Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] Black Forest Labs Recraft V4 Recraft AI

Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

20.3 arena score

#41 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Recraft V4

25.6 arena score

#11 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

100.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Recraft V4

0.0%

win rate

100.0% 0.0% ties 0.0%
Shared challenges 13

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'soft window light from the left' instruction
  • + Clean, modern aesthetic with realistic glass translucency
  • + Clear spatial arrangement of all requested elements
  • The blue sphere has a felt-like texture rather than appearing as a standard smooth sphere
  • The glass cube looks more like a hollow acrylic case due to the thin edges

Recraft V4

  • + Realistic glass refraction and reflections on the sphere and cube
  • + The blue sphere looks more like glass/polished material
  • + Excellent texture on the wooden table and the aged book
  • The plant is more 'around' the cube than 'behind' it
  • The lighting is more frontal/overhead rather than distinctly from the left window

Verdict: Both models followed the spatial instructions perfectly. FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] captured the specific lighting mood and clean composition much better, while Recraft V4 excelled in material realism, particularly the refraction of the glass and the texture of the book.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent skin texture and facial details
  • + Strong atmospheric lighting with realistic raindrops
  • + Natural bokeh and color grading
  • The subject is riding/holding the bike rather than repairing it
  • Missing motion blur from passing cars
  • Anatomy issues with multiple brake cables merging awkwardly

Recraft V4

  • + Successfully captures the man actively repairing the bicycle
  • + Excellent integration of motion blur from passing cars
  • + Impressive reflections on the wet pavement
  • A significant portion of the man's face and back is distorted or merged into the bike frame
  • Low visual quality on distant pedestrians
  • Bicycle frame geometry is disjointed near the seat

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] produces a much higher quality portrait with better textures and lighting, but it misses the 'repairing' action and 'motion blur' requested. Recraft V4 follows the complex scene requirements much more accurately, including the repair action and traffic blur, but suffers from significant anatomical distortion and lower clarity.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent photographic realism in the facial features and lighting.
  • + Highly detailed and authentic-looking engraving on the pauldron.
  • + Sophisticated shallow depth of field with soft bokeh transitions.
  • Largely fails to include the requested 'small beads' in the braided hair.
  • The level of 'dirt and grime' is very subtle, bordering on a clean appearance.

Recraft V4

  • + Perfect adherence to all prompt details, including the beads in the hair and visible dirt/scars.
  • + Stronger interpretation of the 'battle-worn' aesthetic.
  • + Intricate engraving across multiple pieces of the armor.
  • Slightly less photo-realistic skin texture compared to the competitor.
  • The bokeh sparks appear a bit sharper and less natural than in Model A.

Verdict: Recraft V4 is the winner for its superior prompt adherence, successfully incorporating specific details like beads in the braids and realistic grime that FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] neglected. While FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] offers a slightly more realistic skin texture, Recraft V4 captures the 'battle-worn' and 'ornate' aspects of the prompt with much greater accuracy and visual interest.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent use of color and bold sans-serif fonts
  • + Clean, professional layout that matches the 'casual dining' prompt
  • + High-quality, appetizing food photography integration
  • Text consists largely of gibberish words
  • Food items under the 'Mains' section are visually depicted as pizza

Recraft V4

  • + Highly legible, English text for dish names and descriptions
  • + Strict adherence to the 'grid' layout requested
  • + Professional food photography with consistent lighting and shadows
  • Lacks the 'vibrant accents' and bold headers found in Model A
  • Composition feels slightly empty with smaller text and centered images on a large white space

Verdict: Recraft V4 is the clear winner because it produces legible, meaningful English text that follows the menu structure perfectly, whereas FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] produces gibberish. While FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] has more interesting graphic design and bold accents, Recraft V4 delivers a functional and professional asset suitable for restaurant use.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Recraft V4
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent typography with a cohesive glowing fiery effect.
  • + High-quality, appetizing food textures and lighting.
  • + Clean and professional graphic design layout.
  • The burger is 'stacked' rather than 'exploded' or suspended with clear separation.
  • Duplicated the price tag text and failed to include the starburst element.
  • The lettuce and tomato are somewhat buried in the stack.

Recraft V4

  • + Better 'exploded' effect with distinct separation of ingredients as requested.
  • + Followed the 'starburst' instruction for the price tag.
  • + Realistic, non-idealized texture for the burger bun.
  • Failed to make the background 'dark and fiery', opting for a more neutral dark grey.
  • Lighting on the food does not match the dramatic embers in the background.
  • The white sauce dripping from the top bun looks slightly unappealing and messy.

Verdict: Both models failed to combine all elements perfectly. FLUX.1 Kontext produced a much more visually appealing and professional advertisement with superior lighting and text rendering, though it ignored the 'exploded' and 'starburst' layout requirements. Recraft V4 captured the 'exploded' physics and starburst shape correctly but failed to deliver the fiery atmosphere and professional polish seen in the first image.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'chalk handwriting' style with believable texture and variations
  • + Perfect text accuracy, including the full completion of the 'Brown Butter' item
  • + High-quality close-up composition focusing on the chalkboard surface
  • The title font is simple block letters rather than the 'elegant cursive' requested
  • The background is very blurry and lacks café context compared to the other model

Recraft V4

  • + Beautiful environmental composition showing a realistic cozy café setting
  • + Creative addition of chalk illustrations for each menu item
  • + Captures the chalkboard texture and smudge marks very realistically
  • The text style appears more like a digital handwritten font than actual chalk writing
  • The text is very small and lacks the 'natural variations in letter size' and 'elegant cursive' requested
  • Missed the requirement for the title to be in cursive

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] followed the text requirements much better, delivering a board that actually looks handwritten with realistic chalk strokes and perfect spelling of all items. While Recraft V4 creates a much more visually interesting and realistic café environment, its text rendering looks more like a digital overlay and is less legible. FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] is the winner for its superior prompt adherence regarding the handwriting quality and content.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Perfectly adheres to the difficult prompt instruction of the horse riding the astronaut.
  • + Features clever anatomical details like hooves on the astronaut's space suit legs.
  • + Clear, cinematic lighting with a surreal composition that avoids clutter.
  • The small astronaut figure on top of the horse is an unnecessary addition that muddies the logic.
  • The transition between the horse's back legs and the astronaut's shoulders is slightly blurry.

Recraft V4

  • + Beautiful cinematic lighting and high levels of detail in the textures.
  • + Dynamic composition with floating rocks and a large planetary backdrop.
  • Fails the primary prompt instruction by showing the astronaut riding the horse.
  • The horse's front legs exhibit anatomical clipping through the foreground rocks.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] successfully interpreted the logic-defying prompt that required the horse to be on top, even adding witty details like hooves on the suit. Recraft V4 produced a high-quality image but completely ignored the core 'horse on top' instruction, delivering a conventional astronaut-on-horse scene.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent texture on the capybara's fur
  • + Very professional, calm expression as requested
  • + Strong cinematic lighting consistent with an interior taxi shot
  • The passenger in the back looks confused/stressed rather than bored
  • Only one paw is clearly visible on the steering wheel
  • The perspective makes the capybara look giant compared to the car frame

Recraft V4

  • + Perfectly captures the passenger's bored expression while looking at a phone
  • + Shows both paws on the steering wheel as requested
  • + Better environmental storytelling with the rainy Manhattan background and One World Trade Center
  • The capybara's face is slightly less detailed than the rest of the image
  • Hands on the passenger are a bit messy structurally

Verdict: Recraft V4 is the winner as it adhered much more closely to the specific narrative elements of the prompt, particularly the passenger's bored expression and the requirement for both paws on the wheel. FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] produced a high-quality close-up, but it failed to capture the 'normal, bored' attitude of the businesswoman, making her look worried instead.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent gothic typography that looks professional and integrated.
  • + Moody, cinematic lighting with a strong central glow from the jack-o-lantern.
  • + Very intricate cobweb border that aligns well with the 'vintage gothic' aesthetic.
  • Includes a line of gibberish text ('Your: Vorkleat: Iight & Spans') that wasn't in the prompt.
  • The parchment texture is very dark, making the 'parchment' feel less distinct than a standard black background.

Recraft V4

  • + Perfect adherence to the requested text without adding any hallucinations.
  • + Excellent composition with twisted trees framing the central pumpkin and bats.
  • + Clearer visibility of the 'night sky' and atmospheric elements like rain/mist.
  • The scroll banner for the subtitle is very small and plain, lacking a 'vintage gothic' feel.
  • The border, while containing webs, looks a bit more like a digital overlay than a vintage poster.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt well, but Recraft V4 is the winner as it accurately rendered all requested text without adding the gibberish found in the FLUX.1 Kontext output. While FLUX.1 Kontext offered superior typography and a moodier 'invitation' feel, the inclusion of nonsensical text lines makes it less usable for a real invitation than the clean output from Recraft V4.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent 3D cartoon art style with soft, rounded textures
  • + Clean typography that matches the aesthetic of the scene
  • + Perfect isometric composition on a smooth diorama base
  • The flag icon is stylized to the point of being a simplified blob

Recraft V4

  • + High textural detail in the sushi and ice base
  • + Accurate rendering of the Japanese flag
  • + More variety in the sushi types presented
  • Missed the 'cartoon scene' requirement in favor of a photorealistic look
  • The small typography for 'SUSHI' is less balanced than the prompt imply
  • The ice base is more cluttered than the 'minimal' diorama requested

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] followed the stylistic instructions much better, delivering a cohesive cartoon 3D miniature with great lighting and design. Recraft V4 ignored the 'cartoon' requirement and produced a photorealistic image, which although high in quality, fails the prompt's artistic direction.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Exquisite lighting with soft, warm golden tones and very clean rendering
  • + Vibrant, high-contrast colors in the wildflower meadow
  • + Consistent 'cute' aesthetic across all animals
  • Failed the prompt requirement for a rabbit, generating two kittens instead
  • Animals are mostly static rather than 'playfully chasing' or 'tumbling'

Recraft V4

  • + Successfully included all four requested animals: puppy, kitten, bunny, and fox
  • + Much better adherence to the 'playfully chasing' and 'tumbling' action
  • + Superior detail in butterflies and dew sparkles on the grass
  • The fox's limb anatomy looks slightly stiff during the running motion
  • The rabbit's placement is a bit awkward, appearing to float behind the kitten

Verdict: Recraft V4 is the clear winner because it correctly followed the specific list of animals, including the bunny which FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] missed entirely. Recraft V4 also captured the kinetic energy of the animals 'chasing' and 'tumbling' much more effectively than the static portrait style of FLUX.1.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent typography including the requested accent mark on 'Caffè'
  • + Clear and prominent banner element as requested in the prompt
  • + Authentic subtle texture on the background for a vintage feel
  • Minor spelling error in the banner text ('EEST.' instead of 'EST.')

Recraft V4

  • + Elegant and stylish custom typography
  • + Clean vector aesthetic with sophisticated shading on the cloche
  • + Correct spelling of 'Est. 1720'
  • Failed to include the requested 'banner' for the date
  • Typography is more modern/playful than the 'classic' style requested
  • The accent on 'Caffè' is reversed (grave vs acute)

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] followed the prompt instructions more closely by including the specific banner element, though it had a small typo in the date. Recraft V4 produced a more polished graphic but missed the banner requirement and opted for a less 'classic' font style. FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] is the preferred choice for its superior composition and adherence to the vintage emblem aesthetic.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent artistic integration of the rocket and lunar landscape.
  • + Rich NASA-inspired color palette with a cinematic feel.
  • + Dynamic composition with a strong sense of scale.
  • Failed the infographic layout by creating more of a poster illustration.
  • Added a non-existent ringed planet (Saturn) to the Saturn V rocket tip, which is factually confusing for an infographic.
  • Text labels are cluttered and contain minor spelling/logical errors.

Recraft V4

  • + High adherence to the 'infographic' request with a clear step-by-step layout.
  • + Clean, consistent vector iconography as requested.
  • + Exceptional text rendering and logical labeling of the mission phases.
  • The layout is slightly sparse with a lot of white space.
  • The translunar icon is a bit abstract compared to the others.

Verdict: Recraft V4 followed the complex multi-step prompt almost perfectly, delivering a clean, logical, and well-labeled vector infographic that follows all technical constraints. FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] produced a beautiful illustration, but it failed the core request for a step-by-step infographic layout and included confusing visual metaphors like a ringed planet on top of the rocket.

Next steps

Explore each model