Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.1 [dev] Black Forest Labs Recraft V4.1 Recraft AI

Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.1 [dev]

24.6 arena score

#16 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Recraft V4.1

17.6 arena score

#53 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.1 [dev]

100.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Recraft V4.1

0.0%

win rate

100.0% 0.0% ties 0.0%
Shared challenges 13

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Excellent handling of glass refraction and indoor lighting.
  • + High-quality leather texture on the red book.
  • + Consistent and clean geometry of the glass cube.
  • The 'small' blue sphere is disproportionately large relative to the cube.

Recraft V4.1

  • + Perfect adherence to the scale requested for the small sphere.
  • + Superior detail on the wooden table texture and reflections.
  • + Stronger creative lighting with defined shadows on the wood.
  • The glass cube geometry is slightly warped on the right vertical edge.
  • The red book looks slightly more like a generic prop compared to the realistic textures in Image A.

Verdict: Both models followed the complex spatial instructions perfectly. Recraft V4.1 is the winner because it adhered more accurately to the 'small' size descriptor for the sphere and provided a more dynamic, high-contrast composition with beautiful table reflections. While FLUX.1 [dev] produced a cleaner glass object, the sphere's size and the overall lighting felt a bit flatter in comparison.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Excellent full-body composition and spatial awareness.
  • + Highly realistic skin textures and leather jacket details.
  • + Natural-looking rain and pavement reflections.
  • The man is holding the handlebars rather than performing a repair.
  • The 'motion blur' from passing cars is relatively subtle.

Recraft V4.1

  • + More accurately captures the 'repairing' action mentioned in the prompt.
  • + Excellent captured atmosphere with rain droplets on clothing and face.
  • + Successfully implements 'imperfect framing' to feel like a real candid shot.
  • The composition is very tight, cutting off much of the bicycle and man.
  • Some anatomically muddy areas where the hands meet the bicycle frame.

Verdict: FLUX.1 [dev] produced a cleaner, more technically proficient image, but it failed to capture the 'repairing' aspect of the prompt, showing a man simply standing with a bike. Recraft V4.1 followed the specific intent of the prompt much better, delivering a gritty, candid moment of repair with superior atmospheric effects, despite the tighter framing.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Excellent skin texture and lighting on the face.
  • + Strong bokeh effect for the sparks and background.
  • + Intense, lifelike eye rendering.
  • Missed the 'battle-worn' instruction as the face looks clean with freckles rather than scars and dirt.
  • Missing the small beads in the braids.
  • The armor is less 'ornately engraved' than requested.

Recraft V4.1

  • + Followed all prompt details including beads in the hair and discernible facial scars.
  • + Superior engraving detail on the plate armor.
  • + Convincingly 'battle-worn' appearance with visible dirt and grime.
  • The lighting on the face is slightly flat compared to the dramatic lighting on the armor.
  • A bit more noise in the transition areas of the hair.

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 followed the complex prompt more accurately, successfully including specific details like beads in the braids, facial scars, and highly ornate armor engravings. While FLUX.1 [dev] produced a stunning, high-quality portrait, it opted for a clean-faced aesthetic that ignored the 'battle-worn' and 'scarred' requirements.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Elegant white-space management and modern aesthetic.
  • + High-quality, professional food photography integration.
  • + Good interpretation of 'vibrant accents' through the use of soft orange highlights.
  • The text is largely nonsensical 'Lorem Ipsum' style gibberish.
  • Fails to include a specific 'Pizza' section as requested.
  • The grid layout for food photos is not explicitly followed.

Recraft V4.1

  • + Excellent prompt adherence including all specific sections: Appetizers, Pizza, and Mains.
  • + Perfectly legible, high-quality typography with bold sans-serif fonts.
  • + Successfully creates a grid layout for food photos as requested.
  • The composition feels slightly unbalanced with very wide white space in the center.
  • The food photography lighting and resolution are inconsistent between the grid items.

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 is the clear winner as it successfully incorporated every specific instruction, including the distinct menu sections and actual legible text, which results in a usable design. FLUX.1 [dev] produced a more aesthetically pleasing 'design concept', but failed to include all requested categories and the text is unreadable.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Excellent photorealistic lighting and textures on the food components.
  • + Clean, centered composition with a cohesive magical aesthetic.
  • + High resolution with virtually no artifacts on the burger itself.
  • Completely failed to include the primary 'MAGIC BURGER' text.
  • Missing the requested starburst element for the price.
  • The 'exploded' effect is more of a stacked levitation, lacking dynamic motion.

Recraft V4.1

  • + Perfect adherence to all text requirements including specific phrases and pricing.
  • + Strong sense of motion with splashes of sauce and flying ingredients.
  • + Excellent use of the fiery/glowing effect on text as requested.
  • The 'MAGIC BURGER' text takes up a very large portion of the frame, slightly crowding the product.
  • The price starburst looks a bit like a flat clip-art sticker compared to the rest of the 3D scene.

Verdict: While FLUX.1 [dev] produced a more sophisticated and appetizing product shot, it failed significantly on the text-integration requirements of the prompt. Recraft V4.1 followed every instruction, including the complex text effects and specific layout elements like the starburst, while capturing a much more dynamic 'exploded' feel.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Excellent layout with a realistic wood frame and café background
  • + Perfect spelling of all menu items including the added footer text
  • The writing style looks more like a digital marker or vector font than actual chalk on a board
  • Failed the 'elegant cursive' requirement for the title

Recraft V4.1

  • + Superb chalk texture with realistic powdery edges and stroke pressure
  • + Excellent adherence to the request for natural variations in letter size and slant
  • + Captures the authentic look of a hand-wiped chalkboard surface
  • The composition is a tight crop, showing very little of the 'cozy café' atmosphere
  • Slightly less legible than the cleaner lines of FLUX

Verdict: While FLUX.1 [dev] produced a very clean and perfectly spelled menu, it failed to capture the 'chalk texture' requested, resulting in a look that feels more like a digital font. Recraft V4.1 followed the stylistic prompts much more effectively, delivering a gritty, realistic chalk texture with the imperfect charm of actual handwriting, which makes it the winner for this specific challenge.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Successfully followed the difficult logic reversal of having the moon-like atmosphere and lighting but with the horse as the mount.
  • + Clear, clean aesthetic with smooth gradients and lighting.
  • + The horse's mane and tail show dynamic motion.
  • Anatomy error on the horse's rear right leg which appears to have two hooves or a split limb.
  • Failed the specific positional instruction 'horse on top', instead showing the astronaut riding the horse as per convention.

Recraft V4.1

  • + Very high detail in the nebulae and asteroid field textures.
  • + Cinematic lighting and composition create a strong sense of depth.
  • + Rich textures on the astronaut suit and horse fur.
  • Completely ignored the negative constraint/instruction 'horse on top, not vice versa'.
  • The astronaut's left hand is poorly integrated with the reins.

Verdict: Both models failed the specific 'horse on top' instruction, which likely required a very counter-intuitive surrealist arrangement. Recraft V4.1 produced a significantly more detailed and visually interesting cinematic scene, while FLUX.1 [dev] had a cleaner style but suffered from notable anatomical artifacts on the horse's legs.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Excellent photorealistic lighting and shallow depth of field
  • + Detailed texture on the capybara's fur and the taxi hat
  • + Accurate depiction of the human passenger's bored expression
  • The passenger appears to be in the front passenger seat rather than the back seat
  • The capybara's paws are not clearly on the steering wheel

Recraft V4.1

  • + Perfectly adheres to the composition of a driver in front and passenger in the back seat
  • + Realistic depiction of front paws on the steering wheel
  • + Very convincing 'bored' expression on the businesswoman
  • The capybara is missing the dark jacket mentioned in the prompt
  • The taxi sign on top of the car has garbled text

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 followed the spatial instructions much better, correctly placing the businesswoman in the back seat and the capybara's paws on the wheel. While FLUX.1 [dev] produced a more cinematically lit image with higher skin and fur detail, it failed the core compositional requirement by placing the human in the front seat next to the driver.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Clean vector-style composition
  • + Followed the thorny border instruction well
  • + High-contrast lighting on the Jack-O-Lantern
  • Significant text errors ('Falloween Pantcy')
  • Inaccurate date format following commas
  • Lacks the 'vintage parchment' texture requested

Recraft V4.1

  • + Excellent 'vintage parchment' texture and atmosphere
  • + Perfect text rendering for the title and details
  • + Highly detailed and spooky background elements like webs and skulls
  • Small scroll banner text is slightly cramped
  • Pumpkin lighting is a bit uniform

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 is the clear winner as it perfectly followed all text instructions and captured the 'vintage parchment' aesthetic requested by the prompt. FLUX.1 [dev] struggled with the text, producing several typos and a more modern, flat graphic style rather than the requested vintage cinematic look.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Excellent miniature plastic/clay aesthetic consistent with the 'cartoon scene' prompt.
  • + Effective use of depth of field to enhance the diorama feel.
  • + Includes a flag icon and the word 'JAPAN' as requested.
  • Failed to spell 'SUSHI' correctly, rendering 'SUSH CATON' instead.
  • The top-down 45° angle is slightly less isometric than Model B.
  • Extra gibberish text/symbol above the Japan header.

Recraft V4.1

  • + Perfect text rendering for both 'JAPAN' and 'SUSHI'.
  • + Clean, high-clarity isometric composition with realistic PBR materials on the fish.
  • + Strict adherence to the 45° angle and solid background color.
  • The lighting is a bit harsh, creating a strong shadow that contrasts slightly with the 'gentle lighting' request.
  • Layout of the text at the top is not perfectly centered relative to the flag icon.

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 is the clear winner because it followed the text instructions perfectly, whereas FLUX.1 [dev] produced significantly misspelled text and gibberish symbols. While FLUX.1 [dev] captured a more charming 'cartoon' texture, Recraft V4.1 delivered a much cleaner, more professional-looking isometric diorama that met all prompt requirements.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Strong, vibrant color palette with a clean 'wholesome' aesthetic.
  • + Good character design consistent with a stylized illustrative look.
  • Completely fails the 'hyper-photorealistic' part of the prompt, opting for a 3D animated/Pixar style.
  • Missing the required tabby kitten, instead showing two puppies and two rabbit/fox hybrids.
  • Lacks the requested god rays and fine dew sparkles.

Recraft V4.1

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'hyper-photorealistic' requirement with realistic fur and lighting.
  • + Correctly includes all four subjects: golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, bunny, and fox kit.
  • + Atmospheric lighting with clear god rays and dew details as requested.
  • The tabby kitten's anatomy is slightly elongated in the jumping pose.
  • The puppy's open mouth has slightly messy tooth/tongue rendering.

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 is the clear winner as it followed every detail of the prompt, including the specific list of animals and the 'hyper-photorealistic' style. FLUX.1 [dev] produced a high-quality image, but it ignored the photorealistic requirement in favor of a cartoon style and failed to include the requested tabby kitten.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Excellent 'vintage' aesthetic with nice texture
  • + Includes all elements including the cloche and ribbon banner
  • Significant spelling errors in the main name ('Flariláan') and 'RESEAURANT'
  • Contains hallucinated numbers (11011, 1941) that clutter the logo

Recraft V4.1

  • + Perfect text rendering for 'CAFFÈ FLORIAN'
  • + Clean vector style that is very legible
  • + Accurate banner placement and steam silhouette
  • Missing the subtle texture requested in the prompt
  • Composition is a bit vertically stacked compared to traditional horizontal logos

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 is the clear winner because it correctly spells the name of the restaurant and the requested text, whereas FLUX.1 [dev] suffers from multiple spelling errors and hallucinated numbers. Recraft V4.1 also produces a cleaner vector aesthetic that is better suited for an actual logo design.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Captures an aesthetically pleasing, integrated poster layout
  • + Includes a wide variety of secondary icons and complex design elements
  • + Adheres well to the soft, muted color palette requested
  • The text is largely gibberish and ignores the specific step labels
  • The mission logic is confusing, featuring planets like Saturn in place of Earth/Moon
  • Icons do not clearly represent the specific stages of the Apollo 11 mission

Recraft V4.1

  • + Perfectly adheres to the sequential mission steps and labels
  • + Excellent text rendering for main titles, steps, and crew names
  • + Follows the flat-vector style with professional, clean iconography
  • Step numbering has a minor error (two 04 labels instead of 04 and 05)
  • The 'Descent' and 'Landing' icons are identical
  • Composition is a bit rigid and grid-based compared to the more artistic Model A

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 is the clear winner as it directly followed the instructional nature of the prompt, correctly labeling the stages of the mission with legible text. While FLUX.1 [dev] produced a more visually cohesive 'poster' feel, its content was nonsensical and failed to represent the actual Apollo 11 mission steps accurately.

Next steps

Explore each model