FLUX.2 [dev] Black Forest Labs vs FLUX.2 [max] Black Forest Labs

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Perfect adherence to the prompt's spatial instructions.
• + Excellent glass refraction and lighting consistency.
• + Warm, natural photographic aesthetic.

• − The blue sphere appears slightly levitating rather than resting on the bottom.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + High-fidelity textures, specifically on the book cover and wooden table.
• + Sharp, clean geometry for the glass cube.
• + Realistic light streaks on the table surface.

• − The sphere is not truly 'inside' the cube, appearing to float through or in front of the glass pane.
• − The glass cube lacks a bottom, making its structure physically confusing.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent character consistency, accurately preserving the man's hair, scarf, and coat pattern.
• + High-quality interior detail of the car showing realistic dash and seats.
• + Good sense of motion and perspective from within the vehicle.

• − The driver side is on the right, which is incorrect for a car driving in California.
• − The car's exterior frame is partially cut off due to the close framing.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Successfully places the original car and man into the full environment.
• + Preserves the car's exterior design and the man's key features very well.
• + Correctly places the driver on the left side for a US-based road.

• − The scale of the man relative to the car seems slightly off, making him look a bit small.
• − Minor artifacts in the background coastline texture.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent representation of motion blur from passing cars.
• + Highly realistic skin texture and facial details.
• + Stronger 'candid' feel with messy foreground elements and imperfect framing.

• − The structural integrity of the bike is poor, with mismatched parts and confusing geometry.
• − The man's hands melt into the bike's handlebars and wires.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + The bicycle is significantly more coherent and realistic in its construction.
• + The composition is clean and clearly depicts the act of 'repairing' with tools on the ground.
• + Good use of wet pavement reflections and shallow depth of field.

• − Missed the 'motion blur from passing cars' instruction; the background car is sharp.
• − The framing feels a bit too staged and centered compared to the 'imperfect' request.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent adherence to the 'beads in hair' prompt element
• + Clear and visible torch source providing realistic lighting
• + Very intricate engraving details on the chest plate

• − The leather straps look slightly flat in texture compared to the armor
• − Scars look a bit like face paint rather than physical indentations

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Superior 'battle-worn' texture with realistic grime and weathered metal
• + High-quality skin texture and more intense, lifelike eyes
• + Exceptional detail on the frayed cloth underlayer

• − The torch is out of focus and less impactful for the 'warm torchlight' requirement
• − Hair beads are less colorful and distinct than Model A

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent photographic quality and lighting for food items.
• + Strong adherence to the multi-column sections requested.
• + Modern and high-end aesthetic with vibrant color gradients.

• − Text is largely gibberish or contains significant character glitches.
• − The grid layout is slightly uneven in the right column.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Highly legible and clean typography for a menu.
• + Perfect grid alignment for the food photos.
• + Professional iconography and social media footer added.

• − The food photography has a slightly flatter, more generic stock-photo look.
• − The image content doesn't always match the section titles (e.g. burgers and wraps under 'Appetizers').

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent typography with a cohesive neon fiery glow effect.
• + Better composition where each individual ingredient is clearly separated.
• + Stronger sense of motion with the dynamic splashing sauce droplets.

• − The meat patty texture is slightly less detailed than in the competitor's image.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Highly realistic food textures, especially the sesame seeds and the sear on the patty.
• + Complex layering of ingredients with high sharpness.

• − The 'exploded' effect is less clear because several ingredients are still touching each other.
• − The starburst element looks like a flat graphic compared to the more integrated fiery version in Model A.
• − The 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' text lacks the requested fiery glow.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent chalk texture throughout the board
• + Highly authentic 'handwritten' aesthetic with varied letter sizes
• + Includes the complete requested text perfectly

• − The layout is a bit cluttered with the text overlapping some chalk smudges

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Perfect alignment and spacing of the menu items
• + Consistent and elegant cursive handwriting style
• + Excellent lighting and warm café atmosphere

• − The handwriting looks slightly too uniform, almost like a digital chalk font
• − Missing the hyphen in the date requested in the prompt

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Successfully captures the facial features and accessories from the character reference.

• − Extreme anatomical errors including a severed head remaining on the left side of the torso.
• − Fails to match the pose, showing a floating figure rather than the specific stance on the box.
• − Low visual quality with blurry blending where the original person's head was.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Excellent adherence to the complex pose and body position from Image 1.
• + Accurately replicates the clothing, scarf, and sunglasses from Image 2.
• + High visual quality with natural lighting and consistent anatomy.

• − Perspective on the feet standing on the ottoman is slightly flat compared to the reference.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent sense of motion and dynamic composition.
• + Highly detailed spacesuit and horse anatomy.
• + Beautiful lighting reflecting off the Earth's atmosphere.

• − Failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is riding the horse, not vice versa.
• − The horse's back hooves are blurred into the Earth's clouds.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Stellar background with a very cinematic galaxy formation.
• + Interesting use of an asteroid as a platform for the horse.
• + Crisp details on the horse's coat and equipment.

• − Failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is riding the horse.
• − The astronaut's left leg seems slightly malformed where it meets the saddle.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Successfully replicates the scarf pattern and coat style
• + High visual quality and lighting integration

• − Failed to preserve the source person's face and identity, merging features with the person in Image 2
• − Inaccurately added gold chains not present in either source image
• − Altered the person's hair and skin patterns

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Perfectly preserves the source person's face, skin patterns, and hair
• + Accurately replicates the outfit including the scarf, coat, and jeans
• + Excellent integration of clothing onto the subject's pose and body

• − Minor omission of the sunglasses from Image 2

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Successfully renders animal paws on the steering wheel as requested
• + Excellent cinematic lighting and focus on the capybara's texture
• + Perfectly captures the bored, mundane expression of the passenger

• − The scale of the capybara's head is slightly large relative to the driver's seat space

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Great side-profile composition showing more of the car interior
• + Realistic lighting effect from the phone screen on the passenger's face

• − Failed the anatomy prompt by giving the capybara human hands
• − The capybara's head is not properly attached to the neck/body

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent typography and layout for all text elements
• + Captures the vintage gothic aesthetic perfectly with moody colors
• + High-quality, clean borders that integrate webs and thorns seamlessly

• − The jack-o-lantern is mostly black, which feels more illustrative than cinematic

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Realistic lighting and texture on the central jack-o-lantern
• + More atmospheric background featuring church silhouettes
• + Good scroll detail with elegant cursive font

• − Typography for the main title looks slightly generic and less integrated into the art
• − The spider webs in the bottom corners are less detailed than those in the top

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent preservation of the original person's facial features and bone structure.
• + Detailed hair texture with realistic curls and flyaways.
• + The hair blends naturally with the existing beard and sideburns.

• − The hairline across the forehead appears slightly too straight and uniform.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Natural and realistic hairline with uneven growth patterns.
• + Great integration of lighting and highlights on the hair strands.
• + Preserved the background and clothing perfectly.

• − Significantly altered the facial structure, making the man look younger and thinner in the face compared to the source.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent text layout and vertical centering of the flag.
• + Higher level of realism in the fish and rice texture.
• + Clean shadows and soft, refined lighting that feels like a polished 3D render.

• − The diorama base is very simple compared to the 'miniature scene' description.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Better interpretation of the 'diorama base' and 'miniature scene' with a tiered platform and wooden platter.
• + Includes logical environmental details like chopsticks and ginger.
• + Strong adherence to the isometric perspective and cartoon-style modeling.

• − The flag icon is placed to the side of the text rather than vertically centered as implied by the layout.
• − The textures look slightly flatter and more plastic-like than Model A.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Successfully incorporates all elements: tv anchor, dogs, and hockey in a cohesive rink-side news desk scene.
• + Maintains recognizable facial features from the source image within the caricature style.
• + The traditional caricature art style captures the humorous essence requested better than a generic cartoon.

• − The text on the anchor desk is garbled and illegible.
• − Includes a random male character in the upper left that wasn't requested.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Clean, vibrant digital illustration style with high visual clarity.
• + The use of the scoreboard and hockey sticks frames the composition well.
• + Includes a nod to the original attire by keeping the denim shirt on the subject.

• − The facial likeness is significantly less recognizable compared to the source image, looking more like a stock character.
• − The style leans more towards 'modern mobile game cartoon' than a classic 'exaggerated caricature'.
• − Text on the screens and desk is nonsensical.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Expertly rendered 'god rays' and backlighting that creates a warm, atmospheric glow.
• + Individual fur strands and whiskers are exceptionally sharp and detailed.
• + Excellent expressions on the animals that feel emotive and 'wholesome'.

• − Included two rabbits instead of the one requested in the prompt.
• − The animals are sitting relatively still rather than 'playfully chasing' or 'tumbling'.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Perfectly captures the 'playfully chasing' and 'tumbling' movement described in the prompt.
• + Includes exactly one of each animal requested (puppy, kitten, bunny, fox).
• + Dynamic composition with butterflies scattered throughout the scene.

• − The fox's front paws/legs look slightly anatomically awkward in the mid-air pose.
• − The lighting is slightly flatter and less 'magical' compared to the god rays in the other image.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent character likeness to original meme figures
• + Accurately recreates the facial expressions of all three subjects
• + Dreamy flower garden background fits the Ghibli theme well

• − Background diverges significantly from the original city street setting

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Preserved the original city street background while stylizing it
• + Warm, nostalgic lighting and color palette
• + Good paper texture effect helps the hand-painted feel

• − The facial expressions are softened too much, losing the specific 'distracted' and 'indignant' look of the original characters
• − The man's face looks slightly generic compared to the source

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Successfully added wind-blown hair effect.
• + Included numerous small flying leaves throughout the scene.
• + Maintains excellent consistency with the background and human subjects from the source image.

• − The hair flow lacks a single clear direction, looking more static than wind-swept.
• − Some leaves appear slightly blurred or low-resolution compared to the rest of the image.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + The hair flow is much more dynamic and directional, creating a stronger sense of movement.
• + Leaves in the foreground are sharper and more visually integrated.
• + Excellent preservation of the source image's identity and facial details.

• − Some leaves in the extreme foreground have a slight halo or edge artifact.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Strong vector emblem style with bold woodcut-inspired shading.
• + Excellent rendering of text including the specific accent mark on 'Caffè'.
• + Clean, high-contrast composition that works well for branding.

• − The 'Est. 1720' text is slightly small within the secondary banner.
• − The steam icon is very simplified, looking more like a small flame.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + Elegant circular composition that is very classic for a restaurant logo.
• + Superior rendering of the 'steam' effect moving above the cloche.
• + Great use of the requested warm brown and cream color palette.

• − The 'Est. 1720' banner lacks the complexity of a true vintage design.
• − Typography on 'Caffè Florian' is a bit thinner and less impactful than Model A.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Includes all specific icons requested in the prompt including the Saturn V and Lunar Module.
• + Captures a very clean, modern aesthetic with high-quality vector-style illustrations.
• + Successfully renders names of the crew members in a separate call-out box.

• − The layout for the steps is disordered and doesn't follow a logical sequence.
• − Text rendering on several labels is garbled or contains typos like 'Trarquility' and 'Ualsist Ordit'.

FLUX.2 [max]

• + The layout is more logical and structured as an infographic with sequential steps.
• + Excellent text legibility and spelling for all labels.
• + Uses a consistent flat-vector style with a very professional NASA-inspired muted palette.

• − Repetitive labels (labels 'Earth Orbit' three times) and misses some distinct steps like 'Lunar Orbit'.
• − The icons for the spacecraft are more generic and less detailed than the Saturn V in the competing image.