped and unrealistic for a sedan

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Highly realistic taxi dashboard and meter details
  • + Excellent depth of field and street lighting through the windows
  • + The capybara's expression is very professional and focused
  • The capybara's paws are poorly rendered, appearing like human fingers or distorted claws
  • The cap is more of a newsboy/flat cap rather than a traditional taxi driver cap

Verdict: Nano Banana Pro produces a more cinematic and realistic taxi environment with better lighting and interior details, but fails significantly on the rendering of the capybara's paws. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B follows the paw placement instructions much better and provides a clearer view of both characters, though the camera perspective is slightly awkward. Nano Banana Pro is the winner for its superior atmospheric realism and composition.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent moody atmosphere and high-quality textures on the pumpkin.
  • + Good composition with the border elements clearly defined.
  • Major spelling errors in the main title text.
  • Incorrect date (206 instead of 2026) and spelling errors in location labels.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Perfect text rendering for all requested strings including date and location.
  • + Beautiful vintage parchment effect that covers the whole background.
  • + Great use of thorns, webs, and spiders to frame the image.
  • The jack-o-lantern is slightly more cartoonish than the realistic style in Model A.
  • A bit of a 'cluttered' feel near the top banner.

Verdict: Nano Banana Pro is the clear winner as it successfully rendered all the requested text perfectly, including the title, the scroll banner, and the event details. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B failed significantly on text accuracy, with several garbled words and an incorrect date.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Before After
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent preservation of the original facial features and expression
  • + Hair volume matches the 'thick head of hair' prompt very well
  • + Natural integration of hair behind the ears
  • The hairline on the forehead is slightly high and look a bit unnatural
  • A few stray floating hair artifacts on the right side of the head

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Natural and realistic hair texture with fine stray strands
  • + Excellent hairline integration on the forehead
  • + Perfect preservation of the original background and clothing
  • Slightly altered the shape of the eyebrows and forehead wrinkles compared to the source
  • The hair volume is a bit thinner than requested for a 'full, thick head'

Verdict: Both models performed exceptionally well in adding hair while maintaining the identity of the person in the source image. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B provided more volume as requested by the prompt, but Nano Banana Pro achieved a more realistic hairline and more natural-looking texture, making it appear as though the person always had hair. Since Nano Banana Pro's execution of the hairline was more convincing despite the lower volume, it is the slightly better choice for realism.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent material rendering with a realistic subsurface scattering look on the salmon
  • + Sophisticated stone texture on the plate
  • + Perfect 45 degree isometric angle
  • Failed to spell the word 'SUSHI' correctly (rendered as SUSH)
  • Flag icon is generic and doesn't represent Japan
  • Missing the requested 'raised diorama base' structure

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Correctly spelled all text and included the requested flag icon
  • + Stronger adherence to the 'diorama base' requirement with the wooden block and moss
  • + Wide variety of sushi types adding visual interest
  • Text is slightly off-center in the composition
  • Wood texture on the base is slightly repetitive

Verdict: Nano Banana Pro is the winner as it accurately fulfilled all prompt requirements, including the specific text and the Japanese flag icon. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B produced a high-quality material study, but failed on basic spelling and ignored the diorama base requirement.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Successfully captures the likeness of the subject from the source image
  • + Incorporates the TV anchor profession with a news desk setting
  • + Includes two well-drawn dogs that fit the caricature style
  • Fails to include any reference to hockey which was a specific requirement
  • Text in the background is nonsensical

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Perfectly integrates all three requested elements: TV anchor, dogs, and hockey
  • + Matches the subject's outfit (denim shirt and black top) from the source image
  • + High degree of humorous exaggeration and creative details like the dog in a jersey and the puck in the mouth
  • The character's likeness is slightly softer/less distinct than Model A's
  • The hand holding the hockey stick has some anatomical awkwardness with the number of fingers

Verdict: Nano Banana Pro is the clear winner because it followed all instructions, including the hockey element which FLUX.2 [klein] 4B completely omitted. Beyond just meeting the prompt requirements, Nano Banana Pro also showed better source preservation by keeping the subject's denim shirt, while creating a more humorous and detailed scene.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent depiction of god rays and golden hour lighting.
  • + Highly detailed flower field and butterfly variety.
  • + Naturalistic fur textures on the animals.
  • Failed to include the requested baby bunny.
  • Included two kittens instead of the single tabby kitten requested.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Successfully included all four requested animals: puppy, kitten, bunny, and fox.
  • + Captures a very joyful, active movement with the animals running towards the viewer.
  • + Clear, expressive eyes as requested in the prompt.
  • The fur and lighting have a slightly more 'digital CGI' look rather than 'hyper-photorealistic'.
  • The transitions between the animals' paws and the grass are a bit less natural.

Verdict: Nano Banana Pro is the winner because it successfully followed the complex prompt by including all four specific animals, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 4B missed the bunny entirely and duplicated the kitten. While FLUX.2 [klein] 4B had slightly more realistic lighting and environmental detail, the prompt adherence of Nano Banana Pro makes it the superior output for this specific request.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Successfully captures a soft, pastel watercolor aesthetic that aligns with many Studio Ghibli backgrounds.
  • + Maintains very high structural fidelity to the source image's character poses and clothing patterns.
  • + Creative interpretation of the background into a lush, hazy garden/town scene.
  • The character on the right loses her key 'angry' expression, looking happy/content instead.
  • The overall color palette is a bit washed out, losing the contrast of the original red dress.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Excellent preservation of the original expressions, especially the jilted girlfriend's shocked/angry face.
  • + Stronger Ghibli-style character linework and shading while keeping the iconic red dress vibrant.
  • + Captures the hand-painted 'painterly' texture mentioned in the prompt more effectively.
  • The background houses feel slightly generic compared to the intricate street scenes Ghibli is known for.
  • Minor anatomical oddity on the man's neck/jaw line.

Verdict: Both models did an excellent job transforming the 'Distracted Boyfriend' meme into an anime illustration. Nano Banana Pro is the winner because it successfully retained the emotional narrative and facial expressions of the source image while perfectly applying the Ghibli aesthetic, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 4B lost the critical angry expression of the woman on the right.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Before After
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent preservation of the subject's face and original features
  • + Hair movement is realistic and matches the wind direction
  • + Integrates the leaves naturally with the background bokeh
  • The leaf textures are a bit repetitive and less vibrant than Model B

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Stronger sense of 'energetic' motion with more dynamic hair strands
  • + Vibrant, high-contrast leaves that stand out well in the composition
  • + Included motion in the dog's tail and fur, enhancing the overall effect
  • Minor facial distortions compared to the original, particularly around the mouth and eyes
  • Contains small floating artifacts/dots that look like camera sensor dust

Verdict: Both models followed the instructions effectively, adding dynamic hair movement and flying leaves. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B is better for strict source preservation, keeping the woman's face nearly identical to the original, while Nano Banana Pro creates a more lively and energetic aesthetic at the cost of slight facial characteristic shifts.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Strong minimalist vector aesthetic
  • + Clean, professional layout
  • + Correct use of color tones
  • Misspelled name as 'FLAXTION'
  • Duplicated 'Est. 1720' text creating redundancy
  • Slightly too modern/sharp for a 'vintage' request

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Perfect text rendering for both the name and date
  • + Excellent vintage illustrative style with cross-hatching
  • + Dynamic and artistic steam curls improve the composition
  • Slightly less 'minimalist' than Model A due to detailed shading

Verdict: Nano Banana Pro is the clear winner as it perfectly rendered the requested text 'Caffè Florian' and 'Est. 1720', whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 4B failed the name and doubled the date. Nano Banana Pro also captured a more authentic vintage feel with its illustrative style and better integration of the banner and cloche.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Captures the requested flat-vector style with a clean aesthetic.
  • + Successfully utilizes the NASA-inspired color palette.
  • + Includes a good representation of a lunar module landing.
  • Text rendering is unintelligible gibberish throughout the poster.
  • Composition is cluttered and lacks a clear progression or narrative flow.
  • Failed to include all six specific steps as requested.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Excellent text rendering and typography for an infographic.
  • + Clear and logical flow following the requested six steps of the mission.
  • + Highly detailed and consistent iconography that matches the Apollo theme perfectly.
  • Slightly more complex than a 'minimal' flat-vector style, but remains within the modern infographic aesthetic.

Verdict: Nano Banana Pro delivered a nearly perfect response, following all six sequential steps and rendering all text accurately and legibly. In contrast, FLUX.2 [klein] 4B failed to follow the logical flow of the infographic and produced incomprehensible text, resulting in a much less useful design.

Next steps

Explore each model