FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] Black Forest Labs vs FLUX.2 [dev] Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Excellent photographic quality and soft lighting consistent with the window source.
• + Perfect adherence to the spatial arrangement of all objects.
• + The glass cube has realistic, thin bevels and clear transparency.

• − The blue sphere has an unusual felt-like texture rather than appearing as a standard smooth sphere.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + The blue sphere has a realistic glossy finish with convincing reflections.
• + Accurate interpretation of the plant being partially visible through the glass.

• − The glass cube appears excessively thick and has some slight distortion on the bottom edges.
• − The lighting on the cube's top surface is slightly inconsistent with the red book's shadow.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Excellent depiction of raining atmosphere with soft lighting
• + Very natural, non-plastic skin texture on the subject

• − Subject is just holding the bicycle rather than repairing it
• − Background cars are static rather than showing requested motion blur

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Captures the 'repairing' action with accurate hand interaction
• + Effectively incorporates motion blur from passing cars as requested
• + Better pavement reflections and wet-weather gear textures

• − Minor anatomical artifacts on the subject's fingers
• − The framing is slightly more centered than the 'imperfect framing' requested

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Natural and lifelike facial features with realistic skin texture.
• + Elegant and intricate metal engravings that look physically grounded.
• + Sophisticated lighting that feels integrated into the scene.

• − Missed the request for beads in the hair.
• − The 'battle-worn' elements, like scars and dirt, are very faint and understated.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent adherence to the 'hair braided with small beads' prompt.
• + Strong execution of the 'battle-worn' theme with clear scars and dirt.
• + Dynamic secondary lighting and bokeh sparks enhance the atmosphere.

• − The leather straps appear to float slightly above the armor without realistic weight.
• − The face has a slightly airbrushed quality compared to the more natural appearance of the other model.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Excellent typography with clean, bold sans-serif fonts
• + The layout is highly professional and balanced
• + Good adherence to the minimalist aesthetic

• − The content mismatch (a pizza under 'Mains' and salad under 'Pizza') makes the menu nonsensical
• − Food photography is slightly inconsistent in lighting

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Successfully incorporates a larger grid of food photos
• + Uses vibrant color accents as requested
• + Includes more realistic pricing and section dividers

• − The text is largely gibberish and has poor font rendering
• − Some food images are repetitive or look generic
• − The layout feels slightly cluttered for a minimalist design

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Excellent typography with a glowing neon effect
• + High-quality texture on the burger patty and bun
• + Very effective use of embers and smoke for atmosphere

• − Repeated the price text twice, which was not requested
• − Failed to include the starburst element for the price
• − The burger is less 'exploded' and more of a standard stack

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Perfect adherence to the exploded layout with clear separation
• + Included the requested starburst element for the price
• + Accurate text rendering without unnecessary repetitions

• − The bun and cheese have a slightly plastic, less photorealistic appearance
• − The lettuce looks somewhat artificial compared to the other image

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Excellent text legibility and accuracy across all menu items.
• + Consistent chalk texture that looks realistic and physically applied.
• + Composition is balanced and mimics a professional cafe A-frame board.

• − The handwriting style is a bit rigid and looks slightly more digital than Model B.
• − One minor typo in the footer text: 'foiur' instead of 'for'.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Beautiful, authentic cursive chalk style that better captures the 'elegant cursive' prompt requirement.
• + Highly realistic chalkboard texture with smudges and dust that adds character.
• + Correct spelling throughout all menu items and footer.

• − Slight visual artifact on the second line near 'with' where text is blurred.
• − The spacing at the bottom of the board is a bit cramped compared to the top.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Perfectly adheres to the challenging 'horse on top' prompt instruction
• + Excellent surrealist composition with double cinematic layering
• + Creative interpretation where a smaller astronaut is riding the horse which is riding a larger astronaut

• − Anatomical glitch where the large astronaut's legs end in hooves
• − The smaller astronaut's posture is a bit stiff

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + High visual quality with vibrant nebula colors
• + Good lighting and shadows on the horse's coat

• − Completely failed the specific 'horse on top' prompt instruction
• − Generic interpretation of a common trope
• − Astronaut's hand and reins are slightly muddled

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Excellent close-up texture on the capybara's fur.
• + Realistic lighting and shadows that integrate the subjects well into the car interior.

• − The passenger is holding two phones or has a distorted hand gesture that doesn't clearly show her 'looking at her phone'.
• − Only one paw is clearly visible on the steering wheel, despite the prompt asking for both.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Perfect adherence to the prompt, showing both paws on the wheel and the passenger clearly looking at her phone.
• + Better composition that captures both the driver and the passenger in a balanced frame.
• + The Manhattan street lights in the background are more descriptive and atmospheric.

• − The capybara's paws look slightly more like human hands/fingers rather than distinct animal paws.
• − The taxi cap has a slightly less realistic 'T' logo compared to the 'TAXI' text in Model A.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Excellent typography with a classic gothic feel
• + Highly detailed and intricate spider web border
• + Strong atmospheric lighting around the jack-o-lantern

• − Includes hallucinations in the text like 'Vorkleat: Iight & Spans'
• − Parchment texture is less evident compared to the other model

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Perfect text accuracy with no spelling errors or hallucinations
• + Distinct 'dark parchment' texture around the edges
• + The thorns requested in the prompt are more visible and clearly defined in the border

• − The jack-o-lantern rendering is a bit flatter and more illustrative
• − Graphic composition is slightly less balanced with text crowded at the bottom

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Successfully added a thick, styled head of hair.
• + Matches the hair color well to the existing beard.
• + Maintains the overall lighting of the scene.

• − Significantly altered the facial structure, making the person look like a different individual.
• − The hairline looks slightly artificial and sits too high on the forehead.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Perfectly preserved the original facial features and glasses of the subject.
• + Excellent integration of the new hair texture with the existing beard.
• + Preserved the background and clothing exactly.

• − The choice of an afro-style haircut is a stylistic leap that may not be what was intended by 'natural hair' for this subject.
• − The hair density seems almost too uniform at the edges.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Excellent typography style that matches the cartoon aesthetic
• + High-quality textures on the salmon and rice
• + Superior use of the wood-style diorama base

• − The flag icon is stylized into a flag shape rather than a standard flag icon
• − The rice grains are overly large and bulbous

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Provides a more diverse variety of sushi as requested
• + Clean, accurate flag icon rendering
• + Precise centering and layout of the elements

• − The text is a bit plain and lacks the '3D cartoon' character of the scene
• − Visual textures feel slightly more flat compared to model A

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Successfully captures the likeness and pose of the subject in a stylized comic/caricature format.

• − Completely fails to include the requested profession, dogs, or hockey elements.
• − The edit is a simple filter-like transition rather than a thematic caricature.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Excellent adherence to all prompt elements including TV anchor desk, hockey rink setting, and multiple dogs.
• + Captures the classic 'big head' caricature style while maintaining a recognizable likeness of the source image.
• + Humorous and detailed composition that incorporates all requested themes.

• − Text on the desk is garbled/nonsensical.
• − Some minor anatomical issues with the extra character in the top left.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Excellent golden hour lighting with clear rays and consistent backlighting
• + Beautifully rendered soft fur textures that feel tactile
• + Expressive and joyful facial expressions across all animals

• − The 'bunny' is clearly just a white kitten with slightly pointier ears
• − The animals are sitting rather than playfully chasing and tumbling
• − Anatomically confused faces on the middle two animals

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Successfully includes all four distinct species: puppy, kitten, bunny, and fox
• + Much more realistic animal anatomy and detailed fur on the fox and rabbits
• + Better adherence to the 'dew sparkles' requirement in the foreground grass

• − The lighting, while warm, lacks the dramatic 'god rays' requested in the prompt
• − The animals are mostly static and looking at the butterflies rather than 'tumbling'

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Excellent preservation of the original city street background and composition.
• + Perfect capture of the 'Distracted Boyfriend' meme expressions in an anime style.
• + Hand-painted watercolor texture feels very authentic to Ghibli concept art.

• − The red dress is a bit saturated compared to the 'pastel' request.
• − The woman in the foreground is slightly more focused than the original's bokeh effect.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Successfully applied soft pastel colors and a dreamy atmosphere.
• + Beautiful floral background that aligns well with specific Ghibli tropes.
• + Soft light and color grading perfectly match the requested mood.

• − Fails to preserve the source image's urban environment.
• − The facial expressions are significantly dulled compared to the source meme's high-drama reactions.
• − The man's face looks slightly older and less like the source subject than Model A.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Excellent source preservation, maintaining the woman's face and the dog's features almost perfectly.
• + Natural-looking hair movement that feels consistent with the breeze.

• − The 'flying leaves' elements are very sparse and barely noticeable.
• − The overall sense of 'dynamic motion' is somewhat subtle.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Stronger adherence to the 'energetic and lively' prompt with a high volume of flying leaves.
• + Dramatic hair movement that clearly conveys wind.

• − Significant loss of detail in the woman's face compared to the source image.
• − The background leaves appear slightly flat or pasted-on in some areas.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Excellent typography with a perfect accent mark on the letter E.
• + Clean, professional-looking banner with clear numbering.
• + Strong texture that mimics vintage paper or linen.

• − Includes a minor spelling error, 'EEST.' instead of 'EST.'
• − The steam icon looks slightly detached from the cloche knob.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Sophisticated banner integration with double layers and decorative flourishes.
• + Accurate spelling of 'EST.'
• + Well-balanced composition with refined linework on the cloche dome.

• − The accent mark on 'CAFFÈ' is a bit clunky and placed poorly relative to the letter shape.
• − The text on the banner is slightly warped to follow the curve, making it less legible than a flat font.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Successfully captures a clean vector style with a unified composition.
• + Adheres strictly to the navy, white, and muted red NASA palette.
• + Includes the requested 1-6 step sequence in a flowchart-like manner.

• − Confusing orbital logic, placing Saturn (the planet) at the top of the rocket.
• − The sequence labels are scattered and non-linear, making the infographic hard to read.
• − Text labels are occasionally nonsensical like '2, t ar Collins'.

FLUX.2 [dev]

• + Strong iconography that clearly represents each stage of the mission.
• + Excellent layout that functions well as a grid-based infographic poster.
• + Text rendering is significantly cleaner and more legible for the main headers.

• − Failed to follow the requested 6-step sequence, providing 9 icons with some repetition.
• − Minor spelling errors in smaller text like 'Trarquility' and 'LUREST'.
• − Instructional text remains in the image (e.g., 'SATURN ICON').