Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash fal Recraft V4.1 Recraft AI

Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

27.1 arena score

#5 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Recraft V4.1

17.6 arena score

#53 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

Recraft V4.1

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 13

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent adherence to lighting instructions with a clear soft window light from the left.
  • + Highly realistic glass texture and Refractions.
  • + Natural placement of objects with a physically grounded blue sphere.
  • The glass cube has edges that look more like a glass tank than a solid or precise cube.

Recraft V4.1

  • + Clean, sharp geometry for the glass cube.
  • + Solid object textures on the red book and wooden table.
  • Illogical physics with the blue sphere floating in the center of the air.
  • Shadows and lighting are less consistent with the 'from the left' instruction compared to model A.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash produces a much more realistic scene with convincing glass refractions and accurate lighting from the window. Recraft V4.1 fails on physics by making the blue sphere float inside the cube, which was not requested and breaks the realism of the image.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent photographic realism in skin texture and environment.
  • + Accurate representation of the 'Japanese street' aesthetic with correct car models and background architecture.
  • + Highly detailed and mechanically coherent bicycle.
  • The motion blur on the cars is relatively subtle.
  • The framing is quite central despite the 'imperfect framing' prompt.

Recraft V4.1

  • + Stronger 'candid' feel with more dramatic imperfect framing.
  • + Effective use of rain particles and bokeh.
  • + Captures a sense of motion and atmosphere well.
  • Noticeable anatomical issues with the subject's hands merging into the bike.
  • The subject's face is obscured and less detailed than Image A.
  • The bicycle's rear structure is physically impossible/distorted.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash produces a much more technically sound and realistic image, with exceptional detail in the man's face and the mechanical parts of the bike. While Recraft V4.1 captures a moodier atmosphere and better 'imperfect' framing, it suffers from significant AI artifacts in the hands and bicycle geometry, making it feel less like a real photo.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'beads' and 'braids' prompt description with colorful detail.
  • + Superior texture on leather straps and metal engravings.
  • + Perfectly centered, balanced composition with symmetrical torch lighting.
  • The blood/scars look a bit more like surface paint than deep wounds.

Recraft V4.1

  • + Natural, lifelike eye reflections and emotive facial expression.
  • + The scars and dirt look realistically embedded in the skin texture.
  • + Dynamic lighting and angle create a more cinematic feel.
  • The armor engravings are slightly more repetitive and less 'ornate' than Model A.
  • Fewer beads in the hair compared to the specific request for braided beads.

Verdict: Both models performed exceptionally well on this complex prompt. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash provided a more literal interpretation with highly detailed leather and armor textures and clear beadwork, whereas Recraft V4.1 offered a more cinematic and realistic skin texture with a more natural pose. FLUX.2 is the winner for its superior technical execution of the specific 'ornate' and 'beaded' details mentioned in the prompt.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent grid layout with vibrant color framing.
  • + High-quality, appetizing food photography that fills the space well.
  • + Strong adherence to the 'vibrant accents' request with the colorful border elements.
  • Text is mostly gibberish and incoherent symbols.
  • The photo selection is repetitive, showing mostly pizzas even in different sections.

Recraft V4.1

  • + Perfectly legible, high-quality typography with accurate spelling.
  • + Food photos correspond correctly to the specific menu sections (apps, pizza, mains).
  • + Very clean, professional minimalist aesthetic that looks like a real-world design.
  • The 'grid' layout for photos is a bit unbalanced on the right side.
  • Less 'vibrant' than requested, sticking to a very conservative primary color palette.

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 is the clear winner because it produces a functional, professional menu with perfectly legible text and logical food-to-section matching. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash captures the 'vibrant grid' aesthetic better but fails completely on text coherence and variety in the food subjects.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent photorealistic texture on the patty and bun.
  • + Very coherent and appealing layout with a consistent fiery glow effect across text and elements.
  • + The price starburst perfectly follows the requested fiery, glowing style.
  • The 'exploded' effect is a bit more static and ordered compared to a truly dynamic mid-air suspension.

Recraft V4.1

  • + Stronger sense of motion and 'exploded' dynamics with slanted components.
  • + Highly stylized and impactful main title typography.
  • The 6.99 starburst looks like a flat clip-art asset rather than a glowing, fiery element.
  • The sauce at the bottom looks messy and less photorealistic than other components.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash produces a much more professional and cohesive advertisement with superior lighting integration; every element, including the price tag, feels part of the fiery scene. Recraft V4.1 has a more dynamic layout for the burger itself, but fails to maintain the requested fiery aesthetic for the price burst and has inconsistent quality in the sauce rendering.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent chalk texture with realistic smudging and dusting on the board.
  • + Strong environmental context with a warm, cozy café background.
  • + Perfect spelling and elegant script that maintains a consistent architectural handwriting style.
  • The font looks slightly too perfect and polished to be natural hand-lettering.
  • Repeating the '$9' twice on the last item creates a slight layout redundancy.

Recraft V4.1

  • + Highly realistic 'amateur' chalk handwriting with natural variations in letter size and spacing.
  • + Accurately completed the partial prompt 'Brown But...' into a full menu item.
  • + Excellent capture of the 'chalk on slate' friction texture.
  • The background is very blurry and lacks the atmospheric detail of a café.
  • The handwriting is a bit more jittery and less 'elegant' than the prompt requested for the cursive title.

Verdict: Both models followed the complex prompt exceptionally well, with no spelling errors even on the long menu items. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash produced a more aesthetically pleasing image with a richer background and professional-looking script, while Recraft V4.1 captured a more authentic, messy 'handwritten' feel with superior chalk-to-board texture. Recraft V4.1 is the likely winner for its more convincing interpretation of actual chalk physics and natural human variation.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent anatomical rendering of the horse.
  • + Crisp and clear lighting on the spacesuit and horse's coat.
  • + Strong cinematic composition with a clear focal point.
  • Failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is on top, not the horse.

Recraft V4.1

  • + High level of environmental detail with the asteroid field and nebula.
  • + Good back-lighting effect through the horse's mane.
  • + Vibrant color palette.
  • Failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is on top, not the horse.
  • Anatomical issues with the horse's legs, which appear partially transparent or blended into the background.

Verdict: Both models failed the specific spatial reasoning challenge to place the horse on top of the astronaut, providing a standard 'astronaut riding a horse' image instead. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is the preferred choice as it produced a much cleaner image with superior anatomy and more realistic lighting compared to Recraft V4.1, which had issues with leg transparency and cluttered composition.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent photorealistic texture on the capybara's fur and the leather interior.
  • + Accurately depicts the capybara wearing a dark jacket as requested.
  • + The lighting and depth of field create a very cinematic, believable night scene.
  • The capybara's paws look slightly mutated or claw-like rather than anatomical paws.
  • The businesswoman appears to be in the front passenger seat rather than the back seat.

Recraft V4.1

  • + Correctly places the passenger in the back seat as requested.
  • + Excellent profile view showing the capybara's professional posture at the wheel.
  • + The lighting on the businesswoman's face from the phone screen is very realistic.
  • The capybara is not wearing the requested dark jacket.
  • The hat is a simple yellow baseball cap rather than a structured taxi driver cap.

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 followed the spatial instructions much better by placing the woman in the back seat, even though it missed the clothing requirement for the animal. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash has superior textures and better adherence to the specific 'dark jacket' and 'taxi cap' prompts, but it failed to place the passenger in the correct seat and produced slightly distorted paws.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent typography rendering with zero spelling errors
  • + Balanced composition that emphasizes the 'invitation' aspect
  • + High-quality, clean border with clear thorns and webbing
  • Includes some unnecessary gibberish text in the location section
  • The aesthetic is a bit more like a modern digital illustration than 'vintage parchment'

Recraft V4.1

  • + Stunning cinematic lighting and gritty, aged parchment texture
  • + Highly creative and authentic gothic font for the title
  • + Atmospheric background with a glowing moon and better tree integration
  • The small banner text is very tiny and difficult to read
  • Lacks the explicit 'Date:', 'Time:', and 'Location:' labels requested in the prompt
  • The title text overlaps the border slightly, making it feel cramped

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash delivers a better invitation layout with legible, well-organized text and clear sectioning, though it feels slightly more digital. Recraft V4.1 has superior artistic quality, lighting, and textures that perfectly capture the 'vintage gothic' mood, but it fails to include all specific text labels requested for the event details. FLUX.2 is the winner for functional prompt adherence, while Recraft is the winner for pure visual style.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Clean, bold typography that is perfectly centered and legible.
  • + Excellent 3D miniature aesthetic with realistic textures on the wood and rice.
  • + Strong adherence to the requested isometric 45° angle and diorama base.
  • The sushi roll construction is slightly surreal, blending nigiri-style fish over a maki-style roll.

Recraft V4.1

  • + High-quality PBR materials, especially visible on the shrimp and wasabi textures.
  • + Well-executed diorama base with detailed surface patterning.
  • + Includes additional relevant elements like chopsticks which add to the scene's completeness.
  • The flag icon is placed to the side rather than following the 'below it' instruction for the layout.
  • The text is slightly thin and less impactful compared to the other model.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash delivered a more graphic and professionally balanced layout that perfectly matched the requested text hierarchy and isometric style. Recraft V4.1 produced more realistic food textures and a detailed base, but it failed to follow the specific text placement instructions as accurately as the other model.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent center-aligned composition capturing all animals clearly.
  • + Outstanding rendering of dew drops on the grass and fur textures.
  • + Strong adherence to the 'golden sunrise' and 'god rays' lighting effects.
  • Includes duplicate animals (two foxes and two bunnies) instead of one of each.
  • Characters feel somewhat static and posed like a family portrait rather than 'tumbling'.

Recraft V4.1

  • + Perfect adherence to the count of animals with one golden puppy, kitten, bunny, and fox.
  • + Dynamic and active composition that perfectly captures the 'playfully chasing' and 'tumbling' prompt.
  • + Realistic interaction between the animals looking toward a single point of interest (the butterfly).
  • The golden retriever puppy's mouth rendering is slightly messy and less photorealistic than other elements.
  • Background lighting is a bit hazy, losing some of the sharp detail found in the foreground.

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 is the winner because it successfully captured the exact count of animals requested and depicted them in an active, playful scene as described in the prompt. While FLUX.2 [dev] Flash produced a higher level of detail in the fur and dew drops, it failed the count by doubling the number of foxes and rabbits and felt more like a posed studio shot.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent typography integrated into a stylish ribbon
  • + Subtle weathered texture adds to the vintage aesthetic
  • + Great composition with balanced proportions between the cloche and text
  • The 'Est. 1720' is placed below the banner rather than inside it as typically expected for this style

Recraft V4.1

  • + Clean vector lines suitable for a modern minimalist logo
  • + Accurate rendering of the accent mark in 'Caffè'
  • + Followed the request to put the date on a banner
  • Layout is slightly top-heavy with very large text compared to a small icon
  • Lacks the 'vintage texture' requested in the prompt
  • The cloche icon feels a bit generic and small

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash produced a much more cohesive vintage emblem with beautiful texture and character, though it placed the date below the banner. Recraft V4.1 followed the specific banner instruction more literally but resulted in a less balanced composition with text that overwhelms the graphic elements. FLUX.2 is the winner because its aesthetic quality and integration of elements feel more like a professional logo design.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Includes all the requested text correctly and captures the look of a vintage educational poster.
  • + Detailed illustrations for the lunar module and crew silhouettes.
  • Composition is cluttered and chaotic, lacking a logical flow for the steps.
  • Text rendering has significant glitches, particularly the 'L-LAUNCH-ON' and 'MEON' labels.

Recraft V4.1

  • + Excellent adherence to the clean, flat-vector infographic style requested.
  • + Highly organized grid layout with consistent iconography.
  • + Accurate text rendering and color palette adherence.
  • Step numbering error where it repeats '04' twice.
  • The lunar orbit icon is somewhat abstract compared to the earth orbit icon.

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 followed the stylistic instructions perfectly, delivering a clean, modern, and professional-looking vector infographic with a logical layout. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash struggled with the 'flat-vector' style, producing cluttered, semi-realistic illustrations and several significant typographical errors despite capturing more complex visual details.

Next steps

Explore each model