FLUX.1 [dev] Black Forest Labs vs FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent photorealism in the textures of the book and sphere
• + Strong lighting and reflection work on the glass surfaces
• + Creative framing with a more artistic, shallow depth of field

• − The glass 'cube' actually looks more like a rectangular prism or a complex assembly rather than a simple cube

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Perfect adherence to the geometry of a cube
• + Highly detailed book spine with realistic texturing and gold leaf effects
• + Accurately represents the transparency and thinness of glass

• − The blue sphere is levitating without any physical support, which looks slightly less grounded than Model A's interpretation

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent handling of shallow depth of field and rain atmosphere
• + Skin texture and facial details are highly realistic
• + Perfectly captures the request for a 50mm lens aesthetic with organic blur

• − The motion blur of the passing car is quite subtle compared to the prompt request
• − The man is holding the bicycle rather than clearly repairing it

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Dynamic motion blur on the passing vehicle aligns well with the prompt
• + Captures an 'imperfect framing' look by placing the subject off-center
• + Clear rain reflections on the wet pavement

• − The man's leg is clipping through the rear wheel of the bicycle
• − The depth of field is deeper than requested, losing the 50mm portrait feel
• − The facial features look slightly smoother and less natural than Model A

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent skin texture with realistic freckles and pores.
• + Great attention to detail on the metal armor and bokeh background.
• + Faithful representation of lifelike eyes and braided hair.

• − Missed the request for beads in the hair.
• − The character looks a bit too clean and youthful for a 'battle-worn' paladin.
• − Leather straps and cloth underlayers are mostly obscured.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• − The image failed to load or is a solid black square.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Extremely clean and professional typography
• + Highly readable layout typical of a real-world modern menu
• + Excellent use of white space and minimalist design

• − Does not follow the grid photo requirement as well as the competitor
• − Text is mostly gibberish despite looking visually structured
• − Only includes two food photos instead of a grid

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Adheres better to the 'grid' instruction with multiple food photos
• + Includes sections for all requested categories (Appetizers, Pizza, Mains)
• + Dynamic and vibrant presentation with clear section headers

• − Text rendering is poor with several typos (e.g., 'For Pipzzans', 'Appet Love')
• − Composition feels a bit cluttered compared to Model A
• − Perspective distortion from the angled mock-up view makes it harder to read

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Successfully rendered most of the requested text including the price.
• + Clean, vertical stacking of ingredients creates a clear 'exploded' look.

• − Completely failed to include the primary title 'MAGIC BURGER'.
• − The starburst for the price is missing.
• − The composition feels a bit static compared to the 'dynamic' request.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent adherence to all text requirements including the 'MAGIC BURGER' title.
• + Features a much higher sense of motion and dynamic energy with floating embers and debris.
• + High-quality, photorealistic texture on the meat, cheese, and vegetables.

• − The price is not inside a starburst as requested.
• − The bottom of the frame has some small, illegible AI-generated legal text artifacts.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent text accuracy with no spelling errors in the menu items.
• + Very clean and legible chalk handwriting that adheres to the elegant style requested.
• + Well-balanced composition with consistent spacing between items.

• − The text looks slightly digital/vectorized, lacking some of the raw chalk grain and smudging requested in the prompt.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Features a more authentic chalk texture with visible dust and natural stroke variations.
• + The lighting and wood texture of the frame look highly realistic.

• − Significant text hallucinations and repetition, including 'fresh fresh daily' and doubled lines.
• − Incorrect spelling and abbreviations, such as 'mushroomm ris.' and 'fiiistratnisnios'.
• − The layout is cluttered and messy compared to the request.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Strong cinematic lighting with atmospheric glow
• + Smooth, high-quality textures on the spacesuit and horse
• + Clean composition with a focused subject

• − Failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is riding the horse instead of vice versa
• − Lower level of background detail compared to Model B

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Higher overall complexity with detailed Earth background and satellites
• + More realistic rendering of the horse's musculature and mane
• + Better depth and scale in the composition

• − Failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is riding the horse instead of vice versa
• − Slightly messy proportions on the horse's rear leg

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Successfully places the passenger in the back seat as requested.
• + The capybara has both paws on the steering wheel.
• + The composition feels like a view through the windshield, which is engaging.

• − The passenger looks slightly too close to the front for a backseat, though still spatially behind.
• − The capybara's paws look somewhat small and oddly articulated.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + High visual clarity and sharp detail on the capybara's fur and clothing.
• + Excellent rendering of Manhattan street lights in the background.

• − Failed the spatial prompt by putting the passenger in the front passenger seat.
• − The passenger is holding a steering wheel, which does not make sense for a passenger seat.
• − The capybara only has one arm visible and reaching towards the wheel.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent vibrant lighting on the jack-o-lantern and moon.
• + Clean, thorned border frame that contains the composition well.
• + Bold and legible event details at the bottom.

• − Significant spelling errors in the title text: 'Falloween Rantcy'.
• − The text 'You Tre' and duplicate '7pm, 7pm' are clear quality issues.
• − Composition feels slightly clustered in the center.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Almost perfect text spelling across the entire invitation.
• + Superior adherence to the 'parchment scroll' and 'webs and thorns' prompt elements.
• + Stronger gothic aesthetic with more detailed background elements like the castle.

• − Redundant text line 'You are invited to a noickt or a night of frights' below the banner.
• − The glow of the jack-o-lantern is less integrated with the moon compared to Model A.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent 3D miniature textures that look like soft clay or stylized plastic.
• + Contains the small raised diorama base as requested.

• − Included misspelled text 'SUSH CATON' and random characters.
• − The text is very small and lacks the 'large bold' impact requested.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Perfect text rendering for 'JAPAN' and 'SUSHI' in a bold, clean style.
• + High-quality isometric composition with very clean PBR materials.
• + Accurate flag icon integration.

• − Includes some unnecessary elements like a small ladybug and steam on cold food.
• − Slightly busier scene than the 'minimal garnish' requested.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Features all four requested animals plus an extra dog for a total of four subjects.
• + Strong backlight create a warm, glowing atmosphere.

• − Missed the tabby kitten requirement entirely.
• − The animals look more like animated illustrations or plush toys than the requested 'hyper-photorealistic' scene.
• − The fox and bunny characters are morphologically very similar and lack distinct species traits.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Successfully includes the specific animals requested: golden retriever, tabby kitten, bunny, and fox kit.
• + Significantly higher detail in the fur texture and 'dew sparkles' in the grass.
• + Better adherence to the 'hyper-photorealistic' style while maintaining the cute aesthetic.

• − One of the butterflies in the top center has a slightly glitched wing shape.
• − The animals are more passive (watching) rather than 'playfully chasing and tumbling' as requested.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Clean vector aesthetic that matches the minimalist request.
• + Great balance of negative space and typography.
• + Includes a clear cloche and steam icon.

• − Spelling errors in both the restaurant name and the word 'Restaurant'.
• − Contains irrelevant numbers above the logo.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent color palette and vintage circular emblem composition.
• + Typography is very clean and readable, despite a slight misspelling.
• + Subtle texture on the background matches the prompt perfectly.

• − Misspelled name as 'Framilian' instead of 'Florian'.
• − Slightly less 'minimalist' than Model A due to the complex badge design.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Strong aesthetic adherence to the muted NASA-inspired palette.
• + Elegant composition with a central rocket and circular diagram.
• + Clean flat-vector style with professional-looking icons.

• − Text is largely gibberish and does not follow the specific step labels.
• − Iconography sequence is confusing and includes irrelevant planets like Saturn.
• − Failed to provide the specific 6-step linear sequence requested.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Successfully incorporated almost all specific step labels (Launch, Earth Orbit, Translunar, etc.).
• + Bold, readable typography for the main headings.
• + Logical layout where icons represent stages of the mission descending toward the moon.

• − Supporting text contains significant typos and nonsensical phrases.
• − The composition is a bit cluttered with redundant labels.
• − The Saturn V rocket is stylistically inconsistent with some of the more abstract icons.