FLUX.1 [schnell] Black Forest Labs vs FLUX1.1 [pro] Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1 [schnell]

• + Excellent material rendering with realistic glass thickness and reflections
• + High-quality textures on the wooden table and plant leaves
• + Good sense of depth and perspective

• − Added an extra blue sphere on top of the book which was not requested
• − The sphere inside appears to be floating without a visible support structure

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Perfect adherence to the spatial requirements of the prompt
• + Clean and simple composition
• + Accurate glass refraction and lighting on the sphere

• − The glass container is more of a tall rectangular prism than a cube
• − The plant in the background is quite blurry compared to image A

FLUX.1 [schnell]

• + Excellent anatomical and mechanical coherence in both the man and the bicycle.
• + High-quality skin texture and realistic wet weather effects.
• + Maintains clear focus on the subject with a convincing shallow depth of field.

• − The cars in the background are too sharp and lack the requested motion blur.
• − The framing is quite centered and conventional, missing the 'imperfect framing' prompt.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Successfully incorporates the requested 'imperfect framing' for a candid feel.
• + Captures the environment with a more authentic rain-slicked atmosphere.
• + Good implementation of bokeh and background light reflections.

• − The bicycle is catastrophically broken and lacks a rear half/wheel.
• − The man's feet are poorly rendered, appearing to float or merge with objects.

FLUX.1 [schnell]

• + Excellent skin texture and realistic eye detail
• + Very clear and well-defined hair braids
• + Strong use of warm torchlight to emphasize facial structure

• − The armor looks slightly more decorative than battle-worn
• − Missing the requested bokeh sparks in the background

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Perfect adherence to the 'battle-worn' prompt with realistic dirt and grittiness
• + Includes dynamic bokeh sparks as requested
• + High-quality engraving detail on the pauldrons

• − Hair braids are less distinct and blend into loose strands
• − Lighting is a bit more diffused than the requested 'torchlight reflecting'

FLUX.1 [schnell]

• + Clean, minimalist layout that adheres well to professional graphic design standards
• + Bold sans-serif typography is clear and well-spaced
• + Food photos are presented in a neat, orderly grid

• − Small body text is largely gibberish
• − Replaces the 'Mains' category header with the nonsensical word 'ORFEFUS'

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Presents a complete brand mockup including silverware and multiple menu pages
• + Excellent use of vibrant accents and small icons to enhance the casual dining feel
• + Food photography is high quality and diverse

• − Section headers contain typos such as 'MAN & DREAFRY'
• − The layout is a bit more cluttered and less 'minimalist' than requested

FLUX.1 [schnell]

• + Excellent photorealistic texture on the meat patty and melting cheese.
• + Vibrant lighting and a very dynamic sense of motion with the debris.
• + High-resolution details on the embers and background fire.

• − Failed the main text prompt by spelling it 'AGIC BURGER'.
• − Severe repetition and errors in the price rendering, showing '€699' in the starburst.
• − The burger is not truly 'exploded' as requested; it is a mostly assembled burger with external bits floating.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Perfectly rendered text for both 'MAGIC BURGER' and 'LIMITED TIME ONLY'.
• + Clean, professional composition suitable for a high-end advertisement.
• + Accurate price rendering of '€6.99' without the artifacts seen in the other model.

• − Missed the 'starburst' requirement for the price.
• − Like Image A, the burger is mostly intact rather than having all components suspended individually.
• − The neon blue 'MAGIC BURGER' text clashes slightly with the fiery theme requested.

FLUX.1 [schnell]

• + Text looks like authentic messy chalk handwriting
• + Captures the framing of a chalkboard well

• − Significant spelling errors and gibberish throughout the menu
• − Missing parts of the requested date ('Pril' instead of 'April')
• − Chalk texture looks more like a digital pen brush than actual dry chalk

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent spelling accuracy for the majority of the complex prompt
• + Beautiful cursive title as requested
• + High visual quality with realistic café background and lighting

• − Error in pricing for the octopus ($228 and $98)
• − Slight repetition of the octopus item
• − Text rendering is slightly too perfect/clean for real chalk

FLUX.1 [schnell]

• + Perfect adherence to the difficult constraint of the horse being on top.
• + Strong cinematic lighting with a clear focal point.
• + Successfully captures a surreal and unusual concept.

• − Anatomical glitch with two horse heads emerging from one body.
• − The astronaut's posture is a bit awkward and detached from the 'saddle' area.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + High visual quality with vibrant colors and cosmic details.
• + Dynamic composition with a sense of motion and scale.

• − Fails the core prompt instruction to have the horse on top of the astronaut.
• − Produces a conventional 'astronaut riding a horse' image despite explicit negative constraint.

FLUX.1 [schnell]

• + Excellent texture on the capybara's fur
• + Accurate depiction of a New York taxi's front visor and internal framing
• + Characters perfectly positioned with the capybara in the driver's seat and the human in the back

• − The capybara's right paw is awkwardly floating near the steering wheel rather than gripping it
• − The human's hands holding the phone have minor rendering glitches

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Cinematic lighting and high-quality bokeh in the background
• + Very sharp and clean rendering of the human subject
• + Creative interpretation of the capybara's jacket

• − The capybara is not in the driver's seat; it appears to be sitting in the passenger seat next to the woman
• − The steering wheel is missing entirely

FLUX.1 [schnell]

• + Strong gothic font style for the main title.
• + Includes all requested elements like twisted trees and central jack-o-lantern.

• − Significant text errors including redundant 'Time' labels and spelling hallucinations.
• − The layout is somewhat cluttered at the bottom.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Features a highly detailed, cinematic jack-o-lantern and moon.
• + The thorn border is intricate and well-integrated into the design.

• − Repeats information twice in the event details section.
• − Fails to correctly render the 'Halloween Party Invitation' title within the scroll banner.

FLUX.1 [schnell]

• + Excellent adherence to the 'minimal garnish' instruction
• + Includes the requested flag icon
• + Sharp, clean text rendering for 'JAPAN'

• − Missed the secondary 'SUSHI' text instruction
• − The sushi design looks somewhat messy with red streaks compared to a cartoon style

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Includes both 'JAPAN' and 'SUSHI' text as requested
• + Appealing miniature 3D cartoon aesthetic with soft textures
• + More comprehensive collection of sushi pieces

• − Missed the flag icon requirement
• − Ignored the 'minimal garnish' instruction by adding many extra elements
• − Text is slightly less sharp than Model A

FLUX.1 [schnell]

• + Successfully included all four requested animals (dog, cat, rabbit-like creature, and fox).
• + Great use of color and butterfly detail with distinct monarch patterns.
• + Vibrant, high-contrast lighting that emphasizes the sunrise theme.

• − The bunny has cat-like facial features, appearing more like a hybrid.
• − The animals are a bit more static and posed rather than 'tumbling' as requested.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent rim lighting and backlighting effects for a magical atmosphere.
• + Great textural detail on the fur and whiskers.
• + Better depiction of the 'chasing' and 'upward-looking' interaction with butterflies.

• − Failed the prompt requirement by missing the red fox kit entirely.
• − The kittens look more like AI-generated plushies than hyper-photorealistic animals.

FLUX.1 [schnell]

• + Clean vector-style design with good balance
• + Follows the color palette perfectly
• + Simple and professional brand aesthetics

• − Major spelling errors in the main name ('FRAMILAN')
• − Incorrect year ('7720' instead of '1720')
• − Missing the requested steam from the cloche

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Captures the 'steam' and 'vintage' aesthetic much better
• + Correct date 'Est. 1720'
• + Uses a more sophisticated banner layout and texture

• − Spelling error in the main name ('FRANILIAN')
• − Slightly more cluttered than 'minimalist' request

FLUX.1 [schnell]

• + Successfully captures the requested navy, white, and muted red color palette.
• + Includes consistent circular iconography as requested.
• + Clean vector style with high legibility of headings.

• − Failed to provide a chronological 1-6 numbered list of steps.
• − The rocket illustration is messy and lacks the 'crisp lines' requested.
• − Composition is bottom-heavy and lacks a clear main title.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent layout with a clear 'Apollo 11' title and structured numbering.
• + Higher quality vector illustration of the rocket and lunar surface.
• + Followed the instructions for specific steps more closely although numbering becomes repetitive.

• − Included redundant headings (two '6's and a duplicate '2').
• − Text rendering is messy with several typos ('Desceing', 'Earna').
• − Composition is a bit cluttered with lines crossing over the main rocket graphic.