Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [dev] Black Forest Labs FLUX.2 [klein] 9B Black Forest Labs

Settled by community votes across 20 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [dev]

24.5 arena score

#18 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

20.6 arena score

#13 of 32 in Image Editing

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [dev]

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 20

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent optical realism with accurate glass reflections and refractions
  • + High-quality textures on the wooden table and book cover
  • + Perfect adherence to spatial instructions including light source direction
  • The plant is slightly more obscured than might be expected, though still visible through the glass

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Successfully includes all requested elements
  • + Good lighting on the tabletop surfaces
  • The blue sphere appears to be floating mid-air inside the cube rather than resting on the bottom
  • The glass cube has distorted, thick walls that look more like a vase or heavy jar
  • Distracting blue artifacts on the side of the glass that don't match the central sphere

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] produced a much more photorealistic image with convincing physics and optical properties. While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B followed the prompt, it failed on physical coherence, showing a floating sphere and inconsistent glass refractions.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev]
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent preservation of the man's identity, hairstyle, and specific clothing (coat, scarf, pants).
  • + Maintains the interior details and ivory leather of the car accurately.
  • + Dynamic and cinematically pleasing composition with a realistic motion-blurred background.
  • The car's windshield frame appears slightly warped on the right side.
  • Hands on the steering wheel are a bit chunky and lack fine detail.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent preservation of the car's exterior architecture and model.
  • + Good sense of speed with motion blur on the wheels and road.
  • Fails to realistically integrate the man, showing only a small, distorted portion of his hair.
  • The car appears to be driving on the wrong side of the road for the US (left side lane).
  • Does not capture the specified subject (the man from the source image) driving.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] is the clear winner as it successfully combined the two source images, placing the specific man into the specific car while perfectly preserving his unique outfit and hair. In contrast, FLUX.2 [klein] 9B focused almost entirely on the car, relegating the man to an unrecognizable silhouette in the background and failing to follow the core instruction of the edit.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent execution of car motion blur in the background.
  • + Highly realistic skin textures and wet hair detail.
  • + Correctly captures the 'imperfect framing' requested with a tight, candid feel.
  • The anatomy of the man's hands is slightly confused around the brake levers.
  • Missing visible rain droplets on his coat compared to the background.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + High level of detail in the bicycle components and mechanical tools.
  • + Great atmosphere with visible rain and pavement reflections.
  • + Excellent composition with a natural crouching pose.
  • Completely failed to include the requested motion blur on the passing cars.
  • The framing feels too balanced and professional, missing the 'imperfect framing' prompt constraint.
  • The man's right hand position is anatomically awkward against the bike frame.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] followed the prompt more precisely, particularly by incorporating the motion blur and imperfect framing that give it a genuine street photography feel. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B produced a beautiful image, but the cars in the background are static and sharp, ignoring a key technical requirement of the prompt.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent depiction of colored beads within the braids.
  • + Rich, intricate floral engravings on the armor plate.
  • + Realistic skin texture and lifelike eyes.
  • The torch in the background has a slightly artificial, clean flame.
  • The scars look like surface-level scratches rather than deep battle scars.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Highly detailed leather grain and worn texture on the straps.
  • + More convincing facial structure with realistic aging and grit.
  • + Exceptional armor engraving and chainmail detailing.
  • The braids feel slightly more rigid and less natural than in model A.
  • The beads are much more subtle and less distinct.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, but FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is the winner due to its superior rendering of textures, specifically the worn leather and metal grain. While FLUX.2 [dev] produced beautiful colored beads and soft lighting, FLUX.2 [klein] 9B captured the 'battle-worn' aesthetic with more grit and realistic facial detail.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent typography rendering with consistent bold sans-serif fonts
  • + Clean and logical multi-column layout following classic menu design
  • + Highly relevant food photography that feels professional
  • Menu pricing formatting is slightly inconsistent ($1300 vs $190)

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Strong heading font that fits the 'modern minimalist' theme well
  • + Good use of color accents with the horizontal lines
  • Confusing layout with repetitive headers (Appetizers shown twice)
  • Text rendering is messy with many garbled or overlapping letters
  • Food photos show pizza under every category including appetizers and mains

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] produced a far more usable and professional menu design with clear sections for Appetizers, Pizza, and Mains. While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B captured the minimalist aesthetic, it failed on layout logic by repeating the 'Appetizers' header and displaying pizzas in every section regardless of the label.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent 'exploded' view that separates all ingredients clearly.
  • + Perfect adherence to all text requirements including the starburst shape.
  • + Very clean photorealistic textures on the vegetables and meat patty.
  • The 'fiery' effect on the text is slightly less cohesive with the background than in the alternative.
  • The drop of sauce on the left looks a bit like a disconnected floating bean.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Dynamic composition with a strong sense of diagonal motion and energy.
  • + Superior integration of the fiery texture into the typography.
  • + Rich, warm lighting that enhances the food's appeal.
  • Fails the 'exploded' instruction as the burger layers are mostly stacked together.
  • The starburst for the price is less distinct, blending heavily with the background sparks.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] followed the technical instructions more accurately by clearly exploding the burger layers in mid-air as requested. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B created a more visually striking and dynamic advertisement with better lighting, but it struggled to separate the burger components and maintained a mostly assembled stack.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent chalk texture with realistic smudging and dusting on the board.
  • + Strong adherence to the specific text requested, including the full date and menu prices.
  • + Natural variation in handwriting that captures a genuine chalk-on-board feel.
  • The layout of the second item is slightly cluttered with overlapping chalk marks.
  • The bottom text line has some minor warping in the cursive flow.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Very clean and readable cursive handwriting style.
  • + Consistent spacing and layout across the entire board.
  • + Successfully completed the truncated prompt for 'Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies'.
  • The spelling error 'fress' instead of 'fresh' in the bottom line.
  • The handwriting looks a bit too 'perfect' and digital compared to the requested realistic chalk texture.
  • Slightly less chalky debris/smudging making it look more like a digital chalk font.

Verdict: Both models handled the complex text requirements well, but FLUX.2 [dev] produced a much more realistic chalkboard aesthetic with convincing chalk texture and natural smudging. While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B had a cleaner layout, it contained a spelling mistake ('fress') and the handwriting felt more like a digital font than actual chalk.

Pose & Character Mashup

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev]
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Successfully includes the character's clothing and scarf from Image 2.
  • + Captures the facial likeness and sunglasses of the character accurately.
  • Catastrophic failure in anatomy, leaving the original woman's head grafted onto the side of the character's body.
  • Fails to follow the pose of Image 1, orienting the head vertically instead of tilted with the hair flow.
  • Includes a floating leg and impossible body structure.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent adherence to the complex physical pose from Image 1.
  • + Perfectly integrates the character's face, hair, and clothing from Image 2 into the new position.
  • + Matches the lighting and background of Image 1 seamlessly while maintaining anatomical correctness.
  • The right hand is clenched into a fist rather than the open-fingered delicate pose seen in Image 1.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] failed the task by failing to remove the original subject from Image 1, resulting in a disturbing image with two heads and impossible anatomy. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B successfully translated the character from Image 2 into the exact dynamic pose requested, maintaining natural skin tones, lighting, and a clean composition.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent cinematic lighting and atmosphere.
  • + Clean composition with realistic cloud interactions below the horse.
  • + High level of detail in the astronaut suit and horse's mane.
  • Failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is riding the horse, not vice versa.
  • The shadow on the clouds below suggests a ground that isn't visually present.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Ornate and surreal background with multiple planets and nebulae.
  • + Sharp rendering of the astronaut and horse.
  • Failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is riding the horse, not vice versa.
  • Included nonsensical gibberish text at the bottom of the image.
  • Composition is a bit cluttered with repetitive planetary elements.

Verdict: Both models failed the specific prompt instruction to have the horse on top of the astronaut, instead providing the standard 'astronaut on a horse' interpretation. FLUX.2 [dev] is the superior image due to its atmospheric cinematic quality and lack of the distracting garbled text found in FLUX.2 [klein] 9B.

Outfit Transfer Challenge

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev]
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Successfully added all clothing elements and accessories from the second image.
  • + Maintains the pose and framing of the base person.
  • Failed to preserve the source person's face, blending features with the man from Image 2.
  • Removed the sand texture on the face which was a key detail of the original.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Perfect preservation of the face, skin patterns, and sand texture from Image 1.
  • + Excellent adaptation of the clothing to the original person's body type and pose.
  • The jewelry added (gold beads) does not perfectly match the specific necklaces in Image 2.
  • The scarf pattern is slightly simplified compared to the source.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B followed the most critical part of the editing instruction: keeping the person's face and features completely unchanged, even maintaining the fine sand texture on the cheek. FLUX.2 [dev] failed significantly by merging the two men's faces together, resulting in a hybrid person that does not look like the original subject.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent fur texture and lighting on the capybara.
  • + The passenger's bored expression perfectly matches the prompt.
  • + Cinematic composition with a natural depth of field through the windshield.
  • The passenger appears to be sitting in the front seat rather than the back seat.
  • The paws are slightly elongated, looking a bit like human fingers.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Correctly places the capybara in the driver seat and the passenger in the back seat.
  • + Detailed taxi interior including headrests and rear window view.
  • + Good adherence to clothing requirements for both characters.
  • The text on the hat is nonsensical ('NEW TALA').
  • The capybara's head looks somewhat pasted onto the jacket collar compared to model A.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] produced a more visually striking and textures-rich image, but it failed the spatial requirement of placing the passenger in the back seat. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B followed the composition instructions more accurately, correctly positioning the businesswoman in the rear, despite slightly lower text quality on the hat.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent typography with clean, consistent gothic font rendering.
  • + Perfect adherence to all text requirements and placement.
  • + Stronger 'dark parchment' aesthetic with high-contrast, atmospheric lighting.
  • The jack-o-lantern is quite dark, blending a bit too much into the background.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Beautiful background composition featuring a visible moon and better atmospheric depth.
  • + Vibrant jack-o-lantern color that stands out effectively as a central piece.
  • + Elegant scroll banner design that fits the vintage theme well.
  • The text alignment is slightly off-center compared to the graphics.
  • The date and location text is significantly smaller and harder to read.

Verdict: Both models followed the complex text-heavy prompt excellently. FLUX.2 [dev] produced a more polished graphic design layout with better text legibility and alignment, while FLUX.2 [klein] 9B created a superior background illustration with better depth and color. FLUX.2 [dev] is preferred here as the prompt specifically asked for an invitation/poster, and its typesetting is more professional.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [dev]
Before After
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent preservation of the original facial features and lighting.
  • + Perfectly matches the person's existing facial hair texture with the new hair.
  • The afro hair style, while thick, might not be the most 'natural' expectation for the subject's demographic.
  • Small digital artifact visible on the forehead hairline.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Natural, realistic curl texture and density.
  • + Matches the hair color and graying pattern in the beard very effectively.
  • Noticeable alteration of the facial features, specifically making the nose wider and the eyes appear different.
  • The glasses frames are slightly warped compared to the original image.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] did a superior job of preserving the identity and facial structure of the original person, although the hair style choice was quite bold. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B provided a very realistic hair texture, but it failed the core requirement of preserving the original facial features, resulting in a slightly different person.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Successfully rendered the correct Japanese flag.
  • + Excellent textures on the fish and rice that lean into the realistic PBR request.
  • + Clean, professional typography and layout.
  • The diorama base is a bit plain compared to the wood texture in the other model.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Nice wood grain texture on the diorama base.
  • + Bold, clear text that is easy to read.
  • Failed to render the correct flag, showing a Yemeni or similar horizontal tricolor instead.
  • The sushi modeling is slightly less realistic with softer, more plastic-like textures.
  • The Nigiri sushi has a strange seaweed wrap placement.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] followed all instructions perfectly, including the specific flag icon, and provided superior textures for the food. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B failed on the cultural accuracy of the flag and had slightly lower quality 3D assets.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev]
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Expertly integrates the hockey element by placing the anchor desk directly onto an ice rink.
  • + Preserves the likeness of the subject well while applying the caricature transformation.
  • + Creative inclusion of dogs wearing hockey jerseys and an extra caricature character.
  • The text on the anchor desk is gibberish.
  • The camera operator in the background has a slightly distorted face.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent caricature style with highly expressive, exaggerated facial features.
  • + Strong adherence to the TV anchor profession with clear studio props like the microphone and monitors.
  • + Large variety of dogs integrated into the crowd scene.
  • The hockey theme is very subtle, relegated to small icons and a few fans in the background.
  • Gibberish text on the banners and the desk monitor.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] is the winner because it more successfully integrates all three elements of the prompt (TV anchor, dogs, and hockey) into a single cohesive scene by placing the news desk on an ice rink. While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B produces a very high-quality caricature, the hockey element is largely missing or overlooked compared to the prompt requirements.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent fur texture rendering and realistic lighting
  • + Includes two bunnies despite the prompt asking for one, adding to the 'tumbling together' vibe
  • + Very natural integrated background with beautiful god rays
  • The fox looks slightly stiff compared to the other animals
  • Less sense of active movement or 'chasing' compared to the other model

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Perfectly captures the 'playfully chasing' and 'tumbling' motion requested
  • + Extremely vibrant lighting and well-defined butterflies
  • + Stronger emotional expression in the animals' faces
  • Completely failed to include the baby bunny requested in the prompt
  • The kitten's pose and anatomy look slightly awkward and floaty

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] followed the prompt more accurately by including all requested animals, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 9B omitted the bunny. However, FLUX.2 [klein] 9B captured the energetic action of 'chasing and tumbling' much better than the relatively static poses in FLUX.2 [dev].

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev]
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent preservation of the original characters' facial expressions, especially the man's pout and the girlfriend's scowl.
  • + Effective soft-lighting and textured paper effect that matches the Ghibli aesthetic.
  • + Accurate preservation of the poses and clothing details from the source image.
  • The background is a bit generic and lacks the detailed environmental storytelling found in Ghibli films.
  • The red dress has become slightly more pink than the original.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Captured a very high-quality watercolor Ghibli-style aesthetic with distinct line art.
  • + Creative background transformation that adds a whimsical village and extra characters in the distance.
  • + Bright and pleasant color palette.
  • Failed to preserve the key emotional context; the man and girlfriend both look happy/neutral rather than distracted and angry.
  • The woman in the foreground is significantly clearer than the source, losing the out-of-focus background effect that made the original meme work.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] is the winner because it successfully applied the requested artistic style without losing the core narrative of the original image (the 'distracted boyfriend' meme). While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B produced a beautiful illustration, it fundamentally changed the facial expressions, making the man look friendly and the girlfriend look happy, which destroys the context of the source image.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [dev]
Before After
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent preservation of the subject's facial features and the original background.
  • + Natural hair motion that flows realistically from the head.
  • + Subtle and well-distributed flying leaves.
  • The leash handle has been slightly merged with the woman's hand incorrectly compared to the original.
  • Motion on the dog is minimal, lacking the 'energetic feel' in its fur.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Strong adherence to the 'energetic' instruction with many flying leaves.
  • + Effective hair blowing effect that adds significant dynamic motion.
  • + High preservation of the source image's layout and colors.
  • Some leaves appear overly sharpened and flat against the image plane.
  • The dog's fur around the neck and chest has become slightly messy/distorted compared to the original.
  • Hair strands on the right side look slightly disconnected from the main body of hair.

Verdict: Both models performed excellent edits, but FLUX.2 [dev] produced a more natural and cohesive result. While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B added more leaves for a 'busier' feel, FLUX.2 [dev] maintained better facial consistency and more realistic hair blending, making it the more polished option.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent typography including the grave accent in 'Caffè'
  • + Strong balanced composition that follows the vector emblem request perfectly
  • + Beautiful subtle paper texture that enhances the vintage feel
  • The steam is very small and lacks a bit of stylistic character

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Dynamic steam illustration gives the logo movement
  • + Good use of the brown and cream color palette
  • + Clean rendering of the cloche highlights
  • The 'Est. 1720' text is slightly off-center within the banner
  • Composition is a bit bottom-heavy with the large text below the emblem circle
  • Less authentic vintage texture compared to the other model

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] is the clear winner as it produces a more professional and balanced vector emblem with superior typography and a more authentic vintage texture. While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B creates a decent logo, its layout is less cohesive and the letter spacing and alignment on the banner lack the precision found in FLUX.2 [dev].

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent vector iconography with high-level detail on the lunar lander.
  • + Professional layout that adheres to a grid structure.
  • + Generally legible headers and creative inclusion of the crew names in the top right.
  • Included extra redundant icons that were not part of the requested steps.
  • Some text strings became garbled or repetitive ("SATURN ICON", "LTUREST LJAMDIIES").

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Clear visual flow using arrows to connect the mission steps.
  • + Stronger adherence to the requested flat-vector style with bold, simple shapes.
  • + Good use of supporting icons like the crew silhouettes at the bottom.
  • Major spelling errors in the main headers ("AOILLO 11", "EARDHT", "LANDINING").
  • The 'Translural' (Translunar) section lacks a clear icon, showing only text and an arrow.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] produces much higher quality icons and maintains a much more professional 'infographic' feel, although it adds some redundant tiles. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B follows the logical flow better with arrows, but suffers from significant spelling errors and less polished vector art. FLUX.2 [dev] is the preferred choice for its superior visual clarity and more accurate rendering of the spacecraft.

Next steps

Explore each model