Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [flex] Black Forest Labs Wan 2.5 (Preview) Alibaba

Settled by community votes across 18 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [flex]

24.8 arena score

#14 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

23.4 arena score

#26 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [flex]

50.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

50.0%

win rate

50.0% 0.0% ties 50.0%
Shared challenges 18

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent clean aesthetic with high resolution.
  • + Highly accurate cube geometry and refraction.
  • + Perfect lighting consistency between the window source and the shadows.
  • The sphere is quite large relative to the cube, making 'small' a bit inaccurate.
  • The glass cube lacks a top lid, looking more like an open container.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Realistic texture on the red book, including wear and tear.
  • + Good atmospheric effects with dust motes and soft lighting.
  • The sphere appears to be floating without a contact point or shadow on the bottom glass.
  • Perspective issues with how the book sits on the top edge of the cube.
  • Noticeable digital noise/artifacts in the background light.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] produced a much cleaner, more physically coherent image with superior glass physics and lighting. While Wan 2.5 (Preview) captured better textures on the book, it struggled with spatial placement, resulting in a sphere that appears to be floating unnaturally.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Successfully preserved the subject's distinctive hairstyle and facial features.
  • + Excellent motion blur on the wheels and road creates a realistic sense of speed.
  • + Perfect preservation of the specific car model and color from the source image.
  • The man appears to be sitting slightly too far back relative to the steering wheel.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Great creative interpretation of the California coastline with the addition of palm trees.
  • + High visual quality and vibrant colors in the landscape scenery.
  • + Maintains the correct car model and placement within the frame.
  • The subject's facial features are less clear and smaller compared to Image A.
  • The motion blur on the wheels is slightly less realistic than in Model A.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] successfully integrated the specific man and car into a new environment with high fidelity to the source images, particularly in preserving the man's identity. Wan 2.5 (Preview) created a more scenic and visually appealing California atmosphere but lost some of the detail and presence of the subject in the car. FLUX.2 is the winner for better identity preservation and more realistic driving physics in the motion blur.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent depiction of motion blur from passing cars
  • + Natural skin texture and realistic face
  • + Good lighting and reflections on the wet pavement
  • The structural logic of the bicycle frame is quite warped and messy
  • The background figure lacks a clear silhouette

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Cleaner and more realistic bicycle anatomy
  • + Clearer depiction of 'light rain' streaks and pavement splashes
  • + Better use of negative space in the composition
  • Lacks the requested 'motion blur from passing cars'
  • The skin texture on the hands appears somewhat smeared or painterly

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] captures the specific atmosphere and technical camera effects like motion blur and shallow depth of field much better, resulting in a more cinematic image. However, Wan 2.5 (Preview) produces a more coherent bicycle structure and clearer rain details, even though it misses the motion blur requirement.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent depiction of intricate engraved plate armor with high-contrast metallic reflections.
  • + Skin texture and lighting on the face are highly realistic and detailed.
  • + Strong adherence to the 'braided hair with small beads' description with distinct physics.
  • The bokeh sparks appear a bit uniform and repetitive across the background.
  • The character looks slightly 'posed' and perfect for a battle-worn warrior.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Exceptional realism in the 'battle-worn' aesthetic with realistic dirt, under-eye bags, and frayed fabric.
  • + Dynamic and natural-looking warm torchlight that creates realistic cast shadows on the face.
  • + superior texture on the leather straps and the ragged cloth underlayer.
  • The beads in the hair look a bit like metal studs and are concentrated at the top rather than integrated into the length.
  • The armor engraving is slightly softer in focus compared to model A.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, but Wan 2.5 (Preview) produced a more convincing 'battle-worn' atmosphere with superior textures on the non-metal elements like the frayed cloth and leather. FLUX.2 [flex] excels at the ornate detail of the metal plate armor and hair rendering, but the overall grit and lighting of Wan 2.5 make it the winner for this specific character study.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent typography and readability with realistic price points
  • + Professional layout that mimics a real-world restaurant flyer
  • + Clean grid alignment with varied and appetizing food photography
  • Internal category names are mixed up (Bruschetta listed under Pizza)
  • Slight text repetition in the subheader

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Consistent and high-quality food photography across all items
  • + Clear visual separation of sections with colored lines
  • + Good adherence to the requested grid layout
  • Poor typography with significant 'AI gibberish' text and misspellings
  • Layout feels less like a functional menu and more like an icon set
  • Food items are repetitive and don't match his descriptions well

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] is the clear winner because it produces a functional, professional-looking menu with legible text and a realistic hierarchy. While Wan 2.5 (Preview) has high-quality food renders, the text is unreadable and the design feels less like a professional document compared to FLUX.2's clean vertical layout.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent typography with a clean fiery effect on 'MAGIC BURGER'
  • + Remarkable food texture on the patty and bun
  • + Highly effective use of crumbs and sauce droplets for a sense of motion
  • The burger feels a bit too vertical and stacked despite being 'exploded'

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Fantastic dynamic composition with components flying in various directions
  • + Creative melting cheese effect on the primary text
  • + Good integration of smoke and embers for atmospheric depth
  • Text rendering is slightly less sharp than Model A
  • The lettuce and tomato slices lack some of the photorealistic grit found in the other image

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, producing high-quality commercial-style ads. FLUX.2 [flex] excels in photorealistic food textures and crisp typography, making it look like a high-end studio shot. Wan 2.5 (Preview) offers a more creative and dynamic 'exploded' composition that better captures the sense of cinematic motion requested in the prompt.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent text rendering with accurate spelling according to the prompt.
  • + The chalk texture is highly realistic with believable smudges and variations.
  • + The composition is centered and easy to read with a warm, cozy background atmosphere.
  • The font style, while chalky, appears slightly too consistent, leaning toward a digital font aesthetic in some letters.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Natural-looking handwriting with realistic slants and varied letter sizes.
  • + Great use of chalk dust and smearing effects that enhance the authentic chalkboard feel.
  • + Successfully completed the 'Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies' phrase which was cut off in the prompt.
  • Includes a grammatical/symbol error in the second item: 'with Lemon & $28'.
  • The perspective makes some of the text at the bottom harder to read compared to Model A.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] produced a much cleaner and more accurate result, following the menu items and pricing exactly. While Wan 2.5 (Preview) felt more like organic handwriting, it made a significant error in the pricing syntax of the second menu item and had slightly less legible perspective. FLUX.2 [flex] is the preferred choice for its perfect text adherence and professional composition.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Perfectly adheres to the specific 'horse on top' instruction
  • + High cinematic quality with beautiful lighting on the horse's mane
  • + Creative surrealist interpretation of the prompt
  • The astronaut's hands and the horse's hooves merge slightly awkwardly
  • The astronaut's legs lack the same level of texture detail found in the horse

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Excellent anatomical detail on the horse
  • + High resolution background with clear planetary details
  • + Sharp textures on the spacesuit
  • Completely ignores the specific 'horse on top' instruction
  • Produces a cliché image rather than a surreal one
  • The horse's legs show motion blur that doesn't quite match the lack of atmosphere

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] is the clear winner because it followed the difficult logical inversion in the prompt ('horse on top, not vice versa'), which resulted in a truly surreal image. Wan 2.5 (Preview) produced a standard, high-quality image of an astronaut riding a horse, completely failing to follow the core negative constraint and specific layout requested.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent anatomical rendering of the capybara's fur and calm expression.
  • + Dynamic side-profile composition that clearly shows both the driver and the passenger.
  • + Highly realistic taxi interior lighting and textures.
  • The capybara's hands look somewhat more like human hands than animal paws.
  • The taxi sign on top of the car is cut off by the framing.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Direct framing makes the capybara the central focus of the image.
  • + Good representation of the businesswoman's bored expression in the background.
  • + Effective use of rain on the windshield to enhance the New York night atmosphere.
  • The capybara's hands are rendered with strange, claw-like nails that look unnatural.
  • The perspective makes the capybara appear to be sitting in the middle of the car rather than the driver's seat.
  • The passenger is slightly out of focus compared to Model A.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] is the superior image due to its more coherent composition and significantly better rendering of textures and anatomy. While Wan 2.5 (Preview) captures the mood well, its depiction of the capybara's paws is unsettling and the interior geometry feels less realistic than the professional finish of FLUX.2 [flex].

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent typography with a clean, classic gothic aesthetic.
  • + Superior parchment texture with realistic burnt and torn edges.
  • + Stronger gothic branding with subtle skulls and thorns integrated into the border.
  • The color palette is a bit muted and monochromatic.
  • The jack-o-lantern's glow is less dramatic compared to the other model.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Vibrant cinematic lighting with high-contrast blue and orange tones.
  • + The jack-o-lantern features an impressive internal fire effect.
  • + Detailed spiderwebs and thorny vines that fulfill the border requirements.
  • The scroll banner is slightly warped and the text on it is less sharp.
  • The 'v' in 'Invitation' is rendered as a 'u', resulting in a typo.
  • Overall composition feels a bit crowded with the overlapping elements.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] produced a more professional and readable invitation with perfect spelling and a highly realistic vintage parchment texture. While Wan 2.5 has more impressive cinematic lighting and richer colors, it suffered from a spelling error and a slightly messy composition where text overlaps visual elements. FLUX.2 [flex] is the better choice for a functional party invitation due to its clarity and typography.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [flex]
Before After
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent preservation of the original facial features and bone structure.
  • + The hair texture perfectly matches the existing beard texture.
  • + Natural-looking hairline blending seamlessly into the forehead.
  • The hair is a bit short, barely meeting the description of 'full, thick head of hair'.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Successfully added a very thick and voluminous hairstyle as requested.
  • + Good preservation of the background and clothing.
  • Noticeably altered the facial structure, making the man's face appear narrower than the original.
  • The hairline looks slightly artificial where it meets the temple.
  • Changed the shape and tint of the glasses slightly.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] provides a more convincing edit because it perfectly maintains the subject's identity and facial features while flawlessly matching the hair texture to the existing beard. While Wan 2.5 (Preview) provided a more voluminous head of hair, it significantly altered the shape of the man's face and changed the appearance of his glasses, making it feel less like a true edit of the original image.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent adherence to the isometric perspective requirement
  • + Strong and clean text rendering following the specific layout
  • + Realistic soft-clay textures that match the 'miniature' prompt
  • The flag icon is a bit large relative to the text

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + High visual clarity and vibrant, appealing colors
  • + Good material rendering on the fish and rice
  • Failed the isometric perspective, opting for a standard eye-level 3D view
  • Failed to place the flag icon below the text as requested
  • Rice grains look a bit like jelly beans rather than sushi rice

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] followed every part of the complex prompt, specifically nailing the 45° isometric perspective and the exact text layout requested. While Wan 2.5 (Preview) produced a charming image, it failed on the perspective and the specific placement of elements, making FLUX.2 [flex] the clear winner for prompt adherence.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent integration of all prompt elements including multiple dogs, hockey gear, and a news desk.
  • + Consistent caricature style that maintains the subject's recognizing features from the source image.
  • + Richly detailed background with news monitors and high-quality rendering.
  • The text on the news desk is slightly garbled and nonsensical.
  • The dogs' jersey logos are inconsistent and blurry.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Clear caricature style with exaggerated facial features.
  • + Includes all requested elements: hockey stick, dogs, and news anchor setting.
  • The composition feels a bit more like a sticker or clip-art than a cohesive scene.
  • The perspective of the desk and the placement of the microphone at the bottom of the torso look awkward.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] produced a much more immersive and professionally composed caricature, skillfully integrating the dogs, hockey equipment, and news studio into a single detailed scene that preserved the subject's outfit from the source image. Wan 2.5 (Preview) followed the prompt well but resulted in a flatter, less detailed composition with less refined anatomy and perspective.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent adherence to lighting requirements with realistic golden hour god rays
  • + Superior anatomical correctness across all four animals
  • + Beautiful balance between the sharpness of the fur and the soft bokeh background
  • The kitten and rabbit are a bit smaller in the frame compared to the others

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Dynamic sense of movement with the animals running toward the camera
  • + Vibrant colors and clear detail in the flowers
  • The fox exhibits unnatural, glowing artificial-looking eyes
  • The kitten has an anatomical error with its front right leg appearing disconnected or warped
  • Floating water droplets are overly stylized and look like digital artifacts

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] successfully captures a hyper-photorealistic scene with believable textures and lighting, whereas Wan 2.5 (Preview) leans into a more artificial, 'uncanny' aesthetic. FLUX.2 [flex] is the clear winner for its superior anatomical rendering and the sophisticated way it handled the atmospheric 'god rays' and dew.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent adherence to the Ghibli art style with watercolor-like textures and soft line work.
  • + Atmospheric pastel color palette that feels very nostalgic and hand-painted.
  • + Preserves the composition and poses of the source image perfectly.
  • Loss of the specific 'indignant' facial expression for the woman on the right.
  • The background characters are a bit blurry and less defined than the main figures.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Successfully captures the facial expressions of the original meme, particularly the jealous girlfriend.
  • + Cleaner digital anime aesthetic with nice lighting effects like floating leaves and sparkles.
  • + Strong preservation of the source image's layout and character details.
  • The art style feels more like modern generic anime rather than the specific 'Studio Ghibli' hand-painted look requested.
  • The lighting is a bit flat compared to the dreamy atmosphere requested.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] much better captures the specific 'Studio Ghibli' aesthetic requested, using soft watercolor textures and a pastel palette that feels genuinely hand-painted. Wan 2.5 (Preview) does a better job of preserving the emotional expressions from the original meme (the jealous look on the right), but it results in a more modern, generic anime style rather than the nostalgic Ghibli look.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [flex]
Before After
Wan 2.5 (Preview)
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent addition of high-volume flying leaves that occupy the foreground and middle ground.
  • + Great preservation of the woman's facial features and the dog's appearance.
  • + Dynamic hair transformation that realistically depicts wind motion.
  • The leash handle in the woman's left hand has been slightly altered/simplified compared to the source.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Natural and aesthetically pleasing hair movement.
  • + High fidelity to the original background and dog details.
  • + Added leaves are well-distributed across the top and bottom of the frame.
  • The wind direction on the hair seems slightly inconsistent with the static appearance of the dog's fur.
  • Fewer flying leaves compared to the energetic request.

Verdict: Both models successfully interpreted the edit request while maintaining the core identity of the source image. FLUX.2 [flex] feels more 'energetic' as requested, with a larger number of flying leaves and more dramatic hair movement, whereas Wan 2.5 (Preview) is a bit more subtle and retains the character details slightly better.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'minimalist' keyword with clean lines
  • + Perfectly rendered typography and text including the grave accent in 'Caffè'
  • + Accurate vector emblem style that feels like a modern brand asset
  • The 'subtle texture' on the background is almost invisible
  • The 'Est. 1720' banner is a bit simple compared to the arched main text

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Beautifully executed vintage texture on the background and border
  • + Stronger visual appeal with depth and shading on the cloche
  • + Creative and well-integrated banner design incorporating both sets of text
  • Missed the grave accent on 'Caffè' (using an acute accent instead)
  • Slightly less 'minimalist' than Model A due to heavy shading and complex borders

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] delivered a more accurate professional logo asset with perfect spelling and a minimalist vector feel. Wan 2.5 (Preview) produced a more visually striking illustration with superior vintage textures, but failed on the specific typography of the name. FLUX.2 is preferred for actual brand design, while Wan 2.5 excels for artistic flair.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [flex]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [flex]

  • + Excellent typography and clean, modern vector aesthetic.
  • + Strictly follows the requested steps with logical flow and captions.
  • + Highly professional layout that resembles an actual graphic design piece.
  • Missed the final 'Landing' step visually, stopping at 'Descent'.
  • The vertical divider line is slightly off-center in a distracting way.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Includes all 6 requested steps, including the 'Landing' on the surface.
  • + Creative inclusion of the crew member icons and surface map pin.
  • + Striking visual elements with a strong NASA-inspired feel.
  • The 'Descent' and 'Landing' text labels are floating without specific icons attached.
  • Graphic style is slightly inconsistent, mixing flat vectors with more detailed moons and stars.
  • The icon for Lunar Orbit looks like a smaller second moon rather than an orbital path.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] produced a much more cohesive and professional vector infographic that feels like a real educational poster, though it missed the final visual step for 'Landing'. Wan 2.5 (Preview) captured more total content and reached the final landing stage, but the composition is cluttered and the iconography is less consistent. FLUX.2 [flex] is the preferred choice for its superior design execution and legible, crisp text.

Next steps

Explore each model