Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [flex] Black Forest Labs Wan 2.7 Pro Alibaba

Settled by community votes across 19 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [flex]

24.8 arena score

#14 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Wan 2.7 Pro

21.0 arena score

#37 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [flex]

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

Wan 2.7 Pro

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 19

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent clean aesthetic and modern composition.
  • + The blue sphere is perfectly centered and has a pleasing matte texture.
  • + Great rendering of refraction and surface reflections on the table.
  • The glass cube has no top panel, which makes the book appear to float or rest on the vertical edges.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Realistic physics and construction with the book resting on a solid glass top.
  • + Highly detailed wood texture and natural lighting from the window.
  • + Accurate representation of the plant visible through the glass panels.
  • The green plant leaf appears to penetrate through the back of the glass cube.
  • The blue sphere has a slightly marbled texture rather than being a solid blue.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt instructions perfectly, including the specific spatial relationships of the objects. Wan 2.7 Pro is the preferred winner because it realistically depicted the glass cube as a solid object with a top panel to support the red book, whereas FLUX.2 [flex] rendered an open-topped container which made the book's placement look physically impossible.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent preservation of the subject's physical features and hair style.
  • + Convincing motion blur on the wheels and road indicating driving.
  • + High degree of car detail preservation while changing the lighting to match the outdoors.
  • The man is sitting in the passenger seat rather than the driver's seat for a left-hand drive car.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Beautiful scenic background that fits the 'California coastline' description.
  • + Accurate car placement on the road.
  • Failed to use the person from the source image, replacing the black man with a different person.
  • The car looks static on the road despite the prompt asking for him to be 'driving' it.
  • Proportions of the driver's head and neck are anatomically awkward.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] successfully integrated the specific man from the source image into the car, maintaining his likeness perfectly, though it mistakenly placed him in the passenger seat. Wan 2.7 Pro completely failed the identity preservation aspect of the edit, replacing the subject with a generic person, and the car appears parked. FLUX.2 [flex] is the clear winner for following the multi-image editing instructions.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent shallow depth of field and bokeh
  • + Strong execution of the 'imperfect framing' request
  • + Realistic motion blur on passing vehicles
  • Physical bike structure has some AI-generated illogical intersections
  • Rain effect is slightly subtle

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Very realistic skin textures and clothing details
  • + Excellent reflections on the wet pavement
  • + Sharp, believable bicycle anatomy
  • Missed the request for motion blur on passing cars
  • Framing is very centered and traditional despite the prompt for 'imperfect'

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] adhered better to the specific technical requests of the prompt, successfully capturing the motion blur and the 'imperfect framing' aesthetics which contribute to a candid feel. While Wan 2.7 Pro produced a very high-quality and realistic image with superior bicycle details, it failed to include the requested motion blur and ignored the stylistic instruction for imperfect composition.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent depiction of ornate engraving and metal texture
  • + Strong color contrast with warm lighting and cool metal
  • + High-fidelity rendering of the leather straps and fabric underlayer
  • The scars look a bit like fresh red paint or superficial scratches
  • The face has a slightly smooth, digital appearance compared to the armor texture

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Natural and realistic skin texture with believable battle grime
  • + Excellent integration of the braided beads into the hairstyle
  • + Stronger overall cinematic composition and realistic lighting
  • The armor engraving is slightly less intricate than in the other image
  • The bokeh sparks are a bit more diffused/blurry than requested

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, but Wan 2.7 Pro produces a more believable and 'battle-worn' character with superior skin textures and more natural-looking scars. FLUX.2 [flex] excels in the technical detailing of the armor and clothing materials, but the subject's face feels slightly more like a model in a costume than a weathered paladin.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent grid layout with clear section breaks
  • + Bold, readable sans-serif typography for headings
  • + Consistent high-quality food photography across the grid
  • Nonsense filler text for descriptions
  • Content logic error (Bruschetta and Grilled Chicken listed under 'Pizza')

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Near-perfect text rendering with legible names and descriptions
  • + Comprehensive layout including footer with address and QR code
  • + Elegant staging and realistic shadows for a casual dining look
  • Text is slightly small and dense for a physical menu format
  • Some minor spelling errors in small font (e.g., 'Bissue', 'Alferdo')

Verdict: Wan 2.7 Pro is the clear winner for its superior text rendering and professional brand detail, including a functional footer and QR code. While FLUX.2 has a great bold aesthetic, its logic fails as it lists non-pizza items under the pizza heading and uses unreadable gibberish for descriptions.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent typography with a realistic flame effect integrated into the letters.
  • + Highly realistic food textures, especially on the meat patty and melting cheese.
  • + Stronger sense of motion and vertical cohesion in the 'exploded' burger.
  • The '€6.99' starburst is slightly less integrated with the overall lighting than the main text.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Successfully includes all requested text elements clearly.
  • + Good use of negative space in the composition for a balanced ad layout.
  • + Followed the 'starburst' instruction for the price tag explicitly.
  • The meat patty and cheese look somewhat plastic and less photorealistic compared to Model A.
  • The 'exploded' effect looks more like a static arrangement of items than a dynamic action.
  • Lack of a fiery/glowing effect on the price tag as requested by the prompt.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] delivers a much more appetite-appealing and professional-looking food advertisement with superior photorealism in the textures. While Wan 2.7 Pro followed the layout instructions well, its food rendering is less convincing and the typography lacks the requested glowing intensity found in the FLUX.2 version.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent chalk texture with visible smudges and varying opacity.
  • + Highly realistic handwriting style with natural slants and irregular letter heights.
  • + Follows the request for 'elegant cursive' for the title phrase accurately.
  • The word 'Cookies' is slightly less legible than the rest of the text.
  • Slightly less clarity in the bottom-most fine print compared to the competitor.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Perfect text accuracy for every word in the prompt.
  • + Bright and clear lighting on the board making the text highly legible.
  • + Good composition with decorative chalk underlines adding to the cafe aesthetic.
  • The text looks more like a digital font than natural human handwriting.
  • Lacks the gritty chalk texture and smudging requested for realism.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] is the clear winner as it successfully captured the requested chalk texture and realistic handwriting variation, avoiding the look of a digital font. While Wan 2.7 Pro had perfect spelling, its output looks too much like a clean graphic design rather than a physical chalkboard hand-written in a cafe.

Pose & Character Mashup

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”

Source
FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent character preservation, accurately transferring the face, sunglasses, scarf, and clothing from Image 2.
  • + Successfully integrated the character into the lighting and environment of Image 1.
  • + High visual quality with clear textures and good anatomy.
  • Failed to replicate the exact pose from Image 1, producing a crouching/seated pose rather than the yoga/dance balance.
  • The position of the legs and feet on the ottoman is different from the reference.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Perfectly preserved the original background and pose of Image 1.
  • Completely failed the edit instruction by returning Image 1 without any changes.
  • Did not incorporate the character, clothing, or facial features from Image 2.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] successfully transferred the character's appearance and clothing from Image 2 into the environment of Image 1, although it struggled to replicate the specific difficult pose. In contrast, Wan 2.7 Pro failed to perform any edit at all, returning the source image unchanged. FLUX.2 [flex] is the clear winner as it attempted and partially succeeded at a complex character and environment merge.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'horse on top' spatial instruction
  • + Cinematic lighting and highly detailed space background
  • + Dynamic and surreal composition
  • The astronaut's hands are awkwardly clutching the horse's hooves

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Clean visual quality and realistic textures
  • + Well-composed background with multiple planets
  • Failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is riding the horse instead of vice versa
  • Lacks the surreal quality requested in the prompt

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] successfully interpreted the difficult spatial instruction 'horse on top, not vice versa', creating a truly surreal and cinematic image. Wan 2.7 Pro ignored the specific positioning request and defaulted to a standard 'astronaut riding a horse' concept, failing the primary challenge of the prompt.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'bored' expression of the passenger sitting in the back seat.
  • + Accurate placement of subjects within the vehicle cabin.
  • + Highly detailed fur texture and realistic taxi interior lighting.
  • The capybara's hands look slightly more primate-like than capybara paws.
  • The taxi exterior frame/door pillar logic is slightly cluttered in the foreground.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Natural street lighting and realistic bokeh through the windows.
  • + Clean, professional capybara expression and accurate hat placement.
  • Failed the spatial instructions by placing the woman in the front passenger seat instead of the back seat.
  • The woman's hands and phone interaction appear slightly distorted.
  • The capybara's hands are overly human/monkey-like and lack the webbed characteristic of paws.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] is the clear winner as it followed all spatial instructions, correctly placing the businesswoman in the back seat to create the intended narrative of a 'normal' taxi ride. Wan 2.7 Pro failed on composition by placing the passenger in the front seat, although both models struggled to render accurate capybara paws, opting for human-like hands instead.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent typography and layout for an invitation
  • + Superior atmospheric lighting and depth
  • + Perfect adherence to the dark parchment and gothic aesthetic
  • Simple background compared to the other model

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Highly detailed border with additional thematic elements like lanterns and a cauldron
  • + Crisp, clean illustration style
  • + Includes all requested text with clear legibility
  • Illustration feels a bit cluttered
  • The 'Est. 1847' text was not requested
  • Less 'vintage parchment' feel compared to Flux.2

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, but Flux.2 [flex] produced a more professional-looking invitation with better atmospheric lighting and more cohesive gothic styling. While Wan 2.7 Pro included more background details and illustrative elements, it felt a bit like a modern digital illustration rather than the 'vintage gothic' poster requested.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [flex]
Before After
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent preservation of the original image's facial features and background
  • + Consistent lighting and color matching between new hair and existing beard
  • Hair texture appears a bit stiff and uniform
  • Hairline is very straight and lacks some natural irregularity

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Natural wavy hair texture that looks highly realistic
  • + Great integration of hair around the ears and temples
  • + Matches the rugged aesthetic of the subject perfectly
  • Slightly alters the shape of the forehead compared to the original

Verdict: Both models succeeded in adding hair while preserving the identity of the person and the environment. FLUX.2 [flex] was more conservative, keeping the head shape identical but resulting in a slightly 'pasted-on' look, while Wan 2.7 Pro provided a more natural, stylish haircut with superior texture and volume that blends better with the overall image.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'at top-center' text placement
  • + Clean and simple 3D isometric diorama layout
  • + High clarity and text rendering quality
  • The textures look slightly more flat/plastic than realistic PBR
  • The flag is placed below the text rather than alongside it as part of the header

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Superior PBR material rendering with realistic subsurface scattering in the fish and roe
  • + Exquisite fine detail on the rice grains and sushi surface
  • + Sophisticated composition with gold accents
  • Failed the text placement prompt by centering it horizontally but not vertically relative to the top
  • Included unrequested elements like chopsticks and a soy sauce bowl

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] followed the layout and text instructions perfectly, providing a very clean and functional graphic. However, Wan 2.7 Pro produced a far more visually stunning render with superior material details and lighting, despite drifting slightly from the strict text placement and including extra-wide props.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellently captures all request elements including hockey, dogs, and the news anchor desk.
  • + Preserves the subject's outfit from the source image (denim shirt over black top).
  • + Clean, professional cartoon aesthetic with coherent details like dogs in jerseys.
  • Text on the desk ('IHGIANAES NEWS') is garbled.
  • The hockey representation is a bit subtle compared to the dog/anchor themes.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Successfully creates an exaggerated, humorous caricature style.
  • + Cleverly integrates the hockey theme by turning the microphone into a hockey stick.
  • + Includes legibly rendered text in speech bubbles.
  • Does not preserve the source image's clothing, changing it to a formal suit.
  • The background is less detailed and lacks the 'news studio' depth shown in the other model.
  • The facial likeness to the source image is slightly weaker than Model A's.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] produced a more complete and visually rich scene that better preserved the subject's original clothing while perfectly integrating the caricature request. While Wan 2.7 Pro had a clever interpretation of the hockey stick/microphone, it failed to preserve the source image's identity as effectively and had a more generic background.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'tumbling' and 'playful' aspect of the prompt with animals in mid-air
  • + Noticeable dew sparkles on the grass as requested
  • + Strong dramatic lighting with clear god rays and atmospheric haze
  • The fox kit has a slightly cartoonish facial structure compared to the other animals

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + More natural and realistic fur textures across all four animals
  • + Excellent source lighting that feels integrated into the scene
  • + Accurate species representation for the fox kit and tabby kitten
  • The animals are largely standing rather than 'tumbling together' as the prompt requested
  • The kitten's tail is missing/obscured behind the puppy

Verdict: Both models followed the complex prompt well, including all four specific animals. FLUX.2 [flex] captured the action and 'tumbling' motion more effectively, while Wan 2.7 Pro achieved a higher level of photorealistic detail in the fur and lighting. FLUX.2 [flex] is slightly preferred for better capturing the specific energy and 'joyful' vibe required by the prompt.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Captures the distinctive 'Ghibli' anime character aesthetic with simple facial features and clean line work.
  • + The soft, paper-like texture and pastel color palette perfectly match the requested style.
  • + Preserves the composition and poses of the iconic meme while translating it into a new medium.
  • The girl on the right has her expression changed from angry/surprised to a generic smile, losing the narrative of the meme.
  • The hand of the woman on the right appears slightly mangled compared to the original.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Maintains the correct emotional expressions for all three characters, keeping the 'distracted boyfriend' meme context intact.
  • + Exhibits beautiful watercolor-style textures and high artistic detail.
  • + Strong preservation of character likenesses from the source photo while applying an illustrative filter.
  • The style feels more like a western watercolor illustration than the specific Studio Ghibli anime style requested.
  • The lighting is a bit harsher than the 'gentle lighting' requested in the prompt.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] successfully captured the specific Studio Ghibli anime aesthetic, including the characteristic facial features and soft color palette, though it failed to preserve the angry expression of the woman on the right. Wan 2.7 Pro delivered a beautiful watercolor piece that kept the meme's narrative intact, but it leaned more toward a generic illustration style rather than the distinct Ghibli look. FLUX.2 [flex] is the winner for better adhering to the specific stylistic constraints of the art movement requested.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [flex]
Before After
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent addition of green leaves that match the park environment
  • + Captures a strong sense of motion in the hair flowing outwards
  • + Maintains very high consistency with the original subject's facial features
  • The leash handle looks slightly morphed in the left hand
  • A few leaves appear to be floating unnaturally close to the camera lens without blur

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Natural-looking autumn leaves that contrast well with the background
  • + Dynamic hair motion that looks realistic and wind-swept
  • + Great preservation of the original image's lighting and color palette
  • The leaf color (orange/brown) slightly contradicts the very green trees in the background
  • Slightly more deviation in the fine facial details compared to the source

Verdict: Both models performed exceptionally well on this edit task, successfully adding dynamic hair motion and flying leaves while keeping the original composition intact. FLUX.2 [flex] is slightly better at subject preservation, while Wan 2.7 Pro creates a more visually interesting contrast with the autumn leaves, even if the leaf color doesn't perfectly match the background foliage.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent typography rendering with the correct accent mark.
  • + Strong minimalist vector aesthetic that perfectly matches the 'minimalist' prompt.
  • + Very clean layout and composition.
  • The Cloche is a bit generic and lacks the 'retro' character seen in the other model.
  • The steam effect is very simple.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Detailed retro illustration style for the cloche and steam.
  • + Captures the 'emblem' and 'vintage' aspects very well with the circular border.
  • + Creative use of additional elements like the laurel leaves and extra text.
  • Spelling error in the main brand name ('Florion' instead of 'Florian').
  • Includes distracting peripheral elements (coffee cup, cinnamon) that weren't requested.
  • Fails the 'minimalist' part of the prompt by being quite ornate.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] wins this comparison by following the 'minimalist' and 'vector' instructions while maintaining perfect spelling and clean typography. While Wan 2.7 Pro produces a more intricate and charming illustration, the spelling error and excessive decorative elements deviate from the specific prompt constraints.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent typography and readability with zero spelling errors.
  • + Clean, modern vector aesthetic with beautiful iconography.
  • + High visual clarity and professional layout balance.
  • Missed the final 'Landing' step requested in the prompt.
  • The layout is a bit sparse compared to more detailed infographics.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Successfully included all six requested steps including Landing.
  • + Included significant extra detail like dates, crew names, and specific mission data.
  • + Followed the color palette and flat-vector style very closely.
  • Contains spelling errors like 'DESCRIPT' instead of 'Descent' and 'minures' instead of 'minutes'.
  • Small, cramped text is harder to read than the other model.
  • The central vertical line creates a slightly cluttered visual flow.

Verdict: Wan 2.7 Pro followed the complex multi-step instructions more accurately by including all six phases of the mission and adding rich supporting details. However, FLUX.2 [flex] produced a much cleaner, more professional-looking graphic with perfect text rendering, despite missing the final step. Wan 2.7 Pro is the winner for better prompt adherence and informational depth, though it suffers from typical AI spelling artifacts.

Next steps

Explore each model