FLUX.1 [dev] Black Forest Labs vs Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo Stability AI

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent photorealistic rendering of glass and light.
• + Perfect adherence to spatial instructions with the book clearly on top of the cube.
• + Highly realistic textures on the wooden table and red book cover.

• − The plant is behind the cube but doesn't show strong distortion/refraction through the glass itself.
• − The blue sphere appears slightly too large relative to the 'small' description.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo

• + Clean, sharp aesthetic with high contrast.
• + Good interpretation of the plant being visible through the glass pane.

• − Failed the spatial logic by putting the book and sphere inside the cube instead of the book on top.
• − Rendering looks more like a 3D digital model than a photograph.
• − The wooden table texture is repetitive and less natural.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent adherence to the 'cinematic but realistic' requirement with natural lighting.
• + Effective use of depth of field and motion blur to create depth and atmosphere.
• + High-quality textures on the man's jacket and skin, feeling very lifelike.

• − The man is holding the handlebars rather than actively repairing a specific part of the bike.
• − Minor anatomy issues where the hands meet the handlebar grips.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo

• + Successfully captured the 'repairing' action with a more hunched-over posture.
• + The red color of the bicycle is vibrant and centered.

• − Has a plastic, 'cgi' look that contradicts the 'no stylization' and 'realistic' prompts.
• − Severe anatomical and structural errors, particularly with the bicycle frame merging into the man's leg.
• − Failed to create convincing 'motion blur from passing cars' or realistic rain effects.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Subtle, realistic skin textures including fine pores and freckles
• + Masterful use of lighting and bokeh to create a cinematic atmosphere
• + Exceptional eye detail and lifelike expression

• − Missed the request for beads in the hair
• − Armor looks more like general plate than specifically 'ornate engraved'

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo

• + Excellent adherence to the 'ornate engraved' plate armor request
• + Clearly visible beads and ties in the hair
• + Stronger 'battle-worn' feel with more prominent facial markings

• − Skin and hair have a slightly plastic, over-sharpened digital look
• − Lighting feels a bit flat compared to the requested warm torchlight
• − The ear and hair blending has some minor anatomical inconsistencies

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent typography and realistic layout that resembles a real menu.
• + Clean white space and professional color palette.
• + Includes clear headings for Appetizers and Mains as requested.

• − Most small text is illegible gibberish.
• − Missing the specific 'Pizza' section heading mentioned in the prompt.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo

• + Better adherence to the 'grid' layout for food photos.
• + Follows the section requirements including 'Pizza' and 'Mians' (Mains).

• − Composition feels cluttered and unbalanced with oversized food graphics.
• − Text rendering is poor with typos like 'Mians' and non-existent prices.
• − The 'grid' contains repeated, unrealistic-looking bowl assets.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent photorealistic rendering of food textures.
• + Successful explosion/deconstruction effect with mid-air suspension.
• + Accurately rendered most text elements requested including 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' and price.

• − Completely missed the 'MAGIC BURGER' title text.
• − The starburst for the price is missing, although the font and glow are decent.
• − The vertical stacking is a bit rigid and could be more dynamic.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo

• + High energy fiery background with good ember effects.
• + Vibrant colors and high contrast.
• + Good sense of heat and lighting reflection on the burger.

• − Failed to include any of the requested text.
• − Failed to create an 'exploded' view; the burger is mostly intact though floating.
• − Illustrative style lacks the 'photorealistic detail' requested in the prompt.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent text rendering with accurate spelling of complex menu items.
• + Authentic chalkboard texture and realistic handwriting variation.
• + Strong adherence to the requested date and price formatting.

• − The 'cursive' request for the title is interpreted more as a stylized print than true elegant cursive.
• − Minor character artifacts in the bottom disclaimer text ('uufor' for 'us for').

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo

• + Aesthetically pleasing cafe-style composition with lighting and plants.
• + Good chalk-like texture on the main headings.

• − Frequent spelling errors and nonsensical words like 'trulale' and 'ocotpg'.
• − Failed to include the specific year 2026 and accurate pricing.
• − Layout ignores the requested list structure in favor of columns with repetitive garbled text.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent lighting and cinematic atmosphere with soft glowing edges
• + Smooth anatomical integration between the horse and the astronaut's seat
• + High level of detail in the mane and space suit textures

• − Failed the negative constraint: the astronaut is riding the horse, not the requested 'horse on top'

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo

• + Sharp, clear rendering of the space suit and horse's mane
• + Creative use of shadows on the cloud layer below
• + Included a planetary body in the background for composition

• − Failed the negative constraint: the astronaut is riding the horse, not the horse on top
• − Minor anatomical issues with the horse's front hoof and the astronaut's hand positioning

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent photorealism in furry textures and skin tones
• + Perfectly captures the 'bored' expression of the passenger
• + High-quality rendering of the taxi atmosphere and bokeh city lights

• − The passenger appears to be in the front seat or mid-cabin due to perspective
• − The capybara's paws are not placed logically on the wheel

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo

• + Correctly places the human passenger in the backseat
• + Anatomically better use of the capybara's paws on the steering wheel
• + Stronger cinematic angle emphasizing the driving perspective

• − The passenger is very blurry and her bored expression/phone usage is less clear
• − The capybara's face is slightly less 'calm' and looks more like a 3D model than a real photograph

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Successfully included all event details at the bottom.
• + Captured a moody and cinematic lighting feel.
• + Included the requested thorn border and twisted trees.

• − Several spelling errors in the main title and text.
• − Internal text repeats '7pm' twice.
• − The thorn border lacks the requested spider webs.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo

• + Included the requested cobwebs in the border design.
• + Clearer text rendering for the title section.
• + Brighter, high-contrast composition.

• − Completely failed to include the scroll banner and event details (date, time, location).
• − The 'parchment' look is quite clean and lacks a vintage gothic feel.
• − Failed the prompt requirement for a gothic title by using a standard sans-serif font.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent adherence to the 'soft refined textures' and 'miniature 3D cartoon' aesthetic.
• + Accurately places the text and flag at the top-center as requested.
• + Contains a realistic miniature diorama feel with high-quality PBR-like lighting.

• − Includes spelling errors in the secondary text ('SUSH CATON' instead of 'SUSHI').
• − The 'Japan' text is a bit small compared to the 'bold' requirement.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo

• + Features very bold, clear 'JAPAN' text.
• + Good 45-degree isometric composition.
• + Clean, bright colors and sharp textures.

• − Fails to place the text at the top-center, integrating it into the scene instead.
• − Spells 'SUSHI' as 'SIIHI'.
• − The flag icon is a generic red and white rectangle rather than the Japanese flag.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Successfully includes all four requested animals: puppy, kitten, bunny, and fox.
• + Captures the golden sunrise light and 'wholesome' atmosphere effectively.
• + Good full-body compositions for all characters.

• − Has a very stylized, 3D-animation look rather than 'hyper-photorealistic'.
• − The animals have human-like paws and unnatural anatomy.
• − The kitten looks more like a second puppy.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo

• + Significantly better fur texture and lighting on the animals.
• + More realistic facial features and eyes compared to Model A.

• − Failed to include a bunny and a fox, showing only a puppy and two kittens.
• − Anatomical weirdness with overlapping limbs and paws.
• − The kitten on the right has hybrid ears that look like a caracal or lynx rather than a standard tabby.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent minimalist vector style consistent with the prompt
• + Accurate representation of an 'Est. 1720' banner and a cloche dome
• + Correct tonal palette of warm brown and cream

• − Major spelling errors in the main text ('Caffé Flarilaan' and 'Reseaurant')
• − Addition of random numbers (11011, 1941) that were not in the prompt

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo

• + Strong text rendering with only a minor extra accent ('Caffeé Florian')
• + Great use of subtle texture and vintage shading
• + High-quality vector emblem illustration with good volume

• − The cloche dome is oddly integrated into what looks like a mug or cylinder
• − Text placement on the banner is slightly cramped

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent adherence to the color palette with muted navy and reds.
• + Clearer step-by-step layout structure with labeled steps.
• + Good vector icon consistency and clean lines.

• − Text rendering is largely nonsensical despite an accurate header.
• − Includes irrelevant planetary icons like Saturn with rings.
• − The central rocket is a generic missile rather than a Saturn V.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo

• + Stronger 'modern poster' aesthetic with bold, clear sections.
• + Better thematic imagery including an astronaut on the lunar surface.
• + Text sections attempt to categorize the mission stages more clearly.

• − Missed the step-by-step sequential instructions (only four steps shown).
• − Text rendering is garbled and includes typos like 'Apoll.o'.
• − The diagrammatic flow is less logical than requested.