Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.1 [schnell] Black Forest Labs Recraft V4 Recraft AI

Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.1 [schnell]

18.7 arena score

#48 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Recraft V4

25.6 arena score

#11 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.1 [schnell]

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

Recraft V4

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 13

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.1 [schnell]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell]

  • + Vibrant colors and clean, modern aesthetic.
  • + High clarity in the rendering of the glass cube and its reflections.
  • + Includes the green plant as requested.
  • Added an extra blue sphere on top of the book that was not requested.
  • The sphere inside the cube appears to be floating without visible support, which feels slightly less photorealistic.

Recraft V4

  • + Excellent adherence to all spatial instructions without adding extra elements.
  • + Highly realistic textures on the wooden table and the vintage book.
  • + Great atmospheric lighting and realistic glass refraction.
  • The green plant is slightly less 'behind' the cube compared to the other model, framing it more from the sides.
  • The blue sphere is very dark, making it harder to see details within it.

Verdict: Recraft V4 is the clear winner as it followed all prompt instructions perfectly, whereas FLUX.1 [schnell] hallucinated an additional blue sphere on top of the book. Recraft V4 also achieved a much higher level of photorealism, particularly in the textures of the wood and the physical properties of the glass.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.1 [schnell]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell]

  • + Excellent high-frequency detail on the bicycle and clothing
  • + Strong adherence to the 'reflections on wet pavement' prompt
  • + High visual clarity and sharp focus on the subject
  • The cars in the background lack the requested motion blur
  • The framing feels too centered and professional for an 'imperfect framing' request

Recraft V4

  • + Captures the motion blur of the passing car perfectly
  • + Conveys a more authentic 'candid' street photography feel with imperfect framing
  • + Visible rain droplets enhance the atmosphere significantly
  • The red bicycle is partially cut off at the bottom
  • The bicycle geometry is slightly warped compared to Model A

Verdict: Recraft V4 is the winner as it much more accurately captured the difficult stylistic requests like motion blur, light rain, and imperfect, candid framing. While FLUX.1 [schnell] produced a sharper, cleaner image, it failed to incorporate the motion blur and felt like a static portrait rather than a street photo.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.1 [schnell]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell]

  • + Extremely detailed skin texture and facial features
  • + Intense, lifelike gaze with sharp eye detail
  • + Excellent use of warm lighting/rim lighting
  • The armor is cropped too significantly to see the 'ornate engraved plate' as requested
  • Braids lack the requested beads
  • Lighting feels more like studio lighting than natural torchlight

Recraft V4

  • + Excellent adherence to all prompt elements including beads, armor details, and sparks
  • + Perfect balance between cinematic lighting and battle-worn grit
  • + Detailed textures on leather straps and cloth underlayers are clearly visible
  • Skin texture is slightly more smoothed/less hyper-realistic compared to Image A
  • Facial expression is somewhat static compared to the intensity of Image A

Verdict: Recraft V4 is the clear winner as it followed every specific detail of the prompt, including the beads in the hair, the engraved armor, and the bokeh sparks. While FLUX.1 [schnell] has incredible facial resolution, it failed to include many of the requested technical details of the paladin's gear and accessories.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.1 [schnell]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell]

  • + Features a more traditional layout for a single-page menu card
  • + Clean white background with professional headers
  • The text is largely illegible gibberish
  • The food images are repetitive and low in photographic quality
  • Failed to properly label the 'Mains' section correctly, using the word 'ORFEFUS' instead

Recraft V4

  • + Exceptional text rendering with perfect spelling and numbers
  • + High-quality, distinct food photography for each item
  • + Perfect adherence to all sections: Appetizers, Pizza, and Mains
  • The layout is more of a grid of cards rather than a unified restaurant menu sheet

Verdict: Recraft V4 is the clear winner as it produced perfectly legible, meaningful text and high-quality food photography that strictly followed the prompt's category requirements. In contrast, FLUX.1 [schnell] produced gibberish text and repetitive, low-detail food photos that make it unusable for a professional design context.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.1 [schnell]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell]

  • + Excellent photorealistic texture on the meat and bun
  • + Vibrant, high-energy lighting with accurate glowing embers
  • + Appetizing food styling with melting cheese
  • Significant text errors including a missing 'M' in 'MAGIC' and price duplication
  • Failure to follow the 'exploded' instruction, showing a mostly assembled burger instead
  • Odd, unidentifiable food chunks floating around the main burger

Recraft V4

  • + Perfect adherence to the 'exploded' burger composition
  • + Perfect text rendering with accurate spelling and fiery visual effects
  • + Clean and professional graphic design layout suitable for an actual advertisement
  • Lighting on the burger components feels slightly flat compared to the background
  • Individual burger components look a bit isolated rather than a cohesive explosion

Verdict: Recraft V4 is the clear winner as it followed every instruction, including the 'exploded' layout and complex text rendering with zero errors. FLUX.1 [schnell] produced a more appetizing-looking burger texture but failed on the layout and had significant spelling mistakes and price duplication.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.1 [schnell]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell]

  • + Features a clear, legible chalkboard texture
  • + Captures the framing of a cafe menu board well
  • Significant spelling errors throughout the menu items
  • Text is uneven and hallucinates additional lines of nonsensical characters
  • Fails to render the date correctly as requested

Recraft V4

  • + Perfect text accuracy for all requested items and the date
  • + Highly realistic chalk texture with smudges and natural variations
  • + Excellent composition with added illustrations that enhance the café theme
  • The font choice for the body text leans slightly more toward a neat digital script than a rough handmade slant

Verdict: Recraft V4 is the clear winner as it followed every complex text instruction perfectly, whereas FLUX.1 [schnell] struggled with spelling and coherence. Recraft V4 also captured a much better 'cozy café' atmosphere with realistic lighting and background details.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.1 [schnell]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell]

  • + Excellent adherence to the specific 'horse on top' request
  • + Creative and surreal anatomical fusion
  • + Clean, cinematic lighting and composition
  • The horse has two heads which adds to the surrealism but may be an unintended artifact
  • The astronaut's pose is somewhat awkward

Recraft V4

  • + High level of environmental detail with the asteroids
  • + Strong cinematic textures and realistic materials
  • Completely failed the negative constraint to have the horse on top
  • Followed the common trope instead of the specific prompt instruction

Verdict: FLUX.1 [schnell] is the clear winner because it successfully followed the difficult and specific prompt instruction to place the horse on top of the astronaut. Recraft V4 ignored the specific positional instruction and generated a standard astronaut riding a horse, despite the high visual quality of the render.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.1 [schnell]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell]

  • + Excellent fur texture and lighting on the capybara
  • + Clear, legible taxi branding on the cap
  • + Highly expressive and detailed woman in the background
  • The capybara's paw placement on the wheel feels a bit anatomically awkward
  • The lighting inside looks slightly more studio-lit than street-lit

Recraft V4

  • + Perfect adherence to the pose prompt with both paws realistically on the wheel
  • + Exceptional cinematic realism with raindrops on the window and authentic city bokeh
  • + The capybara's expression is perfectly 'calm and professional' as requested
  • The passenger in the back is slightly less detailed/sharply focused compared to Model A
  • The capybara's ear is clipping through the hat

Verdict: While FLUX.1 [schnell] provides a vivid and sharp image, Recraft V4 captures the atmosphere of a rainy New York night with superior realism and composition. Recraft V4 also followed the specific paw placement instructions better, creating a more convincing 'professional driver' silhouette.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.1 [schnell]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell]

  • + Excellent graphic design layout with a clear hierarchy.
  • + Vibrant orange and black color scheme that fits the Halloween theme.
  • + Good border detail with thorns and webs as requested.
  • Numerous spelling errors in the small text and event details.
  • Redundant text fields and 'Fate' section not in the prompt.

Recraft V4

  • + Perfect text rendering for all requested information without spelling errors.
  • + Highly detailed illustrative style with realistic textures on the pumpkin and leaves.
  • + Accurate interpretation of 'thorns and webs' for the border.
  • The 'You are invited' banner is a bit small and less central than requested.
  • Dark, drizzly atmosphere makes the text at the bottom slightly harder to read against the busy background.

Verdict: Recraft V4 is the clear winner because it followed every text instruction perfectly, whereas FLUX.1 [schnell] struggled with spelling and logic in the event details section. Recraft V4 also delivered a more cohesive 'cinematic' look with impressive detail in the environment.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.1 [schnell]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell]

  • + Excellent 3D miniature diorama feel with clean, soft textures
  • + High clarity and centered composition on a smooth base
  • + Accurate rendering of the Japanese flag and 'JAPAN' text
  • Missed the 'SUSHI' text requirement entirely
  • The sushi design is slightly anatomically strange, mixing nigiri and maki traits

Recraft V4

  • + Successfully included all requested text ('JAPAN' and 'SUSHI')
  • + Realistic PBR materials on the fish and a creative ice/salt diorama base
  • + Higher variety of sushi items shown on the plate
  • The diorama base is textured/grainy rather than the requested 'small raised diorama base'
  • Lighting is harsher with heavy shadows, losing some of the 'gentle' 3D cartoon feel

Verdict: Recraft V4 followed the complex text prompts more accurately by including both words, whereas FLUX.1 [schnell] missed the word 'SUSHI'. However, FLUX.1 [schnell] captured the isometric 3D cartoon style and clean diorama aesthetic much better than Recraft V4, which leaned more toward a realistic product photo with a textured base.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.1 [schnell]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell]

  • + Excellent fur texture and lighting on the puppy
  • + Vibrant, warm color palette that fits the 'wholesome' vibe
  • Failed to include a rabbit, instead showing two kitten-like animals
  • The animals look static rather than 'playfully chasing' or 'tumbling'
  • The anatomy of the middle animals is ambiguous and distorted

Recraft V4

  • + Successfully included all four requested animals: puppy, kitten, bunny, and fox
  • + Dynamic composition that captures the 'running and chasing' action perfectly
  • + Beautiful implementation of 'god rays' and dew sparkles as requested in the prompt
  • The fox's front right leg has an awkward anatomical bend
  • Some butterflies in the background are a bit over-sharpened compared to the depth of field

Verdict: Recraft V4 is the clear winner as it followed all prompt instructions, successfully including the golden retriever, tabby kitten, bunny, and fox kit in a dynamic, playful scene. FLUX.1 [schnell] failed to generate the bunny and produced anatomical merging between the middle characters. Recraft V4 also captured much better atmospheric details like 'god rays' and 'dew sparkles' while maintaining a photographic quality.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.1 [schnell]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell]

  • + Strong emblem composition with balanced decorative flourishes
  • + Clean vector-style execution
  • + Warm, cohesive color palette
  • Failed spelling of 'Caffè Florian' (rendered as 'Cafeé Framilan')
  • Incorrect date '7720' instead of requested '1720'
  • Missing the steam element requested in the prompt

Recraft V4

  • + Perfect adherence to text and date requirements
  • + Includes visual depiction of steam as requested
  • + High-quality 'vintage minimalist' typography and cross-hatched shading
  • The 'Est. 1720' is placed in a semi-circle rather than a banner
  • The 'n' in Florian has an unusual flourish that merges with a terminal dot
  • Background is less cream-toned compared to Model A

Verdict: Recraft V4 is the clear winner as it correctly rendered the specific name 'Caffè Florian' and the date '1720', whereas FLUX.1 [schnell] hallucinated 'Framilan' and '7720'. Recraft V4 also successfully included all prompt elements, including the steam, with a more sophisticated vintage design aesthetic.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.1 [schnell]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell]

  • + Strong aesthetic appeal with a creative concentric orbit layout.
  • + Excellent use of the navy, red, and white palette.
  • Text is largely gibberish or nonsensical character strings.
  • Infographic flow is confusing and does not clearly follow the requested 1-6 step sequence.

Recraft V4

  • + Perfect text rendering for all steps and headings.
  • + Excellent adherence to the step-by-step instructions and iconography requests.
  • + Includes highly relevant supporting details like the crew names.
  • Composition is a bit sparse with significant empty white space.
  • The layout is a simple grid rather than a more dynamic infographic design.

Verdict: Recraft V4 is the clear winner as it successfully follows the complex instructions for specific textual steps and icons, producing perfectly legible and accurate text. FLUX.1 [schnell] creates a more visually striking 'poster' feel but fails significantly on text legibility and logical flow of the information requested.

Next steps

Explore each model