Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] Black Forest Labs Nano Banana 2 Google

Settled by community votes across 17 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

20.3 arena score

#41 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Nano Banana 2

28.4 arena score

#1 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Best Text-to-Image right now Top 2 in Image Editing
Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

Nano Banana 2

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 17

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent photographic quality and realistic depth of field.
  • + Accurate placement of the red book exactly on top of the cube.
  • + Soft window lighting is naturally rendered.
  • The blue sphere appears fuzzy/textured rather than smooth.
  • The cube structure has some perspective issues on the back edge.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Impressive text rendering on the book spine related to the plant theme.
  • + Realistic reflections of the blue sphere on the bottom of the glass.
  • + Texture of the wooden table is highly detailed.
  • The glass cube lacks a physical top panel, making the book appear to float or sit on the thin edges.
  • The composition is a bit crowded with the background bookshelf.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] creates a more physically plausible scene with a clear glass enclosure, though the blue sphere has an odd fuzzy texture. Nano Banana 2 features impressive details like legible text and marble-like reflections, but fails on the structural logic of the glass cube's top. Both models followed the complex spatial instructions accurately, but FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] feels more like a cohesive photograph.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent skin texture and facial realism
  • + Perfectly captures the lighting of a rainy day
  • + Great shallow depth of field
  • The subject appears to be riding or holding the bike rather than repairing it
  • Cars in the background are static rather than showing motion blur
  • Rain effect looks slightly like a generic overlay

Nano Banana 2

  • + Better narrative adherence to the 'repairing' action with tools
  • + Captures the 'reflections on wet pavement' and 'motion blur' more effectively
  • + Includes authentic environmental details like Japanese signage
  • Anatomical errors in the hands and how he is holding the wrench
  • The wrench and chain interaction is physically nonsensical
  • Low-quality rendering of background pedestrians

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 followed the prompt's specific composition requirements much better, including the act of repairing, motion blur from cars, and vibrant pavement reflections. However, FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] produced a much higher quality portrait with superior skin texture and lighting, even though it missed several semantic cues like the tools and the motion blur. Nano Banana 2 is preferred for its storytelling, but FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] wins on photographic realism.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent photographic realism in skin texture and eyes
  • + Sophisticated use of lighting and shallow depth of field
  • + Accurate rendering of ornate engravings and leather texture
  • Missed the request for beads in the hair braids
  • The 'battle-worn' effect is very subtle compared to the prompt

Nano Banana 2

  • + Very strong adherence to 'battle-worn' with grit and scarring
  • + Perfectly captures the 'braids with small beads' detail
  • + Highly intricate armor with historical and rune-like detailing
  • Lighting is a bit harsh and flat for a torchlit scene
  • The hand holding the sword is slightly muddy in detail
  • Less 'shallow' depth of field than requested

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] creates a more cinematic and realistic portrait with superior lighting and soft focus, though it misses the specific bead details. Nano Banana 2 follows the prompt's descriptive details much more closely, including the beads and grime, making it the better choice for strict prompt adherence despite a slightly more computer-generated look.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent typography rendering with zero letter artifacts
  • + Bold use of color accents on the text headers
  • + Clean and spacious minimalist layout
  • The placeholder text is gibberish
  • Food photos do not always match the section labels, such as a pizza under 'Mains' and a salad under 'Pizza'

Nano Banana 2

  • + Successfully uses a grid layout for food photos as requested
  • + Rendered text contains real, readable English menu items
  • + Consistent professional design suitable for a casual dining brand
  • Minor text artifacts in the secondary descriptions
  • The grid layout feels slightly cluttered compared to Model A's extreme minimalism

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the superior choice because it interpreted the 'grid' requirement effectively and provided readable, contextually accurate menu items. While FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] has cleaner typography and a more artistic minimalist aesthetic, its failure to match food images to their corresponding categories and its use of gibberish text makes it less functional as a design prototype.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent photorealistic texture on the meat and bun
  • + Clean typography with a glowing lighting effect
  • + Realistic interaction between cheese and ingredients
  • The price appears twice, which looks cluttered
  • Fails to include the 'starburst' for the price
  • The explosion effect is very subtle compared to the request

Nano Banana 2

  • + Dynamic 'exploded' composition with high motion
  • + Followed layout instructions perfectly including the starburst
  • + Creative fiery texture integrated into the title text
  • Slightly more 'digital illustration' feel than 'photorealistic'
  • The bottom bun texture is a bit inconsistent

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 followed the complex prompt requirements much more accurately, successfully including the starburst and a truly 'exploded' burger layout. While FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] offers higher photorealism in its textures, it duplicated the price text and failed to deliver the specific graphic elements requested.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent text legibility and accuracy
  • + Realistic chalk texture on the letters
  • + Good adherence to the specific pricing and menu items
  • Failed to use elegant cursive for the title as requested
  • Text layout is a bit cramped at the bottom with a typo ('faiur')
  • The background is very blurry and lacks the 'cozy café' atmosphere detail present in the other model

Nano Banana 2

  • + Perfectly adhered to the elegant cursive title request
  • + Superior composition with a rich, detailed café background
  • + Highly realistic chalk smudge effects and varied handwriting styles that feel more authentic to a physical board
  • Small typo in the bottom line ('ask about our' instead of just following requested pattern)
  • The wooden frame of the easel is slightly physically impossible in its construction

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner as it followed more of the complex stylistic instructions, specifically the 'elegant cursive' for the title and the 'cozy café' setting. While FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] produced very clean text, it failed the cursive requirement and the background was nearly non-existent compared to the atmospheric environment in the other image.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Perfectly adheres to the subverted prompt by placing the horse on top of the astronaut
  • + Stunning cinematic lighting with realistic textures and atmosphere
  • + Includes a small bonus astronaut effectively 'riding' the horse to double the surrealism
  • The main astronaut's legs end in hooves, which is a bizarre anatomical glitch

Nano Banana 2

  • + Vibrant colors and a more 'space-fantasy' aesthetic
  • + Follows the positioning instruction with the horse above the astronaut
  • The astronaut is floating upside down and sideways, which looks more disorganized than surreal
  • Lower resolution and less realistic lighting compared to the competitor

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] followed the complex spatial instructions perfectly, creating a highly detailed and cinematic scene that feels intentional. While Nano Banana 2 technically placed the horse higher in the frame, the composition lacks the grounded surrealism and lighting quality of FLUX.1 Kontext [pro].

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent fur texture rendering on the capybara.
  • + Photorealistic lighting on the car exterior.
  • + The capybara's expression is very professional and calm.
  • Composition is too tight, obscuring the 'inside the taxi' feel and the businesswoman's phone.
  • The woman in the back is on a phone call rather than looking at her phone as requested.
  • The 'TAX' text on the hat is cut off and simplistic.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Outstanding adherence to all prompt details, including the businesswoman on her phone.
  • + Rich environmental storytelling with the 'NYC Hack License' and fare meter.
  • + Excellent internal car lighting and clear Manhattan background.
  • The capybara's paws are rendered with too many finger-like claws.
  • The capybara's hat is black/dark blue instead of the requested yellow.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner for its superior composition and detail-oriented approach, capturing the specific interaction of the businesswoman on her phone and adding creative touches like a custom 'Captain Cappy' license. While FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] has slightly more realistic fur and lighting, it fails to capture the core of the prompt by zooming in too far and missing the requested action of the passenger.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Features a very sharp and clean gothic title font.
  • + Excellent lighting on the jack-o-lantern and ground textures.
  • + Includes the requested thorn and web border clearly.
  • Includes significant hallucinated text ('Your: Vorkleat: light & Spans').
  • The scroll banner is positioned awkwardly and cuts into the background layout.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Excellent layout that fits all elements into a cohesive postcard/poster design.
  • + Perfect text accuracy for all requested fields including the date and location.
  • + High-quality 'dark parchment' aesthetic with burnt, irregular edges.
  • The jack-o-lantern carving is a bit more generic compared to Model A.
  • Background arches are a bit blurry in the distance.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner as it followed every text requirement perfectly and created a balanced, professional invitation layout. FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] produced a beautiful central image but failed significantly on text accuracy by adding nonsensical lines of jibberish.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Before After
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Provides a very thick and voluminous head of hair as requested.
  • + Maintains high resolution and clarity in the hair texture.
  • Significantly alters the person's facial structure, making them look like a different individual.
  • The hair looks a bit stylized and 'too perfect' for the rugged environment.
  • The glasses and ear shape were modified from the original.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Excellent source preservation, keeping the person's face exactly the same.
  • + The hair texture and style perfectly match the rugged, natural aesthetic of the original image.
  • + The hairline integration is seamless and realistic.
  • The hair could be considered slightly less 'full' compared to the dramatic volume in Model A, though it still meets the 'thick' requirement.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner because it successfully adds a realistic, thick head of hair while perfectly preserving the identity of the person in the source image. In contrast, FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] fails the source preservation aspect of the editing task by changing the man's facial features and glasses so much that he is no longer recognizable as the same person.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent 3D tactile cartoon aesthetic with soft PBR materials.
  • + Perfectly captures the 'minimal' request with a clean, single focus.
  • + High-quality charming typography that fits the art style.
  • The flag icon is stylized into a flag shape rather than a standard rectangular icon.
  • Rice grains look slightly more like pebbles than real rice.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Outstanding variety of sushi types and realistic textures.
  • + Perfect adherence to the flag icon and text layout requested.
  • + Very professional diorama composition with added elements like moss and chopsticks.
  • The scene is much busier than requested, ignoring the 'minimal garnish' instruction.
  • The 'cartoon' element is less pronounced, leaning more toward miniature realism.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] better captured the 'cartoon' and 'minimalist' aspects of the prompt, creating a charming and clean 3D icon style. Nano Banana 2 provided a much more complex and visually rich scene with perfect text rendering, but it missed the mark on the request for a 'minimal' setup. FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] is the likely winner for its superior balance of style and clarity.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent preservation of the source subject's features and clothing
  • + Strong stylistic consistency in the cartoon/caricature execution
  • Completely ignored the prompt instructions regarding hockey, dogs, and the profession
  • Failed to add any thematic elements requested

Nano Banana 2

  • + Successfully integrated all requested elements including hockey, dogs, and TV anchor setting
  • + Excellent caricature style with expressive features and humorous text
  • + Creative narrative integration like the 'W-K9 News' logo
  • Modifies the subject's face slightly more than Image A, though still recognizable

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] failed the editing task by ignoring all thematic requirements, providing only a stylized version of the original selfie. Nano Banana 2 followed every instruction perfectly, creating a humorous, well-composed caricature that cleverly combined dogs, hockey, and a news anchor setting while maintaining the subject's likeness.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent soft lighting and glow that matches the 'joyful wholesome vibe' perfectly.
  • + Highly expressive and cute faces that align with the big communicative eyes requested.
  • Failed to include a distinct bunny, instead creating two cats and a fox/dog hybrid.
  • The animals are mostly stationary and looking at the camera rather than chasing butterflies.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Successfully included all four distinct requested animals: puppy, kitten, bunny, and fox.
  • + Captured the 'playfully chasing' and 'tumbling' action mentioned in the prompt.
  • + Clearer 8K resolution with sharp details on the fur and wildflowers.
  • The fox's front right leg has an anatomical issue where it appears disconnected or twisted.
  • Some butterflies appear stagnant or awkwardly placed in the air.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner for prompt adherence as it successfully included all four specific animals, whereas FLUX.1 Kontext missed the bunny entirely. Nano Banana 2 also better captured the dynamic action of the animals playing, while FLUX.1 Kontext focused more on a portrait-style aesthetic with superior lighting.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent preservation of the source image's specific background architecture and composition.
  • + Strong capture of the requested Ghibli-style character linework and facial features.
  • + Accurately replicates the distinct plaid pattern of the man's shirt.
  • The woman in the foreground has slightly larger eyes than typically seen in the Ghibli aesthetic.
  • Colors are a bit flat compared to the requested 'dreamy' lighting.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Successfully incorporates more Ghibli-esque environment details like flowers and quaint architecture.
  • + Has a softer, more painterly texture consistent with the 'hand-painted' instruction.
  • + Conveys a warmer, more nostalgic color palette.
  • Significantly alters the background layout from the source image.
  • Character features are slightly less refined, particularly the hands and the squint of the man.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] is the better edit in terms of source preservation, maintaining the exact layout and clothing patterns of the original meme perfectly while applying a clean anime style. However, Nano Banana 2 better captures the 'vibe' of Studio Ghibli through its use of floral details, warm lighting, and painterly backgrounds, even though it deviates more from the original photo's environment.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Before After
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent preservation of the subject's face and original features.
  • + Subtle and realistic hair movement that feels integrated with the original pose.
  • + High visual consistency with the source image background and lighting.
  • The 'flying leaves' are very sparse and look somewhat like static green spots.
  • Less 'energetic' feel compared to the other model.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Highly dynamic and energetic interpretation of the wind through both hair and clothing.
  • + Clearly identifiable flying leaves with realistic motion blur and variety.
  • + Effective change of expression to a more energetic laugh that fits the prompt.
  • Lower fidelity in facial features compared to the source image (teeth and eyes look slightly altered).
  • Occasional artifacting around the floating leaves in the foreground.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] creates a much more faithful edit that preserves the identity of the original subject perfectly, but its motion effects are very subtle. Nano Banana 2 takes the instruction much further, delivering a truly energetic scene with significant wind effects and many flying leaves, though it loses some of the original face's detail in the process. Nano Banana 2 is the winner for better fulfilling the 'energetic and lively' specific request.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent typography rendering with perfect spelling
  • + Follows the minimalist aesthetic requested in the prompt
  • + Clean vector-style execution with subtle paper texture
  • Includes a minor spelling error 'EEST' instead of 'EST'
  • The cloche illustration is very basic compared to Model B

Nano Banana 2

  • + Highly detailed and sophisticated vintage illustration
  • + Perfect text rendering for both the name and the date
  • + Strong circular emblem composition with accurate steam and cloche details
  • Slightly less 'minimalist' than Model A, opting for a more ornate design

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, but Nano Banana 2 is the superior choice because it achieved perfect spelling across all text elements and provided a much more professional level of illustration. While FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] captured a cleaner minimalist look, it failed on the spelling of 'EST.' (writing 'EEST.') whereas Nano Banana 2 delivered a more balanced and visually interesting logo.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Clean vector illustration style
  • + Includes all requested colors from the palette
  • Nonsensical diagram logic (Saturn V colliding with Saturn, labeled Earth is the Moon)
  • Text is garbled and misplaced
  • Fails to show a clear step-by-step 1-6 sequence

Nano Banana 2

  • + Perfect adherence to the infographic structure with clear 1-6 steps
  • + Excellent text rendering for all labels including names
  • + High-quality, consistent iconography in a professional flat-vector style
  • Includes a fourth anonymous astronaut silhouette
  • Minor visual clutter with extra stars

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 followed the prompt's structural requirements perfectly, delivering a logical and highly legible infographic with crisp icons for each mission stage. In contrast, FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] produced a confusing illustration with factual errors, such as placing Saturn behind the rocket and mislabeling planetary bodies.

Next steps

Explore each model