FLUX.2 [dev] Black Forest Labs vs FLUX.2 [pro] Black Forest Labs

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Perfect adherence to all spatial instructions.
• + Excellent rendering of glass texture and refractive light.
• + Accurate interpretation of 'soft window light' affecting the scene.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Sophisticated composition and photographic depth of field.
• + Very realistic material rendering for the book and wooden table.
• + Sharp, clean glass edges.

• − The green plant is not visible through the glass as requested, only around it.
• − The blue sphere is partially fused with the bottom of the glass cube.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent preservation of the man's specific clothing including the pattern, scarf, and hairstyle.
• + Realistic interior car detail that matches the luxury aesthetic of the source car.
• + Dramatically captures the 'drive' with high-quality background motion blur.

• − The man's facial features changed significantly compared to the source image.
• − The car's exterior frame is partially cut off due to the close-up angle.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Successfully keeps the entire car and the man in the frame while showing the coastline.
• + Preserves the man's smile and identifiable facial features much better than the other model.
• + Accurately places the car specifically on a coastal highway with motion on the wheels.

• − The man's clothing took a significant loss in detail, losing the specific plaid pattern and heavy scarf from the source.
• − Slightly less 'cinematic' lighting compared to Model A.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent representation of motion blur from passing cars as requested.
• + Captures the feeling of 'light rain' through visible droplets and atmospheric haze.
• + The framing feels appropriately 'imperfect' and candid for a street photo.

• − Significant anatomical and mechanical errors where the man's legs and the bicycle frame merge in a confusing way.
• − The bicycle's structure is nonsensical in the center area.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Extremely high detail in skin texture and clothing materials.
• + Clear, logical bicycle mechanics and a realistic squatting pose for the subject.
• + Beautifully rendered reflections and wet pavement textures.

• − Failed to include the requested 'motion blur from passing cars'.
• − The background car is static and doesn't convey the busy street energy requested.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent rendering of the ornate engraved armor texture.
• + Very realistic leather straps with visible wear and accurate buckle placement.
• + Good adherence to the 'beads' prompt with natural-looking wooden beads.

• − The lighting on the face feels a bit flat compared to the dramatic background.
• − The scarring is a bit simplistic in texture.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Superior skin texture with grit, dirt, and more realistic, deep scarring.
• + Dynamic lighting with very strong warm reflections off the armor's surface.
• + Better sense of depth and atmospheric bokeh sparks.

• − The beads in the hair look slightly more like modern plastic or colorful jewelry than weathered paladin beads.
• − The metal engraving is slightly less crisp than in Model A.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent photographic quality and realistic food rendering.
• + Consistent use of bold, vibrant accent colors across different sections.
• + Good spacing and visual balance for a two-page spread layout.

• − Text is largely gibberish strings of characters.
• − Includes a typo in a header (PIZZAU) and redundant labeling.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Text is much more legible and includes recognizable menu items.
• + Features a clean, centered layout with consistent iconography.
• + Strict adherence to the requested grid-based food photo section.

• − The 'Mains' category is misspelled as 'MINS'.
• − Prices are awkwardly formatted with strange comma placement (e.g., $,30).

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent typography with a vibrant, fiery glow effect on all text elements.
• + High-quality, distinct rendering of the burger toppings with great color saturation.
• + The starburst design perfectly captures the 'fiery' prompt requirement.

• − The meat patty looks slightly dry compared to a typical food advertisement.
• − The composition is quite vertical and standard.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Highly dynamic composition with motion trails and swirling grease/sauce particles.
• + The texture of the meat and melted cheese is extremely realistic and appetizing.
• + Excellent use of lighting to create depth and volume within the burger stack.

• − The text 'MAGIC BURGER' is slightly less legible than in the other version.
• − The starburst element looks a bit more like a vector graphic compared to the photorealistic burger.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent chalk texture with hyper-realistic smudging and dust remnants
• + Precise text rendering with zero spelling errors
• + Strong framing that fills the board effectively

• − The handwriting style is a bit inconsistent across different lines
• − The 'with lemon' and '$28' spacing is slightly awkward

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Beautiful, consistent cursive handwriting that feels very authentic to a café aesthetic
• + Better composition relative to the surrounding wall and background bokeh
• + Perfectly followed the instruction for elegant cursive title

• − The 'S' in 'Specials' is slightly malformed
• − Minor spacing issues on the 'Brown Butter' line

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Successfully carries over the head and accessories from the character reference image.

• − Severely fails anatomically, leaving the original female head floating near the shoulder.
• − The body position is distorted and does not resemble a human form.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Successfully recreates the character's clothing, face, and accessories in a high-quality render.
• + Produces a coherent human anatomy that attempts to follow the spirit of the dynamic pose.

• − Fails to match the exact leg and torso position of Image 1, opting for a squat instead of the standing/leaning cross-legged pose.
• − The character is now wearing shoes/socks or has strangely textured feet compared to the barefoot reference.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + High resolution and realistic textures on the spacesuit and horse fur.
• + Cinematic lighting with a strong sense of scale over the planet.

• − Completely failed the negative constraint/spatial instruction of 'horse on top'.
• − Shows a generic astronaut riding a horse which is a very common AI trope.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Followed the difficult spatial prompt of placing the 'horse on top' of the astronaut.
• + Excellent surreal composition with beautiful nebula effects.
• + High level of detail on the astronaut's life support systems.

• − Anatomical issues where the horse's legs merge oddly with the astronaut's body.
• − The 'horse on top' is actually a horse standing on another horse-like structure emerging from the astronaut.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent front-on perspective emphasizing the capybara's expression.
• + The businesswoman's 'bored' expression is perfectly captured and positioned clearly.
• + Strong color contrast and high-resolution texture on the fur.

• − The paws look a bit human-like and awkward on the steering wheel.
• − The exterior environment through the windows is less detailed than in its counterpart.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Superior interior detail, including the dashboard, meter, and gear shift.
• + Cinematic lighting and realistic rain/bokeh effects on the windshield.
• + The capybara's anatomy and paws on the wheel look very natural in the profil view.

• − The businesswoman looks somewhat distant and less integrated into the 'taxi ride' narrative than in model A.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent typography with a cohesive gothic font choice
• + Very clean and intentional border design using thorns and webs
• + Balanced layout with clear hierarchy of information

• − The dark jack-o-lantern blends slightly too much into the background
• − The scroll banner looks slightly flat compared to the rest of the image

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Dynamic cinematic lighting with a glowing pumpkin and moon
• + Greater depth of field with misty ground and atmospheric background
• + Higher level of texture on the parchment and scroll banner

• − Layout is slightly more cluttered with elements overlapping
• − The border is thinner and less defined than requested

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent preservation of the original face, beard, and eyewear
• + Extremely convincing blend between the new hair and the existing beard texture
• + High degree of realism in individual hair strands and volume

• − The choice of an afro-style texture may be seen as a specific interpretation rather than a generic head of hair
• − The hairline is slightly obscured by the volume

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Good preservation of the background and clothing
• + The hair style feels like a natural extension of the person's likely younger appearance

• − Slightly alters the facial structure, making the man look slightly younger/different
• − Noticeable artifacts where the hair meets the forehead, appearing less integrated than Model A
• − The beard texture was slightly smoothed compared to the original

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent PBR textures showing realistic translucency in the fish
• + Accurate rendering of rice grains
• + Perfectly followed text layout with large 'JAPAN' and smaller 'SUSHI'

• − Lighting is a bit soft, causing the white text to blend slightly into the background

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Strong 'cartoon' aesthetic with bold, stylized geometry
• + Large, highly legible white text
• + Clean isometric representation of the diorama base

• − Sushi rice appears more like a bumpy pattern than individual grains
• − The 'JAPAN' and 'SUSHI' text are nearly the same size, ignoring the hierarchy requested

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Successfully maintains a high level of facial resemblance to the source image within the caricature style.
• + Includes clever details like dogs wearing hockey jerseys and a camera crew.
• + Creative integration of a hockey rink as the studio background.

• − The text on the anchor desk is garbled and nonsensical.
• − The additional human character in the background is not explicitly requested and looks a bit cluttered.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Clean and vibrant illustration style that feels professional.
• + Very symmetrical and balanced composition.
• + Includes fun details like dogs sitting in office chairs and holding hockey sticks.

• − Loses significant facial resemblance to the source image, looking more like a generic cartoon character.
• − The hands are slightly distorted with inconsistent finger counts.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Includes all four requested animals (dog, cat, fox, and two bunnies).
• + Excellent use of backlight and 'god rays' through the fur.
• + Very high level of realism in the fur texture and meadow details.

• − The animals are mostly sitting still rather than 'playfully chasing' and 'tumbling' as requested.
• − The bunny looks a bit static and duplicated in the foreground.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Captures the 'playfully chasing' and 'tumbling' action much more dynamically.
• + Superior composition with more expressive, 'big' eyes as requested.
• + The lighting and dew sparkles are beautifully rendered.

• − Failed to include the baby bunny requested in the prompt.
• − The anatomy of the puppy's raised paw is slightly distorted.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent soft lighting and pastel color palette.
• + Beautiful dreamy floral background effectively adds to the theme.
• + Great preservation of the characters' expressions and poses.

• − The background departs significantly from the original street scene.
• − The character design leans slightly more towards modern anime than classic Ghibli.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Superb preservation of the original street composition and background elements.
• + Authentic Studio Ghibli art style with watercolor-like textures and character line work.
• + Stronger adherence to the 'hand-painted' texture request.

• − The man's expression is slightly more neutral/curious than the 'checking out' expression in the original.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent hair motion that blends naturally with the original portrait.
• + Subtle and realistic addition of flying leaves that fit the background scale.
• + Maintains perfect structural integrity of the woman and the dog.

• − The 'lively and energetic' feel is a bit more restrained compared to Model B.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Successfully adds motion to more elements, including the denim jacket flaring out.
• + Dynamic leaf placement with depth of field, creating a strong sense of wind.
• + Maintains high fidelity to the original subject's face and the dog.

• − Some foreground leaves are slightly distracting and can obscure the composition.
• − A few leaves have minor artifacts or look pasted on compared to the background elements.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent typography integrated into a classic banner
• + Strong vector emblem aesthetic with high contrast
• + Perfect adherence to the requested color tones and textures

• − The cloche steam is a bit small and simplistic

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Elegant circular composition that feels more like a complete brand mark
• + Superior rendering of the steam and shading on the cloche
• + Very clean, professional typography with classical serif styling

• − The 'Est. 1720' text is slightly less prominent than the banner style in Model A

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Includes all six individual stages as distinct icons.
• + Cleverly includes the names of the Apollo 11 crew correctly.
• + Matches the requested navy, white, and red color palette perfectly.

• − The layout is cluttered and non-linear, making the mission steps hard to follow.
• − Several text labels are garbled or contain typos (e.g., 'Trarquility', 'UALSIST ORDIT').
• − Included redundant launch icons that break the requested numbered step sequence.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Higher quality text rendering for the main headers and location pin.
• + Better infographic flow with connected path lines between steps.
• + More consistent vector style that feels like a professional poster.

• − Combines descent and landing into a vertical flow, missing the explicit 'Landing' text for the final step.
• − The 'Earth Orbit' and 'Translunar' icons are visually similar and slightly repetitive.
• − The placeholder body text under headers is gibberish.