FLUX.1 [dev] Black Forest Labs vs Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium Stability AI

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent photorealistic rendering of glass and light reflections
• + Accurate perspective and object placement
• + High detail in the texture of the book and wooden table

• − The glass structure is more of a hollow pedestal than a simple solid cube

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Accurately places the plant behind the glass as requested in the prompt
• + Correctly identifies all prompt elements

• − Noticeable artifacts on the glass edges and floating sphere
• − Lighting is somewhat flat and overexposed in the background
• − The sphere lacks high-quality refraction and texture compared to the other model

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent anatomical realism in the man's face and hands.
• + High-quality rendering of textures, especially the leather jacket and wet pavement.
• + Accurate interpretation of shallow depth of field and soft bokeh.

• − The motion blur on the passing car is quite subtle compared to the request.
• − The man appears to be holding the bike rather than actively repairing it.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Stronger 'candid' feel with a more dynamic, imperfect composition.
• + Colors and lighting feel very cinematic, especially the red reflections on the wet street.
• + Captures the atmosphere of light rain and street activity effectively.

• − Noticeable anatomical distortion in the hands and how they grip the bike.
• − The bicycle's geometry is physically inconsistent, especially near the handlebars and seat.
• − Lack of fine detail in the man's facial features compared to Model A.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent skin texture with realistic pores and subtle freckles.
• + Intense, lifelike eye rendering with clear reflections.
• + Clean composition with professional-looking bokeh.

• − Failed to include 'small beads' in the hair braids.
• − Armor lacks the 'ornate engraved' level of detail requested, appearing more like plain hammered metal.
• − Skin appears too clean and modeled for a 'battle-worn' character.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Successfully incorporated small beads into the complex braided hair.
• + Superior adherence to 'battle-worn' prompt with visible dirt and faint scars.
• + Highly detailed ornate engraving on the plate armor and visible leather/cloth textures.

• − Skin texture on the forehead is slightly blotchy and looks more like digital noise than natural dirt.
• − The warm torchlight is a bit overexposed on the cheek, losing some facial detail.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent typographic hierarchy and legibility
• + Very clean and professional white space management
• + High-quality realistic food images that feel consistent

• − Missed the 'grid' requirement for food photos
• − Did not include a specific 'pizza' section label

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Successfully implemented a grid layout for food photos
• + Includes multiple food items as requested

• − Text is largely illegible and uses stylized, inconsistent fonts
• − Layout feels cluttered and less 'minimalist' than requested
• − Pricing and text alignment are messy and unrealistic

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent 'exploded' view with clear separation of all burger elements.
• + Accurate rendering of the secondary text and price.
• + Clean, professional composition with a magical, starry atmosphere.

• − Completely failed to include the primary title 'MAGIC BURGER'.
• − Lacks the requested fiery starburst for the price.
• − The background is more starry than fiery as requested.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Successfully integrated all requested text strings including 'MAGIC BURGER'.
• + Includes a starburst graphic for the price as requested.
• + Vibrant fiery background matches the requested aesthetic well.

• − Failed to provide an 'exploded' burger, showing a mostly intact levitating burger instead.
• − Slight text distortion on 'ONLY'.
• − Lower realism on the burger textures compared to Model A.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent text rendering with almost 100% accuracy to the prompt's requested menu items.
• + The chalk texture looks authentic with realistic dust and varying stroke pressure.
• + Strong composition that maintains a clean, readable café aesthetic.

• − The writing style is a bit too uniform, appearing slightly more like a digital font than natural handwriting in some sections.
• − Minor spelling artifacts in the bottom disclaimer text like 'drish' instead of 'fresh'.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + High level of chalk realism with smudge marks and textured eraser lines.
• + Captured the 'cursive' element of the prompt more aggressively than its competitor.

• − Complete failure in text legibility, with most words being gibberish or heavily misspelled.
• − Did not follow the requested date or price format specified in the prompt.
• − The layout is messy and cluttered, making it look like a rough sketch rather than a professional menu board.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent anatomical rendering of both the horse and the astronaut.
• + Strong cinematic lighting with a soft atmospheric glow from the planet.
• + Clean, professional composition with smooth textures and clear details.

• − Prompt followed incorrectly; the astronaut is riding the horse, but the prompt requested the horse riding the astronaut.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Dynamic composition with a wide-angle perspective of the planet below.
• + Included some interesting patches of light on the horse's coat.

• − Prompt followed incorrectly; failed the 'horse on top' requirement.
• − Anatomy is poor, with the horse having too many legs or malformed limb structures.
• − Astronaut's legs are floating disconnected from their body.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent photorealism in the human subject and phone details.
• + Correctly places the woman in the passenger area while the capybara drives.
• + Strong skin textures and realistic lighting from city lights.

• − The woman appears to be in the front passenger seat rather than the back seat.
• − The capybara's paws are not placed logically on the steering wheel.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Successfully places the passenger in the back seat as requested.
• + The capybara's expression and clothing are very detailed.
• + Correctly centers the capybara as the driver with paws near the wheel.

• − The passenger is not looking at a phone.
• − The passenger is blurry and lacks the 'bored' professional expression requested.
• − The composition feels slightly more like a collage than a single photorealistic shot.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Strong prompt adherence for specific text strings
• + Clean, professional graphic design aesthetic with consistent lighting
• + Near-perfect spelling of the date, time, and location details

• − The main title text is corrupted into 'Lalloween Rantcl'
• − Lacks the requested parchment texture, appearing more like a modern digital poster

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Excellent 'vintage parchment' texture and gothic atmosphere
• + Includes both webs and thorns as requested in the border

• − Significant spelling errors throughout all text fields
• − Poor composition with text overlapping the parchment edges
• − The year is incorrectly rendered as '226' instead of '2026'

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent adherence to the isometric perspective and diorama base request.
• + Includes the requested flag icon and Japanese characters.
• + High-quality soft clay-like textures with clean lighting.

• − Text rendering is slightly messy with 'SUSH CATON' instead of just 'SUSHI'.
• − The diorama base is slightly cropped at the bottom.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Precise and bold text rendering for 'JAPAN' and 'SUSHI'.
• + Very vibrant colors and clear, high-resolution textures.
• + Perfectly centered square composition.

• − Missed the request for a raised diorama base.
• − Failed to include the flag icon.
• − The perspective is more of a side-angle than a 45-degree top-down isometric view.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent whimsical composition with clear butterfly interaction
• + Clean character designs with soft, appealing lighting

• − Failed to include a tabby kitten, instead showing two puppies and two rabbit-like hybrids
• − Stylistically leaned toward 3D cartoon/animation rather than the requested hyper-photorealism

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Followed the animal variety better by including a kitten and a distinct fox
• + Excellent fur texture and lighting on the animals
• + Colors are vibrant and fit the 'lush wildflower' prompt well

• − Failed to include the baby bunny from the prompt
• − There is a slight anatomical smudging on the kitten's paws

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Clean vector aesthetic suitable for a logo
• + Excellent alignment and balance
• + Legible 'Est. 1720' text

• − Significant spelling errors in the main name ('Flarilaan') and bottom text ('Reseaurant')
• − Addition of random numbers (11011, 1941) not in prompt

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Strong vintage illustration style with good texture
• + Accurate representation of a cloche dome integrated into the design
• + Closer spelling of 'Caffee' and 'Florrian'

• − Incorrect date text ('Est 170' instead of '1720')
• − Text on the lower banner is garbled and unreadable
• − Cluttered composition compared to the 'minimalist' request

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Follows the requested NASA-inspired color palette perfectly with a professional navy and muted red.
• + Excellent layout balance with a clear central illustrative element and supporting icons at the bottom.
• + Crisp, clean vector lines that accurately reflect the requested modern flat-vector style.

• − The text labels are largely nonsensical gibberish despite the prompt's clear step titles.
• − Includes extraneous celestial bodies like Saturn that were not part of the Apollo 11 mission scope.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Attempts to follow the sequential list of 6 steps more literally than the comparative image.
• + Uses a clean sans-serif typeface that is very legible.

• − Composition is cluttered and lacks a clear focal point or logical flow.
• − The iconography is inconsistent, featuring wireframe spheres mixed with silhouettes and rough shapes.
• − Fails to capture the 'modern vector' aesthetic, appearing more like a low-fidelity scan of a poster.