FLUX.2 [flex] Black Forest Labs vs FLUX1.1 [pro] Black Forest Labs

FLUX.2 [flex]

• + Excellent adherence to lighting and composition instructions.
• + The glass cube has a realistic, thick base and proper caustic reflections on the table.
• + The plant is very natural-looking and correctly positioned relative to the depth of field.

• − The blue sphere looks somewhat flat and matte compared to the other materials.
• − The book sits on the edges of the open cube rather than on a solid top surface.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + High visual quality with realistic textures, especially on the book's canvas cover.
• + Beautiful reflections of the window on the surface of the blue sphere.
• + Sharp, clean glass edges.

• − The glass container is a rectangular prism rather than the requested cube.
• − The blue sphere appears to be levitating, which looks slightly less natural than Model A.
• − Object proportions feel a bit cramped within the frame.

FLUX.2 [flex]

• + Excellent depiction of an elderly person with natural skin textures
• + Strong adherence to the 'repairing' aspect of the prompt
• + Captures the atmosphere of light rain and street reflections beautifully

• − The structural anatomy of the red bicycle is physically impossible near the chain area

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Successfully captures the motion blur of passing cars in the background
• + Good cool-toned cinematic color grading
• + Effective shallow depth of field

• − The subject appears to be holding the bike rather than actively repairing it
• − Major anatomical errors with the bicycle including missing frame segments and floating pedals
• − The subject's hands are mangled and blending into the handlebars

FLUX.2 [flex]

• + Excellent depiction of ornate, engraved plate armor with high-quality metal textures.
• + Accurate interpretation of 'hair braided with small beads'.
• + Perfectly followed the lighting prompt with visible torches and warm reflections.

• − The scars look a bit like clean cuts rather than old or battle-worn wounds.
• − The overall composition feels slightly more like a clean studio portrait than a gritty battle scene.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Highly realistic skin texture including pores, dirt, and lifelike eyes.
• + Stronger sense of cinematic atmosphere and 'battle-worn' characterization.
• + Exceptional shallow depth of field and bokeh spark integration.

• − Missed the 'braided hair with small beads' detail, opting for loose, wet-looking hair.
• − The ornate armor is cropped out and less visible compared to the other model.

FLUX.2 [flex]

• + Excellent typographic hierarchy with clear, bold sans-serif header fonts.
• + High-quality, vibrant food photography that follows a consistent grid layout.
• + Literal adherence to all requested sections: Appetizers, Pizza, and Mains.

• − Nonsense filler text for descriptions and small sub-headers.
• − Minor logical error where pizza is listed under the Pizzas header but contains a 'Chicken Bowl' description.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Clean, professional presentation with a realistic brand mockup style including cutlery.
• + Good use of white space and minimalist graphic accents.
• + Includes a grid of food photos as requested.

• − Poor text legibility with significant 'AI gibberish' throughout the body text.
• − Small food images in the grid lack the clarity and appetite appeal seen in the other model.
• − Failed to clearly delineate the specific requested sections like 'Mains' and 'Pizza' in a logical way.

FLUX.2 [flex]

• + Perfect adherence to all text requirements including price and secondary message
• + Excellent fiery, glowing text effects consistent with the background
• + High-quality food photography aesthetic with realistic textures

• − The 'exploded' effect is slightly less dramatic than requested as some layers are still touching

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Good sense of motion with flying debris around the burger
• + Clean text rendering for the primary title

• − Missed the 'starburst' requirement for the price
• − The text uses a blue neon effect which contradicts the 'fiery' prompt requirement
• − Included redundant title text that cluttered the composition

FLUX.2 [flex]

• + Excellent text rendering with no spelling errors.
• + Realistic chalk texture including smudges and dust on the board.
• + Strong adherence to the cursive request for the header.

• − The handwriting style is very consistent, bordering on looking like a digital font despite the chalk texture.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Very natural handwriting variation with specific character inconsistencies that mimic real writing.
• + Beautiful background atmosphere with warm lighting.

• − Significant text errors including 'Chipkies', 'Herbss', and incorrect pricing like '$228'.
• − Failed to keep the list to three items, repeating the octopus entry.

FLUX.2 [flex]

• + Perfect adherence to the unusual 'horse on top' request
• + High cinematic quality with vibrant colors and deep space details
• + Logical surrealism where the horse holds the astronaut's shoulders

• − The horse's back legs blend slightly into the galaxy background
• − The asteroid shapes are a bit repetitive

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Beautiful lighting and cloud-like nebula effects
• + High level of detail on the space suit and saddle

• − Failed the core prompt instruction of having the horse on top
• − Anatomical issues where the horse's front legs attach to its torso
• − More traditional interpretation rather than the requested surreal inversion

FLUX.2 [flex]

• + Excellent adherence to the 'both front paws on the steering wheel' instruction.
• + High level of detail in the capybara's fur and the realistic taxi interior lighting.
• + Consistent 'New York' aesthetic with recognizable exterior background elements.

• − The capybara's hands look slightly more primate-like than typical capybara paws.
• − The composition is a bit tight on the left side.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Beautiful cinematic lighting and bokeh in the background street lights.
• + Very clean and aesthetic rendering of the businesswoman character.

• − The capybara is not driving; it is sitting in the passenger seat facing the woman.
• − Failed the instruction to have both paws on the steering wheel.
• − The capybara's head shape is slightly less accurate than Model A.

FLUX.2 [flex]

• + Excellent typography with perfect spelling in all sections.
• + Strong parchment texture and ornate border details that match the vintage gothic theme.
• + Great visual balance between the central glowing pumpkin and the text layout.

• − The parchment texture is a bit flat across the center.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Beautiful cinematic lighting with a glowing moon and thorny atmosphere.
• + Vibrant colors that contrast well against the dark background.

• − Multiple text errors including repetitive lines and a spelling mistake ('You invited to a n night of frights').
• − Failed the square format requirement by producing a portrait-oriented poster on a square canvas.
• − Layout is cluttered at the bottom with redundant event details.

FLUX.2 [flex]

• + Excellent typography rendering with the requested 'JAPAN' and 'SUSHI' text.
• + Includes the requested small flag icon.
• + Strict adherence to the 45° isometric perspective and diorama base.

• − The sushi models look slightly generic or rubbery compared to high-end PBR textures.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Beautiful soft textures and varied sushi designs.
• + Clean, vibrant color palette that fits the 'miniature cartoon' aesthetic.

• − Failed to include the requested flag icon.
• − The text 'SUSHI' is very small and difficult to read compared to the prompt requirements.

FLUX.2 [flex]

• + Perfect prompt adherence, including all four requested animals (dog, cat, bunny, fox).
• + Excellent composition with a sense of movement and 'tumbling' as requested.
• + Superior rendering of lighting effects including god rays and dew sparkles.

• − The fox's front right leg has a slightly awkward anatomical joint angle.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Beautiful bokeh and soft lighting that gives a very wholesome, ethereal vibe.
• + Extreme detail on the fur texture and 'big expressive eyes' mentioned in the prompt.

• − Failed to include the fox kit, missing one of the primary subjects requested.
• − The animals are posing statically rather than 'chasing butterflies' or 'tumbling'.

FLUX.2 [flex]

• + Excellent typography including the correct accent on 'Caffè'.
• + Perfect adherence to the 'minimalist' and 'vector emblem' style constraints.
• + Clean, professional layout suitable for an actual logo.

• − The 'subtle texture' requested is extremely faint, bordering on absent.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Beautiful vintage woodcut illustration style for the cloche.
• + Good use of texture and decorative framing consistent with a retro aesthetic.

• − Failed the primary text task by spelling it 'FRATILIAN' instead of 'FLORIAN'.
• − The design is overly ornate and fails the 'minimalist' prompt constraint.
• − Awkward typography with a misplaced accent mark over the last letter of 'Caffé'.

FLUX.2 [flex]

• + Excellent typography with clean, legible, and accurate text rendering.
• + Faithfully follows the requested steps from Launch to Lunar Orbit with distinct sections.
• + Consistent iconography and professional vector-style execution.

• − Misses the final 'Landing' step, stopping at 'Descent'.
• − The layout feels slightly sparse on the right side.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Creative use of a central moon motif to anchor the design.
• + Good adherence to the color palette and flat-vector style.

• − Major text legibility issues with garbled characters and spelling errors.
• − The infographic flow is cluttered and difficult to follow logically.
• − Duplicate numbering and inconsistent iconography for the steps.