Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] Black Forest Labs Nano Banana Google

Settled by community votes across 16 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

20.3 arena score

#41 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Nano Banana

23.8 arena score

#21 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

Nano Banana

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 16

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent adherence to all spatial instructions
  • + High resolution with realistic wood grain and material textures
  • + Logical lighting and reflections on the glass
  • The blue sphere has a felt-like texture which might be an unexpected interpretation for a sphere

Nano Banana

  • + Beautiful atmospheric lighting with visible sunbeams
  • + Correct placement of all objects
  • The glass cube looks more like a solid block of glass rather than a hollow container
  • The blue sphere appears to be floating unnaturally in the center of the block instead of resting on the bottom
  • Noticeable digital noise/artifacts in the air

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] followed the prompt more logically, creating a hollow glass cube with a sphere resting inside on the table surface. Nano Banana produced a more stylized, atmospheric image, but the physics of the cube and sphere were less believable, making it look like a solid resin block with a sphere suspended inside.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent skin texture and facial details
  • + Accurate 50mm shallow depth of field effect
  • + Captures the mood of light rain with subtle reflections
  • The man appears to be riding or holding the bike rather than repairing it
  • Missing requested motion blur from passing cars

Nano Banana

  • + Strong composition showing a full-body action for repairing
  • + Better adherence to the 'reflections on wet pavement' and 'candid street' atmosphere
  • + Successfully includes the requested motion blur on background vehicles
  • The hat choice feels slightly less natural for a rainy day scenario
  • Slightly more artificial sharpening on the pavement textures

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] creates a much more intimate portrait with superior skin textures and photographic realism, but it fails to show the man actually repairing the bike. Nano Banana better captures the full scene requested, including the 'repairing' action and the secondary technical prompts like motion blur, making it a more complete interpretation of the prompt despite slightly lower facial detail.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Extremely lifelike skin texture and lighting that feels photorealistic.
  • + Subtle and naturalistic scars and dirt that avoid being overly stylized.
  • + Superior bokeh and shallow depth of field, creating a more professional photographic look.
  • The hair braids are missing the requested 'small beads' for the most part.
  • The character looks slightly less 'battle-worn' than requested compared to the intensity of Model B.

Nano Banana

  • + Perfectly captures the 'braided with small beads' requirement in the hair.
  • + Ornate engraved plate armor is highly detailed with specific motifs like the eagle.
  • + Strong prompt adherence regarding the scars and battle-worn appearance.
  • The image has a slightly more 'digital painting' or CGI aesthetic compared to the realism of Model A.
  • The lighting on the face is a bit flat despite the torches in the background.
  • The sparks look a bit like uniform dots rather than natural embers.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] produces a significantly more realistic and cinematic portrait with sophisticated lighting and depth of field, though it missed the bead detail in the hair. Nano Banana followed the specific decorative prompts better, such as the beads and ornate engravings, but it lacks the organic, lifelike quality found in the skin and eyes of the FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] output. FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] is preferred for its superior visual quality and believable texture.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent typography rendering with crisp, bold sans-serif fonts
  • + High-quality, realistic food photography photography that looks professionally plated
  • + Clean and modern layout that feels like a real commercial menu
  • The text content is largely nonsensical gibberish despite looking visually correct
  • The food images are placed in a staggered fashion rather than a strict grid

Nano Banana

  • + Successfully follows the grid layout request for food photos
  • + Includes legible, real English words for menu items and prices
  • + Bright, vibrant color accents that enhance the casual dining feel
  • Spelling errors present such as 'APPETIERS'
  • The grid of eight photos contains items not listed in the menu below (like pancakes and burgers)
  • Some food textures in the photos appear slightly artificial

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] produces a more sophisticated and professional-looking graphic design with superior image quality, though the text is nonsensical. Nano Banana follows the grid structure prompt more closely and provides legible text, but the overall aesthetic and food photography feel less premium. FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] is the winner for its high-fidelity rendering and polished layout.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent typography with a professional neon glow effect
  • + High photographic realism in the patty and bun textures
  • + Vibrant and punchy color palette that suits a food advertisement
  • The burger is slightly separated but lacks a true 'exploded' dynamic compared to the other model
  • Failed to include the requested starburst for the price
  • Price text is repeated unnecessarily at the bottom

Nano Banana

  • + Great 'exploded' composition with ingredients dynamically suspended at various angles
  • + Accurately included the price inside a glowing starburst as requested
  • + Clean and readable text layout across all four sections
  • The 'MAGIC BURGER' text rendering is slightly less polished than the first model
  • The lighting on the lettuce looks a bit flat and less realistic

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt well, but Nano Banana is the winner for its superior composition and detail adherence, specifically the dynamic exploded view and the inclusion of the price starburst. FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] produced a more appetizing-looking burger with better text effects, but it missed several layout requirements and suffered from repetitive text.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent chalk texture and grainy detail on the letters.
  • + Perfect spelling and adherence to the layout requested in the prompt.
  • + Realistic variation in letter size and spacing characteristic of handwriting.
  • The text at the bottom contains a gibberish phrase 'Ask we ous gluten tree'.
  • The 'elegant cursive' request for the title was not fully met, as it is mostly print-style.

Nano Banana

  • + Dynamic composition and lighting within a realistic café environment.
  • + Slim, realistic chalk-style handwriting that feels authentic to the surface.
  • + Included decorative flourishes like the chalk dividers.
  • The final menu item text is slightly cut off at the edge of the board.
  • Perspective makes the text at the far end of the board harder to read.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] followed the prompt more precisely regarding specific item prices and text content, but it failed at the bottom with garbled text. Nano Banana provided a much more aesthetically pleasing and atmospheric 'cozy café' composition, though it struggled slightly with the spatial placement of the text on the board.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Exceptional high-resolution detail on the capybara's fur and whiskers
  • + Accurate depiction of the taxi driver uniform requested
  • + Great lighting and reflections on the yellow car exterior
  • The person in the back seat is not looking at a phone as requested
  • The capybara only has one paw clearly on the steering wheel

Nano Banana

  • + Excellent adherence to the passenger's action, clearly showing her looking at a phone
  • + Captures a very realistic 'bored' expression on the passenger
  • + Composition clearly shows the relationship between driver and passenger
  • The passenger appears to be in the front passenger seat rather than the back seat
  • The capybara's paws look somewhat like human hands with fur rather than natural paws

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] creates a more visually stunning and high-quality image with impressive textures, but it fails to include the specific action of the passenger looking at a phone. Nano Banana followed the character instructions more accurately regarding the passenger's expression and phone usage, though the spatial logic of placing the passenger in the front seat deviates from the 'back seat' prompt instruction.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent typography with a professional gothic font style.
  • + Superior rendering of the fine web and thorn border details.
  • + Highly atmospheric cinematic lighting on the jack-o-lantern.
  • Includes a line of gibberish text in the middle of the event details.
  • The dark background is slightly less like 'parchment' and more like a textured dark void.

Nano Banana

  • + Perfectly renders the 'dark parchment' texture around the edges.
  • + Includes all requested text elements accurately without hallucinations.
  • + Strong adherence to the border of webs and thorns, creating a thick, bushy frame.
  • The 'Halloween Party Invitation' text is slightly warped along a curve.
  • The lighting is a bit flatter and less 'cinematic' compared to the other model.

Verdict: Nano Banana is the winner because it successfully followed all text instructions without adding nonsensical content, whereas FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] included a line of gibberish. While FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] had more polished typography and lighting, Nano Banana's adherence to the parchment texture and accurate event details makes it a more functional invitation.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Before After
Nano Banana

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Successfully added a dense head of hair that follows the head shape well.
  • + Preserves the overall lighting and environment of the original photo.
  • Significantly altered the facial features, making the eyes smaller and changing the nose shape.
  • The hairline integration appears a bit harsh and unnatural at the forehead.

Nano Banana

  • + Excellent preservation of the original facial features, including the eyes, nose, and expression.
  • + The hair texture and style look very natural and well-integrated into the scene.
  • + Maintains the original skin texture and fine details of the face better than the competitor.
  • Slightly altered the shape of the glasses frame.
  • Some minor artifacts where the hair meets the background bushes on the right side.

Verdict: Nano Banana is the clear winner because it successfully applied the requested edit while maintaining high source preservation of the subject's face. FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] failed to preserve the facial features, essentially generating a new person that loosely resembles the original, whereas Nano Banana kept the subject's identity intact with a much more realistic hairstyle.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent typography with a charming 3D cartoon style
  • + Superior PBR material rendering on the salmon and plate
  • + Perfectly follows the request for a small diorama base
  • The rice texture looks more like pearls than grains
  • The flag icon is stylized as a waving banner rather than a simple icon

Nano Banana

  • + Features a more variety of sushi types
  • + Very clean and accurate Japanese flag icon
  • + Strict adherence to the 45° isometric perspective
  • Text lacks the requested cartoonish style and feels like a simple overlay
  • Text layout is slightly off-center to the left
  • The diorama base is a bit cluttered compared to the 'minimal' request

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] captures the requested '3D cartoon' aesthetic much better through its cohesive lighting and playful typography. While Nano Banana offers more variety in the sushi itself and a very clean flag, its text looks flat and disconnected from the 3D scene, making the overall composition less polished than FLUX.1 Kontext [pro].

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Successfully converts the image into a cartoon caricature style.
  • + Preserves the subject's outfit and pose from the original image.
  • Completely ignored the request to include her job as a TV anchor, her love for dogs, and hockey.
  • Misses the 'exaggerated and humorous' aspect of a caricature, opting for a generic avatar style.

Nano Banana

  • + Excellent adherence to all prompt details, incorporating dogs, hockey, and a TV anchor setup.
  • + Creative storytelling with humorous details like the 'Dogs vs Cats' scoreboard and dogs in the arena.
  • + Strong caricature style with exaggerated features that still resemble the original subject.
  • The subject's outfit was changed from the original denim shirt to a news anchor suit, though this fits the prompt better.

Verdict: Nano Banana followed every part of the complex prompt, successfully merging the subject's likeness with the requested themes of hockey, dogs, and TV news into a cohesive, funny caricature. FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] only changed the art style into a cartoon, completely failing to add the requested thematic elements or the humor typical of a caricature.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent photographic lighting with realistic bloom and soft focus bokeh
  • + High fidelity fur textures and naturalistic animal anatomy
  • Failed to include a distinct bunny, providing a second cat-like creature with long ears instead
  • Animals are mostly sitting rather than tumbling or chasing

Nano Banana

  • + Correctly included all four requested animals: golden retriever, tabby kitten, bunny, and fox kit
  • + Better adherence to the dynamic action of tumbling and playing
  • + Beautifully rendered god rays and dew sparkles on the flowers
  • The fox kit has an anatomical issue with its tail merging oddly into its body
  • Slightly more 'digital art' look compared to the requested hyper-photorealism

Verdict: Nano Banana followed the prompt much more successfully by including all four distinct animals (golden retriever, tabby, bunny, and fox), whereas FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] missed the bunny entirely. While FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] has slightly more realistic photographic lighting, Nano Banana captures the spirit of the 'tumbling' and 'wholesome joyful vibe' much better.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Perfectly captures the Studio Ghibli art style with hand-painted watercolor textures.
  • + Maintains the exact composition and core character identities of the source image.
  • + Follows the prompt instructions for soft pastel colors and a nostalgic mood perfectly.
  • The facial expression of the girlfriend (right) is slightly softened compared to the intensity in the source.

Nano Banana

  • + Preserves the source image perfectly, though it fails the edit instructions.
  • Completely failed to apply the requested artistic style transformation.
  • Zero visible change from the original photo beyond perhaps a slight shift in saturation.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] successfully transformed the 'distracted boyfriend' meme into a high-quality Ghibli-esque illustration while keeping the original composition recognizable. Nano Banana failed the task entirely, returning the original photo without any meaningful artistic changes.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Before After
Nano Banana

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent preservation of the woman's face and original features.
  • + Highly realistic hair physics showing wind interaction from multiple directions.
  • + Subtle and natural-looking flying leaves that integrate well into the depth of the scene.
  • The position of the woman's left hand has shifted significantly from the original.
  • The dog's tail loses some definition compared to the source.

Nano Banana

  • + Stronger visual emphasis on the 'flying leaves' part of the prompt with vibrant autumn colors.
  • + Good wind effect on the hair that maintains a consistent direction.
  • Significant distortion of the woman's face, losing the likeness of the original subject.
  • The dog's face and eyes have been noticeably altered/distorted.
  • The leaves appear as flat overlays rather than being integrated into the scene's lighting and depth.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] is the superior model because it successfully adds the requested dynamic motion while maintaining the identity and facial structure of the woman in the source image. Although Nano Banana followed the leaf instruction more aggressively, it failed the core requirement of source preservation by distorting the faces of both the woman and the dog.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent typography with correct accents and alignment
  • + Strong adherence to the minimalist vector style
  • + Subtle paper-like texture adds to the vintage feel
  • Steam icon is somewhat thick and abstract

Nano Banana

  • + Elegant hand-lettered aesthetic
  • + Ornate decorative borders enhance the vintage theme
  • + Accurate text rendering and 'Est. 1720' banner implementation
  • Steam is represented by thin flourishes that could be mistaken for wire or ornament
  • Less 'minimalist' than requested due to the complex flourishes

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] followed the 'minimalist' part of the prompt more effectively, delivering a clean, punchy vector logo with perfectly legible type. Nano Banana opted for a more ornate, decorative approach which looks beautiful and captures the 'vintage' spirit well, but is slightly less successful in conveying clear 'steam' and minimalism. Both models handled the text and specific dates perfectly.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Nano Banana

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Strong artistic vector style with a dynamic composition.
  • + Follows the NASA-inspired color palette effectively.
  • + High-quality rendering of the main Saturn V rocket.
  • Fails to follow the requested 6-step structure.
  • Nonsensical celestial elements like Saturn's rings being placed on a rocket and the Moon.
  • Confused logic with numbering and text placement.

Nano Banana

  • + Perfect adherence to the requested 6-step infographic structure.
  • + Excellent text rendering for headers, sub-headers, and labels.
  • + Very clean, consistent iconography and modern flat layout.
  • Skips step 5 in the numbering (jumps from 4 to 6).
  • A minor typo in 'Armstrong' (rendered as Armsrong).

Verdict: Nano Banana is the clear winner as it successfully interprets the 'infographic' request with a clear, logical horizontal flow and consistent iconography for each mission step. While FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] produces a more visually dramatic illustration, it fails to deliver the requested structured data format and includes confusing visual errors like Saturn-like rings on the rocket and moon.

Next steps

Explore each model