Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash fal Reve Image 1.0 Reve AI

Settled by community votes across 8 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

27.1 arena score

#5 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Reve Image 1.0

20.0 arena score

#44 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

100.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Reve Image 1.0

0.0%

win rate

100.0% 0.0% ties 0.0%
Shared challenges 8

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Reve Image 1.0
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent physical realism with believable glass thickness and dust particles.
  • + Correct interpretation of the plant being behind the cube and visible through it.
  • + Very high level of detail on the book texture and wood grain.
  • The plant is slightly less 'behind' the direct line of the cube than it could be, though still visible through the side.

Reve Image 1.0

  • + Clean, vibrant colors and a modern aesthetic.
  • + Good adherence to the basic object placement requested.
  • Physics error as the blue sphere appears to be floating inside the cube.
  • The plant is positioned to the left rather than directly behind the cube as it is not visible through the glass.
  • The lighting is a bit harsh and lacks the soft window quality requested.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash produces a much more realistic image with convincing materials and accurate physics, successfully showing the plant through the glass of the cube. Reve Image 1.0 fails on the transparency requirement (no plant visible through glass) and depicts the sphere floating unnaturally.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Reve Image 1.0

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'battle-worn' aesthetic with realistic scars, dirt, and blood.
  • + Highly detailed engraving on the plate armor and visible texture on leather straps.
  • + Superior rendering of hair braids and beads as requested in the prompt.
  • The torches in the background look slightly static and generic.
  • Symmetry in the armor pattern is almost too perfect for a battle-worn look.

Reve Image 1.0

  • + Dynamic and realistic warm lighting from the torch, creating strong highlights on the metal.
  • + Good use of shallow depth of field and bokeh sparks in the upper right.
  • + Interesting interpretation of the hair beads integrated into the hairstyle.
  • The character looks significantly younger than a typical 'battle-worn paladin'.
  • Missing the 'highly detailed texture on leather straps' as they are not visible in the frame.
  • Armor texture appears a bit muddy compared to Model A's sharp engraving.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is the clear winner as it followed every specific detail of the prompt, including the leather straps and the specific look of the braids. While Reve Image 1.0 captured the lighting and bokeh effect beautifully, the character design feels less like a seasoned paladin and more like a young squire, and the texture work on the armor is less defined.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Before After
Reve Image 1.0

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent preservation of the original face, lighting, and background.
  • + Realistic hair texture that matches the existing beard hair perfectly.
  • + Seamless integration at the hairline and temples.
  • The choice of an afro-style haircut might not be the most 'natural' fit for the existing facial hair type, though it follows the 'full and thick' prompt.

Reve Image 1.0

  • + Successfully adds a full head of hair while keeping the base image intact.
  • + Hair texture and color are well-matched to the subject's beard.
  • The hairline is a bit low and looks slightly pasted on around the forehead.
  • The hair volume has a slightly artificial, synthetic look compared to the model A.

Verdict: Both models did an excellent job of preserving the source image while adding the requested hair. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is the winner because the hair integration is more seamless, particularly where the hair meets the forehead and temples, whereas Reve Image 1.0 has a slightly more defined 'cut-and-paste' edge at the hairline.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Reve Image 1.0
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent rendering of realistic PBR materials, especially the wood grain and fish texture.
  • + Flawless text rendering and icon placement.
  • + Greater complexity in the sushi models (nori wrap and visible fillings) while maintaining a clean look.
  • The sushi is slightly off-center on the wooden base.
  • The lighting is a bit darker than the 'gentle lighting' suggested by the bright blue background.

Reve Image 1.0

  • + Perfectly centered composition matches the prompt's request for 'perfectly centered'.
  • + Bright, vibrant palette that fits a 'cartoon scene' style well.
  • + Accurate text and icon rendering.
  • The materials look more like plastic/clay than 'realistic PBR materials'.
  • Lower detail in the sushi models compared to Model A.
  • Slight artifacts/blurring on the edges of the red sushi piece.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash delivers a much more sophisticated image with high-quality textures and realistic lighting that truly feels like a 3D diorama. While Reve Image 1.0 followed the centering instructions more precisely, it lacked the material depth and fine details found in the FLUX output.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Reve Image 1.0

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent caricature style with classic 'big head' exaggeration.
  • + Highly creative integration of all elements, including dogs wearing hockey gear on an ice-rink set.
  • + Strong facial preservation of the source subject's features despite the stylistic shift.
  • The 'TV SHOW' text is a bit generic and literal.
  • The background is very busy, making it feel a bit cluttered.

Reve Image 1.0

  • + Good inclusion of hockey and news elements in a single shot.
  • + Clean composition with a clear focal point.
  • + Humorous detail of the dog wearing a tie and headset.
  • The caricature style is less pronounced than requested, feeling more like a standard illustration.
  • Anatomy issues in the hand holding the microphone.
  • The hockey stick appears to be floating or awkwardly propped up.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash delivered a superior caricature that perfectly captures the 'exaggerated and humorous' tone requested, successfully blending the TV anchor, hockey, and dog themes into a cohesive scene. While Reve Image 1.0 included the necessary elements, it suffered from anatomical issues in the hands and felt less like a caricature and more like a simple digital portrait.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Reve Image 1.0

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent preservation of the original pose, facial angles, and specific floral patterns on the shirt.
  • + Successfully captures a soft, pastel, hand-painted texture.
  • + Maintains high resolution and clear facial expressions.
  • Changes the background from an urban street to a field of flowers, which alters the context of the source image.
  • The style leans more toward generic modern shoujo manga rather than the distinct Ghibli aesthetic.

Reve Image 1.0

  • + Perfectly captures the Studio Ghibli art style, specifically resembling 'The Secret World of Arrietty' or 'From Up on Poppy Hill'.
  • + Preserves the original urban setting while stylisticly interpreting it.
  • + Uses a color palette and character design that feels authentically like hand-drawn animation.
  • Loss of fine detail in the foreground woman's face (very blurry).
  • Slightly less faithful to the specific facial features of the original people compared to Model A.

Verdict: Reve Image 1.0 is the winner because it identifies and executes the 'Studio Ghibli' style with much higher accuracy, reflecting the specific line work and background painting techniques of the studio. While FLUX.2 [dev] Flash creates a beautiful illustration, it changes the background environment entirely and uses a more generic anime style that lacks the specific Ghibli charm.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Before After
Reve Image 1.0

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent preservation of the subject's face and original features.
  • + Highly effective interpretation of wind-blown hair style.
  • + The leaves are sharp and integrate well despite their large quantity.
  • The wind direction appears conflicting, pulling hair in opposite directions symmetrically.
  • The high density of small leaves can feel a bit cluttered.

Reve Image 1.0

  • + Natural-looking hair motion that follows a consistent wind direction.
  • + Motion blur on the leaves adds a realistic sense of speed and energy.
  • + Excellent preservation of the original image's character and lighting.
  • Some leaves appear oversized in the foreground, which can be distracting.
  • Slightly less hair detail compared to the first model.

Verdict: Reve Image 1.0 is the winner because it successfully conveys 'dynamic motion' through the use of directional hair blowing and motion-blurred leaves, creating a more convincing sense of a gust of wind. While FLUX.2 [dev] Flash also followed all instructions, its symmetrical hair and static-looking leaves feel more like a composite than a singular, lively moment.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Reve Image 1.0

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent adherence to the NASA-inspired color palette.
  • + Highly detailed and accurate rendering of the Saturn V and Lunar Module.
  • + Successfully included all required steps and additional thematic elements like the crew names.
  • The layout feels a bit cluttered with redundant labels for the same icons.
  • Text rendering for 'Saturn V' and other small labels contains some garbled characters.

Reve Image 1.0

  • + Perfectly captures the requested 'flat-vector style' with clean, minimalist iconography.
  • + The composition is very orderly and easy to read as a modern infographic.
  • + Very clean background and professional spacing between elements.
  • Significant spelling errors in prominent text like 'APQUO 11', 'LUNNR', and 'DESSENT'.
  • Missing the 'Translunar' step, jumping from Earth Orbit to Moon Orbit.
  • Some icons are overly simplified or slightly generic compared to the specific mission icons requested.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash produced a much more detailed and accurate representation of the mission components with superior text rendering for the main title and crew. While Reve Image 1.0 nailed the minimalist vector aesthetic, it failed on spelling and omitted one of the requested steps (Translunar), making FLUX.2 [dev] Flash the better choice for an informative infographic.

Next steps

Explore each model