Nano Banana vs Nano Banana 2
Head-to-head across 18 challenges
Nano Banana
25.0%
win rate
Ties
6.3%
Nano Banana 2
68.8%
win rate
Challenge Results
The Halloween Invitation
Text-to-Image“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”
AI Judge Analysis
Nano Banana
- + Excellent text rendering with clean, readable fonts
- + High visual clarity and cinematic lighting
- + Perfect adherence to all requested event details
- − The parchment texture is limited to the outer margin, making it look less 'vintage'
- − The composition feels a bit like a digital montage rather than a cohesive poster
Nano Banana 2
- + Stronger 'vintage' gothic aesthetic with a weathered parchment look
- + Highly detailed border and background including a castle that adds to the mood
- + Great integration of the scroll banner into the overall composition
- − Wait, the text in the location field is slightly cramped compared to Model A
- − Resolution is slightly lower with more painterly noise in the shadows
Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, producing accurate text and all requested elements. Nano Banana (Model A) provides a cleaner, more modern digital look with perfect legibility, while Nano Banana 2 (Model B) captures the 'vintage' and 'parchment' aesthetic much more effectively through its textures and ornate borders. Nano Banana 2 is the preferred choice for a true gothic invitation feel.
Man and Car in California
Editing“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”
AI Judge Analysis
Nano Banana
- + Successfully places the car on a coastal road
- + Preserves the car model accurately
- + Good motion blur on the wheels and road
- − The driver's appearance is obscured and poorly defined
- − Lighting on the car feels slightly disconnected from the environment
Nano Banana 2
- + Excellent character preservation, including the specific hairstyle and clothing from the source image
- + Dynamic and high-quality composition of the California coastline
- + Strong integration of lighting and shadows on the car
- − None notable for this specific request
Verdict: Both models successfully moved the subjects to the requested environment, but Nano Banana 2 far exceeded Nano Banana in character preservation. Nano Banana 2 accurately rendered the man's hair, scarf, and plaid coat from the source image, whereas Nano Banana's driver is barely visible and generic.
Chalkboard Menu
Text-to-Image“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”
AI Judge Analysis
Nano Banana
- + Excellent chalk texture on the board surface with realistic smudging
- + Perfect text rendering with every character and number from the prompt present
- + Highly realistic bokeh and cafe lighting in the background
- − The handwriting style is slightly too consistent, appearing more like a digital font than natural human handwriting
- − The text layout is very rigid and centered, lacking a bit of organic character
Nano Banana 2
- + Natural variation in letter size and spacing creates a more convincing 'handwritten' appearance
- + Captures a great organic layout with line breaks and varied slants
- + Highly accurate text rendering down to every specific price and item requested
- − The chalk texture on the letters themselves is slightly less grainy than Image A
- − The background characters appear slightly more distorted in the depth of field
Verdict: Both models performed exceptionally well on the text-rendering and prompt-following aspects of the challenge. Nano Banana 2 is the winner because its handwriting feels more authentic to a human hand, with natural variations in letter size and a less 'perfect' alignment that better matches the request for a handwritten style. Nano Banana produced clear text but it looked slightly more like a digital typeface applied to a chalkboard.
Fantasy Warrior
Text-to-Image“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”
AI Judge Analysis
Nano Banana
- + Excellent anatomical realism in the facial structure and eyes.
- + Superior rendering of the engraved eagle motif and metallic textures on the pauldrons.
- + Clean and aesthetically pleasing bokeh that highlights the subject well.
- − The 'battle-worn' aspect is a bit subtle, with very clean skin despite the scars.
- − The hair braids look a bit stiff and thick.
Nano Banana 2
- + Perfect implementation of the 'battle-worn' prompt with realistic dirt, grime, and blood splatter.
- + Exceptional detail on the cloth underlayer (gambeson) and leather straps.
- + Includes beads in the hair as explicitly requested in the prompt.
- − The fingers gripping the sword hilt have some anatomical blurring/merging issues.
- − The background is slightly more cluttered compared to the clean depth of field in the other model.
Verdict: Nano Banana produces a cleaner, more heroic-looking portrait with high-end metallic reflections, while Nano Banana 2 much more accurately captures the 'battle-worn' aesthetic with grit, dirt, and realistic textile textures. Nano Banana 2 is the preferred choice for strictly following the textural cues of the prompt, despite a minor anatomical flaw in the hand.
Outfit Transfer Challenge
Editing“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”
AI Judge Analysis
Nano Banana
- + Excellent preservation of the person's original facial features and hair.
- + Perfect adherence to the background and lighting of the source image.
- + Correctly transferred the coat, scarf, watch, and ring from Image 2.
- − Missed the sunglasses from Image 2.
- − Minor anatomical distortion in the right hand (extra finger/merged digits).
Nano Banana 2
- + Successfully included the sunglasses from Image 2.
- + Better preservation of the person's skin pigmentation (vitiligo) on the hands.
- + High level of detail on clothing textures and accessories like the watch and ring.
- − The right hand lacks clarity and has some structural artifacts.
- − Slightly less crisp blending of the sunglasses compared to the face's original resolution.
Verdict: Both Nano Banana and Nano Banana 2 performed exceptionally well on this complex clothing transfer task, perfectly maintaining the background and the subject's identity. Nano Banana 2 is the slight winner because it successfully incorporated the sunglasses from Image 2 while also thoughtfully applying the subject's unique skin patterns to the visible hands, showing higher attention to detail.
Modern Clean Menu
Text-to-Image“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”
AI Judge Analysis
Nano Banana
- + Perfectly adheres to the grid layout request
- + Cleanest minimalist aesthetic
- + Vibrant and high-quality food photography
- − Spelling errors like 'APPETIERS', 'Margheiita', and 'Remaigined'
- − Highly repetitive pricing ($5 for everything) makes it feel like a placeholder
Nano Banana 2
- + Excellent text rendering with descriptive subtext
- + Comprehensive menu structure including 'Appetizers', 'Pizza', and 'Mains'
- + Professional use of color-coded labels for food photos
- − The layout is a bit more cluttered compared to the minimalist request
- − A few minor typos like 'cizza and mate'
Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the superior design as it functions as a realistic menu with logical pricing, detailed descriptions, and high-quality text rendering. While Nano Banana captures the minimalist prompt more accurately with its spacing, its multiple spelling errors in headings and repetitive placeholder pricing make it less usable than Nano Banana 2.
The Capybara Taxi Driver
Text-to-Image“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”
AI Judge Analysis
Nano Banana
- + Excellent photorealistic texture on the capybara's fur and the leather jacket
- + Strong adherence to the passenger character description and her expression
- + Captured the cinematic lighting of a rainy NYC night effectively
- − The passenger appears to be in the front seat or middle console area rather than the back seat
- − The capybara's paw/hand merging with the steering wheel looks a bit distorted
Nano Banana 2
- + Highly detailed taxi interior including meter, radio, and dashboard
- + Correct positioning of the capybara in the driver's seat and both paws on the wheel
- + Accurate depiction of a modern NYC taxi driver hat and uniform jacket
- − Completely failed to include the passenger in the back seat
- − The capybara's body lower half looks somewhat detached from its torso
Verdict: Nano Banana captures a more cinematic and moody atmosphere with better character expressions, but it fails to correctly place the passenger in the back seat. Nano Banana 2 provides a much more technically detailed and realistic taxi interior, but it completely omits the second subject requested in the prompt. Nano Banana is the likely winner for successfully including all characters, even if the spatial composition is slightly flawed.
Candid Street Photography
Text-to-Image“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”
AI Judge Analysis
Nano Banana
- + Excellent atmospheric lighting and cinematic mood.
- + Strong adherence to the shallow depth of field and 50mm lens look.
- + High-quality skin texture and realistic clothing details.
- − The bike anatomy is slightly warped, specifically the handlebars and seat alignment.
- − Less 'candid' and more posed/staged than requested.
Nano Banana 2
- + Perfectly captures the 'imperfect framing' and 'candid street photo' aesthetic.
- + Includes clear motion blur from passing cars as requested.
- + Effective use of atmospheric elements like wet pavement reflections and background umbrellas.
- − The subject's hands and the wrench are poorly rendered, with the tool merging into the bike chain.
- − The lighting is flatter and less cinematic than Model A.
Verdict: Both models followed the prompt well, but Nano Banana 2 (Model B) captured the specific 'candid street' and 'imperfect framing' requirements much more authentically, feeling like a real film photograph. Nano Banana (Model A) looks more like a high-end digital render or a professional film still, though it handles fine details like the face and hands much better than Model B.
Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge
Text-to-Image“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”
AI Judge Analysis
Nano Banana
- + Excellent text legibility and clean font rendering
- + Realistic food textures and a balanced 'exploded' composition
- + Perfect adherence to all prompt elements including the currency and secondary text
- − The lighting on the food feels slightly more studio-based than the fiery environment suggests
Nano Banana 2
- + Dynamic use of fire and embers that better matches the 'fiery' atmosphere prompt
- + Glossy, high-detail rendering of the burger ingredients
- + Creative interpreted star-shaped starburst for the price
- − The secondary text 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' is slightly squashed
- − The food composition is a bit cluttered with more items than specifically requested
Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, producing high-impact marketing imagery. Nano Banana is the subtle winner because of its superior font rendering and cleaner composition, whereas Nano Banana 2 has slightly distorted text and the price tag overlaps the background details more aggressively.
Pose & Character Mashup
Editing“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”
AI Judge Analysis
Nano Banana
- + Near-perfect adherence to the exact pose and environment from Image 1.
- + Incorporates the clothing and sunglasses from the character reference (Image 2).
- + Maintains the framing and stool from the original source image.
- − Completely failed to use the face/character from Image 2, retaining the woman's face and long hair from Image 1.
- − The sunglasses are poorly blended on the face.
Nano Banana 2
- + Successfully used the character's face, hair, and facial features from Image 2.
- + Accurately recreates the clothing style including the scarf and branded sweatshirt details.
- + Matches the yellow background and red stool environment correctly.
- − Failed to match the exact pose; the body is oriented differently with a hand on the stool instead of two feet.
- − Significant anatomical issues with the legs and feet, showing a disjointed limb emerging from the torso area.
Verdict: Nano Banana successfully preserved the pose and composition of Image 1 but failed the primary task of swapping the character, keeping the woman's face and hair. Nano Banana 2 correctly identified the character and clothing from Image 2, but it struggled significantly with the complex pose requested, resulting in poor anatomical coherence and a changed body position. Nano Banana 2 is the relative winner for at least attempting the character swap, which was the core instruction, despite the structural artifacts.
Geometric Composition
Text-to-Image“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”
AI Judge Analysis
Nano Banana
- + Excellent soft lighting and window shadows that create a realistic atmosphere.
- + The blue sphere is correctly placed inside a solid-looking glass cube.
- + High level of visual cohesion and artistic depth of field.
- − The glass cube looks more like a solid block of glass rather than a hollow container.
- − The plant is very large and dominates the background rather than being 'partially visible through the glass'.
Nano Banana 2
- + Perfect adherence to the instruction for the plant to be visible THROUGH the glass cube.
- + Excellent text rendering on the book spine ('THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT').
- + The glass cube is clearly a hollow vessel, making the sphere's placement feel more natural.
- − The blue sphere's reflection on the bottom of the cube looks slightly disconnected.
- − The lighting is a bit flatter compared to the atmospheric shadows in the first image.
Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the better image as it follows the spatial instructions more accurately, specifically showing the green plant behind and through the clear glass cube. Nano Banana created a more artistic and moody scene with better lighting, but the cube appears to be a solid glass block, which makes the placement of the sphere inside it look physically impossible. Nano Banana 2 also features impressive text rendering on the book.
Bald man challenge
Image Editing“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”
AI Judge Analysis
Nano Banana
- + Excellent realism in the hair texture and flyaways
- + Great volume and natural appearance
- + Preserves the original face and clothing perfectly
- − The hairline on the forehead is slightly soft and blends a bit unusually with the skin
Nano Banana 2
- + Perfect integration of the hairline with the forehead
- + The hair style feels very cohesive with the existing beard
- + Zero artifacts or changes to the background/clothing
- − The hair texture is slightly less detailed than Model A
Verdict: Both models performed exceptionally well, maintaining the original person's likeness, lighting, and environment perfectly. Nano Banana 2 (Model B) is the slight winner because the hairline construction is more structurally sound and realistic than Nano Banana (Model A), which has a slightly 'pasted on' look at the very front of the forehead.
Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes
Text-to-Image“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”
AI Judge Analysis
Nano Banana
- + Perfect text rendering of 'JAPAN' and 'SUSHI'
- + Accurate interpretation of the 'cartoon scene' and 'soft refined textures' style
- + Very clean isometric layout with a simple diorama base
- − The sushi models are a bit overly simplistic and repetitive
- − Missing the requested flag icon (includes a generic red circle on white, but not as part of a cohesive layout with the text)
Nano Banana 2
- + Excellent realistic PBR materials with high-quality textures on the fish and wood
- + Complex and visually appealing arrangement of sushi
- + Includes the flag icon integrated well with the text
- − The text 'JAPAN' has some slight distortion/aliasing on the edges
- − Ignores the 'cartoon' aspect of the prompt in favor of high realism
- − The diorama base is more cluttered than the 'minimal' request
Verdict: Nano Banana followed the 'cartoon' and 'minimal' aesthetic of the prompt much more closely, resulting in a cleaner image that better matches the requested isometric diorama style. Nano Banana 2 produced a much more realistic and detailed image with superior materials, but it failed to capture the specific stylistic direction of a 3D cartoon scene.
Over-the-top cartoon caricature
Editing“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”
AI Judge Analysis
Nano Banana
- + Successfully integrates all prompt elements (anchoring, hockey rink background, and a dog) into a cohesive scene.
- + The character design maintains a reasonable likeness to the source person's facial features despite the caricature style.
- + Features high-quality rendering with clean lines and legible text on the screen.
- − The muscular arm feels somewhat out of place and wasn't specifically requested.
- − The hand on the dog's head is anatomicaly awkward with too many fingers.
Nano Banana 2
- + Excellent thematic integration with 'W-K9 NEWS' and humorous headline text.
- + Strong caricature energy with exaggerated facial expressions and dynamic poses from multiple dogs.
- + Good preservation of the subject's outfit (denim shirt over black top) from the source image.
- − The hand holding the microphone is poorly rendered with garbled fingers.
- − The hand holding the hockey stick is missing several fingers or has a strange grip.
Verdict: Both models did an excellent job of interpreting the caricature request. Nano Banana created a more polished, digital illustration style with a clear hockey rink setting, while Nano Banana 2 opted for a hand-drawn pencil/ink look that captured the subject's original clothing better and added more specific humor through the text. Nano Banana 2 is the slight winner for its cleverer thematic puns and better preservation of the source image's attire, despite the messy hand rendering.
Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow
Text-to-Image“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”
AI Judge Analysis
Nano Banana
- + Excellent expressive eyes and soft fur texture
- + High lighting quality with distinct god rays and dew sparkles
- + Wholesome, centered composition that highlights all requested animals
- − The fox exhibits anatomical issues with an extra paw visible
- − The lighting feels slightly more 'AI-glow' than natural photography
Nano Banana 2
- + Captures the 'playfully chasing' and 'tumbling' motion more effectively
- + The lighting feels more natural and integrated with the environment
- + Excellent variety and density of wildflowers
- − The kitten has a slightly distorted, flat face
- − The golden retriever's back legs/body positioning is somewhat awkward
Verdict: Nano Banana creates a more stylized, polished 'masterpiece' look with superior fur textures and lighting effects, but suffers from a significant anatomical error on the fox. Nano Banana 2 better captures the action of the prompt (chasing and tumbling) and feels more like a real photograph, despite some minor facial distortions on the kitten. Nano Banana 2 is the winner for its superior composition and adherence to the dynamic movement requested.
Studio Ghibli Anime Style
Editing“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”
AI Judge Analysis
Nano Banana
- + Perfectly preserves the composition and identity of the original image.
- − Completely fails to apply the requested artistic style.
- − The image remains a photograph with almost no discernible edit.
Nano Banana 2
- + Excellent adherence to the 'Studio Ghibli' illustration style.
- + Successfully translates the scene into a hand-painted aesthetic with soft textures and pastel colors.
- + Maintains the core composition and character poses from the source image.
- − Some minor background details are altered to fit the cottagecore/Ghibli aesthetic.
Verdict: Nano Banana failed to perform the edit, returning an image that is virtually identical to the photographic source. Nano Banana 2 successfully transformed the image into a high-quality hand-drawn illustration that perfectly captures the Studio Ghibli aesthetic while maintaining the recognizable meme layout.
Vintage Cafe Logo
Text-to-Image“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”
AI Judge Analysis
Nano Banana
- + Perfect text rendering for all requested strings
- + Clean minimalist vector style that feels more modern yet vintage in spirit
- + Accurate representation of the 'Est. 1720' banner
- − The cloche design is slightly simplistic
- − Less 'vintage' feel compared to the more ornate alternative
Nano Banana 2
- + Excellent typography and high level of detail in the emblem
- + Added creative details relevant to the brand's history like 'Venezia Piazza San Marco'
- + Rich textures and shading on the cloche dome
- − Missed the accent in 'Caffè' (used 'CAFFÈ' but the accent mark is slightly detached/stylized)
- − The composition is much busier, leaning away from the 'minimalist' request
Verdict: Nano Banana followed the 'minimalist' instruction more closely, providing a clean, professional vector logo with perfect text spelling. Nano Banana 2 provided a more ornate and visually impressive badge with additional historical context, but it ignored the minimalist requirement in favor of a detailed illustrative style. Nano Banana is preferred for better adherence to the specific design style requested.
Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility
Text-to-Image“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”
AI Judge Analysis
Nano Banana
- + Perfect text rendering for all labels and names.
- + Consistent iconography style with clean, glowing borders.
- + Follows the NASA color palette closely with a professional dark theme.
- − The 'Descent' icon is just a duplicate of 'Lunar Orbit' rather than a landing module.
- − The Saturn V rocket design is a bit simplified compared to the source.
Nano Banana 2
- + More detailed and accurate iconography for the Descent and Landing phases.
- + Excellent use of the 'muted red' accent color in the icons and text.
- + Dynamic composition with a large moon detail for the landing site.
- − Includes a fourth, unnamed astronaut silhouette, which is historically incorrect for Apollo 11.
- − The text 'TRANQUILITY' is slightly less crisp than Model A.
Verdict: Both models followed the prompt's aesthetic and logical steps very well. Nano Banana 1 has superior text clarity and a very cohesive professional layout, but failed to provide a unique icon for the descent phase. Nano Banana 2 provides more descriptive icons for the lunar module and a better translunar trajectory visual, though it mistakenly adds a fourth astronaut. Nano Banana 1 is the slight winner for its cleaner typography and better adherence to the flat-vector style requested.
Nano Banana
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image is optimized for image understanding and generation, offering a balance of price and performance with fast and efficient image generation and editing capabilities.
Nano Banana 2
Gemini 3.1 Flash with image generation capabilities. High-efficiency image generation model with support for text rendering, reference images, search grounding, and thinking mode. The efficient counterpart to Gemini 3 Pro Image.