Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash fal Nano Banana Pro Google

Settled by community votes across 20 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

27.1 arena score

#5 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Nano Banana Pro

28.2 arena score

#2 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Best Image Editing right now Top 2 in Text-to-Image
Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

33.3%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Nano Banana Pro

66.7%

win rate

33.3% 0.0% ties 66.7%
Shared challenges 20

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Nano Banana Pro
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent rendering of the glass cube with realistic thickness and edge reflections.
  • + The blue sphere has a high-quality, marble-like finish with accurate internal refractions.
  • + Very clean, modern photographic aesthetic with soft, natural-looking window light.
  • The plant is slightly less 'behind' the cube compared to Model B, appearing more to the side.
  • The book spine text is nonsensical.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Includes legible text on the book spine ('THE QUIET HOURS').
  • + Successfully places the plant directly behind the glass as requested, showing realistic distortion.
  • + Beautiful lighting with long shadows that emphasize the table texture.
  • The glass cube is missing its top or front face where the book rests, as the book appears to be floating just above the side walls without a clear glass surface underneath.
  • The base of the blue sphere has a slightly disconnected shadow/reflection.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt instructions perfectly, including all requested objects and lighting. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash produced a more physically coherent glass cube, whereas Gemini 3 Pro's cube suffers from a 'missing' top face, making the book look like it is balancing on thin edges. However, Gemini 3 Pro handled the text and the 'behind the glass' positioning of the plant much better.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent preservation of the subject's face and specific hair texture.
  • + Maintains the plaid pattern of the coat and the black scarf accurately.
  • + The car interior features realistic textures and lighting cohesive with the scene.
  • The steering wheel is positioned on the wrong side for a California coastline drive.
  • The car has been changed to a mid-century vintage style rather than the modern Rolls-Royce provided.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Successfully preserves the white Rolls-Royce body style and modern luxury seats.
  • + Captures the iconic California coastline aesthetic with warm golden hour lighting.
  • + Maintains the correct left-hand drive orientation for a US road.
  • The subject's facial features and hair lose significant detail compared to the source image.
  • Visible artifacting on the steering wheel where the hand is awkwardly merged.
  • The person appears slightly small in scale relative to the car's interior.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash does a superior job of preserving the subject's identity and clothing, though it changes the car into a vintage model and places the steering wheel on the right side. Nano Banana Pro preserves the correct modern Rolls-Royce and driving orientation but fails to maintain the subject's likeness as effectively. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is the winner for its high-quality rendering of the man and seamless integration into the environment.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Nano Banana Pro
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent motion blur on the background vehicles, creating a sense of a busy street.
  • + Highly realistic skin texture and facial features on the subject.
  • + Complex mechanical details on the bicycle and the ground tools.
  • The bicycle's anatomy is slightly warped, with the frame appearing to intersect with the man's legs incorrectly.
  • The lighting on the man's hands is a bit inconsistent with the rainy environment.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + The 'imperfect framing' prompt is perfectly executed with the pole on the right and the subject being off-center.
  • + Incredible atmospheric realism with the wet pavement reflections and rainy city background.
  • + The bicycle mechanics, kickstand, and the man's posture are very believable.
  • The motion blur on the passing taxi is less pronounced than requested.
  • The background figures/umbrellas are a bit generic.

Verdict: While FLUX.2 [dev] Flash produces a very high-detail portrait with great motion blur, Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview captures the 'candid' and 'imperfect framing' essence of the prompt far better. Gemini delivers a more authentic street photography aesthetic with superior environmental storytelling and convincing pavement reflections.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent engraving details on the pauldrons
  • + Clearer and more distinct beads and braids
  • + High fidelity cloth texture and leather grain
  • The bokeh sparks appear a bit more like static dots than glowing embers
  • Face looks slightly 'cleaner' than the 'battle-worn' description suggests

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Stronger atmospheric lighting with more realistic warm torchlight reflections
  • + Superior skin texture with realistic dirt and grit that fits the 'battle-worn' prompt
  • + Very lifelike eyes and expression
  • The leather strap has some minor clipping/merging issues with the plate
  • Engravings on the armor are slightly less crisp than in Model A

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, capturing the intricate armor, braided hair, and lighting. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash has sharper technical details in the engravings and leatherwork, but Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview provides a more convincing 'battle-worn' atmosphere with better skin texture and more natural integration of the torchlight and sparks.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Features a vibrant, colorful accent palette consistent with the prompt
  • + High-quality, appetizing food photography
  • + Includes clear, bold section headers
  • Text consists largely of garbled characters and gibberish
  • The layout is confusing, with 6 pizza photos positioned above localized text categories
  • Poor contrast in the 'Mains' text section makes it hard to read

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Logical layout with photos directly corresponding to the items and sections
  • + Readability is much higher with recognizable (though fictional) words
  • + Balanced composition that looks like a functional modern menu
  • One item is labeled 'Chicken Pizza' but the image is clearly pasta
  • Visual style is slightly more generic compared to the 'vibrant accents' requested
  • Minor text spacing issues in the description blocks

Verdict: Nano Banana Pro is the winner because it provides a logical, legible layout where the images directly relate to the menu items below them. While FLUX.2 [dev] Flash has more artistic 'vibrant accents,' its text is completely illegible and the grid of 6 pizza images is disconnected from the actual menu sections, making it non-functional as a design.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent photorealistic texture on the patty and bun.
  • + Sophisticated typography with realistic fiery embers within the lettering.
  • + Clean and professional composition suitable for a high-end ad.
  • The 'exploded' effect is a bit static compared to Model B.
  • The sauce droplets look slightly artificial and uniform.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Dynamic sense of motion with crumbs and splashing sauce.
  • + High contrast and vibrant colors that make the burger pop.
  • + Perfect adherence to all requested text elements and starburst design.
  • Lighting on the text feels a bit more like a basic outer glow filter.
  • Overall image has a slightly more saturated, 'digital' look rather than pure photorealism.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, including the specific pricing and text requirements. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash provides a more realistic and polished look for the food itself, while Nano Banana Pro captures a better sense of explosive motion and dynamic energy.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent chalk texture on the lettering with visible powdering and strokes.
  • + Very high level of realism in the board's smudge marks and background cafe environment.
  • + Perfectly followed the prompt's specific date and price points.
  • The layout of the 'Grilled Octopus' line is slightly awkward with the trailing dash.
  • Small spelling/spacing artifact in the bottom line with 'gluten-free'.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Very clean and legible handwriting layout.
  • + Great atmospheric lighting within the café setting.
  • + Excellent adherence to the full menu list and pricing.
  • The handwriting looks slightly more uniform/digital than the requested 'natural variation' chalk style.
  • The chalk texture on the letters is less pronounced compared to the board smears.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash captures the specific 'chalk' texture much more effectively, making the handwriting look truly hand-drawn with pressure variations. Nano Banana Pro produces a very beautiful image, but the text styling feels slightly too perfect and consistent for a genuine hand-lettered chalkboard. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is the winner for its superior rendering of the requested chalk medium.

Pose & Character Mashup

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Nano Banana Pro
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent character replication including the sunglasses and scarf details.
  • + Good preservation of the environment and lighting from the source.
  • Major artifacts including a ghosting head with long hair behind the character.
  • Anatomical failure where the right foot is not connected to a leg and appears floating.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Successfully replicates the character into the new environment.
  • + Much cleaner composition with no 'ghosting' or extra heads.
  • + Keeps the clothing style and specific accessories like the scarf and eyewear.
  • The pose is slightly less dynamic than the original reference, with the torso more upright.
  • The left foot (on top) has an unnatural toe alignment.

Verdict: Both models struggled with the complex anatomy of the crossed-leg pose, but Nano Banana Pro produced a much cleaner image without the bizarre visual artifacts seen in FLUX.2 [dev] Flash, which included a phantom head and a detached foot. Nano Banana Pro successfully transferred the character features and clothing while maintaining a coherent, albeit slightly modified, version of the pose.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + High photographic realism and cinematic lighting.
  • + Excellent detailing on the spacesuit and textures.
  • + Dynamic composition with a sense of motion.
  • Completely failed the semantic instruction of the horse being on top of the astronaut.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Correctly followed the specific prompt instruction for the horse to be on top.
  • + Creative interpretation with the horse wearing a space-themed cape.
  • + Good whimsical and surreal atmosphere.
  • The astronaut's hands and the horse's hooves merge awkwardly.
  • The lighting on the astronaut is somewhat flat compared to the horse.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash produces a much higher quality image in terms of texture and lighting, but it completely ignored the core requirement of the horse being on top. Nano Banana Pro successfully followed the difficult semantic instruction to invert the rider roles, making it the winner for following a complex and specific prompt.

Outfit Transfer Challenge

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Attempts to incorporate more complex clothing layers and jewelry.
  • Severely distorts the person's face into a horrific, multi-eyed glitch.
  • Does not preserve the background accurately, adding a second person behind the subject.
  • Fails to maintain the original pose and proportions.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Perfectly preserves the person's face, hair, and the background.
  • + Accurately maps the coat, scarf, and jeans from the second image onto the person's pose.
  • The transition from the neck to the clothing is slightly sharp.
  • Misses the specific watch and ring details from the source images.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash fails completely as an image editor, creating a nightmarish facial distortion and failing to preserve the source subject. Nano Banana Pro successfully performs the edit by cleanly dressing the original subject in the wardrobe from Image 2 while keeping his face and the environment identical to Image 1.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Nano Banana Pro
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent character placement and facial expressions on both the capybara and the human.
  • + Very clean, cinematic lighting and high resolution.
  • + Effective use of the 'T' logo on the cap to represent a taxi service.
  • The passenger is sitting in the front passenger seat instead of the back seat.
  • The paws on the steering wheel look slightly anthropomorphized/distorted.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Correctly places the human passenger in the back seat as requested.
  • + Realistic dashboard details including the taxi meter and rain on the windshield.
  • + Natural-looking paws on the steering wheel.
  • The passenger's face is slightly less clear and detailed than Model A.
  • The 'TAXA' type sign on the roof is partially cut off and less clear.

Verdict: Nano Banana Pro followed the spatial instructions much better by placing the businessman in the back seat, creating a more realistic taxi composition. While FLUX.2 [dev] Flash has slightly cleaner lighting and sharper character expressions, it failed the core instruction of positioning the passenger in the back.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent typography rendering with almost perfect spelling
  • + Followed the request for a scroll banner effectively
  • + Detailed spider web integration in the corners
  • Includes a line of gibberish text 'Hurk: 03698' that wasn't requested
  • The background trees are less defined compared to the competition

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Atmospheric cinematic lighting with high contrast
  • + Very clean and accurate text layout with no hallucinated phrases
  • + Dynamic composition with curving trees framing the central subject
  • The 'webs' in the border are slightly less prominent
  • The scroll banner is a bit squashed and small

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, producing high-quality gothic invitations. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash has slightly more intricate border details but suffers from a line of nonsensical text, whereas Nano Banana Pro delivers a cleaner, more professional composition with superior lighting and no text errors.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Before After
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent preservation of the background and original clothing.
  • + Follows the instruction for a thick, full head of hair.
  • The hair texture and style (afro-textured) do not match the character's existing beard texture, feeling unnatural.
  • The hairline is a bit too uniform and artificial looking along the forehead.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + The hair texture and color perfectly match the existing beard and eyebrows.
  • + The hairline and flyaway strands look highly realistic and integrate seamlessly with the original lighting.
  • + Perfect preservation of facial features and the environment.
  • None notable; it successfully fulfilled all aspects of the edit.

Verdict: Nano Banana Pro is the winner as it provided a hair texture and style that realistically matches the man's existing beard and facial features. While FLUX.2 [dev] Flash followed the instructions, the choice of an afro-textured hairstyle felt disconnected from the subject's natural features, whereas Nano Banana Pro looked like a genuine unedited photograph.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Perfectly rendered text with consistent font weight
  • + Excellent 'miniature' feel with high-clarity PBR textures
  • + Precise 45° isometric angle and centered composition
  • The sushi roll geometry is slightly unusual with fish draped over a maki roll

Nano Banana Pro

  • + High level of charming detail including tea with steam and chopsticks
  • + Excellent 'cartoon' aesthetic with soft, rounded edges
  • + Well-placed flag icon and bold typography
  • Text arrangement is slightly off-center compared to the diorama
  • Diorama base is less centered in the square frame

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, capturing the isometric 3D miniature style. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is preferred for its technical precision, featuring perfectly centered text and a cleaner professional look, whereas Gemini 3 Pro adds more creative flair with tea and chopsticks but is slightly less balanced in its framing.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent caricature style with exaggerated features that strongly resembles the source subject.
  • + Creative integration of hockey by placing the news desk directly on an ice rink.
  • + High-quality rendering with cohesive lighting and color.
  • The transition from the tiny body to the large head is a bit abrupt.
  • The text on the news desk is generic ('TV-SHOW') compared to the more specific elements in Model B.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Better source preservation of the subject's outfit (the denim shirt).
  • + Includes numerous specific details like the 'Anchor Lady' mug and hockey posters.
  • + The inclusion of a hockey stick and puck on the desk directly addresses the prompt's themes.
  • The caricature style is slightly more generic and 'clipart-like' compared to the subject's face.
  • The hand holding the microphone is poorly rendered with an incorrect finger count/structure.

Verdict: Both models successfully interpreted the prompt, but FLUX.2 [dev] Flash produced a much more professional and artistically polished caricature that captured the subject's likeness more effectively. While Nano Banana Pro did a great job including small thematic details like the mug and denim shirt, it suffered from anatomical issues in the hands and a less sophisticated illustrative style.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Nano Banana Pro
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent composition with a natural grouping of the animals.
  • + Superior rendering of lighting and dew sparkles with realistic god rays.
  • + Very high detail in the fur texture and butterfly wings.
  • Included five animals instead of the requested four (two bunnies/rabbits).
  • The kitten's pose and connection to the puppy's leg are slightly awkward.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Perfectly followed the count of four specific animals requested.
  • + Captures the 'playfully chasing' and 'tumbling' action better than Model A.
  • + Vibrant colors and high expressive facial features on all animals.
  • The puppy's front right paw is anatomically messy and blurred.
  • Lighting feels slightly more synthetic and 'glowy' compared to Model A.
  • Only one butterfly is present, whereas the prompt suggested plural 'butterflies'.

Verdict: Both models captured the wholesome vibe and high detail requested, but they failed in different ways regarding prompt adherence. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash produced a more photorealistic image with beautiful lighting, but it failed the count by including an extra rabbit. Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview followed the animal list perfectly and captured more dynamic movement, but suffered from anatomical blurring in the puppy's paws and a more digital, less photorealistic art style.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Expertly captures the soft, hazy aesthetic and gentle lighting characteristic of Studio Ghibli films.
  • + Maintains an impressive level of structural fidelity to the source image, including the exact plaid pattern of the shirt.
  • + The dreamlike meadow background adds an emotive, whimsical layer to the original meme scene.
  • The faces feel a bit more like generic modern anime rather than specific Ghibli-style character designs.
  • The composition feels slightly crowded with the inclusion of the rabbit-like spirit in the background.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Superior watercolor texture on the clothing and skin that mimicking hand-painted cel animation.
  • + The background town successfully translates the original urban setting into a Ghibli-esque village.
  • + Excellent facial expressions that better capture the nuances of the 'jealous girlfriend' and 'distracted boyfriend' emotions.
  • The color palette is slightly more saturated than requested, losing some of the 'soft pastel' feel.
  • The character on the left has slightly simplified hair details compared to the original and Model A.

Verdict: Both models did an exceptional job at reinterpreting the 'Distracted Boyfriend' meme into the requested style while maintaining perfect anatomical and compositional consistency. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash captures the lighting and atmosphere of a dreamlike Ghibli sequence slightly better, while Nano Banana Pro excels at the hand-painted watercolor textures and character expressions that define the studio's look. Nano Banana Pro is the likely winner for its superior 'painterly' feel and better preservation of the scene's narrative intent within the Ghibli world.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Before After
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent preservation of the source image's identity and background.
  • + Added a large quantity of leaves to enhance the scene.
  • + The hair manipulation is symmetrical and clean.
  • The hair movement looks a bit static and artificial like a 'halo' rather than wind.
  • The leaves are somewhat small and uniform in color, lacking depth.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Naturalistic hair motion that realistically crosses the face and follows a wind direction.
  • + The leaves have varied shapes, sizes, and a vibrant autumn color that adds visual interest.
  • + Adds subtle motion to the dog's tail which enhances the 'lively' feel.
  • Slightly altered the woman's facial features compared to the source image.
  • Some leaves appear slightly blurred or have odd artifacts near the dog's fur.

Verdict: Both models successfully interpreted the prompt, but Nano Banana Pro created a much more convincing sense of 'dynamic motion' with hair that looks truly wind-blown and vibrant, stylized leaves. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash was better at preserving the exact facial features of the source image, but its hair edit looks more like a static hairstyle than an environmental effect.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent typography integrated into a classic banner design.
  • + Strong vector emblem feel with clean, bold shapes.
  • + Accurate adherence to the grave accent in 'Caffè'.
  • The 'Est. 1720' text is placed below the banner rather than inside it.
  • Steam lines are a bit thick and stylized compared to the rest of the icon.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Elegant hand-drawn steam effect adds to the vintage feel.
  • + Includes 'Est. 1720' inside the banner as requested.
  • + Good use of cross-hatching for a tactile, retro texture.
  • The main brand name is outside the emblem, weakening the 'logo' feel.
  • The 'è' in Caffè is slightly inconsistent with the other letters' stylistic serifs.
  • Logo lacks the weight and impact of a professional vector emblem.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash produced a much more cohesive logo design with superior typography and a stronger vector aesthetic, though it missed putting the date inside the banner. Nano Banana Pro followed the placement instructions for the date better and had lovely illustrative details, but the layout felt more like an illustration with text underneath rather than a unified logo emblem.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Nano Banana Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Follows the specific icon requests for Saturn V and the lunar module variants.
  • + Accurately names the crew members and labels major steps correctly.
  • + Uses a realistic yet clean NASA-inspired color palette.
  • The layout is cluttered and lacks a clear logical flow between steps.
  • Contains significant text artifacts and several duplicated labels like 'Landing' and 'Descent'.
  • Technical errors in icons, such as two Saturn V rockets and a misspelled 'Sataurr' Iccòn'.

Nano Banana Pro

  • + Superior infographic composition with a clear, readable path connecting all six steps.
  • + Perfect adherence to the 'flat-vector style' with crisp lines and consistent iconography.
  • + Excellent text rendering with no spelling errors and professional typography.
  • Step 3 (Translunar) lacks a distinct icon compared to the path itself.
  • The trajectory path logically loops strangely between Earth and the Moon.

Verdict: Gemini 1.5 Pro produced a professional-grade infographic with a clear visual hierarchy and excellent typography that perfectly matches the 'modern vector' request. While FLUX.1 [dev] Flash attempted more complex icons, it failed significantly on layout, spelling, and organization, resulting in a cluttered and repetitive image.

Next steps

Explore each model