FLUX.1 [dev] Black Forest Labs vs FLUX.2 [pro] Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Exceptional photographic realism in materials
• + High-quality refractions and reflections within the glass
• + Satisfying color saturation

• − The sphere appears to be floating unnaturally or fused with the glass
• − The cube looks more like a solid glass block with a cavity rather than a hollow cube

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Perfect adherence to the physical relationship of the objects
• + The plant is clearly visible through the glass as requested
• + More realistic wood grain and soft lighting

• − The blue sphere is quite small relative to the cube
• − Slightly more muted colors compared to image A

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent shallow depth of field with realistic background bokeh.
• + Very high-quality clothing texture and leather jacket detail.
• + Captures a realistic 'candid' moment with the man's posture.

• − The man appears to be just holding the bike rather than actively repairing it.
• − The motion blur of the passing car is very subtle compared to the request.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Strong composition with better adherence to the 'repairing' aspect of the prompt.
• + Highly realistic wet pavement reflections including ripple effects in puddles.
• + Successful inclusion of motion blur in the background traffic.

• − The bike anatomy becomes slightly garbled near the chainring and pedals.
• − Slightly less 'natural' skin texture compared to Model A.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Features very lifelike, piercing eyes that align with the prompt.
• + Captures a subtle bokeh effect with soft lighting.

• − Missed several specific prompt elements like beads in the hair and faint scars.
• − The character looks too clean and 'pristine' for a battle-worn description.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Excellent adherence to specific details like hair beads, scars, and dirt.
• + Highly detailed texture on leather straps, cloth underlayers, and engraved armor.
• + Stronger interpretation of the torchlight and battle-worn aesthetic.

• − The sparks look slightly more like brush strokes than photographic bokeh compared to the other model.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent minimalist graphic design aesthetic
• + Correct use of bold sans-serif fonts
• + Clean professional layout with balanced white space

• − Failed to include a grid of colorful food photos
• − Text becomes garbled nonsense in the descriptions
• − Only includes two categories (Appetizers/Mains) instead of the three requested

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Successfully implemented the food photo grid with vibrant colors
• + Followed the prompt instructions for specific categories (Appetizers, Pizza, Mains)
• + Legible header text and price formatting

• − Confusing repetition of categories in the layout
• − Misspelled section header 'MINS' instead of 'Mains'
• − Image contents are repetitive (listing Garlic Bread under every section)

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent photorealistic rendering of the food items.
• + Strong vertical composition that looks professional and clean.
• + Good use of focal depth and lighting.

• − Failed to include the 'MAGIC BURGER' title text.
• − The background effect is minimal and lacks the 'fiery, glowing' text effect requested.
• − The price is not in a starburst shape.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Perfect adherence to text prompts, including the title, secondary message, and starburst price.
• + Highly dynamic composition with sauce droplets and crumbs conveying motion.
• + Beautifully rendered 'fiery' text effect as requested.

• − The bun texture is slightly less realistic compared to Model A.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent legibility and clean character formation.
• + Accurately rendered all requested menu items and prices.
• + Effective use of an actual wooden frame for the chalkboard.

• − The text looks a bit too much like a clean digital font rather than authentic dusty chalk.
• − The handwriting style for the title is blocky rather than the requested 'elegant cursive'.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Superb realism in the chalk texture, including dust and varying pressure.
• + Followed the instruction for 'elegant cursive' handwriting for the title.
• + The slate material has a very realistic, textured edge.

• − Text alignment is slightly sloping and crowded toward the bottom.
• − Some characters have slight artifacts, making them a bit harder to read than Model A.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Clean, cinematic lighting with a strong focal point.
• + High anatomical clarity of the horse and suit textures.

• − Fails the specific prompt instruction to have the horse on top of the astronaut.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Successfully follows the difficult constraint of having the horse on top of the astronaut.
• + Very high cinematic detail in the space background and nebulae.

• − Anatomical issues with the rear horse sharing legs or merging into the astronaut's back.
• − Slightly cluttered composition with the multiple galaxies.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Successfully positions the woman in the back seat as requested
• + Rendered high-quality fur and whisker details on the capybara
• + Captures the bored expression on the passenger perfectly

• − The steering wheel is on the wrong side for a New York taxi (Right Hand Drive)
• − The woman appears to be sitting in the front passenger seat due to the perspective of the car frame

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Executes a much more complex composition with the passenger clearly in the background
• + Excellent photorealistic details in the taxi dashboard and rainy window effects
• + Follows the jacket and cap descriptions with high fidelity

• − The capybara's hands look slightly more human/gloved than natural paws
• − The steering wheel orientation is still ambiguous relative to the frame

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Strong illustrative style with a clean thorn border.
• + Vibrant glowing light effect from the jack-o-lantern.
• + Includes the requested scroll banner element.

• − Significant spelling errors in the title text ('Falloween Ranty', 'You Tre').
• − Redundant time entry ('7pm, 7pm') and inconsistent punctuation in the date.
• − Art style feels more like a modern vector illustration than a 'vintage gothic parchment'.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Perfect text rendering for all requested details including title, banner, and event info.
• + Excellent adherence to the 'vintage gothic' and 'dark parchment' aesthetic.
• + Higher realism in the central jack-o-lantern and moody atmosphere.

• − The thorns and webs are combined into a darker, less distinct border compared to Model A.
• − Lighting on the scroll feels slightly detached from the foggy environment.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Excellent 3D miniature 'clay-like' texture
• + Soft, gentle lighting that creates a peaceful atmosphere
• + Accurate 45-degree isometric perspective

• − Text contains typos with 'SUSH CATON' and a garbled character
• − The diorama base and text are quite small relative to the canvas
• − Text and flag are floating semi-randomly in the background

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Perfect text rendering for both 'JAPAN' and 'SUSHI'
• + Strong adherence to the 'bold text at top-center' instruction
• + Clean, high-clarity 3D modeling and lighting

• − The sushi rice texture looks a bit like uniform bubbles/cubes rather than realistic grain
• − The background blue is a bit darker than requested but still acceptable

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Features a very clean and vibrant color palette with warm golden lighting.
• + Captures the 'wholesome' and 'joyful' vibe effectively with stylized expressions.

• − Failed the prompt requirement for realism, resulting in a 3D animation/cartoon style.
• − Missing the tabby kitten requested in the prompt.
• − Anatomical issues with paws and ears, appearing more like plush toys than animals.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Perfectly adheres to the 'hyper-photorealistic' instruction with realistic fur textures and anatomy.
• + Correctly includes all four requested animals: golden retriever, tabby kitten, bunny, and fox kit.
• + Excellent integration of butterflies and dew sparkles in a natural-looking meadow.

• − The lighting, while realistic, is slightly less dramatic than the 'god rays' requested in the prompt.

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Strong vintage aesthetic with woodblock-style cross-hatching
• + Good use of warm brown tones

• − Major spelling errors in the brand name ('Flarilaan') and category ('Reseaurant')
• − Addition of random, hallucinated numbers '11011' and '1941'
• − Cloche illustration is very basic and small relative to the text

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Perfect text rendering for both the main name and the foundation date
• + More sophisticated vector emblem style with professional shading
• + Subtle paper texture matches the prompt requirements perfectly

• − The cloche handle is slightly off-center within the steam trail

FLUX.1 [dev]

• + Captures the requested navy, muted red, and white palette well.
• + Clean flat-vector aesthetic with a balanced, circular composition.

• − The text is largely nonsensical gibberish.
• − Includes random planets like Saturn that were not part of the prompt.
• − Fails to follow the specific 6-step logical sequence requested.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Excellent text rendering for headings and crew names.
• + Strictly follows the requested steps from Launch to Landing in a logical flow.
• + High-quality iconography that matches the Apollo mission details.

• − Missed the 'subtle gradients only' instruction by using some heavier shading on the moon.
• − The 'Translunar' step iconography is a bit cluttered with multiple Earths.