Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] Black Forest Labs FLUX.2 [dev] Flash fal

Settled by community votes across 17 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

20.3 arena score

#41 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

27.0 arena score

#7 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 17

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent adherence to lighting instructions with a soft, natural window glow.
  • + The glass cube has very clean, sharp geometry.
  • + High resolution and clear textures on the wooden table.
  • The blue sphere appears to be floating unnaturally within the cube.
  • The sphere has a fuzzy, felt-like texture rather than appearing as a solid material.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + The blue sphere is correctly grounded on the bottom of the cube with realistic reflections.
  • + Authentic glass rendering with slight imperfections and realistic thickness.
  • + The red book looks very realistic with detailed spine text texture.
  • The glass plant behind the cube is slightly cluttered.
  • The lighting is a bit more directional and less 'soft' compared to the other model.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt instructions perfectly, including the specific spatial arrangement of objects. FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] produced a cleaner, more minimalist aesthetic, while FLUX.2 [dev] Flash provided superior realism in regarding how the sphere sits inside the glass and how light interacts with the materials.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent skin texture and realistic facial detail
  • + Highly cinematic lighting and bokeh
  • + Effective atmospheric rain effects
  • The man appears to be riding or holding the bike rather than 'repairing' it
  • Lack of 'motion blur' on background cars as requested

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Follows the 'repairing' action more accurately with tools and posture
  • + Includes motion blur on background vehicles as requested
  • + Composition feels more 'candid' and busy like a real street photo
  • The bike frame geometry and basket structure are slightly warped
  • Rain looks a bit more like static noise than individual streaks
  • Background highlights are a bit harsh/blown out

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] produces a much more beautiful and high-quality portrait with superior skin textures, but it fails to show the man actually repairing the bike. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash captures the specific actions of the prompt better, including the tools and motion blur, making it the more accurate interpretation of the requested scene despite slightly lower aesthetic refinement.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent skin texture and realistic, lifelike eyes.
  • + Subtle and sophisticated leather/cloth texture rendering.
  • + Highly aesthetic lighting with natural-looking warm highlights on the metal.
  • Missed the request for beads in the hair braids.
  • Armor engraving is slightly soft in comparison to Model B.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Perfect adherence to specific details like hair beads and multiple scars.
  • + Stronger depiction of 'battle-worn' through visible blood and dirt.
  • + Complex layers of armor, leather straps, and mail are very detailed.
  • Slightly more 'digital' or artificial look to the skin and hair.
  • Lighting is more flat and less atmospheric than the competitor.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] produces a more cinematic and realistic portrait with superior lighting and skin shaders, but it missed the specific detail of beads in the hair. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash followed the technical prompt constraints more closely, including the beads and scars, but has a slightly more artificial 'video game' texture quality compared to the more lifelike FLUX.1 Kontext [pro].

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent typographic clarity with legible headings.
  • + Clean, professional layout that accurately follows the requested sections.
  • + Very high-quality food photography that fits the minimalist aesthetic.
  • Menu text is mostly gibberish.
  • The food items under the pizza section include a salad-like appetizer instead of a pizza.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Strong use of vibrant color accents through frames and borders.
  • + Captures the 'grid' aspect of the food photos better than Model A.
  • + Includes realistic price formatting.
  • The typography is cluttered and contains significant artifacts.
  • Section headings are poorly placed and overlapping with photos.
  • Significant text distortion in the header area.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] produced a much more realistic and professional-looking menu with superior typography and high-end visual polish. While FLUX.2 [dev] Flash better interpreted the request for a grid of photos, it suffered from messy text rendering and poor section placement that made the menu unreadable.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent photorealistic texture on the bun and meat patty
  • + Strong, vibrant glowing effects on the main title text
  • + High visual impact with dynamic fire and embers
  • Failed to include the starburst element for the price
  • Repeated the price information unnecessarily
  • The burger components are closely stacked rather than truly 'exploded'

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Followed all layout instructions including the starburst for the price
  • + Superior 'exploded' effect with clear separation between all ingredients
  • + Excellent fiery text effect that matches the theme perfectly
  • The lighting on the cheese looks a bit flat and plastic compared to the rest of the image
  • Smaller scale for the price makes it slightly less prominent as an offer

Verdict: While FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] has slightly more realistic food textures, FLUX.2 [dev] Flash followed the negative and positive constraints much better, specifically regarding the 'exploded' nature of the burger and the inclusion of the price in a starburst. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash feels like a more complete advertisement design that strictly adheres to the prompt's layout requirements.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent text legibility and spelling throughout.
  • + Strong chalk texture realism within the lettering.
  • Failed the request for 'elegant cursive' for the title, using more of a printed style.
  • Contains a spelling error in the final sentence ('four' instead of 'for').
  • Composition is a bit plain and tightly cropped.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Successfully captured the 'elegant cursive' style for the title and menu headers.
  • + Excellent environmental context that feels like a cozy café.
  • + Superior chalkboard texture with realistic smears and dusting.
  • Repetitive text rendering on the price for the cookies ($9 is listed twice).
  • Smaller text at the bottom begins to lose the handwritten quality compared to the top.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is the winner because it followed the specific stylistic instruction for 'elegant cursive' handwriting, whereas FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] used a standard print-style font. Additionally, FLUX.2 [dev] Flash provided a much better atmosphere and more realistic chalkboard imperfections, despite a minor repetition error in the text.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Perfect adherence to the complex prompt requirement of the 'horse on top'.
  • + Highly creative and surreal interpretation with an astronaut riding an astronaut.
  • + Excellent cinematic lighting and texture on the spacesuits.
  • The small astronaut silhouette riding the horse is a bit blurry.
  • The horse's front legs merging into the astronaut's back is slightly messy.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Clean, high-quality rendering of the horse and astronaut.
  • + Beautiful background with detailed planets and space dust.
  • + Good anatomical proportions for both horse and astronaut.
  • Failed the core 'horse on top' instruction, providing a standard 'astronaut on horse' image.
  • Less surreal and more generic interpretation of the prompt.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] is the clear winner because it successfully followed the difficult 'horse on top' instruction, creating a surreal image where a horse (being ridden by a small astronaut) is itself riding a larger astronaut. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash ignored the spatial requirement and produced a conventional, though high-quality, image of an astronaut riding a horse.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent fur texture and lighting on the capybara.
  • + The passenger has a very realistic, bored expression as requested.
  • The passenger is holding a phone to her ear or face rather than looking down at it.
  • Only one paw is clearly visible on the steering wheel.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Stronger prompt adherence with both paws on the steering wheel.
  • + Captures the businesswoman looking down at her phone with a bored expression perfectly.
  • + Better composition that shows more of the taxi environment and Manhattan background.
  • The capybara's paws look slightly more like bird talons or claws than actual capybara feet.
  • The passenger appears to be sitting in the front seat or middle, rather than the back seat.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash follows the specific prompt instructions more closely, notably placing both paws on the wheel and having the passenger look at her phone. While FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] has slightly better texture on the capybara's fur, FLUX.2 [dev] Flash provides a more engaging composition that captures the surrealism of the scene more effectively.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent typography with clean, sharp gothic fonts.
  • + Deep, contrasty cinematic lighting that feels professional.
  • + Complex and detailed spiderweb decorative border.
  • Includes some hallucinated gibberish text in the event details section.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Stronger adherence to the 'thorns' element in the border design.
  • + Good parchment texture and balanced composition.
  • + Includes bats and twisted trees with high clarity.
  • The text rendering in the lower section contains significant gibberish and broken symbols.
  • Overall lighting is flatter compared to the other model.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt well, but FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] produced a more polished and visually striking result with superior lighting and sharper typography. While both models struggled slightly with the small text in the middle of the details block, FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] managed the specific date and location information with better legibility.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Before After
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Successfully added a realistic head of hair that matches the beard color.
  • + Maintained excellent fidelity to the original background and lighting.
  • Significantly altered facial features, making the person look like a younger/different individual.
  • The hair texture appears slightly overly groomed for the rugged setting.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Perfectly preserved the original face, glasses, and expression.
  • + Source preservation of the background and clothing is highly accurate.
  • The hairstyle choice (large afro) feels slightly less natural in the context of the forehead blending.
  • The hairline looks somewhat 'stuck on' rather than growing naturally from the forehead.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is the winner for its superior source preservation, keeping the subject's face identical to the source image, whereas FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] creates a completely different face. While FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] has a smoother hairline, the facial changes make it fail the primary goal of an image edit.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent typography style that matches the 3D cartoon aesthetic.
  • + Superior texture work on the salmon and rice, giving it a high-quality PBR feel.
  • + Playful 3D interpretation of the flag icon that integrates well with the text.
  • The sushi rice grains are slightly oversized, looking more like pearls than rice.
  • The text placement is slightly lower than 'top-center' compared to pure graphic design standards.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Perfect adherence to the 45-degree isometric perspective.
  • + Highly realistic textures for the seaweed (nori) and tuna.
  • + Clean and professional graphic design for the text and flag.
  • The text is a flat 2D overlay which clashes slightly with the 3D scene below it.
  • The arrangement of the three sushi pieces is slightly cramped on the plate.

Verdict: Both models performed exceptionally well, but FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] captures the '3D cartoon scene' aesthetic more cohesively by styling the text to match the 3D objects. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash provides a more accurate isometric angle and realistic food textures, but the flat typography feels less integrated into the miniature diorama.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Captures the user's likeness well in a simplified comic style.
  • + Preserves the original clothing and pose.
  • Completely fails to include the requested profession (TV anchor), dogs, or hockey elements.
  • The style is a standard illustration rather than a humorous caricature.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent adherence to all prompt elements including TV anchor desk, dogs, and hockey jerseys/sticks.
  • + Features a classic 'big head' caricature style that is exaggerated and humorous.
  • + Great visual composition that integrates all themes into one scene.
  • The facial likeness is slightly more generic than the source image.
  • Includes some minor AI artifacts in the background text and details.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] completely ignored the core requirements of the prompt, failing to add any of the requested thematic elements like dogs or hockey. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash successfully created a detailed, humorous caricature that perfectly blended the user's likeness with her profession and hobbies.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Beautiful warm lighting with distinct god rays and a soft morning glow.
  • + Excellent fur texture and cohesive color palette that feels very 'wholesome'.
  • + Captures the 'tumbling/playing' request well with expressive mouths and joyful eyes.
  • The anatomy of the middle animals is slightly confused, appearing more like cat-bunny hybrids.
  • The butterflies are less detailed and somewhat blended into the background glow.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Successfully includes all four distinct animal types with clearer anatomical separation.
  • + Highly detailed butterflies with realistic wing patterns.
  • + Excellent execution of the 'dew sparkles' on the grass and flowers.
  • Several animals have extra limbs or tail-like appendages emerging from the wrong places.
  • The kitten's facial expression is slightly more rigid compared to the others.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] captures the overall mood and lighting much better, creating a cohesive, warm image that perfectly fits the 'wholesome' vibe, despite some anatomical blending between the kitten and bunny. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash provides more distinct species and better dew details, but suffers from significant anatomical errors (extra legs and tails) that detract from the photorealism. FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] is the preferred winner for its superior artistic composition and lighting.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent preservation of the source image composition and street background.
  • + Captures the iconic Studio Ghibli cel-shaded character style with clean line art.
  • + Maintains the distinct facial expressions of all three subjects accurately.
  • Texture feels a bit more like a digital drawing than a traditional hand-painted watercolor.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Beautifully soft, dreamy color palette with nostalgic lighting.
  • + Hand-painted watercolor texture is very prominent and fits the Ghibli aesthetic well.
  • + Substantially changes the background to a whimsical field, adhering to the 'dreamy' prompt.
  • Loss of structural detail in the background street scene which was part of the original composition.
  • The face of the woman in red is softened to the point of appearing unrelated to the source.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] is the winner for its expert balance of preserving the original 'Distracted Boyfriend' meme's composition while perfectly applying a clean Ghibli-esque character style. While FLUX.2 [dev] Flash produces a very pretty, painterly image with a more 'dreamy' background, it loses the specific urban context and iconic facial expressions found in the source image.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
Before After
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Excellent preservation of the original subjects' faces and clothing
  • + Natural hair movement that looks physically plausible
  • + Subtle but effective addition of falling leaves
  • The leash handle shape was slightly altered from the original

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Very dramatic hair movement that significantly conveys the wind prompt
  • + Abundant falling leaves throughout the frame
  • + Maintains the likeness of the woman and dog well
  • The hair movement looks somewhat artificial and symmetrical
  • Some leaves overlap the subjects in a slightly messy way

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] provided a more realistic and grounded edit, perfectly preserving the identity while adding subtle motion. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash went much further with the 'energetic and lively' request, creating a more dramatic visual impact with the hair and leaves, though it looks slightly more like a composite. FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] is the winner for its seamless integration and better preservation of the source image's integrity.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Perfect text rendering of the brand name
  • + Strong vector emblem aesthetic with clean lines
  • + Matches the minimalist requirement well
  • Includes a spelling error 'EEST' instead of 'EST'
  • The banner feels slightly disconnected from the main text

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent vintage texture and paper grain effect
  • + Dynamic and integrated composition with the banner
  • + Accurate spelling of all requested text
  • Large highlight on the cloche dome slightly breaks the minimalist feel
  • Text alignment within the banner is a bit tight on the edges

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] creates a very clean, professional vector logo but fails on a basic spelling check in the banner. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash captures the vintage atmosphere more effectively with superior textures, better integration of elements, and correct spelling.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

  • + Strong artistic composition with a clear 'big picture' trajectory.
  • + Excellent implementation of the requested flat-vector style and color palette.
  • + High-quality rendering of the Saturn V rocket illustration.
  • Confused scientific logic, such as Saturn rings around the Moon and rocket tip.
  • Fails to follow the sequential numbered steps requested in the prompt.
  • Text labels are cluttered and nonsensical in placement.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Successfully follows the requested infographic structure and step-by-step logic.
  • + High text legibility and better adherence to specific technical icons like the Lunar Module.
  • + Effective use of 'supporting details' by including portraits of the crew members.
  • Some overlapping text and graphical artifacts in the 'Launch' and 'Lunar Orbit' sections.
  • Visual style is a bit more 'cluttered clip-art' compared to the clean aesthetic of the competitor.
  • Repeating the label 'Lunar Orbit' and 'Descent' multiple times.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] produces a more visually stunning, artistic poster, but fails significantly on the 'infographic' requirement by placing rings around the moon and ignoring the requested step sequence. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash follows the prompt's structural instructions much more accurately, providing a clear sequence of events and recognizable mission components, despite some minor text layering issues. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is the preferred choice for a functional infographic.

Next steps

Explore each model