Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.1 [dev] Black Forest Labs Nano Banana 2 Google

Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.1 [dev]

24.6 arena score

#16 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Nano Banana 2

28.4 arena score

#1 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Best Text-to-Image right now Top 2 in Image Editing
Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.1 [dev]

0.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Nano Banana 2

100.0%

win rate

0.0% 0.0% ties 100.0%
Shared challenges 13

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Excellent lighting and realistic glass refractions.
  • + Highly aesthetic and clean composition.
  • + Strong adherence to the 'soft window light from the left' instruction.
  • The plant is mostly above and to the side rather than 'behind and partially visible through' the cube.
  • The blue sphere appears to be floating rather than resting inside the cube naturally.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Perfect adherence to all spatial instructions, including the plant being behind and visible through the glass.
  • + Includes relevant, high-quality text on the red book.
  • + Achieves a very natural, photorealistic tabletop scene.
  • The glass cube looks a bit like a thin-walled aquarium rather than a solid or precisely machined glass cube.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 followed the spatial instructions much better, correctly placing the plant behind the glass cube so that it is visible through the transparent faces. While FLUX.1 [dev] produced a more artistic and high-clarity image, it failed to properly place the plant and the sphere's position feels less grounded.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Excellent depiction of rain droplets and realistic skin texture
  • + Strong adherence to the 50mm shallow depth of field request
  • + Cinematic atmospheric lighting
  • The man is just holding the bicycle rather than repairing it
  • The background feels slightly generic compared to the specific 'Japanese street' vibe expected

Nano Banana 2

  • + Strong narrative of 'repairing' with tools and a crouched pose
  • + Authentic Japanese street setting with legible signage
  • + Accurate depiction of wet pavement reflections and light rain
  • The man's left hand and the bicycle chain/frame connection are physically incoherent
  • Some artifacts in the character's facial features and the wrench alignment

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 captures the spirit of the prompt much better by showing an actual repair in an authentic Japanese setting, whereas FLUX.1 [dev] produces a more technically polished image but shows the man simply standing with a bicycle. While FLUX.1 [dev] has superior skin and rain textures, Nano Banana 2's composition and storytelling make it the more compelling response to the specific narrative requirements.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Excellent photographic skin texture and lifelike eye details
  • + Soft, cinematic bokeh effect that creates a clean aesthetic
  • Missed many prompt details such as hair beads, leather straps, and faint scars
  • Character looks too clean and 'model-like' for a battle-worn description

Nano Banana 2

  • + Perfect adherence to all prompt details including beads, dirt, scars, and leather straps
  • + Highly impressive engraving on the armor and rich texture on the woven underlayers
  • + Authentic battle-worn atmosphere with visible torchlight sources
  • The sword hand has structural issues with the fingers and grip orientation
  • Slightly more 'digital' feel to the skin compared to the hyper-realism of model A

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner for prompt adherence, successfully capturing every element from the 'battle-worn' state to the specific 'beads' and 'leather straps' that FLUX.1 [dev] omitted. While FLUX.1 [dev] produced a more realistic human face, it ignored the core thematic requirements of the prompt, whereas Nano Banana 2 delivered a detailed and atmospheric character portrait.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Elegant and truly minimalist design with wide margins.
  • + Consistent color palette with professional orange and grey accents.
  • + High-quality, clean food photography that integrates well into the layout.
  • Text is largely illegible gibberish.
  • Missing the specific 'Pizza' section requested in the prompt.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'food photos in grid' instruction.
  • + Highly legible text with clear sections for Appetizers, Pizza, and Mains.
  • + Robust and vibrant visual style suitable for casual dining.
  • Layout is a bit crowded compared to the 'minimalist' request.
  • Slightly less 'modern' aesthetic, leaning more towards standard takeaway style.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 followed the prompt much more accurately by including all requested menu sections and a clear photo grid, while maintaining impressive text legibility for an AI model. FLUX.1 [dev] produced a more high-end minimalist design, but failed to include a specific pizza section and the text is unusable for a real menu.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Features a clean, centered layout with a dark atmospheric background.
  • + High photographic realism in the texture of the lettuce and buns.
  • Completely missed the 'MAGIC BURGER' title text requested in the prompt.
  • Failed to include the starburst for the price.
  • The explosion effect feels static and lacks motion compared to the prompt's request.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Excellent adherence to all text requirements including 'MAGIC BURGER' and 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' with fiery effects.
  • + Perfectly captures the 'exploded' and dynamic motion feel with flying sauce and embers.
  • + Correctly integrates the price in a starburst as specified.
  • The composition is quite busy, which might slightly distract from the food detail.
  • Some of the flying embers may appear a bit messy to some viewers.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner as it followed every instruction in the prompt, including complex text integration and specific layout elements like the starburst. FLUX.1 [dev] produced a high-quality image but failed significantly on the prompt adherence by omitting the primary 'MAGIC BURGER' title and dynamic motion elements.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Excellent text clarity and spelling accuracy.
  • + Good chalk-like texture on the lettering.
  • + Well-centered composition with balanced spacing.
  • The cursive is not especially 'elegant' as requested, appearing more like rounded print.
  • The background is quite blurry and generic compared to the competitor.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Superb realistic chalkboard texture with smudges and chalk dust.
  • + Beautiful handwritten aesthetic that convincingly looks like authentic chalk art.
  • + Excellent background composition that creates a 'cozy café' atmosphere.
  • Slightly less crisp text rendering compared to FLUX.1 [dev].

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the winner because it perfectly captures the 'cozy café' atmosphere and 'natural chalk texture' requested in the prompt, including realistic smudges and dust. While FLUX.1 [dev] produced very clean text, it looked more like a digital overlay than an actual handwritten chalkboard.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Clean, cinematic lighting and high-resolution textures.
  • + Follows the general concept of space-themed horse riding.
  • + Anatomically coherent horse and astronaut figures.
  • Completely failed the tricky logic instruction to have the horse on top.
  • Standard composition that lacks the requested surreal element.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Successfully followed the difficult logic instruction of placing the horse on top of the astronaut.
  • + High degree of surrealism and vibrant, cosmic colors.
  • + Intricate detail on the space suit and horse's iridescent coat.
  • Anatomy of the horse's legs is slightly distorted.
  • Lower overall clarity compared to the sharpness of Model A.

Verdict: While FLUX.1 [dev] produced a more polished and visually clean image, it failed the specific prompt instruction to place the horse on top of the astronaut. Nano Banana 2 successfully interpreted the 'surreal' and 'horse on top' requirements, creating a more creative and prompt-accurate composition despite slightly more artifacts.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Excellent photographic lighting on the capybara's fur
  • + Accurate yellow taxi driver cap as per prompt
  • + Clean, high-resolution textures on the passenger's face and phone
  • Compositional error: the passenger appears to be in the front seat next to the driver instead of the back seat
  • Presence of a secondary steering wheel or weird artifact on the right side

Nano Banana 2

  • + Outstanding storytelling with the 'Captain Cappy' NYC Hack License and fare meter
  • + Stronger spatial composition showing the woman clearly in the back seat
  • + Very realistic rainy Manhattan environment and interior details
  • The cap is a black chauffeur-style hat instead of the requested yellow taxi cap
  • The capybara's eyes are slightly less expressive than Model A

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner for its superior composition and creative attention to detail, including an in-universe taxi license and fare meter that perfectly captures the prompt's humor. While FLUX.1 [dev] has slightly better lighting and adhered better to the hat color, it failed significantly on the spatial layout, placing the passenger in the front seat and creating a confusing cabin geometry.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Nano Banana 2
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Features a thick, intricate thorn border as requested
  • + Atmospheric glowing cinematic lighting on the jack-o-lantern
  • Several significant typos in the text including 'Falloween Rantcy' and 'The Archis'
  • Text layout feels disjointed with the sub-banner text appearing below the main banner
  • Includes a strange repetition of '7pm, 7pm' in the details

Nano Banana 2

  • + Excellent text rendering with no spelling errors across all requested lines
  • + Captures the vintage parchment aesthetic perfectly with weathered edges and spider webs
  • + Superior composition using the central jack-o-lantern and gothic architecture elements
  • The thorns in the border are less prominent than the spider webs

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner as it followed every instruction perfectly, including complex text rendering with zero spelling errors. FLUX.1 [dev] struggled significantly with the text, producing several nonsensical words and a cluttered layout despite having good lighting effects.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Excellent 3D miniature/diorama aesthetic
  • + Beautiful soft lighting and clay-like textures
  • + Accurate 45-degree isometric perspective
  • Text rendering is poor with spelling errors ('SUSH CATON')
  • Lacks the requested 'JAPAN' and 'SUSHI' hierarchy
  • Nigiri shapes are somewhat repetitive

Nano Banana 2

  • + Perfect text rendering of 'JAPAN' and 'SUSHI'
  • + Includes a wide variety of detailed sushi types
  • + High clarity and realistic PBR material effects
  • Perspective is slightly lower than the requested 45-degree isometric
  • The layout is more of a product shot than a 'cartoon miniature scene'
  • Slightly cluttered despite the 'minimal garnish' request

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the overall winner for its flawless execution of the text requirements and the high variety/quality of the sushi models. While FLUX.1 [dev] captured the 'miniature cartoon/diorama' style more accurately with its soft textures and perspective, it failed significantly on the text rendering and font hierarchy.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Clean, vibrant colors and lighting
  • + Captures an expressive 'joyful' vibe
  • + High-quality fur textures
  • Missed the 'tabby kitten' requirement by generating four canines/rabbits
  • Stylistically leaning toward 3D animation rather than hyper-photorealism
  • Anatomy is stylized with large, cartoonish heads

Nano Banana 2

  • + Successfully included all four distinct animals: puppy, kitten, bunny, and fox
  • + Excellent adherence to hyper-photorealistic style
  • + Dynamic composition shows animals actually 'tumbling' and chasing
  • Fox anatomy is slightly awkward in the front leg
  • Small white speckle artifacts in the sky

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner as it followed the complex prompt precisely, including all four requested animal types with high realism. FLUX.1 [dev] failed the prompt instructions by omitting the kitten and opting for a much more stylized, cartoonish aesthetic instead of the requested photorealism.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Strong minimalist aesthetic with a clean vector feel.
  • + Accurate representation of small-scale steam and the requested color palette.
  • Several spelling errors in the brand name and sub-text.
  • Includes unnecessary random numbers (11011, 1941) that clutter the design.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Perfect text rendering for both the brand name and the 'Est. 1720' banner.
  • + Excellent use of texture on the background and within the vector lines.
  • + Beautiful composition that feels like a coherent, authentic vintage emblem.
  • The detail level is slightly higher than 'minimalist', moving more into classic illustration.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner as it correctly spells 'Caffè Florian' and places the supporting text exactly as requested. While FLUX.1 [dev] captures a more minimalist vector style, it fails significantly on text legibility and accuracy, including extraneous numbers and misspelling 'Restaurant'.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.1 [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [dev]

  • + Strong artistic composition with a unique circular flowchart layout.
  • + Captures the 'modern vector' and 'muted' NASA-inspired palette effectively.
  • Text consists of garbled, nonsensical characters.
  • Includes irrelevant celestial bodies like Saturn that were not part of the Apollo 11 mission.
  • The icons do not clearly represent the specific requested steps.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Excellent prompt adherence, following all 6 steps with accurate iconography.
  • + Superior text rendering with clear, legible labels for mission phases and astronauts.
  • + Clean, consistent vector style that perfectly matches the 'infographic' requirement.
  • The layout is a bit more rigid/linear compared to the creative flow of the other model.
  • The fourth astronaut silhouette is historically inaccurate for the 3-man mission.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner as it functions as an actual infographic, accurately depicting each of the requested mission steps with legible text and specific icons. While FLUX.1 [dev] has a more sophisticated artistic layout and color blending, it fails as a technical graphic by including nonsensical text and irrelevant planets.

Next steps

Explore each model