Seedream 5.0 Lite vs Wan 2.7 Pro
Head-to-head across 5 challenges
Seedream 5.0 Lite
100.0%
win rate
Ties
0.0%
Wan 2.7 Pro
0.0%
win rate
Challenge Results
Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge
Text-to-Image“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 5.0 Lite
- + Excellent typography with a glowing, fiery neon effect that matches the prompt perfectly.
- + Includes all requested text elements, including the price starburst and secondary message.
- + Highly realistic textures on the vegetables and bun with a believable 'exploded' vertical arrangement.
- − The cheese is fused to the patty rather than being a separate suspended component.
- − The bottom bun appears to be a bagel or has a hole in the center.
Wan 2.7 Pro
- + Dynamic, messy 'exploded' composition with ingredients spread across the canvas.
- + Intense fire and spark effects create a strong sense of drama.
- + Separates each component clearly, including sauces and individual cheese slices.
- − Failed to include 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' and the '€6.99' starburst.
- − Text rendering is flat and lack the requested 'fiery, glowing effect'.
- − The bun texture looks slightly artificial compared to Model A.
Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite followed the prompt much more accurately, successfully integrating all requested text elements and maintaining a cohesive glowing aesthetic. While Wan 2.7 Pro captured the 'exploded' motion well, it failed to include over half of the requested text requirements and used a flat font style.
Chalkboard Menu
Text-to-Image“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 5.0 Lite
- + Excellent realistic chalk texture on both the green board and the text
- + Authentic handwritten feel with natural slants and variations
- + Good framing of the chalkboard surface
- − Several spelling errors including 'Heriss', 'Beliter', and 'frese op-toons'
- − Failed to follow the 'elegant cursive' instruction for the title
Wan 2.7 Pro
- + Perfect spelling on all requested menu items
- + Clean, aesthetically pleasing composition with café background
- + Successfully interpreted the 'Brown But...' prompt truncation into 'Brown Butter'
- − Text looks like a digital font rather than authentic chalk handwriting
- − Repeated the 'Herbs' line twice by mistake
- − Lacks the requested natural variations and chalky grit in the lettering
Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite produces a much more realistic chalk appearance with genuine texture and handwriting style, though it struggles significantly with spelling and text accuracy. Wan 2.7 Pro provides perfect spelling and a beautiful environment, but the text appears to be a digital overlay rather than authentic chalk, and it suffers from a repetitive line error. Seedream 5.0 Lite is the likely winner for better adhering to the specific stylistic requirements of 'realistic chalk handwriting' despite the typos.
Pose & Character Mashup
Editing“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 5.0 Lite
- + Expertly combines the character details from Image 2 (clothing, scarf, sunglasses, face) with the pose from Image 1.
- + Successfully matches the lighting and vibrant yellow environment of the source pose image.
- + Maintains excellent anatomy and facial recognition while translating the character into the new position.
- − The left hand (pointing up) shows some minor structural distortion in the palm/fingers.
- − The text on the shirt is slightly altered to be less legible than the source character image.
Wan 2.7 Pro
- + Preserves the source image 1 almost perfectly.
- − Completely failed the edit instruction to change the character to the person in Image 2.
- − Identical to source Image 1 with no character reference applied.
Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite successfully performed a complex character-to-pose transfer, maintaining the identity and clothing of the man from Image 2 while perfectly replicating the dynamic pose of the woman from Image 1. Wan 2.7 Pro failed to perform any edit at all, returning an image that is virtually indistinguishable from the first source image.
Outfit Transfer Challenge
Editing“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 5.0 Lite
- + Successfully replicates the exact outfit from Image 2 including the coat, scarf, glasses, and watch.
- + Perfectly preserves the face, unique skin markings, and sand details from Image 1.
- + Seamlessly blends the new clothing with the lighting and background of the original scene.
- − The composition is a slightly closer crop than Image 1, though it maintains the original's essence.
Wan 2.7 Pro
- + Attempts a full-body reconstruction showing shoes and full legs.
- − Completely fails to use the outfit from Image 2, instead generating a random patterned robe.
- − The person's face and unique vitiligo patterns are significantly altered and lose the accuracy of Image 1.
- − Anatomical issues with the hands and feet.
Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite is the clear winner as it followed every instruction perfectly, accurately transferring the specific clothing from Image 2 onto the person in Image 1 while keeping their identity and the background intact. Wan 2.7 Pro failed on almost every metric, providing a completely different outfit and failing to preserve the specific features of the base person.
The Capybara Taxi Driver
Text-to-Image“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 5.0 Lite
- + Excellent adherence to the 'human looking at her phone' requirement.
- + Highly detailed fur texture and realistic passenger facial features.
- + Captures the New York night atmosphere with vibrant street bokeh.
- − The capybara's anatomy is slightly more humanoid than requested, appearing like a person in a suit.
- − The steering wheel placement looks a bit cramped against the dashboard.
Wan 2.7 Pro
- + The capybara looks very natural and animal-like in its proportions while driving.
- + Good use of side-profile composition that shows both the driver and the city lights well.
- + Strictly adheres to both paws on the steering wheel with realistic claws.
- − Completely missed the 'looking at her phone' requirement for the businesswoman.
- − The passenger is looking forward and lacks the specific 'bored' expression requested.
Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite followed all prompt instructions, specifically including the key detail of the passenger looking at her phone, whereas Wan 2.7 Pro missed the phone interaction entirely. Seedream 5.0 Lite also creates a more immersive 'inside the taxi' feeling, even though the capybara's posture is a bit more artificial.
Seedream 5.0 Lite
ByteDance's image generation model with built-in reasoning, example-based editing, and deep domain knowledge, supporting up to 3K resolution
Wan 2.7 Pro
Alibaba's Wan 2.7 Pro image generation and editing model with higher-quality outputs and support for 4K image generation