Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [dev] Black Forest Labs Nano Banana 2 Google

Settled by community votes across 20 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [dev]

24.3 arena score

#19 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Nano Banana 2

28.4 arena score

#1 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Best Text-to-Image right now Top 2 in Image Editing
Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [dev]

25.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Nano Banana 2

75.0%

win rate

25.0% 0.0% ties 75.0%
Shared challenges 20

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent depiction of thick glass and optical distortion
  • + Accurate soft lighting from the left
  • + Simple, clean composition that adheres to all prompt elements
  • The blue sphere appears to be floating mid-air inside the cube
  • The plant in the background is quite blurry and less defined

Nano Banana 2

  • + Perfect text rendering on the book spine
  • + Realistic wood texture on the table
  • + Includes a clear reflection of the sphere on the bottom glass surface
  • The glass cube is missing a front pane, looking more like an open frame than a solid cube
  • The sphere appears slightly too large relative to the 'small' descriptor

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] followed the spatial instructions perfectly, creating a convincing solid glass cube with accurate refraction, though the sphere appears to float. Nano Banana 2 produced an image with impressive details like legible text and rich textures, but it failed the geometric prompt by rendering an open-faced glass frame rather than a closed cube.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent preservation of the man's specific clothing and hairstyle
  • + Accurate interior details of the specific car model from the source
  • + Realistic motion blur and lighting depth
  • The composition is a tight close-up, showing less of the requested coastline
  • The man's facial likeness is slightly altered compared to the source

Nano Banana 2

  • + Stellar composition showing a wide, iconic California coastline vista
  • + Successfully places the exact car from the source into the new environment
  • + Includes the man with his recognizable hairstyle and scarf
  • The man appears slightly too small and low in the seat for the car's scale
  • The man is sitting in the passenger seat (right-hand side of a left-hand drive car) while the steering wheel is on the left

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] excels at preserving the fine details of the man's clothing and the car's interior, but chooses a very tight crop. Nano Banana 2 provides a much better interpretation of the 'California coastline' prompt with a beautiful wide shot, though it mistakenly places the man in the passenger seat while the steering wheel remains on the left. Nano Banana 2 is the preferred choice for capturing the spirit and scope of the requested scene.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent depiction of motion blur from passing cars
  • + Strong interpretation of the 'imperfect framing' prompt with a tight, slightly off-center composition
  • + High-quality skin textures and realistic lighting
  • The red bicycle construction is physically nonsensical with multiple stems and overlapping frames
  • The man's scale relative to the bike and road feels slightly inconsistent

Nano Banana 2

  • + Beautiful atmospheric depth with neon signs and wet pavement reflections
  • + The action of repairing the bike (with a wrench and tool kit) is much more logically depicted
  • + Exceptional color palette and 'candid' street photography aesthetic
  • Failed to include the requested motion blur for passing cars
  • The wrench and chain interaction is slightly messy upon close inspection

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 produces a much more coherent and visually appealing image that captures the 'Japanese street' atmosphere perfectly, although it failed the specific instruction for motion blur. FLUX.2 [dev] followed the motion blur and framing prompts more techincally, but the central subject—the bicycle—is a distorted mess of overlapping metal parts that ruins the realism.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Nano Banana 2
25% wins 0% ties 75% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent depiction of shallow depth of field and bokeh sparks
  • + High-quality skin texture with realistic scars and dirt
  • + Clear lighting logic with warm torchlight reflecting off the metal
  • The 'beads' in the hair look a bit repetitive and simplistic

Nano Banana 2

  • + Incredibly intricate engraving on the armor including runes and heraldry
  • + Strong atmospheric composition with visible sword and textured clothing
  • + Distinctive braided hair with detailed metallic beads
  • Slightly less 'shallow' depth of field compared to the prompt's request

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well. FLUX.2 [dev] excels in photographic realism, specifically with the bokeh effects and natural skin texture. However, Nano Banana 2 provides a more 'paladin-like' feel with superior armor detail and a grittier, more battle-worn aesthetic, making it the more visually compelling interpretation of the prompt's creative elements.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Strong use of vibrant gradient accents
  • + Clean white background that fits the minimalist request
  • + Good high-quality food photography imagery
  • Text is mostly gibberish or nonsensical (e.g., 'PIZZAU')
  • Layout is bit cluttered with overlapping images and text blocks
  • Food images don't always match the section they are placed in

Nano Banana 2

  • + Excellent text legibility and coherent English naming
  • + Perfect alignment of photos with corresponding menu items
  • + Highly professional layout that looks like a real-world document
  • The grid includes an image of a burger under the 'Mains' category which was not explicitly requested but fits the theme
  • Slightly less 'vibrant' accent colors compared to Model A

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner as it produces a fully legible and functional menu with coherent English text, logical item categorization, and clear prices. While FLUX.2 [dev] has attractive color accents and high-quality individual photos, the text is unreadable and the layout lacks the professional organizational logic found in Nano Banana 2.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent typography rendering with clean, glowing lines
  • + Realistic food textures, particularly on the beef patty
  • + Effective use of negative space for a clean advertising layout
  • The 'exploded' effect is very conservative, with most parts still resting on each other
  • The cheese looks somewhat plastic and lacks melted texture

Nano Banana 2

  • + Highly dynamic 'exploded' composition with great sense of motion
  • + Exceptional fiery text effect that integrates perfectly with the background
  • + Vibrant colors and detailed splashes of sauce
  • Small artifact in the price tag where the starburst lines overlap messy
  • The text 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' is slightly warped on the banner

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the winner because it better captures the 'dynamic, exploded' requirement of the prompt, creating a much more exciting sense of motion compared to the static feel of FLUX.2 [dev]. While both models handled the complex text requirements perfectly, Nano Banana 2's artistic integration of the fiery theme across the food and the typography is superior.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent chalk texture on the board surface with realistic smudges.
  • + Clean and highly legible handwriting that accurately follows the prompt.
  • + Large, clear focus on the text content.
  • The 'Grillled Octopus' line has a strange 'with w' artifact that looks like a failed word.
  • The composition is a bit tight on the bottom edge of the board.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Beautiful composition including the café environment and easel.
  • + Highly accurate text rendering of all requested items including the partial prompt suffix.
  • + Very realistic chalkboard texture with chalk sticks visible at the bottom tray.
  • The perspective on the 'TODAY'S SPECIALS' underline is slightly warped.
  • Slightly less 'dusty' chalk texture on the letters themselves compared to Model A.

Verdict: Both models handled the text rendering exceptionally well, but Nano Banana 2 provides a much better overall composition by showing the board in a cozy café environment as requested. FLUX.2 [dev] has slightly more realistic chalk grain on the letters, but it suffers from a text artifact in the middle of the menu and a very tight crop.

Pose & Character Mashup

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Successfully preserved the clothing and scarf details from the character reference.
  • + Maintained the lighting and background color of the source image.
  • Catastrophic failure in anatomy, merging the two characters into one body.
  • Completely failed to tilt the head/torso to match the pose in Image 1.
  • Nails on the hands are still red from the original image model, showing poor integration.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Successfully recreates the complex leg and torso position from the reference pose.
  • + Excellent character consistency, including the facial features, sunglasses, and scarf.
  • + Maintains a coherent, single-person anatomy unlike the other model.
  • The head tilt is slightly more upright than the extreme angle in the source pose.
  • One foot has six toes, indicating minor anatomical artifacting.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner as it successfully transferred the character from Image 2 into the complex pose and environment of Image 1 while maintaining logical anatomy. FLUX.2 [dev] suffered a significant failure, essentially pasting parts of the new character over the original person, resulting in two heads and a nonsensical body structure.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent anatomical details on both the horse and the astronaut.
  • + High photographic realism and cinematic lighting.
  • + Clean composition with a beautiful planetary background.
  • Failed to follow the specific spatial instruction for the horse to be on top.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Followed the difficult logic of the prompt by placing the horse on top of the astronaut.
  • + Vibrant colors and creative, surreal interpretation.
  • + Good sense of floating in zero gravity.
  • Anatomical issues with the horse's legs and overall musculature.
  • The harness and reins are cluttered and don't make logical sense.
  • The astronaut's posture is slightly awkward.

Verdict: This was a test of prompt adherence over aesthetics. While FLUX.2 [dev] produced a much higher quality image visually, it completely ignored the specific instruction to place the horse on top. Nano Banana 2 successfully interpreted the surreal spatial requirement, making it the winner for following the prompt despite lower technical fidelity.

Outfit Transfer Challenge

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Successfully copies the scarf, coat, and sunglasses style.
  • + Matches lighting and depth of field well.
  • Completely fails to preserve the identity of the person from Image 1, replacing the face with the man from Image 2.
  • Alters the background composition and removes the unique vitiligo patterns on the torso.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Accurately preserves the identity, vitiligo patterns, and facial structure of the person in Image 1.
  • + Retains the original background and pose much more effectively than the competitor.
  • Bizarrely adds a ghostly second figure in the background.
  • Clothing adaptation is slightly messy around the open chest area.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] failed the primary constraint of an image editing task by completely replacing the subject's face with the reference model's face. Nano Banana 2 correctly maintained the subject's identity and vitiligo markings from Image 1 while applying the clothing from Image 2, making it the clear winner despite the hallucinated second person in the background.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent fur texture on the capybara
  • + Natural cinematic lighting on the subjects
  • + Clean, high-quality facial rendering for the human passenger
  • The passenger appears to be in the front passenger seat rather than the back
  • The capybara's 'paws' look more like human hands in gloves

Nano Banana 2

  • + Perfect adherence to the spatial 'back seat' positioning
  • + Outstanding attention to detail with the taxi meter and 'Captain Cappy' license
  • + Highly creative and humorous environmental storytelling
  • Image is a bit cluttered with many small elements
  • The human passenger's face is slightly less detailed than in Model A

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner for its superior storytelling and adherence to the prompt's spatial requirements; it correctly places the passenger in the back seat and adds delightful details like the 'NYC Hack License.' While FLUX.2 [dev] offers excellent lighting and texture, it fails the layout by placing the passenger next to the driver, which breaks the requested 'taxi ride' dynamic.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent text legibility and clean font choices
  • + Accurate adherence to all text fields including dates and locations
  • + Strong aesthetic focus on the thorn and web border as requested
  • Composition feels slightly empty in the mid-ground
  • The 'dark parchment' effect is limited to the outer edges rather than the whole texture

Nano Banana 2

  • + Rich, detailed illustration with high visual appeal
  • + Excellent use of cinematic lighting and glowing accents
  • + Creative inclusion of a gothic church and skulls that enhance the theme
  • Text in the scroll banner is less crisp than the primary text
  • The date text at the bottom is slightly cramped against the bottom border

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] produces a very clean, professional layout with perfect typography that is highly functional as an actual invitation. Nano Banana 2 offers a much more illustrative and atmospheric image with superior lighting and artistic detail, though its text integration is slightly less polished. FLUX.2 [dev] is the likely winner for its superior prompt adherence regarding specific text placement and clarity.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [dev]
Before After
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent preservation of the original image's background, clothing, and facial details.
  • + High-density hair as requested.
  • The afro hair texture and style do not match the subject's existing beard texture or ethnicity, looking unnatural.
  • The hairline integration around the forehead and temples is slightly blurry.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Perfectly matches the hair texture and color to the subject's existing beard.
  • + Extremely realistic hairline and integration with the original head shape.
  • + Flawless preservation of all source image elements including lighting and skin texture.
  • None notable; the hair could be slightly 'fuller' but it fits more naturally.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner as it provides a realistic, harmonized result where the added hair matches the style and texture of the existing beard perfectly. FLUX.2 [dev] successfully added hair while preserving the image, but the choice of an afro style feels incongruous and less 'natural' for the specific subject compared to the result in Nano Banana 2.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent adherence to the isometric miniature diorama style.
  • + Perfect text layout and typography as requested.
  • + Clean 3D cartoon aesthetic with soft, refined lighting.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Highly realistic material textures for the various sushi types.
  • + Impressive level of detail in the food rendering.
  • + Includes a wide variety of sushi assets.
  • Failed the text layout, placing the flag between the words rather than at the bottom.
  • The camera angle is a standard perspective rather than the requested 45° isometric view.
  • Does not feature the 'raised diorama base', opting for a standard plate and tray.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] followed the stylistic and layout instructions perfectly, delivering a true isometric diorama with the exact text and flag placement requested. Nano Banana 2 produced more realistic food textures, but it ignored the isometric requirement and failed the specific text positioning. FLUX.2 [dev] is the clear winner for its superior prompt adherence and composition.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent professional digital caricature style with clean lines and shading.
  • + Strong incorporation of all three theme elements into a cohesive scene (anchor desk on ice).
  • + Maintains strong facial resemblance to the subject in a stylized way.
  • Text on the desk is gibberish/garbled.
  • The additional human character in the top left feels unnecessary to the prompt.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Perfect text rendering with humorous, relevant headlines.
  • + Creative use of the 'W-K9 NEWS' branding to merge dogs and anchoring.
  • + Great hand-drawn pencil/marker texture that feels like a traditional caricature.
  • The facial resemblance is slightly weaker than Model A, moving more toward a generic cartoon face.
  • The composition is a bit more cluttered with loose wires and floating microphones.

Verdict: Both models did an excellent job interpreting the request. FLUX.2 [dev] creates a more polished, cinematic digital illustration that captures the subject's likeness better, while Nano Banana 2 excels in humor and storytelling through perfectly rendered, thematic text like 'W-K9 NEWS'. Nano Banana 2 is the preferred winner because its creative use of text and traditional 'drawing' aesthetic feels more aligned with the spirit of a custom caricature gift.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent fur texture and lighting on the animals.
  • + Captures the 'god rays' and dew sparkles effectively.
  • + Very high resolution and clear focal points on the faces.
  • The animals are mostly sitting rather than 'playfully chasing and tumbling'.
  • Generated two bunnies instead of the requested one.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Captures the 'playfully chasing' action much better than Model A.
  • + Adheres strictly to the requested animal count (one of each).
  • + Lush wildflower meadow is more varied and colorful.
  • The fox kit's front legs look slightly unnatural in their pose.
  • Overall sharpness is slightly lower than Model A, particularly in the background.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 followed the prompt's instructions regarding the action and animal count much more accurately, showing the animals in motion rather than sitting. While FLUX.2 [dev] has slightly superior fur texture and lighting, it failed the count (two bunnies) and the requested activity of 'tumbling together'.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent application of soft pastel colors and dreamy lighting.
  • + High fidelity to the original 'Distracted Boyfriend' character expressions.
  • + Consistent hand-painted paper texture across the entire image.
  • Replaced the urban street setting with a generic flower field, failing to preserve the background architecture.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Successfully preserves the original composition including the street setting and background people.
  • + The character art style is very close to authentic late-era Studio Ghibli films like 'The Secret World of Arrietty'.
  • + Strong use of watercolor textures and vibrant floral accents consistent with the request.
  • The woman in the foreground is slightly more blurry than the original image suggests she should be.

Verdict: Both models successfully captured the Studio Ghibli aesthetic with soft colors and painted textures. FLUX.2 [dev] delivers a high-quality illustration but completely changes the background to a field, whereas Nano Banana 2 manages to preserve the iconic street composition of the original meme while translating every detail into a beautiful watercolor anime style. Nano Banana 2's ability to maintain the source imagery's context makes it the winner.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [dev]
Before After
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent preservation of the subject's face and body from the source image.
  • + Accurately adds a large volume of falling leaves scattered naturally across the scene.
  • + Successfully simulates wind blowing through the hair in a symmetrical, dramatic fashion.
  • The hair edit looks slightly artificial and flat compared to the lighting in the rest of the image.
  • Failed to add motion to the dog's tail or fur to match the windy theme.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Enhanced the 'energetic and lively' feel by changing the facial expression to a more open-mouthed smile.
  • + Superior motion capture with hair blowing naturally in one direction and the dog's tail showing movement.
  • + Added leaves with motion blur and varied orientations for a more dynamic look.
  • Lower source preservation as it changed the woman's facial features and specific expression.
  • Some minor artifacts appearing around the hand holding the leash.

Verdict: Both models followed the instructions well, but Nano Banana 2 took more creative liberties to achieve the 'energetic' feel, adding motion to the dog's tail and changing the woman's expression, which resulted in a more cohesive action shot. FLUX.2 [dev] was much better at preserving the original subject's appearance, though its hair edit felt more like a static overlay. Nano Banana 2 is the preferred choice for a truly dynamic result, despite changing the face more significantly.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent typography and spelling throughout.
  • + Strong minimalist vector style that feels modern yet vintage.
  • + Well-balanced composition with a clean banner.
  • The steam elements are very small and slightly abstract.
  • Texture on the background is very faint.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Beautiful engraving style with more detailed 'vintage' shading.
  • + The 'Est. 1720' banner is more classical and ornate.
  • + Better execution of the 'subtle texture' on the background.
  • The typography for 'Caffè Florian' is slightly messy with uneven letter spacing.
  • Less minimalist than requested, leaning more into a complex badge style.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt well, but FLUX.2 [dev] produced a cleaner, more professional vector logo with superior font rendering. While Nano Banana 2 captured a more authentic vintage 'engraved' look, its typography was slightly less polished than FLUX.2 [dev], which perfectly balanced the 'minimalist' and 'vector' keywords.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Features a high-contrast palette that fits the 'navy' requirement well.
  • + Illustrations are more detailed and realistic while remaining within a vector style.
  • + Includes all crew names accurately in the header.
  • Layout is disorganized and lacks a logical chronological flow.
  • Text rendering is poor with several instances of illegible garbled characters.
  • Includes redundant icons that don't follow the requested step-by-step numbering.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Perfect adherence to the flat-vector style with consistent iconography.
  • + Information is logically organized in a clear, easy-to-read sequence.
  • + Text is exceptionally crisp and accurately reflects all prompt instructions.
  • The 'Descent' icon is slightly disconnected from its label compared to the previous steps.
  • The palette is very light, leaning more towards light gray/blue than the requested 'navy' dominant feel.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner as it successfully interprets the 'infographic' requirement with a logical layout and professional vector aesthetic. FLUX.2 [dev] produces higher quality individual illustrations but fails to organize them into a coherent sequence and suffers from significant text rendering issues.

Next steps

Explore each model