Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash fal FLUX.2 [klein] 4B Black Forest Labs

Settled by community votes across 20 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

27.0 arena score

#7 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

22.3 arena score

#32 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 20

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent material rendering, with realistic glass thickness and reflections.
  • + The plant is clearly visible through the glass as requested.
  • + Strong photographic quality with natural lighting and sharp textures on the wooden table.
  • The red book has some minor distortion on its texture and spine text.

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Good adherence to the spatial arrangement requested in the prompt.
  • + Clean, minimalist composition.
  • The glass cube lacks thickness on the edges, making it look slightly like a 2D overlay.
  • The blue sphere has a slightly matte, plastic appearance compared to the requested glass/sphere aesthetic.
  • The book is very small and thin, looking more like a coaster than a standard book.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is the clear winner as it produces a much more realistic and high-fidelity image with convincing material physics. While both models followed the prompt instructions perfectly, FLUX.2 [dev] Flash handled the transparency and refraction of the glass cube more naturally, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 4B feels more like a digital illustration with flatter elements.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent preservation of the man's identity, including his hairstyle, plaid coat, and scarf.
  • + High-quality, cinematic composition that feels immersive.
  • + Consistent lighting and color grading between the character and the background.
  • The car interior is significantly altered from the source image, looking more vintage/wood-paneled.
  • The steering wheel is on the right side, which is inconsistent with driving in California.

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Perfectly preserves the exterior of the Rolls-Royce from the source image.
  • + Captures the typical California coastline scenery effectively.
  • + The man is correctly positioned on the left side (driver's seat for US).
  • The man's appearance is heavily altered and does not strongly resemble the source image.
  • The person appears too small in the cabin, leading to slightly awkward proportions.
  • The scarf and specific clothing details from the source image are lost.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash did a superior job of preserving the identity and specific clothing of the man, making the composite feel much more intentional despite changing the car's interior. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B preserved the car perfectly but failed to accurately represent the person from the second source image, resulting in a generic-looking driver.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent natural skin texture and facial detail on the man.
  • + Very convincing street environment with realistic cars and lighting.
  • + The interaction between the hands and the bike tools feels authentic.
  • The bike anatomy is slightly flawed with the kickstand and frame merging.
  • Less rain visibility compared to model B.

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Beautiful capture of light rain and atmospheric reflections.
  • + Composition feels very cinematic and adheres well to the 'candid' prompt.
  • Significant anatomical errors with the bicycle wheels and pedals.
  • The man's right arm and hand are poorly formed and merge into the bicycle frame.
  • Resolution and detail on the face/skin are lower than Model A.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is the clear winner as it produces a much more coherent image with realistic human anatomy and high-quality textures. While FLUX.2 [klein] 4B captures a lovely atmosphere and lighting, it suffers from severe structural errors where the man and the bicycle merge into a nonsensical shape.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent engraving detail on the plate armor
  • + Highly realistic textures on skin, blood, and leather straps
  • + Great atmosphere with believable bokeh sparks and torchlight
  • The hair beads are a bit cluttered in the front

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Clean facial features and sharp eyes
  • + Good application of the requested 'braids with beads'
  • Armor texture looks slightly flatter and less metallic than Image A
  • The torchlight effect on the skin is less immersive
  • The leather straps lack the worn, pitted texture requested

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash significantly outperforms the other model in terms of textural detail and atmosphere, capturing the 'battle-worn' aesthetic with realistic grime and intricate metalwork. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B produces a clean image, but it feels more like a studio portrait of a costume rather than a realistic scene, missing the depth in the leather and steel materials.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent adherence to the color-coded sections requested in the prompt
  • + High-quality, appetizing food photography with consistent lighting
  • + Better legibility of section headers like 'APPETIZERS' and 'PIZZA'
  • The section content under 'PIZZA' and 'MAINS' is largely gibberish
  • Nearly all the photos are of pizza, ignoring the variety of 'colorful food photos' requested

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Stronger variety in food imagery including salads, steaks, and bowls
  • + Better utilization of whitespace for a true 'minimalist' aesthetic
  • + More creative grid layout involving different image sizes
  • Section titles are misspelled or nonsensical (e.g., 'FRAZZA', 'MDAINS')
  • Visual artifacts present in the text rendering and price lists
  • Failed to properly represent the categories (Mains appears twice as Mdains and Mdans)

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash produces a more professional-looking menu with cleaner font rendering and better color accents, though it lacks variety in the food photos. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B offers a better variety of dishes and a more sophisticated grid layout, but suffers from significant text errors and nonsensical headers. Overall, FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is the more usable design starting point.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Perfectly follows the 'exploded' instruction with clear spacing between all ingredients.
  • + Flawless text rendering for all three requested phrases with the specified fiery effect.
  • + Excellent photorealistic textures on the patty, seeds, and lettuce.
  • The glowing embers are slightly soft-focused, though they fit the background well.

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Vibrant colors and high contrast create a very dynamic visual impact.
  • + Successful execution of the starburst price tag and 'limited time' text.
  • Fails the 'exploded' requirement as the burger is mostly intact.
  • Major spelling and layout errors in the 'MAGIC BURGER' title text.
  • Composition feels a bit cluttered compared to the clean layout of the first image.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is the clear winner as it successfully rendered every part of the prompt, including the difficult 'exploded' burger effect and accurate text. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B failed to separate the burger components and produced a garbled main title that is difficult to read.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent text accuracy with no spelling errors.
  • + Very realistic chalk texture with smudges and natural handwriting variations.
  • + Strong atmospheric lighting and depth of field in the café background.
  • The pricing for cookies is repeated twice on separate lines.
  • The 'S' in 'SPECIALS' is slightly disconnected from the word.

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Successfully captured the cursive style requested for the title.
  • + Good board smudging and chalk dust effects.
  • + Centered framing provides a clear view of the entire menu.
  • Numerous spelling errors including 'SPECIALS', 'Truffel', 'Musheram', and 'Ootrpous'.
  • The text looks slightly too uniform and digital in its stroke weight compared to Image A.
  • The background is dark and lacks the requested café atmosphere.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is the clear winner due to its superior text rendering and accuracy; it followed the complex menu items perfectly while maintaining a high level of photorealism. In contrast, FLUX.2 [klein] 4B struggled significantly with spelling and provided a less convincing café environment.

Pose & Character Mashup

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Successfully replicates the clothing and scarf from Image 2
  • + Maintains good facial identity of the man in Image 2
  • Completely fails to replicate the pose, showing the character upright instead of bent over
  • Contains a disturbing artifact of the original woman's head/hair sticking out from behind the man
  • Anatomically broken legs where feet do not match body orientation

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Perfectly replicates the complex dynamic pose from Image 1
  • + Successfully integrates the man's facial features and sunglasses into the composition
  • + Matches the lighting and yellow studio environment seamlessly
  • Fused the man's short hair with the woman's long hair from Image 1, rather than strictly keeping his hair style
  • The scarf detail is simplified compared to the source image

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash fails the primary task of pose replication, resulting in a cluttered image with severe anatomical errors and leftover fragments of the original person. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B followed the instructions almost perfectly, accurately placing the character from Image 2 into the exact difficult pose from Image 1 while maintaining a high level of visual coherence.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent cinematic lighting and atmosphere
  • + Dynamic gallop pose adds to the surreal feeling
  • + High level of detail in the space background and dust effects
  • Failed the logical constraint 'horse on top'
  • Anatomical issues with the horse's back right leg and hoof connection

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Strong clarity in the astronaut's face through the visor
  • + Clean composition with good contrast against the starfield
  • + Good textures on the horse's coat
  • Failed the logical constraint 'horse on top'
  • The horse's shadow on the clouds below is physically inconsistent

Verdict: Both FLUX.2 [dev] Flash and FLUX.2 [klein] 4B failed to follow the specific negative/logical constraint of placing the 'horse on top' of the astronaut, both defaulting to the standard 'astronaut on horse' trope. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is slightly preferred for its superior cinematic lighting and more dynamic, surreal movement compared to the stiffer pose in the Klein model.

Outfit Transfer Challenge

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Successfully incorporated the coat and scarf textures from Image 2.
  • + Included many complex jewelry elements as requested.
  • Severely distorts the person's face into a Cronenberg-style anatomical horror.
  • Added a second ghostly head behind the main subject.
  • Failed to preserve the original person's identity and facial structure completely.

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Perfectly preserved the original person's face, hair, and distinct skin markings.
  • + Accurately transferred the coat, scarf, and blue jeans from Image 2.
  • + Maintained high image coherence and realistic lighting on the beach.
  • Missed the sunglasses from the second image.
  • The jewelry is much simpler than what was seen in the source material.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash fails completely as an image editor by catastrophically Mangling the subject's face and adding extra body parts. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B followed the instructions excellently, keeping the target person's identity and environment intact while realistically applying the clothing from the reference image.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent photorealism in the capybara's fur and the taxi's exterior details
  • + The capybara's expression is very professional and human-like as requested
  • + Detailed New York taxi 'TX' light on top of the car
  • The passenger is sitting in the middle of the back seat which looks slightly cramped
  • The capybara's paws look somewhat skeletal/distorted on the steering wheel

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Better internal composition with a clear view of both the driver and the passenger
  • + The passenger's bored expression perfectly matches the prompt
  • + More realistic placement of paws on the steering wheel
  • The car interior feels more like a small vintage car than a standard NYC Crown Victoria or modern taxi
  • The capybara's hat is less 'taxi driver' style and looks more like a standard baseball cap

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt very well, but FLUX.2 [dev] Flash produced a more convincing photorealistic texture for the capybara and the NYC taxi exterior. While FLUX.2 [klein] 4B had better composition inside the cabin, FLUX.2 [dev] Flash felt more cinematic and accurate to the 'New York' aesthetic.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Perfect text rendering of the main title and specific details.
  • + Balanced composition with clear gothic motifs and a central jack-o-lantern.
  • + Elegant and spooky border that follows the prompt exactly.
  • Includes a strange line of gibberish text starting with 'Hurk' among the details.

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Atmospheric lighting and background with effective silhouette trees.
  • + Good parchment texture and border integration.
  • Significant spelling errors in the main title ('Hallbwom Party niisation').
  • Typos in the subtext ('frights' vs 'friglts') and details ('Loecton').
  • Missing the year digit in the date '20.206'.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is the clear winner due to its superior text legibility and adherence to the layout requirements. While both models captured the aesthetic requested, FLUX.2 [klein] 4B failed significantly on the typography, resulting in numerous garbled words and incorrect date/location labels.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Before After
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent preservation of the source image's facial features and background.
  • + Follows the 'thick head of hair' instruction with a very dense afro-textured style.
  • + Maintains consistent lighting with the original environment.
  • The hairline on the forehead looks slightly pixelated/unnatural upon close inspection.

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Provides a very realistic hair texture with natural-looking waves and flyaways.
  • + Seamlessly integrates the hair into the original facial structure without changing his identity.
  • + Strong preservation of lighting and color balance from the source.
  • The hairline transition is slightly better than A, but still shows minor blending artifacts near the temples.

Verdict: Both models performed excellently at preserving the source image while adding hair. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash went for a very thick, round texture that fits the prompt's 'full' requirement but looks a bit less natural at the hairline. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B provided a more realistic medium-length style with superior texture and a more convincing integration, making it the preferred choice for a 'natural' look.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Perfect text rendering of 'SUSHI' and a correct Japan flag icon.
  • + Excellent material definition with high-clarity PBR textures on the wood and fish.
  • + Followed the diorama base requirement perfectly with the wooden block.
  • The sushi roll/nigiri hybrid is a bit of a strange physical construction.

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Clean isometric perspective and solid background adherence.
  • + Pleasant soft lighting and color palette.
  • Spelling error in the text, rendering 'SUSH' instead of 'SUSHI'.
  • Incorrect flag icon, resembling the flag of Austria or Latvia rather than Japan.
  • Failed to include a distinct raised diorama base as requested, using just a plate.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash significantly outperformed FLUX.2 [klein] 4B by correctly following all text and iconography instructions. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash also interpreted the 'diorama base' prompt accurately by placing the scene on a wooden plinth, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 4B failed on the text spelling, flag representation, and the base requirement.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent integration of all prompt elements including the tv desk, dogs, and hockey rink background.
  • + Maintains a high level of facial similarity to the source image while applying the caricature style.
  • + Fun details like dogs wearing hockey helmets and jerseys add to the humor.
  • The transition from the small body to the large head is a bit abrupt at the neck.

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Strong caricature art style with expressive facial features.
  • + Good source preservation in terms of hair and basic facial structure.
  • Completely missed the hockey requirement of the prompt.
  • The text on the background screens is garbled and nonsensical.
  • The overall composition feels a bit flatter compared to the other model.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is the clear winner because it incorporated every part of the prompt, specifically the hockey theme which FLUX.2 [klein] 4B ignored. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash also did a better job of translating the subject's likeness into a caricature while maintaining a more complex and professional-looking composition.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent adherence to lighting requirements with clear god rays and dew sparkles.
  • + Highly detailed fur textures and expressive, clean eye rendering.
  • + Includes all four requested animals (although some are duplicated).
  • Duplicate animals (two rabbits, two foxes) clutter the composition.
  • The butterfly wings look somewhat rigid and flat compared to the realism of the animals.

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Dynamic 'playful' composition that better captures the 'tumbling/chasing' part of the prompt.
  • + Beautiful bokeh and lighting effects with bright, vibrant colors.
  • + More natural interactions between the animals and the butterflies.
  • Missing the baby bunny requested in the prompt.
  • Anatomical issues with the animals, notably the fox kit's tail and paw placement.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash provides much higher technical detail and follows the specific animal list more closely, but the image is a bit crowded with duplicates. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B captures a more joyful and active 'vibe' with better movement, but ultimately fails the prompt by excluding the bunny and containing more anatomical artifacts.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent preservation of the source image's character expressions, especially the girlfriend's look of disbelief.
  • + Subtle watercolor texture and soft lighting that perfectly aligns with the Ghibli-inspired aesthetic.
  • + Maintains the exact clothing colors and patterns from the original meme.
  • The transition from the foreground character's hair to the background is a bit blurry.
  • The addition of a small creature in the background is a bit distracting.

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Beautiful pastel color palette and dreamy background architecture featuring European-style buildings.
  • + High-quality linework that captures the anime aesthetic effectively.
  • + Good preservation of the man's pose and clothing details.
  • Failed to preserve the girlfriend's facial expression, replacing her glare with a neutral, pleasant look.
  • The red dress has been washed out to a pale pink, losing the visual punch of the original composition.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is the winner because it successfully applied the Ghibli style while perfectly preserving the core emotional narrative of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme, specifically the woman's facial expression. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B created a beautiful illustration but sacrificed the meme's essential character beats by making the girlfriend look happy and drastically changing the color of the red dress.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
Before After
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent source preservation with virtually no changes to the background or subject details
  • + Dramatic and symmetric hair blowing effect that looks very lively
  • The hair effect looks slightly artificial and overly symmetric
  • Leaves are quite small and many look like static yellow shapes rather than textured leaves

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Natural-looking hair motion that follows a consistent wind direction
  • + Leaves have better texture, variety, and realistic motion blur which adds to the energetic feel
  • Slightly less preservation of the original hair volume compared to Model A

Verdict: Both models followed the instructions well, but FLUX.2 [klein] 4B feels more cohesive as the hair and leaves seem to react to the same directional wind. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash provides a more dramatic hair edit, but the leaves feel more like a flat overlay rather than being part of the environment.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent typography with perfect spelling of 'Caffè Florian'.
  • + Sophisticated vector emblem style with a professional vintage grit texture.
  • + Great composition with the banner framing the text correctly.
  • The steam is a bit wispy/thin compared to the rest of the thick lines.

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Includes all requested elements like the cloche and steam.
  • + Captures the warm brown and cream tones well.
  • Spells the name incorrectly as 'CAFFÈ FLAXTION'.
  • Contains repetitive 'Est. 1720' text, appearing both in the banner and below it.
  • The vector lines are less refined and looks more like clip-art.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash followed the instructions perfectly, delivering professional-grade typography and a cohesive vintage emblem. In contrast, FLUX.2 [klein] 4B failed on text accuracy, misspelling the restaurant name and repeating the date unnecessarily.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent text rendering for complex labels and names
  • + Logically follows the mission steps from launch to landing surface
  • + Professional layout that feels like a cohesive poster
  • Iconography is a bit cluttered with some overlapping elements
  • The rocket icon looks more like a generic missile than a Saturn V

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Consistent flat-vector style across all icons
  • + Distinct color blocks that match the NASA-inspired request
  • Poor text legibility with numerous spelling errors
  • Nonsensical mission progression and duplicated icons
  • Layout feels sparse and disconnected

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is the clear winner as it successfully follows the sequential steps of the Apollo mission with mostly accurate text and a professional infographic layout. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B fails significantly on prompt adherence, providing garbled text and a confusing visual flow that does not accurately represent the mission milestones.

Next steps

Explore each model