Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.1 [dev] Black Forest Labs Recraft V4.1 Pro Recraft AI

Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.1 [dev]

24.6 arena score

#16 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Recraft V4.1 Pro

19.6 arena score

#44 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.1 [dev]

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

Recraft V4.1 Pro

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 13

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Excellent handling of glass thickness and internal reflections.
  • + Clearer visibility of the green plant through the glass as requested.
  • + Photorealistic textures for the leather-style book cover and the wooden table.
  • The glass object is tall and rectangular rather than a perfect cube.
  • The blue sphere appears to be floating unnaturally instead of resting on the bottom of the cube.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

  • + Correctly interprets the 'cube' shape for the glass container.
  • + Highly realistic lighting and shadows, particularly the window reflection on the sphere.
  • + Strong material textures on the red cloth-bound book.
  • The green plant is mostly behind the book rather than visible through the glass cube.
  • The book is significantly larger than the cube, creating a slightly unbalanced composition.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt instructions well, but FLUX.1 [dev] produced a more aesthetically pleasing image with better transparency effects for the plant behind the glass. However, Recraft V4.1 Pro followed the spatial geometry more accurately by creating a true cube and placing the sphere realistically on the surface.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Excellent shallow depth of field and bokeh effect
  • + High resolution with realistic textures on the jacket and wet pavement
  • + Consistent lighting and color palette
  • The man is holding the handlebars rather than repairing the bike
  • Lacks obvious motion blur from the passing car as requested

Recraft V4.1 Pro

  • + Perfectly captures the requested motion blur of passing cars
  • + Shows a more active engagement in 'repairing' the bike
  • + Authentic grainy film-like texture and imperfect framing that feels like a candid street photo
  • Some anatomical issues with the man's hands and eyes
  • The rain texture looks a bit like static or noise rather than falling droplets

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 Pro much better captures the specific technical requirements of the prompt, including the motion blur and the 'imperfect framing' of a candid street shot. While FLUX.1 [dev] is cleaner and more aesthetically polished, it feels static and misses the 'repairing' action and motion blur requested.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Excellent shallow depth of field and bokeh execution.
  • + Clean and symmetrical facial features.
  • + Good metallic reflections from the environment.
  • Missed several prompt elements including the beaded braids and 'battle-worn' texture.
  • The character looks too clean and 'model-like' for the requested scenario.
  • Armor engraving is very basic, lacking the requested ornate detail.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

  • + Perfectly captures the 'battle-worn' aesthetic with grime, scars, and textured skin.
  • + Highly detailed ornate engraving on the plate armor and visible leather straps.
  • + Faithfully included the small beads in the braided hair as requested.
  • One braid appears to be merging into a leather strap near the bottom.
  • The lighting is slightly more diffused compared to the high-contrast warmth of the other model.

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 Pro is the clear winner as it followed every detail of the prompt, including specific textures and accessories like the beads and scars. FLUX.1 [dev] produced a high-quality but generic portrait that ignored the 'battle-worn' and 'beaded' requirements in favor of a clean, polished look.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Excellent professional layout that looks like a real-world printed menu.
  • + High-quality, clean food photography that integrates well with the page design.
  • + Good implementation of a minimalist aesthetic with subtle shadows and curves.
  • Text consists of gibberish/placeholder characters rather than legible English.
  • Does not separate 'Pizza' into its own distinct header as requested, grouping it under mains.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

  • + Perfectly legible English text with logical menu descriptions and pricing.
  • + Strict adherence to the prompt by including specific sections for Appetizers, Pizza, and Mains.
  • + Uses a clear grid-like structure for the food photography.
  • Composition feels a bit unbalanced with awkward white space on the right side.
  • Visual style is slightly more 'template-like' compared to the premium feel of the competitor.

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 Pro is the clear winner because it produces fully legible and logical English text that adheres to all specific section requests (Appetizers, Pizza, and Mains). While FLUX.1 [dev] creates a more sophisticated visual design, its lack of readable text makes it less functional as a ready-to-use menu.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Clean and symmetrical composition for high-end product photography.
  • + Highly realistic food textures and lighting.
  • + Atmospheric use of fire and embers at the base.
  • Missed the 'MAGIC BURGER' title text entirely.
  • Missing the required starburst for the price.
  • Lacks the requested 'exploded' dynamic motion, appearing more like a static stack.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

  • + Perfect adherence to all text requirements including 'MAGIC BURGER' and 'LIMITED TIME ONLY'.
  • + Excellent 'exploded' effect with dynamic sauce splatters and angled components.
  • + Successfully implemented the fiery glowing effect on text and the starburst for the price.
  • The 'MAGIC BURGER' text is slightly clipped at the top edge.
  • Lighting on the burger ingredients is somewhat flatter compared to the environment.

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 Pro is the clear winner as it followed every instruction in the prompt, including complex text integration and specific layout elements like the price starburst. FLUX.1 [dev] produced a high-quality image but failed significantly on prompt adherence by omitting the primary title and several stylistic requirements.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Excellent centering and balanced composition of the menu board.
  • + Flawless spelling and execution of all requested menu items.
  • + Consistent and legible handwriting style throughout the entire image.
  • The chalk texture looks a bit too smooth and digitised compared to real chalk.
  • The 'elegant cursive' for the title is more of a standard print style than true cursive.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

  • + Highly realistic chalk texture with dusty smudges and varying pressure.
  • + Excellent adherence to the 'natural variations' and 'slight slant' requested in the prompt.
  • + Dynamic perspective and realistic cafe background lighting.
  • The alignment is slightly skewed, making the bottom text feel cramped.
  • The cursive elements are very subtle, leaning more toward print.

Verdict: FLUX.1 [dev] produced a very clean, well-aligned, and perfectly spelled menu that is highly legible, though it feels slightly more like a digital font. Recraft V4.1 Pro captured a much more authentic chalk-on-board texture with realistic imperfections and dust, making it feel more like a real object in a physical space. FLUX.1 [dev] is preferred for clarity, while Recraft V4.1 Pro is preferred for realism and mood.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Excellent anatomical clarity and smooth lighting.
  • + Clean composition with a cinematic shallow depth of field.
  • + Follows the core concept of an astronaut-occupied horse in orbit.
  • Fails the negative constraint, depicting the astronaut on top despite the prompt asking for 'horse on top'.
  • The rear legs of the horse have slightly distorted hoof shapes.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

  • + Highly detailed nebula and space background textures.
  • + Dynamic pose with a 'galloping' feel through the cosmos.
  • + Crisp lighting on the astronaut's suit and the horse's coat.
  • Fails the negative constraint, depicting the astronaut on top of the horse.
  • The composition is a bit cluttered with two planets of similar scale in the frame.

Verdict: Both FLUX.1 [dev] and Recraft V4.1 Pro failed to follow the specific surreal instruction for the horse to be on top of the astronaut, instead defaulting to the standard 'astronaut riding a horse' trope. Recraft V4.1 Pro offers a more vibrant, detailed cosmos, while FLUX.1 [dev] provides a cleaner, more focused cinematic aesthetic.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Excellent photographic quality and lighting
  • + Captures the bored, normal expression of the human passenger perfectly
  • + Includes clear 'TAXI' branding on the cap as a creative detail
  • The passenger appears to be in the front seat next to the driver rather than the back seat
  • The capybara's paws look slightly like small claws rather than distinct paws

Recraft V4.1 Pro

  • + Correctly places the woman in the back seat as requested
  • + Better representation of a capybara's physical paws on the wheel
  • + Realistically depicts the dark jacket and taxi cap on the animal
  • The passenger is quite blurred and lacks the detail seen in Model A
  • Composition is a bit tighter, cutting off some of the taxi exterior

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 Pro followed the spatial instructions more accurately by placing the woman in the back seat, whereas FLUX.1 [dev] placed her in the front passenger seat. However, FLUX.1 [dev] produced a much higher quality image with better lighting and a more convincing facial expression on the human subject.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Strong illustrative style with vibrant lighting
  • + Nicely integrated thorn border
  • + Excellent central jack-o-lantern design
  • Significant text errors including 'Falloween Rantcy' and 'You Tre'
  • Duplicate '7pm, 7pm' in event details
  • More of a graphic illustration than a 'vintage gothic parchment' texture

Recraft V4.1 Pro

  • + Perfect text rendering of all requested information
  • + Highly atmospheric 'cinematic' lighting and realistic parchment texture
  • + Includes both webs and thorns in the border as requested
  • The 'You are invited' scroll banner looks slightly flat compared to the rest of the image
  • Placement of the moon behind the pumpkin stem is slightly awkward

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 Pro is the clear winner as it followed every instruction, including complex text rendering with zero typos, while maintaining a high-quality cinematic atmosphere. FLUX.1 [dev] produced a visually striking illustration but failed significantly on the specific text requirements, resulting in numerous spelling and formatting errors.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Excellent 3D miniature clay-like texture and depth
  • + Pleasant soft lighting and high-quality PBR materials
  • + Includes a raised diorama base as requested
  • Text rendering is poor with 'SUSH CATON' instead of 'SUSHI'
  • Includes extra unrequested decorative flowers

Recraft V4.1 Pro

  • + Perfect adherence to text requirements with clean, bold typography
  • + True 45° isometric perspective
  • + Includes the Japan flag icon correctly
  • The diorama base filled with loose grain rice looks a bit messy compared to the 'clean' request
  • Lighting is a bit flatter than the PBR quality requested

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 Pro is the clear winner because it followed all text instructions perfectly, whereas FLUX.1 [dev] failed significantly on the 'SUSHI' text. While FLUX.1 [dev] had a more appealing 'miniature 3D' artistic style, Recraft V4.1 Pro delivered a cleaner graphic design that met every specific prompt constraint.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Warm and appealing lighting effect.
  • + Strong character symmetry and balance.
  • Failed the photorealistic requirement, appearing as a 3D CG illustration.
  • Failed to include a tabby kitten.
  • The fox and bunny characters are morphologically indistinguishable.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'hyper-photorealistic' instruction with realistic fur and textures.
  • + Accurately included all four distinct animal types from the prompt.
  • + Dynamic and natural action poses that capture the mentioned 'tumbling' and 'chasing'.
  • The fox kit's leg anatomy is slightly awkward in mid-air.
  • The butterflies appear somewhat flat compared to the animals.

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 Pro followed the prompt much more effectively, delivering a stunningly realistic image with all four requested animals and excellent detail. In contrast, FLUX.1 [dev] produced a stylized, cartoonish illustration that missed one of the core subjects (the kitten) and ignored the request for photorealism.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Features a highly decorative vintage aesthetic consistent with the 'retro' prompt
  • + Good use of cross-hatching texture in the banner and decorative elements
  • + Excellent warm brown and cream color palette
  • Significant spelling errors ('Flarilaan', 'Reseaurant')
  • Includes hallucinated numbers ('11011', '1941') that clutter the design

Recraft V4.1 Pro

  • + Perfect text rendering of 'Caffè Florian' and 'Est. 1720'
  • + Clean, minimalist vector style that adheres well to a modern-day vintage logo concept
  • + High clarity and balanced composition
  • The cloche dome design is slightly generic and lacks the 'subtle texture' requested
  • The steam effect is a bit harsh compared to the logo body

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 Pro is the clear winner due to its accurate text rendering; FLUX.1 [dev] failed notably on spelling the name of the establishment and the word 'Restaurant'. While FLUX.1 [dev] captured a more authentic vintage texture, Recraft V4.1 Pro provided a more professional, usable logo with perfect typography.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Excellent artistic composition with a centralized rocket layout.
  • + Captures the vintage NASA aesthetic with a rich, starry background.
  • Text consists of nonsensical gibberish and hallucinations.
  • Iconography is confusing, including random rings and planets not related to the mission steps.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

  • + Perfect text rendering of the mission phases and astronaut names.
  • + High adherence to the requested icons and sequential flow of the mission.
  • + Clean, professional vector style that strictly follows the color palette.
  • Slight logical error in numbering where '05' is repeated twice.
  • Composition is a bit more clinical and less 'poster-like' than Model A.

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 Pro is the clear winner as it successfully renders legible, accurate text and follows the specific logical steps of the Apollo 11 mission. While FLUX.1 [dev] creates a more visually striking artistic piece, its text is completely illegible and the information provided is nonsensical for an infographic.

Next steps

Explore each model