Black Forest Labs' precision image generation model with maximum control, reliable text rendering, and complete creative control supporting up to 4MP output
Settled by community votes across 16 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.
FLUX.2 [flex]
#14 of 62 in Text-to-Image
HiDream I1 Full
#60 of 62 in Text-to-Image
Where the votes landed
FLUX.2 [flex]
100.0%
win rate
Ties
0.0%
HiDream I1 Full
0.0%
win rate
Challenge by challenge
The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.
Geometric Composition
Text-to-Image“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [flex]
- + Excellent adherence to lighting instructions with a soft, diffused quality.
- + High clarity and realistic textures on the book and table.
- + Perfect spatial arrangement of the requested objects.
- − The sphere is quite large relative to the 'small blue sphere' prompt.
- − The glass cube edges are slightly thick and look like an acrylic frame.
HiDream I1 Full
- + Successfully rendered the sphere as 'small' as requested.
- + The glass cube has realistic reflections and refractive properties.
- + Accurately placed the light source on the left side with natural sunlight patches.
- − The sphere appears to be floating unnaturally in the center of the air.
- − The physical interaction between the book and the top of the cube looks slightly flattened.
Verdict: Both models followed the complex spatial instructions perfectly. FLUX.2 [flex] produced a cleaner, more professional-looking photograph with a larger sphere, while HiDream I1 Full captured the 'small' scale of the sphere better but struggled with its groundedness, making it look like it was floating.
Candid Street Photography
Text-to-Image“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [flex]
- + Excellent handling of motion blur from passing cars as requested.
- + Realistic skin texture and convincing interaction with the bike chain.
- + Authentic cinematic lighting with beautiful bokeh and wet pavement reflections.
- − The bike frame geometry is somewhat abstract and missing a top tube.
HiDream I1 Full
- + Strong reflection details on the wet pavement.
- + Accurate and clear representation of the red bicycle frame.
- − The subject appears to be sitting on or hovering over the bike rather than actively repairing it.
- − Lacks the motion blur from cars explicitly requested in the prompt.
- − The background cars and architecture look slightly more artificial than Model A.
Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] adhered much better to the specific technical requests of the prompt, successfully incorporating motion blur and an 'imperfect framing' that feels like a real candid shot. While HiDream I1 Full produces a clean image, it fails to deliver the requested car motion blur and the subject's pose is less convincing for a repair task. FLUX.2 [flex] is the winner for its superior realism and prompt adherence.
Fantasy Warrior
Text-to-Image“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [flex]
- + Excellent texture on the leather straps and metal engravings
- + Realistic and subtle skin texture with natural-looking dirt
- + Coherent lighting and soft bokeh effects
- − The scars look a bit like surface paint rather than deep physical marks
HiDream I1 Full
- + Stronger 'battle-worn' aesthetic with more intense scars
- + Intricate hair braiding with numerous beads
- + High-contrast lighting creates a dramatic mood
- − Over-sharpened and slightly crunchy texture on the face
- − Anatomical oddity with the bridge of the nose and eye symmetry
- − The metal engravings feel less distinct and more like generic noise in places
Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] produces a much more realistic and physically coherent image with superior material textures on the armor and leather. While HiDream I1 Full captures the 'battle-worn' intensity well, it suffers from over-processing and slight facial distortions that make it look less lifelike.
Modern Clean Menu
Text-to-Image“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [flex]
- + Excellent grid layout with a balance of high-quality food photography and text.
- + Follows the prompt instructions for specific categories like Pizza and Mains meticulously.
- + Professional and realistic menu typography including prices and descriptions.
- − Internal food labels occasionally mismatch the photo (e.g., Bruschetta next to a salad bowl).
- − Slight repetition of item names like 'Grilled Chicken Bowl'.
HiDream I1 Full
- + Features a bold, simple header that clearly communicates the intent.
- + Provides a clean, minimalist white background as requested.
- − The grid is repetitive, showing four pizzas instead of a variety of appetizers and mains.
- − The typography is weaker with many artifacts and misformed characters in the body text.
- − Lacks the vibrant accents and professional layout complexity found in the other model.
Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] produced a highly professional and functional menu design that correctly included varied food photography and distinct sections for different courses. HiDream I1 Full failed to include a variety of food types, repeating pizza images in every section and exhibiting lower quality text rendering. FLUX.2 [flex] is the clear winner for its adherence to the design constraints and superior visual polish.
Chalkboard Menu
Text-to-Image“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [flex]
- + Excellent text rendering with perfect spelling for all requested menu items.
- + Realistic chalkboard texture with authentic chalk dust and erasing marks.
- + Consistent handwriting style that matches the cozy cafe aesthetic.
- − The slant in the handwriting is very minimal, bordering on a upright font style.
HiDream I1 Full
- + High contrast heading with elegant cursive as requested.
- + Good chalk illustration of a coffee cup at the bottom.
- − Fails significantly on text accuracy, producing illegible gibberish for menu items.
- − Incorrect prices and layout compared to the prompt instructions.
- − Text looks like a digital overlay rather than natural chalk on a board.
Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] is the clear winner as it followed every textual instruction perfectly, including specific food items and prices, while maintaining a highly realistic chalkboard texture. HiDream I1 Full failed to render the specific menu items requested, resulting in nonsensical text and a generic layout that disregarded the prompt's details.
The Reversed Rodeo
Text-to-Image“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [flex]
- + Excellent adherence to the specific prompt instruction of having the horse on top.
- + High visual quality with vibrant colors and complex nebula backgrounds.
- + Creative and surreal interpretation of the astronaut carrying the horse.
- − The horse's front legs merging with the astronaut's hands is slightly anatomically confusing.
HiDream I1 Full
- + Natural composition if the prompt were standard.
- + Good lighting on the astronaut's suit.
- − Failed the primary negative constraint: the astronaut is on top, not the horse.
- − The background is less detailed and lacks the cinematic depth of the first image.
Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] successfully followed the difficult 'horse on top' constraint, creating a surreal and visually stunning scene that perfectly fits the prompt's intent. HiDream I1 Full ignored the specific positional instruction and generated a generic astronaut-on-horse image, failing the primary challenge of the prompt.
The Capybara Taxi Driver
Text-to-Image“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [flex]
- + Excellent depiction of the professional atmosphere with a realistic taxi uniform and cap.
- + Stronger composition that feels more cinematic and accurately captures the New York night background.
- + Better anatomical rendering of the capybara's hands/paws on the steering wheel.
HiDream I1 Full
- + High clarity on the capybara's facial texture.
- + Accurately represents both front paws on the steering wheel.
- + The passenger's 'bored' expression is well-executed.
- − The passenger appears to be in the front seat or middle, rather than clearly in the back seat as requested.
- − The cap is a standard baseball cap rather than a traditional taxi driver cap.
- − The lighting on the capybara is slightly flat compared to the background.
Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] produced a much more convincing and cinematic scene that correctly placed the businesswoman in the back seat and provided a more authentic 'taxi driver' cap. While HiDream I1 Full had great detail on the fur, it failed the spatial requirement of having the passenger in the back Seat, making the composition feel cramped and less realistic.
The Halloween Invitation
Text-to-Image“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [flex]
- + Excellent text rendering with no spelling errors.
- + Sophisticated cinematic lighting and atmospheric foggy background.
- + Matches the 'vintage parchment' and 'elegant gothic' aesthetic perfectly.
- − The parchment edges look a bit like a burnt overlay rather than a physical object.
HiDream I1 Full
- + Strong contrast and vibrant colors.
- + Includes all requested elements like webs, thorns, and twisted trees.
- − Severe text hallucinations and gibberish in the event details section.
- − Missed the required title 'Halloween Party Invitation', truncating it to 'Halloween Party'.
- − Lower visual fidelity with a more clip-art feel.
Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] is the clear winner as it followed every textual instruction perfectly, including the specific date and location which HiDream I1 Full failed to render. FLUX.2 [flex] also achieved a more polished, professional cinematic look compared to the more cartoonish style of the competitor.
Bald man challenge
Image Editing“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [flex]
- + Successfully added a realistic full head of hair that follows the original lighting.
- + Excellent source preservation, keeping the face, clothing, and background nearly identical to the original.
- − The hairline transition on the forehead is a bit sharp and could be softer.
HiDream I1 Full
- + Maintained the general aesthetic of the jacket and beard style.
- − Failed to add a full head of hair, instead adding an illogical ponytail behind a bald head.
- − Failed significantly at source preservation by changing the background, removing the glasses, and adding a strange black object near the mouth.
- − Altered the subject's facial features and bone structure.
Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] successfully performed the requested edit with high fidelity, maintaining the subject's identity and the image's overall context. In contrast, HiDream I1 Full failed on almost every metric, hallucinating a new background, removing the glasses, and failing to provide the requested full head of hair.
Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes
Text-to-Image“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [flex]
- + Excellent font rendering and adherence to text hierarchy instructions.
- + Includes the requested flag icon which is missing in the other model.
- + Very clean 3D miniature aesthetic with soft, professional lighting.
- − The sushi and plate are slightly off-center compared to the overall base.
HiDream I1 Full
- + Strong isometric composition with a nice raised diorama base.
- + High-quality textures on the salmon and roe.
- − Failed to include the requested flag icon.
- − The text 'SUSHI' is not centered under 'JAPAN'.
- − Minor artifacts around the edges of the text.
Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] is the clear winner as it followed every specific detail of the prompt, including the text placement and the flag icon. While HiDream I1 Full produced a lovely 3D model, its failure to include the flag and the poor alignment of the text makes it less successful for this specific design brief.
Over-the-top cartoon caricature
Editing“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [flex]
- + Strongly adheres to all requested themes, including TV anchor setting and hockey gear for the dogs.
- + Maintains character likeness while translating it into a distinct cartoon caricature style.
- + Cleverly preserves the subject's outfit from the source image (denim jacket over black top).
- − The text on the news desk is garbled and nonsensical.
- − The composition is a bit crowded with six dogs.
HiDream I1 Full
- + Successfully creates a caricature that retains a higher degree of facial likeness to the source.
- + Includes the dog as requested.
- − Completely fails to incorporate the hockey theme requested in the prompt.
- − The 'TV anchor' profession is only vaguely referenced by a blurred TV in the background rather than a professional setting.
- − The dog's placement on the shoulder looks unnatural and lacks artistic cohesion.
Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] is the clear winner because it successfully integrated all elements of the prompt (caricature, news anchor, dogs, and hockey) into a cohesive and humorous scene. HiDream I1 Full failed to include the hockey theme and provided a very weak representation of the TV anchor profession, resulting in a less creative interpretation.
Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow
Text-to-Image“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [flex]
- + Successfully included all four specific animal species from the prompt.
- + Excellent dynamic composition with animals appearing to leap and tumble.
- + Beautiful lighting with clearly visible god rays and dew sparkles on the grass.
- − The fox kit has a slightly elongated tail that looks a bit mature for its body size.
HiDream I1 Full
- + Wholesome and cute character designs for the animals.
- + Bright and cheerful warm lighting.
- − Failed to include the baby bunny requested in the prompt.
- − Includes two kittens instead of one kitten and one bunny.
- − Composition is static and lacks the 'tumbling' and 'chasing' action requested.
Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] is the clear winner as it followed the complex prompt requirements perfectly, including all four specific animals and the sense of motion. HiDream I1 Full failed to include the bunny, duplicating the kitten instead, and produced a much more static, posed image compared to the dynamic scene requested.
Studio Ghibli Anime Style
Editing“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [flex]
- + Excellent preservation of the original image's composition and poses.
- + Perfectly captures the Studio Ghibli watercolor aesthetic with hand-painted textures.
- + Maintains the facial expressions crucial to the 'distracted boyfriend' meme.
- − The colors are slightly more washed out than a typical Ghibli film.
HiDream I1 Full
- + Features vibrant, appealing colors in a clean anime style.
- + Good character design details like the floral patterns on the shirt.
- − Fails to preserve the core humor of the original image, changing the poses and expressions entirely.
- − The characters are no longer looking at each other in the way intended by the source image.
- − Style leans more towards modern generic anime than the specific Ghibli painterly aesthetic requested.
Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] is the clear winner as it successfully translates the famous meme into the Ghibli style while perfectly maintaining the composition, character poses, and crucial facial expressions. HiDream I1 Full creates a nice-looking illustration but fails as an image editor, completely changing the character interaction and losing the essence of the source image.
Golden Hour Stroll
Image Editing“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [flex]
- + Excellent source preservation, maintaining the woman's face, the dog, and the background environment accurately.
- + Natural-looking hair motion that follows the requested wind effect.
- + Subtle but effective addition of green leaves that match the summer setting.
- − The added leaves are a bit repetitive in shape and lack much motion blur.
HiDream I1 Full
- + Successfully captures a high-energy, lively feel and dramatic motion.
- + Beautifully rendered autumn leaves with varying sizes and depths.
- − Extremely poor source preservation; it completely removed the dog and changed the woman's identity and clothing.
- − The background environment was significantly altered, losing the pond and bridge entirely.
Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] successfully performed the edit while adhering to the core principle of image editing: preserving the original content. It accurately added wind-blown hair and flying leaves to the existing scene. HiDream I1 Full failed as an editor by completely regenerating a new image that removed the dog and changed the woman's face, despite capturing the 'lively' mood well.
Vintage Cafe Logo
Text-to-Image“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [flex]
- + Perfect typography including the correct name 'Caffè Florian' with the accent mark.
- + Clean vector emblem style with excellent balance and minimalist aesthetic.
- + Accurate interpretation of 'cloche dome with steam' using subtle line work.
- − The steam lines are very faint and could be more defined.
- − The texture on the background is almost imperceptibly subtle.
HiDream I1 Full
- + Stronger use of the warm brown color palette with solid fills.
- + Bolder cloche design that feels more like a 1950s retro badge.
- + Good placement of the 'Est. 1720' banner.
- − Completely failed to include the primary text 'Caffè Florian'.
- − The cloche looks more like a bell or a jar due to the tall proportions.
- − Visual artifacts present at the ends of the ribbon banner.
Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] successfully followed all instructions, including the specific restaurant name and the accent mark, while maintaining a sophisticated minimalist vector style. HiDream I1 Full failed on the most critical text element ('Caffè Florian') and produced an awkwardly proportioned icon that lacked the professional polish of an actual logo.
Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility
Text-to-Image“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [flex]
- + Excellent typography with clean, readable, and correctly spelled labels.
- + Logical infographic flow that adheres closely to the requested 6-step sequence.
- + Sophisticated vector style that fits the 'modern' and 'NASA-inspired' prompt.
- − The layout becomes slightly cluttered in the center overlapping areas.
- − Missed the final 'Landing' step visually, stopping at 'Descent'.
HiDream I1 Full
- + Strong, bold graphic design with high visual impact.
- + Follows the requested color palette accurately.
- + Clean, minimalist flat-vector aesthetic.
- − Failed to include several of the requested steps (Descent, Landing).
- − Contains text errors and placeholder-like nonsense text (e.g., 'UNLY', 'UNG').
- − The logical flow of the infographic is confusing and non-linear.
Verdict: FLUX.2 [flex] successfully created a coherent and informative infographic with professional-grade typography and clear iconography that identifies the mission steps. In contrast, HiDream I1 Full produced an attractive but functionally flawed poster with significant text errors and a failure to follow the sequential requirements of the prompt. FLUX.2 [flex] is the clear winner for its functional design and attention to detail.
Explore each model
HiDream AI's 17B parameter text-to-image model using sparse diffusion transformer with mixture of experts, achieving state-of-the-art image generation quality with strong prompt following