FLUX.1 [dev] Black Forest Labs vs FLUX1.1 [pro] Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent photorealistic texture on the book's leather cover.
• + High-quality glass refractions and realistic soft lighting from the window.
• + Very clean and sharp rendering of the wooden table.

• − The glass structure has an extra internal vertical pane that makes it look more like a display stand than a simple cube.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Perfect adherence to the 'glass cube' geometry.
• + The blue sphere is more vibrant and centrally positioned.
• + The plant is clearly visible through the glass as requested.

• − The sphere appears to be floating without a clear physical resting point inside the cube.
• − The book's texture is slightly less realistic compared to Model A.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent realism in skin texture and clothing materials.
• + Clean, logical bicycle architecture that looks physically possible.
• + Perfectly executed shallow depth of field and bokeh.

• − Fails to include the 'motion blur' from passing cars as requested.
• − The lighting on the pavement is a bit flat compared to the pro version.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Captures the 'candid' and 'imperfect framing' feel more authentically.
• + Better environmental reflections and wet pavement textures.
• + Stronger cinematic color grading and atmosphere.

• − The bicycle frame is physically nonsensical and broken.
• − The subject's hands are mangled and blending into the handlebars.
• − Anatomical issues with the legs and a floating object behind the subject.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent depiction of clean, braided hair
• + Highly symmetrical and aesthetically pleasing face
• + Clear representation of polished, ornate metal texture

• − Fails to realistically depict the 'battle-worn' or 'scars and dirt' aspect of the prompt
• − Model appears more like a clean fashion model than a grueling paladin

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Strong adherence to the 'battle-worn' and 'dirt/scars' descriptive prompts
• + Dynamic lighting with sparks and excellent skin texture detail
• + Realistic, gritty interpretation of a paladin

• − The braids are less distinct and partially obscured compared to image A
• − Composition is very tight, slightly cutting off some of the ornate armor details

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Clean, professional typographic layout that mimics a real menu
• + High-quality, realistic food photography and lighting
• + Clear, legible sans-serif font choices

• − Failed to include a photo grid as requested
• − Missing a dedicated pizza category section

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Followed the grid layout instruction for food photos effectively
• + Includes all requested categories including pizza
• + Creative use of icons and vibrant accents

• − Text consists largely of illegible gibberish compared to Model A
• − Layout feels a bit cluttered and less 'minimalist' than the other
• − Low resolution or slightly blurred appearance on small text and icons

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent depiction of a deconstructed/exploded burger layout.
• + Clean rendering of the currency symbol and price.
• + Captures the 'magic' theme with subtle sparkles and floating elements.

• − Completely missed the 'MAGIC BURGER' title text.
• − Failed to include the starburst element for the price.
• − Lacks the fiery, glowing effect on the text requested in the prompt.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Successfully included all requested text phrases with accurate spelling.
• + Strong sense of motion with debris and dynamic lighting.
• + Impressive photorealistic textures on the lettuce and meat patties.

• − The burger is not 'exploded' or deconstructed as requested; it is mostly assembled.
• − The price is at the bottom without the starburst graphic.
• − The 'Magic Burger' title is repeated twice, once in a neon style not explicitly requested.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent text accuracy with no spelling errors or repeated items.
• + Strong adherence to the chalkboard texture and realistic handwriting style.
• + Perfect layouts for all three requested menu items including pricing.

• − The cursive handwriting at the bottom has some slight legibility issues like 'drish' instead of 'fresh'.
• − The title is in print-block letters rather than the 'elegant cursive' specifically requested.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + The title uses a cursive style that more closely matches the 'elegant cursive' prompt requirement.
• + Atmospheric lighting and background composition give a cozy café feel.

• − Significant text hallucinations and errors, including a $228 octopus and repeated menu lines.
• − Spelling mistakes such as 'Chipkies' and 'Herbss'.
• − Poor layout with items condensed and price tags overlapping or incorrect.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent anatomical rendering of the horse's musculature.
• + Clean, cinematic lighting with high contrast.
• + Good spatial positioning showing the Earth in the background.

• − Failed the negative constraint: the astronaut is on top of the horse, not vice versa.
• − The horse's back legs lack hooves, appearing pointed and unfinished.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Highly detailed textures on the spacesuit and horse's mane.
• + Dynamic and dramatic composition with a beautiful nebular sky.
• + Atmospheric lighting and rich color palette.

• − Failed the negative constraint: the astronaut is on top of the horse, not vice versa.
• − The horse's chest and belly anatomy appears fused or distorted with the saddle.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Successfully places the character in the front seat and the passenger in the back seat as requested.
• + The capybara's paws are clearly on the steering wheel.
• + High level of detail in the capybara's fur and the passenger's expression.

• − The perspective is slightly awkward with the TAXI sign appearing inside the car roofline.
• − The passenger's hands and phone interaction look slightly less natural than Model B.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent bokeh and lighting realism in the background city lights.
• + Strong textures on the clothing and car upholstery.
• + Cinematic lighting on the capybara's face.

• − Failed the spatial positioning requirement; both subjects appear to be in the front seat or mid-cabin.
• − The capybara does not have its paws on the steering wheel.
• − The passenger is looking at the capybara rather than looking bored at her phone.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent illustration of the thorns and twisted trees with a strong gothic feel.
• + Bold and clear central jack-o-lantern with effective cinematic lighting.

• − Significant text errors including 'Falloween Ranty' and 'You Tre invited'.
• − Redundant time listing ('7pm, 7pm') and poor character rendering in 'Arches'.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Successfully captured the 'dark parchment' texture with ragged paper edges.
• + Better arrangement of the graveyard atmosphere with depth and a realistic moon.

• − Repeated text blocks for time and location clutter the bottom of the poster.
• − Minor spelling errors in the secondary banner like 'You inivted to a n night of frights'.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent adherence to the small raised diorama base requirement.
• + Superior PBR material quality with realistic light scattering on the fish textures.
• + Includes the requested flag icon.

• − Includes extraneous text 'SUSH CATON' and a random kanji character.
• − The sushi variety is limited to just one type.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Correctly renders both 'JAPAN' and 'SUSHI' text in a bold, clean style.
• + Offers a more diverse and visually appealing variety of sushi types.
• + Very clean, bright 'cartoon' aesthetic that matches the 3D miniature prompt.

• − Failed to include the requested flag icon.
• − The text 'SUSHI' is significantly smaller and less bold than the 'JAPAN' text.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent handling of the lighting request with distinct 'god rays' and backlighting.
• + Includes all four requested animals (dog, cat, bunny, fox).
• + Vibrant colors and high-quality rendering of the meadow environment.

• − The style leans into 'Pixar-like' 3D animation rather than the requested 'photorealistic' scene.
• − The animals look like stylized toys with oversized, glassy eyes.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Features more realistic fur textures and anatomically believable eyes.
• + Better captured the 'chasing butterflies' action through the gaze and posture of the animals.
• + Superior bokeh and depth of field in the foreground.

• − Failed to include all four requested animals, missing the fox kit.
• − The butterflies are less defined and look more like floating sparks of light.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent color palette adherence with warm brown and cream tones.
• + Clean vector emblem style that feels truly minimalist.
• + Correct spelling of 'Est. 1720'.

• − Significant spelling errors in the brand name ('Flariláan') and secondary text ('Reseaurant').
• − Extraneous numbers ('11011', '1941') that were not in the prompt.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Ornate and high-quality vintage line work and shading.
• + Includes a decorative border that enhances the vintage aesthetic.
• + Closer to the requested 'Caffè Florian' spelling, though still slightly off.

• − Text rendering errors ('Caifeé FRATILIAN') despite high visual quality.
• − The layout is a bit more crowded than a 'minimalist' prompt usually dictates.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent adherence to the NASA-inspired color palette.
• + Superior typography and overall layout composition.
• + Very clean, professional vector aesthetic with crisp lines.

• − The text content is largely gibberish despite good font choices.
• − The trajectory diagram is visually appealing but logicially confusing regarding the specific mission steps.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Stronger visual storytelling with clear icon labeling for steps 1-5.
• + Bold 'Apollo 11' heading is legible and well-integrated into the design.
• + Better attempt at including the requested iconography like the Saturn V.

• − The color palette is less sophisticated than requested, relying on heavy contrast.
• − The moon illustration is overwhelming and occupies too much of the screen space compared to the data.
• − Graphic elements like icons overlap awkwardly in some places.