Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash fal Wan 2.6 Alibaba

Settled by community votes across 19 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

27.0 arena score

#7 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Wan 2.6

23.3 arena score

#28 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Top 2 in Image-to-Video
Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

100.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Wan 2.6

0.0%

win rate

100.0% 0.0% ties 0.0%
Shared challenges 19

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'partially visible through the glass' prompt instruction.
  • + Very clean glass textures and realistic light refraction.
  • + Superior rendering of the book's spine and cover texture.
  • The placement of the plant behind the glass is a bit sparse compared to the rest of the greenery.
  • The glass cube lacks a physical top lid, making the book appear to float on just the edges.

Wan 2.6

  • + Beautiful lighting and warm wood grain texture.
  • + Strong color saturation on the blue sphere.
  • + Good composition with the plant pot fully visible.
  • Fails the 'partially visible through the glass' prompt as the plant is shifted mostly to the right side of the cube.
  • The book has a distorted, melted appearance on its edges/pages.
  • The glass cube geometry is slightly warped/inconsistent.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is the clear winner as it successfully placed the plant behind the glass, creating a complex refraction effect that Wan 2.6 avoided by shifting the plant to the side. Additionally, FLUX.2 rendered the book with much higher fidelity, whereas Wan 2.6's book appeared to have structural AI artifacts.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent preservation of the subject's clothing and hairstyle
  • + High level of detail in the car's interior wood grain and dashboard
  • + Realistic lighting and shadow integration for the subject
  • The car model was changed from a modern Rolls-Royce to a vintage-style interior with a different steering wheel
  • The perspective makes the car feel slightly disconnected from the road

Wan 2.6

  • + Successfully preserved the specific Rolls-Royce car body style and spirit of ecstasy hood ornament
  • + Dynamic sense of motion with blurred wheels and road
  • + Good integration of both the specific man and the specific car into the new environment
  • The man's face and hair are less detailed than in the source image
  • The subject is wearing a simplified version of the plaid coat

Verdict: Both models successfully combined the two source images into the requested scene. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash did a better job of preserving the texture and pattern of the man's clothing, but it changed the interior and steering wheel of the car significantly. Wan 2.6 is the more successful edit as it maintained the identity of both the specific man and the specific model of Rolls-Royce from the source images while creating a more coherent sense of speed and motion.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent depiction of motion blur in the background cars.
  • + Highly realistic hand anatomy and tool interaction.
  • + Effective shallow depth of field that keeps the subject sharp while blurring the street.
  • The lighting on the man's face is a bit flat compared to the dramatic environment.
  • One of the bicycle brake cables terminates unnaturally behind the man's hand.

Wan 2.6

  • + Beautiful rain droplet effects and wet texture on the man's jacket.
  • + Strong cinematic atmosphere with vibrant reflections and neon glow.
  • + The 'imperfect framing' requested is well-executed with the subject off-center.
  • The man's right hand has anatomical errors and digit blending.
  • The bicycle chain and gear area are simplified and lack mechanical coherence.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash produces a more grounded, realistic image with superior anatomical detail and better execution of the 'motion blur' request. Wan 2.6 captures the 'cinematic' and 'wet' atmosphere more vividly with impressive rain textures, but fails on internal consistency with the man's hands and the bicycle's mechanics.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent symmetry and central composition.
  • + High-fidelity texture on the leather straps and metal engravings.
  • + Very clear and numerous beads integrated into the braids.
  • The facial wounds look a bit like paint or stamps rather than deep 'battle-worn' scars.
  • Lighting is a bit flat across the face despite the torches.

Wan 2.6

  • + Superior 'battle-worn' aesthetic with realistic dirt and perspiration on the skin.
  • + More cinematic lighting with strong highlights and shadows from the torches.
  • + Highly detailed fraying on the cloth underlayer as requested.
  • The leather strap across the chest has some structural inconsistencies.
  • The face shape feels slightly distorted in the 3/4 view.

Verdict: While FLUX.2 [dev] Flash produces a very clean and symmetrical image with excellent detail on the armor and beads, Wan 2.6 captures the 'battle-worn' prompt much more effectively. Wan 2.6's use of lighting, realistic dirt textures, and frayed cloth underlayers creates a more immersive and lifelike character portrait.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent photographic quality and lighting in the food images.
  • + Dynamic uses of colorful border accents around the grid.
  • + Good use of bold sans-serif headlines.
  • Confused layout where 'Appetizers' heading is actually a grid of pizzas.
  • Text rendering is messy with garbled characters and inconsistent font weights.

Wan 2.6

  • + Layout logic is superior with a variety of food types matching the sections (salads for appetizers).
  • + Cleaner text rendering and more consistent price alignment.
  • + Better grid composition with eight photos providing a more professional menu feel.
  • The main header 'RESTAUR MENU' is poorly cropped compared to Model A.
  • Minor artifacting in the 'PIZZA' section header where it overlaps a photo.

Verdict: Wan 2.6 is the preferred model because it correctly understands the relationship between headers and photos, showing salads and varied dishes under Appetizers, whereas FLUX.2 [dev] Flash simply repeated pizza images for every section. Additionally, Wan 2.6 has much cleaner text and price alignment, resulting in a more functional menu design.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent typography with a consistent fiery glow effect.
  • + Clean and professional composition with superior food lighting.
  • + Perfect adherence to all text requirements including the starburst.
  • The 'exploded' effect is a bit static compared to the other model.

Wan 2.6

  • + Highly dynamic 'exploded' motion with realistic sauce physics.
  • + Intense fiery background with effective use of smoke and embers.
  • + Strong focus on the 'fiery' theme across all elements.
  • The starburst for the price is a 2D graphic that clashes with the 3D scene.
  • Lacks the specific 'fiery' glow requested for the price text.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash delivered a more polished and professional advertisement with cohesive text rendering and premium food photography lighting. Wan 2.6 captured the 'exploded' motion and fiery atmosphere with more energy, but the inclusion of a flat, cartoonish starburst graphic for the price significantly lowered the visual quality of the overall composition.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent text rendering with clean, legible handwriting.
  • + Captures the realistic texture of chalk including dust and smudges.
  • + Almost perfect adherence to the long list of menu items.
  • Includes a stray dollar sign at the end of the cookie line.
  • The layout becomes slightly cramped at the bottom.

Wan 2.6

  • + Natural, slanted handwriting style that feels very authentic to a café.
  • + Great lighting and chalkboard frame composition.
  • + Correctly interprets the three menu items without extra punctuation errors.
  • Repeats the word 'Chip' in the cookie item ('Chip Cookies').
  • The handwriting is slightly less uniform in quality compared to Model A.

Verdict: Both models performed exceptionally well on a difficult text-heavy prompt, capturing the chalk texture and specific dates/prices perfectly. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash has slightly cleaner lettering but included a stray dollar sign, while Wan 2.6 captured a more natural 'slanted' handwriting style but suffered from a minor word repetition error.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent anatomical details on the horse's head and body
  • + Crisp cinematic lighting with realistic reflections on the visor
  • + Clean composition with well-defined background elements
  • Failed the negative constraint to have the horse on top of the astronaut
  • Common interpretation of the concept rather than 'surreal'

Wan 2.6

  • + Vibrant and artistic space background with multiple nebulae
  • + Strong cinematic light rays from the top right corner
  • + High level of detail on the space suit and saddle
  • Failed the negative constraint to have the horse on top of the astronaut
  • Reins are disconnected/floating awkwardly behind the astronaut

Verdict: Both FLUX.2 [dev] Flash and Wan 2.6 failed the specific prompt constraint of positioning 'the horse on top, not vice versa,' instead opting for the standard imagery of an astronaut riding a horse. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is technically superior due to the absence of the floating strap artifacts found in Wan 2.6.

Outfit Transfer Challenge

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Attempts to include the jewelry and accessories mentioned in the prompt.
  • Severely distorts the person's face with disturbing artifacts and multiple eyes.
  • Fails to preserve the person's exact hair, adding a second head behind them.
  • The clothing looks like a collage rather than a realistic adaptation to the body.

Wan 2.6

  • + Successfully preserves the person's face, hair, and original vitiligo patterns.
  • + Integrates the coat and scarf realistically with the lighting of the scene.
  • + Correctly adds the sunglasses from the second image while maintaining facial structure.
  • Simplifies the scarf pattern compared to the source image.
  • Misses some of the more elaborate jewelry details present in the second source image.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash fails the editing task by completely distorting the subject's face and head, resulting in a surreal and unusable image. Wan 2.6 performs exceptionally well, perfectly maintaining the identity and environment of Image 1 while realistically applying the clothing and sunglasses from Image 2.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent photorealism in textures, especially capybara fur and the jacket.
  • + Perfect adherence to the 'bored expression' prompt for the passenger.
  • + The passenger is correctly placed in the back seat as requested.
  • The perspective from outside the hood looking through the windshield makes the interior feel slightly less present.
  • Text on the car light is a bit garbled ('TAX').

Wan 2.6

  • + Dynamic cinematic lighting and vibrant night-time city bokeh.
  • + Detailed costume design with a more authentic-looking driver's cap.
  • + Side-angle composition offers a better view of both the steering wheel interaction and the city.
  • The passenger appears to be in the middle of a two-door vehicle rather than the back seat of a standard sedan taxi.
  • The interior of the door/car lacks the 'clean professional' taxi look requested, appearing a bit worn or weathered.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash adhered better to the spatial requirements of the prompt by placing the passenger in the back seat and capturing the specific 'bored' expression perfectly. While Wan 2.6 has more vibrant colors and an impressive side profile, the passenger placement and vehicle interior felt less like a standard New York taxi and more like a cramped courier vehicle.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent typography with a cohesive gothic font choice
  • + Clean and professional graphic design layout
  • + Perfect adherence to all prompt elements including thorns and webs
  • Includes some hallucinated text characters next to 'Time'

Wan 2.6

  • + More cinematic lighting and depth
  • + Strong 'dark parchment' feel with aged edges
  • + Accurate text transcription without extra characters
  • The 'thorns' in the border look a bit muddy and less defined
  • The font for the bottom details is very basic compared to the header

Verdict: Both models performed exceptionally well on this complex prompt. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash has a superior graphic layout and more polished border details, while Wan 2.6 offers better lighting and a more immersive 'vintage' texture. FLUX.2 is the winner for its professional font integration and cleaner illustrative style.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Before After
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent preservation of the original facial structure and features
  • + Perfectly maintains the background and clothing from the source image
  • + Provides a full, thick head of hair as requested
  • The hair texture (afro) creates a slight mismatch with the straight texture of the person's beard
  • The hairline integration at the forehead looks a bit harsh and flat

Wan 2.6

  • + Natural hair texture and realistic flow
  • + Good integration with the sideburns and beard
  • + High visual quality in the hair strands
  • Slightly alters the forehead and brow area during the hair addition
  • The hairline looks a bit too low and uniform

Verdict: Both models successfully added hair while preserving the identity and surroundings of the subject. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash perfectly preserved the face without any changes to the brow or skin, though the hair texture chosen feels less 'natural' relative to the beard; Wan 2.6 provided a very realistic texture and style, but subtly altered the man's forehead shape.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent text rendering with clean, bold typography.
  • + Higher texture detail on the fish and wasabi, giving it a high-quality PBR look.
  • + Strong adherence to the 45-degree isometric perspective.
  • The sushi pieces are somewhat merged together in an anatomically strange way.
  • The flag icon is placed to the right of the word 'SUSHI' instead of following the vertical hierarchy implied by the prompt.

Wan 2.6

  • + Perfectly follows the diorama base requirement with a clear tiered platform layout.
  • + Distinct, well-organized sushi pieces (salmon, tuna, shrimp).
  • + Clean composition with a nice balance of colors.
  • Text is slightly less crisp than Model A.
  • The flag icon is placed to the left of 'SUSHI' rather than below the text block in a secondary position.
  • The textures appear a bit more 'plastic' and less like the requested PBR materials.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt well, but FLUX.2 [dev] Flash stands out for its superior text rendering and more realistic material textures. Wan 2.6 provided a better diorama composition with more variety in the sushi types, but FLUX.2's overall clarity and professional finish make it the stronger image.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent preservation of the subject's facial features and likeness in a caricature style.
  • + Superior integration of all themes, placing the news desk directly on an ice rink with hockey-playing dogs.
  • + Highly detailed rendering with a professional editorial cartoon aesthetic.
  • The hands are slightly small and less detailed compared to those of the central figure.

Wan 2.6

  • + Successfully incorporates all elements of the prompt including dogs and a hockey stick.
  • + Clean, vibrant 2D illustration style.
  • The facial likeness of the source image is almost entirely lost in the generic cartoon style.
  • The hockey stick is unusually long and thin, resembling a cane or pole.
  • Anatomy issues with the pug's hand/paw on the hockey stick.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is the clear winner as it successfully maintains the subject's identity from the source image while creatively merging the TV anchor, hockey, and dog themes into a cohesive scene. Wan 2.6 provides a more generic cartoon character that bears little resemblance to the user and features awkward proportions on the hockey equipment.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent fur texture and sharpness on all animals.
  • + Includes all requested subjects, though in multiple quantities.
  • + Strong rendering of dew drops on the flowers and grass.
  • Failed to generate exactly one of each animal, duplicating the foxes and rabbits.
  • The composition feels more like a static 'yearbook' pose rather than action-oriented 'chasing' and 'tumbling'.

Wan 2.6

  • + Perfectly adheres to the subject count with one puppy, one kitten, one bunny, and one fox.
  • + Captures a more dynamic sense of movement and 'tumbling' as requested.
  • + Features distinct, cinematic god rays that create a magical atmosphere.
  • The kitten has an oddly elongated left leg and slightly distorted paw.
  • Dew drops look more like large floating soap bubbles in the foreground.

Verdict: Both models delivered high-quality, vibrant interpretations of the prompt. While FLUX.2 [dev] Flash has superior fur detail and clarity, Wan 2.6 is the overall winner for its superior prompt adherence regarding animal counts and its much more successful depiction of the 'chasing' and 'tumbling' action requested.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent adherence to the Ghibli aesthetic with its soft, warm color palette and painterly textures.
  • + Successfully transforms the background into a dreamy, grassy landscape which enhances the nostalgia.
  • + Preserves the iconic composition and expressions of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme perfectly.
  • Replaces the urban setting entirely, which may be seen as a lower level of source preservation for the background elements.

Wan 2.6

  • + Maintains the original urban street layout and background elements like the bus while applying the Ghibli texture.
  • + Provides a more 'hand-painted' watercolor feel particularly on the clothing and skin tones.
  • + Preserves the facial features and hair shapes of the original subjects very effectively.
  • The lighting feels a bit bleached or overexposed in the center compared to the rich warmth of Model A.
  • Some white speckle artifacts throughout the image look more like noise than intentional artistic flair.

Verdict: Both models do an exceptional job of translating a famous meme into the Studio Ghibli style. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash leans more into the 'dreamy' aspect of the prompt by replacing the street with a floral field and a sunset, resulting in a more cohesive artistic piece. Wan 2.6 preserves the source image's location more accurately but suffers from slightly flatter lighting and distracting white spots.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Before After
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'windy' hair request with a highly symmetric and expressive hair spread
  • + Adds a high density of falling leaves that effectively fills the scene
  • + Preserves the identity of the person and the dog perfectly
  • The hair effect looks somewhat artificial and rigid due to its perfect symmetry
  • The brownish leaves clash slightly with the vibrant green trees in the background

Wan 2.6

  • + Natural-looking hair motion that feels realistic and directional
  • + Excellent source preservation of the background and characters while adding motion
  • + The green leaves match the color palette of the existing foliage
  • Added leaves are sparse compared to the request for an energetic feel
  • Motion in the hair is more subtle than requested

Verdict: Both models followed the instructions well, preserving the source image while adding the requested elements. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash went for a more dramatic, energetic interpretation with a high volume of leaves and very expansive hair, while Wan 2.6 provided a more subtle, photorealistic edit that integrated better with the lighting and environment of the original image.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent typography and inclusion of the grave accent in 'Caffè'.
  • + Accurate banner placement and integration into the emblem design.
  • + Superb paper-like texture and vintage color palette.
  • The 'Est. 1720' text is slightly off-center under the arc of the main text.

Wan 2.6

  • + Clean, high-contrast illustration of the cloche dome.
  • + Good use of negative space for the steam effect.
  • + Correct spelling and accentuation of the cafe name.
  • Failed to put 'Est. 1720' on a banner as requested, opting for a small tag instead.
  • The main typography is less 'classic' and feels more like a standard modern font.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash much more accurately followed the prompt's layout request by properly placing the text on a banner and creating a cohesive vector emblem. While Wan 2.6 produced a clean image, it missed the banner element and felt less like a professional vintage logo.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Wan 2.6
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Successfully included all requested infographic stages from Launch to Landing.
  • + Followed the NASA-inspired color palette perfectly.
  • + Contains readable and relevant text including the astronaut names and mission steps.
  • Some text elements contain gibberish or spelling errors like 'Sataurri Iccòn'.
  • The layout is a bit cluttered with redundant labels for 'Descent' and 'Landing'.

Wan 2.6

  • + Clean, minimalist aesthetic with crisp typography.
  • + Correctly identified the primary astronauts for the mission.
  • Failed to include any of the six requested infographic steps/icons.
  • The composition is mostly empty space, lacking the 'infographic' requirement entirely.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash followed the complex prompt instructions by creating a multi-stage infographic with icons and labels for each requested step of the mission. While it has some minor text artifacts, it is a functional poster, whereas Wan 2.6 ignored the majority of the prompt's content requirements, providing only a title and astronaut names.

Next steps

Explore each model